Endoscopic anti-reflux treatment is emerging as a new option for gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)treatment in patients with the same indications as for laparoscopic fundoplication.There are many techniques,the fi...Endoscopic anti-reflux treatment is emerging as a new option for gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)treatment in patients with the same indications as for laparoscopic fundoplication.There are many techniques,the first of which are transoral incisionless fundoplication(TIF)and nonablative radio-frequency(STRETTA)that have been tested with comparative studies and randomized controlled trials,whereas the other more recent ones still require a deeper evaluation.The purpose of the latter is to verify whether reflux is abolished or significantly reduced after intervention,whether there is a valid high pressure zone at the gastroesophageal junction,and whether esophagitis,when present,has disappeared.Unfortunately in a certain number of cases,and especially in the more recently introduced ones,the evaluation has been based almost exclusively on subjective criteria,such as improvement in the quality of life,remission of heartburn and regurgitation,and reduction or suspension of antacid and antisecretory drug consumption.However,with the most studied techniques such as TIF and STRETTA,an improvement in symptoms better than that of laparoscopic fundoplication can often be observed,whereas the number of acid episodes and acid exposure time are similar or higher,as if the acid refluxes are better tolerated by these patients.The suspicion of a local hyposensitivity taking place after antireflux endoscopic intervention seems confirmed by a Bernstein test at least for STRETTA.This examination should be done for all the other techniques,both old and new,to identify the ones that reassure rather than cure.In conclusion,the evaluation of the effectiveness of the endoscopic anti-reflux techniques should not be based exclusively on subjective criteria,but should also be confirmed by objective examinations,because there might be a gap between the improvement in symptoms declared by the patient and the underlying pathophysiologic alterations of GERD.展开更多
Over the past 30 years, the field of endoscopy has witnessed several advances. With the advent of endoscopic mucosal resection, removal of large mucosal lesions have become possible. Thereafter, endoscopic submucosal ...Over the past 30 years, the field of endoscopy has witnessed several advances. With the advent of endoscopic mucosal resection, removal of large mucosal lesions have become possible. Thereafter, endoscopic submucosal resection was refined, permitting en bloc removal of large superficial neoplasms. Such techniques have facilitated the development of antireflux mucosectomy, a promising novel treatment for gastroesophageal reflux. The introduction and use of over the scope clips has allowed for endoscopic closure of defects in the gastrointestinal tract, which were traditionally treated with surgical intervention. With the development of per-oral endoscopic myotomy(POEM), the treatment of achalasia and spastic disorders of the esophagus have been revolutionized. From the submucosal tunnelling technique developed for POEM, Per oral endoscopic tumor resection of subepithelial tumors was made possible. Simultaneously, advances in biotechnology have expanded esophageal stenting capabilities with the introduction of fully covered metal and plastic stents, as well as biodegradable stents. Once deemed a primarily diagnostic tool, endoscopy has quickly transcended to a minimally invasive intervention and therapeutic tool. These techniques are reviewed with regards to their application to benign disease of the esophagus.展开更多
Endoscopic resection(ER) is at present an accepted treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. ER provides similar efficacy to surgery; however, it is minimally invasive and less expensive. Endoscopic mucosa...Endoscopic resection(ER) is at present an accepted treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. ER provides similar efficacy to surgery; however, it is minimally invasive and less expensive. Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) is superior to biopsy for diagnosing advanced dysplasia and can change the diagnostic grade and the management. Several EMR techniques have been described that are alternatively used dependent upon the endoscopist personal experience, the anatomic conditions and the endoscopic appearance of the lesion to be resected. The literature suggests that EMR offers comparable outcomes to surgery for selected indications. EMR techniques using a cap fitted endoscope and EMR using a ligation device [multiband mucosectomy(MBM)] are the most frequently use. MBM technique does not require submucosal injection as with the endoscopic resectioncap technique, multiple resections can be performed with the same snare, pre-looping the endoscopic resection-snare in the ridge of the cap is not necessary, MBM does not require withdrawal of the endoscope between resections and up to six consecutive resections can be performed. This reduces the time and cost required for the procedure, while also reducing patient discomfort. Despite the increasing popularity of MBM, data on the safety and efficacy of this technique in upper gastrointestinal lesions with advanced dysplasia, defined as those lesions that have high-grade dysplasia or early cancer, is limited.展开更多
目的研究内镜下应用多环黏膜切除术（multiband mucosectomy，MBM）治疗Barrett食管。方法采用前瞻性研究的方法，在窄波成像（narrow band imaging，NBI）下确认Barrett食管病变范围，用多环黏膜切除器吸引病灶，套扎橡皮圈后用圈套器...目的研究内镜下应用多环黏膜切除术（multiband mucosectomy，MBM）治疗Barrett食管。方法采用前瞻性研究的方法，在窄波成像（narrow band imaging，NBI）下确认Barrett食管病变范围，用多环黏膜切除器吸引病灶，套扎橡皮圈后用圈套器电切。3个月复查胃镜，评估疗效。结果134例Barrett食管患者共切除病灶206块。急性并发症出血发生率6.7%（9/134），无一例发生穿孔。术后30d内（迟发性并发症）出血发生率1.5%（2/134），出现食管狭窄症状39.8%（53/133）；30d后（远期并发症）主要为食管狭窄，发生率2.3%（3/133）。术后3个月复查胃镜，病灶完整切除率98.5%（131/133）。结论内镜下MBM术治疗Barrett食管，简便、安全、有效。展开更多
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of death from cancer in the world. We now know that 90% of CRC develop from adenomatous polyps. Polypectomy of colon adenomas leads to a significant reduction in th...Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of death from cancer in the world. We now know that 90% of CRC develop from adenomatous polyps. Polypectomy of colon adenomas leads to a significant reduction in the incidence of CRC. At present most of the polyps are removed endoscopically. The vast majority of colorectal polyps identified at colonoscopy are small and do not pose a significant challenge for resection to an appropriately trained and skilled endoscopist. Advanced polypectomy techniques are intended for the removal of difficult colon polyps. We have defined a "difficult polyp" as any lesion that due to its size, shape or location represents a challenge for the colonoscopist to remove. Although many "difficult polyps" will be an easy target for the advanced endoscopist, polyps that are larger than 15 mm, have a large pedicle, are flat and extended, are difficult to see or are located in the cecum or any angulated portion of the colon should be always considered difficult. Although very successful,advanced resection techniques can potentially cause serious, even life-threatening complications. Moreover, post polypectomy complications are more common in the presence of difficult polyps. Therefore, any endos-copist attempting advanced polypectomy techniques should be adequately supervised by an expert or have an excellent training in interventional endoscopy. This review describes several useful tips and tricks to deal with difficult polyps.展开更多
文摘Endoscopic anti-reflux treatment is emerging as a new option for gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)treatment in patients with the same indications as for laparoscopic fundoplication.There are many techniques,the first of which are transoral incisionless fundoplication(TIF)and nonablative radio-frequency(STRETTA)that have been tested with comparative studies and randomized controlled trials,whereas the other more recent ones still require a deeper evaluation.The purpose of the latter is to verify whether reflux is abolished or significantly reduced after intervention,whether there is a valid high pressure zone at the gastroesophageal junction,and whether esophagitis,when present,has disappeared.Unfortunately in a certain number of cases,and especially in the more recently introduced ones,the evaluation has been based almost exclusively on subjective criteria,such as improvement in the quality of life,remission of heartburn and regurgitation,and reduction or suspension of antacid and antisecretory drug consumption.However,with the most studied techniques such as TIF and STRETTA,an improvement in symptoms better than that of laparoscopic fundoplication can often be observed,whereas the number of acid episodes and acid exposure time are similar or higher,as if the acid refluxes are better tolerated by these patients.The suspicion of a local hyposensitivity taking place after antireflux endoscopic intervention seems confirmed by a Bernstein test at least for STRETTA.This examination should be done for all the other techniques,both old and new,to identify the ones that reassure rather than cure.In conclusion,the evaluation of the effectiveness of the endoscopic anti-reflux techniques should not be based exclusively on subjective criteria,but should also be confirmed by objective examinations,because there might be a gap between the improvement in symptoms declared by the patient and the underlying pathophysiologic alterations of GERD.
文摘Over the past 30 years, the field of endoscopy has witnessed several advances. With the advent of endoscopic mucosal resection, removal of large mucosal lesions have become possible. Thereafter, endoscopic submucosal resection was refined, permitting en bloc removal of large superficial neoplasms. Such techniques have facilitated the development of antireflux mucosectomy, a promising novel treatment for gastroesophageal reflux. The introduction and use of over the scope clips has allowed for endoscopic closure of defects in the gastrointestinal tract, which were traditionally treated with surgical intervention. With the development of per-oral endoscopic myotomy(POEM), the treatment of achalasia and spastic disorders of the esophagus have been revolutionized. From the submucosal tunnelling technique developed for POEM, Per oral endoscopic tumor resection of subepithelial tumors was made possible. Simultaneously, advances in biotechnology have expanded esophageal stenting capabilities with the introduction of fully covered metal and plastic stents, as well as biodegradable stents. Once deemed a primarily diagnostic tool, endoscopy has quickly transcended to a minimally invasive intervention and therapeutic tool. These techniques are reviewed with regards to their application to benign disease of the esophagus.
文摘Endoscopic resection(ER) is at present an accepted treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. ER provides similar efficacy to surgery; however, it is minimally invasive and less expensive. Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) is superior to biopsy for diagnosing advanced dysplasia and can change the diagnostic grade and the management. Several EMR techniques have been described that are alternatively used dependent upon the endoscopist personal experience, the anatomic conditions and the endoscopic appearance of the lesion to be resected. The literature suggests that EMR offers comparable outcomes to surgery for selected indications. EMR techniques using a cap fitted endoscope and EMR using a ligation device [multiband mucosectomy(MBM)] are the most frequently use. MBM technique does not require submucosal injection as with the endoscopic resectioncap technique, multiple resections can be performed with the same snare, pre-looping the endoscopic resection-snare in the ridge of the cap is not necessary, MBM does not require withdrawal of the endoscope between resections and up to six consecutive resections can be performed. This reduces the time and cost required for the procedure, while also reducing patient discomfort. Despite the increasing popularity of MBM, data on the safety and efficacy of this technique in upper gastrointestinal lesions with advanced dysplasia, defined as those lesions that have high-grade dysplasia or early cancer, is limited.
文摘目的研究内镜下应用多环黏膜切除术（multiband mucosectomy，MBM）治疗Barrett食管。方法采用前瞻性研究的方法，在窄波成像（narrow band imaging，NBI）下确认Barrett食管病变范围，用多环黏膜切除器吸引病灶，套扎橡皮圈后用圈套器电切。3个月复查胃镜，评估疗效。结果134例Barrett食管患者共切除病灶206块。急性并发症出血发生率6.7%（9/134），无一例发生穿孔。术后30d内（迟发性并发症）出血发生率1.5%（2/134），出现食管狭窄症状39.8%（53/133）；30d后（远期并发症）主要为食管狭窄，发生率2.3%（3/133）。术后3个月复查胃镜，病灶完整切除率98.5%（131/133）。结论内镜下MBM术治疗Barrett食管，简便、安全、有效。
文摘Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of death from cancer in the world. We now know that 90% of CRC develop from adenomatous polyps. Polypectomy of colon adenomas leads to a significant reduction in the incidence of CRC. At present most of the polyps are removed endoscopically. The vast majority of colorectal polyps identified at colonoscopy are small and do not pose a significant challenge for resection to an appropriately trained and skilled endoscopist. Advanced polypectomy techniques are intended for the removal of difficult colon polyps. We have defined a "difficult polyp" as any lesion that due to its size, shape or location represents a challenge for the colonoscopist to remove. Although many "difficult polyps" will be an easy target for the advanced endoscopist, polyps that are larger than 15 mm, have a large pedicle, are flat and extended, are difficult to see or are located in the cecum or any angulated portion of the colon should be always considered difficult. Although very successful,advanced resection techniques can potentially cause serious, even life-threatening complications. Moreover, post polypectomy complications are more common in the presence of difficult polyps. Therefore, any endos-copist attempting advanced polypectomy techniques should be adequately supervised by an expert or have an excellent training in interventional endoscopy. This review describes several useful tips and tricks to deal with difficult polyps.
