Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),various measures have been taken to protect against the infection.As droplet and contact transmission are the main routes of COVID-19 infection,endoscopy ce...Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),various measures have been taken to protect against the infection.As droplet and contact transmission are the main routes of COVID-19 infection,endoscopy centers are considered to be high-risk areas for exposure to COVID-19.We have undertaken several countermeasures in our endoscopic center during the pandemic,and have gained significant experience in terms of prevention and control of COVID-19.We here present our experience and strategies adopted for preventing hospital infection in our endoscopy center during the COVID-19 pandemic.We describe our management of the environment,endoscope,patients,and medical staff,and our self-made masks.展开更多
AIM: To determine the incidence of colonoscopic perforation (CP), and evaluate clinical findings, management and outcomes of patients with CP from the World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) Endoscopy Training ...AIM: To determine the incidence of colonoscopic perforation (CP), and evaluate clinical findings, management and outcomes of patients with CP from the World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) Endoscopy Training Center in Thailand. METHODS: All colonoscopies and sigmoidoscopies performed between 1999 and 2007 in the Endoscopic unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok were reviewed. Incidence of CP, patients' characteristics, endoscopic information, intraoperative findings, management and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 17357 endoscopic procedures of the colon (13 699 colonoscopies and 3658 flexible sigmoidoscopies) were performed in Siriraj hospital over a 9-year period. Fifteen patients (0.09%) had CP: 14 from colonoscopy and 1 from sigmoidoscopy. The most common site of perforation was in the sigmoid colon (80%), followed by the transverse colon (13%). Perforations were caused by direct trauma from either the shaft or the tip of the endoscope (n = 12,80%) and endoscopic polypectomy (n = 3, 20%). All patients with CP underwent surgical management: primary repair (27%) and bowel resection (73%). The mortality rate was 13% and postoperative complication rate was 53%. CONCLUSION: CP is a rare but serious complication following colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Incidence of CP was 0.09%. Surgery is still the mainstay of CP management.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders during childhood,and have evolved from a more infrequent inpatient procedure in the op...BACKGROUND Endoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders during childhood,and have evolved from a more infrequent inpatient procedure in the operating room to a routine outpatient procedure conducted in multiple care settings.Demand for these procedures is rapidly increasing and thus there is a need to perform them in an efficient manner.However,there are little data comparing the efficiency of pediatric endoscopic procedures in diverse clinical environments.We hypothesized that there are significant differences in efficiency between settings.AIM To compare the efficiency and examine adverse effects of pediatric endoscopic procedures across three clinical settings.METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted on 1623 cases of esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)or combined EGD and colonoscopy performed between January 1,2014 and May 31,2018 by 6 experienced pediatric gastroenterologists in three different clinical settings,including a tertiary care hospital operating room,community hospital operating room,and free-standing pediatric ambulatory endoscopy center at a community hospital.The following strict guidelines were used to schedule patients at all three locations:age greater than 6 mo;American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2;normal craniofacial anatomy;no anticipated therapeutic intervention(e.g.,foreign body retrieval,stricture dilation);and,no planned or anticipated hospitalization post-procedure.Data on demographics,times,admission rates,and adverse events were collected.Endoscopist time(elapsed time from the endoscopist entering the operating room or endoscopy suite to the next patient entering)and patient time(elapsed time from patient registration to that patient exiting the operating room or endoscopy suite)were calculated to assess efficiency.RESULTS In total,58%of the cases were performed in the tertiary care operating room.The median age of patients was 12 years and the male-to-female ratio was nearly equal across all locations.Endoscopist time at the tertiary care operating room was 12 min longer compared to the community operating room(63.3±21.5 min vs 51.4±18.9 min,P<0.001)and 7 min longer compared to the endoscopy center(vs 56.6±19.3 min,P<0.001).Patient time at the tertiary care operating room was 11 min longer compared to the community operating room(133.2±39.9 min vs 122.3±39.5 min,P<0.001)and 9 min longer compared to the endoscopy center(vs 124.9±37.9 min;P<0.001).When comparing endoscopist and patient times for EGD and EGD/colonoscopies among the three locations,endoscopist,and patient times were again shorter in the community hospital and endoscopy center compared to the tertiary care operating room.Adverse events from procedures occurred in 0.1%(n=2)of cases performed in the tertiary care operating room,with 2.2%(n=35)of cases from all locations having required an unplanned admission after the endoscopy for management of a primary GI disorder.CONCLUSION Pediatric endoscopic procedures can be conducted more efficiently in select patients in a community operating room and endoscopy center compared to a tertiary care operating room.展开更多
文摘Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),various measures have been taken to protect against the infection.As droplet and contact transmission are the main routes of COVID-19 infection,endoscopy centers are considered to be high-risk areas for exposure to COVID-19.We have undertaken several countermeasures in our endoscopic center during the pandemic,and have gained significant experience in terms of prevention and control of COVID-19.We here present our experience and strategies adopted for preventing hospital infection in our endoscopy center during the COVID-19 pandemic.We describe our management of the environment,endoscope,patients,and medical staff,and our self-made masks.
文摘AIM: To determine the incidence of colonoscopic perforation (CP), and evaluate clinical findings, management and outcomes of patients with CP from the World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) Endoscopy Training Center in Thailand. METHODS: All colonoscopies and sigmoidoscopies performed between 1999 and 2007 in the Endoscopic unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok were reviewed. Incidence of CP, patients' characteristics, endoscopic information, intraoperative findings, management and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 17357 endoscopic procedures of the colon (13 699 colonoscopies and 3658 flexible sigmoidoscopies) were performed in Siriraj hospital over a 9-year period. Fifteen patients (0.09%) had CP: 14 from colonoscopy and 1 from sigmoidoscopy. The most common site of perforation was in the sigmoid colon (80%), followed by the transverse colon (13%). Perforations were caused by direct trauma from either the shaft or the tip of the endoscope (n = 12,80%) and endoscopic polypectomy (n = 3, 20%). All patients with CP underwent surgical management: primary repair (27%) and bowel resection (73%). The mortality rate was 13% and postoperative complication rate was 53%. CONCLUSION: CP is a rare but serious complication following colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Incidence of CP was 0.09%. Surgery is still the mainstay of CP management.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders during childhood,and have evolved from a more infrequent inpatient procedure in the operating room to a routine outpatient procedure conducted in multiple care settings.Demand for these procedures is rapidly increasing and thus there is a need to perform them in an efficient manner.However,there are little data comparing the efficiency of pediatric endoscopic procedures in diverse clinical environments.We hypothesized that there are significant differences in efficiency between settings.AIM To compare the efficiency and examine adverse effects of pediatric endoscopic procedures across three clinical settings.METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted on 1623 cases of esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)or combined EGD and colonoscopy performed between January 1,2014 and May 31,2018 by 6 experienced pediatric gastroenterologists in three different clinical settings,including a tertiary care hospital operating room,community hospital operating room,and free-standing pediatric ambulatory endoscopy center at a community hospital.The following strict guidelines were used to schedule patients at all three locations:age greater than 6 mo;American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2;normal craniofacial anatomy;no anticipated therapeutic intervention(e.g.,foreign body retrieval,stricture dilation);and,no planned or anticipated hospitalization post-procedure.Data on demographics,times,admission rates,and adverse events were collected.Endoscopist time(elapsed time from the endoscopist entering the operating room or endoscopy suite to the next patient entering)and patient time(elapsed time from patient registration to that patient exiting the operating room or endoscopy suite)were calculated to assess efficiency.RESULTS In total,58%of the cases were performed in the tertiary care operating room.The median age of patients was 12 years and the male-to-female ratio was nearly equal across all locations.Endoscopist time at the tertiary care operating room was 12 min longer compared to the community operating room(63.3±21.5 min vs 51.4±18.9 min,P<0.001)and 7 min longer compared to the endoscopy center(vs 56.6±19.3 min,P<0.001).Patient time at the tertiary care operating room was 11 min longer compared to the community operating room(133.2±39.9 min vs 122.3±39.5 min,P<0.001)and 9 min longer compared to the endoscopy center(vs 124.9±37.9 min;P<0.001).When comparing endoscopist and patient times for EGD and EGD/colonoscopies among the three locations,endoscopist,and patient times were again shorter in the community hospital and endoscopy center compared to the tertiary care operating room.Adverse events from procedures occurred in 0.1%(n=2)of cases performed in the tertiary care operating room,with 2.2%(n=35)of cases from all locations having required an unplanned admission after the endoscopy for management of a primary GI disorder.CONCLUSION Pediatric endoscopic procedures can be conducted more efficiently in select patients in a community operating room and endoscopy center compared to a tertiary care operating room.