Maternal and Neonatal Outcome for Singleton and Twin Pregnancies in Emergency Cesarean Section vs.Urgent Cesarean Section in a Retrospective Evaluation from 2003-2012

Objectives: Emergency cesarean is performed, when a situation requires immediate action in order to reduce the risk to mother and/or child, while urgent cesarean is done if a non-life threatening but compromising situation occurs. The aim of the study was to investigate the maternal and fetal outcome for emergency and urgent cesarean. Study Design: A retrospective case-control study was performed;cases underwent emergency cesarean section, while controls underwent urgent cesarean section. We included 303 cases of women and 336 cases of children, and controls were matched. Maternal and fetal outcome parameters for singleton and twin pregnancies were investigated using the Wilcoxon test and the Chi-square-test. Results: Maternal outcome: Higher?blood loss (cases: mean 383.12 ± 232.89, range 100 - 2500 vs. controls: 336.06 ± 129.19, range 100?- 1000, p = 0.008), hemorrhage (34 vs. 11, p < 0.001) and puerperal anemia (30 vs. 10, p < 0.001). Neonatal outcome: One, five, and ten minutes Apgar levels and umbilical cord pH values are lower for cases (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Twins had lower five and ten minutes Apgar levels (p = 0.040 and 0.002), but higher umbilical cord pH values than singletons (p < 0.001). The perinatal mortality among singletons was 3.8%, among twins 8.1%. For cases the perinatal mortality among singletons was 5.7% and 17.14% for twins (control group 1.41% and 2.63%, respectively). Conclusion: The maternal and fetal outcome is poorer in emergency cesarean section. Especially the perinatal mortality is high in emergency cesarean section, particular for twins.

Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks: Rate of Spontaneous Onset of Labor before Planned Cesarean Section and Impact on Maternal Outcome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks is still a debatable subject, both regarding maternal and neonatal outcomes. In the Saudi context, there is lack of local data to aid decision-making regarding the timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery. Objectives: To estimate the rate of spontaneous onset of labor before the planned gestational age for repeat cesarean section in women who were booked at gestational age of (39 0/7 - 39 6/7) weeks (W39) versus (38 0/7 - 38 6/7) weeks (W38) and to compare the rate of maternal composite outcome between these groups. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: This study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, KSA. Method: Delivery registry books were reviewed to identify all deliveries from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 (3 years). All low-risk pregnant women who had 2 or more cesarean deliveries and who met the inclusion criteria were included. Results: A total of 440 women were included of whom 318 (72.3%) were planned for elective cesarean section at W38 gestational age and 122 women at W39 gestational age. Mothers planned at W39 had higher rate of emergency cesarean deliveries versus those planned at W38 (18.0% versus 10.4%, p = 0.030;RR = 13.06), most frequently due to early onset of contractions (16.4% versus 8.2%, p = 0.012;RR = 12.17) or cervical dilatation (11.6% versus 5.4%, p = 0.024, RR = 16.15). No difference in the incidence of individual or composite maternal complications was noted between the two groups. Mother’s age (OR 0.93, p = 0.018) and schedule date at W39 (OR = 1.94, p = 0.028) were independently associated with spontaneous onset of labor before the scheduled gestational age, while no association was found with parity, previous number of spontaneous vaginal deliveries, number of previous cesarean deliveries or interval from last cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Elective cesarean section scheduled at 39 weeks of gestation or beyond carries a higher risk of emergency cesarean section, with no significant increase in maternal complications. The identification of factors associated with spontaneous onset of labor before the planned gestational age should be carefully identified to determine the optimal timing.

The Impact of Spontaneous Labor Before Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery on Pregnancy Outcome:A Prospective Cohort Study

and neonatal outcomes.Methods:This was a prospective cohort study.All consecutive ERCDs,occurring at≥37 weeks of gestation between July 1,2017 and December 31,2019 in Makassed General Hospital,were evaluated.The maternal and neonatal outcomes of 183 laboring women undergoing unscheduled repeat cesarean delivery(URCD)group were compared with those of 204 women undergoing cesarean delivery(CD)without spontaneous labor(ERCD)group.Primary outcomes were“composite adverse maternal outcome”and“composite adverse neonatal outcome.”Fisher’s exact and Student’s t tests were used to assess the significance of differences in dichotomous and continuous variables,respectively.Two logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors with most significant influence on the rate of composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.Results:“Composite adverse maternal outcome”was significantly more common in women who underwent spontaneous labor((40/183)21.9%vs.(19/204)9.3%,P=0.001,relative risk(RR):2.7,95%confidence interval(CI):1.50–4.90).Similarly,“composite adverse neonatal outcome”was significantly increased in the URCD group((24/183)13.1%vs.(12/204)5.9%,P=0.014,RR:2.4,95%CI:1.18–4.98).These adverse effects persisted after adjustment for confounders.Multivariate regression models revealed that,besides labor,CD-order impacted maternal outcome(RR:1.5,95%CI:1.02–2.30,P=0.036),while CD-order and teenage pregnancy influenced neonatal outcome(RR:2.1,95%CI:1.29–3.38,P=0.003,and RR:16.5,95%CI:2.09–129.80,P=0.008,respectively).Conclusion:In our study,spontaneous labor before ERCD,including deliveries at term,was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes,indicating that it is preferable to conduct ERCD before the onset of labor.Screening women with MRCD may identify those at increased risk for spontaneous labor for whom CD could be scheduled 1–2 weeks earlier.Further large prospective studies to assess the effects of such an approach on maternal and neonatal outcomes are strongly warranted.

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme as a Possible Biomarker to Predict Effect of Obstetric Anesthesia on Pregnant Women with COVID-19 Infection

We retrospectively investigated 68 parturients with or without COVID-19 undergone emergency cesarean section with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA)from a single tertiary university hospital in Wuhan,China.The cases were divided into 2 groups:patients with COVID-19 pneumonia(Group 1)and cases without COVID-19 pneumonia(Group 2).The patients in Group 1 were later divided into 2 groups:patients with low-angiotensin converting enzyme(ACE)(Group 3)and patients with normal-ACE(Group 4).The ACE levels,blood pressure and anesthesia management between the patients of Group 1 and Group 2,Group 3 and Group 4 were recorded as the primary outcome.The secondary outcome included perioperative symptoms,laboratory parameters and vital signs.Compared with Group 2,the patients in Group 1 had different ACE level and lower blood pressure after CSEA.Compared with Group 4,the patients in Group 3 showed lower SBP after CSEA(127 vs.130 mm Hg,p=0.028),accompanied with more partus matures and younger age(28 vs.32 years,p=0.007).ACE may be a possible biomarker to predict the anesthesia effects on patients with COVID-19 infections undergoing emergency cesarean delivery.