Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI), we proposed a comprehensive s...Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI), we proposed a comprehensive system for evaluating Chinese academic journals in the humanities and social sciences. This system constitutes 8 primary indicators and 17 sub-indicators for multidisciplinary journals and 19 sub-indicators for discipline-specific journals. Each indicator or sub-indicator is assigned a suitable weight according to its importance in terms of measuring a journal's academic quality and/or impact.展开更多
A 10-year-old unified editing standard was recently abolished in the field of humanities and social science journals. This is because the standard failed in showing equal respect to disciplinary differences, in keep...A 10-year-old unified editing standard was recently abolished in the field of humanities and social science journals. This is because the standard failed in showing equal respect to disciplinary differences, in keeping with Chinese culturaltraditions, and in gaining acceptance among journal editors. As such, amendment efforts to the National Standard should be undertaken patiently and in a practical manner to achieve agreement within this publishing field.展开更多
With its rising number of publications and expanding international collaborations,China's humanities and social sciences(HSS)research is displaying its potential for global prominence.Researchers have been explori...With its rising number of publications and expanding international collaborations,China's humanities and social sciences(HSS)research is displaying its potential for global prominence.Researchers have been exploring the development of China's HSS from different perspectives.However,the examinations from the perspective of sentiment analysis are scanty.Our aim is then to examine the sentiment features in Chinese HSS academic writing,by analyzing a large-scale corpus with over 275 million characters and with a time span from 2000 to 2020.Considering that most studies only focused on abstracts,we examined both the abstracts and the full texts,as well as a direct comparison between them.We found that Chinese HSS academic writing has evolved to be more positively biased in the past two decades,showing an upward trend in the use of positive words and a slight downward trend in the use of negative words.However,the upward trend of positive words in the full texts is not that clear,resembling a fluctuating pattern.Regarding the comparison,the abstracts are more likely to use positive words while the full texts tend to use more negative words.These phenomena can be explained with the social cognitive theory,in that they may be shaped by a joint force of the nature of human beings,the nature of language,the particular socio-cultural background in China and the features of the academic genre.展开更多
【目的】优质稿源是英文科技期刊学术质量的保障,编辑通过参加国际学术会议可以达到宣传期刊扩充稿源的目的。【方法】总结调研获取国际学术会议信息的方式以及参加会议前的准备,研究如何发挥参会期间的主观能动性,做好会后的追踪工作...【目的】优质稿源是英文科技期刊学术质量的保障,编辑通过参加国际学术会议可以达到宣传期刊扩充稿源的目的。【方法】总结调研获取国际学术会议信息的方式以及参加会议前的准备,研究如何发挥参会期间的主观能动性,做好会后的追踪工作。【结果】结合Chinese Journal of Aeronautics编辑部参加国际学术会议的策略与具体实践,对编辑提出参加学术会议的建议。【结论】有针对性地参加国际学术会议有助于英文科技期刊加快国际化进程,提升国际影响力。展开更多
文摘Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI), we proposed a comprehensive system for evaluating Chinese academic journals in the humanities and social sciences. This system constitutes 8 primary indicators and 17 sub-indicators for multidisciplinary journals and 19 sub-indicators for discipline-specific journals. Each indicator or sub-indicator is assigned a suitable weight according to its importance in terms of measuring a journal's academic quality and/or impact.
文摘A 10-year-old unified editing standard was recently abolished in the field of humanities and social science journals. This is because the standard failed in showing equal respect to disciplinary differences, in keeping with Chinese culturaltraditions, and in gaining acceptance among journal editors. As such, amendment efforts to the National Standard should be undertaken patiently and in a practical manner to achieve agreement within this publishing field.
基金supported by the Social Science Foundation of Chongqing[Grant Number 2019QNYY51]the Science Foundation of Chongqing[Grant Number cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0554]+2 种基金the Fund of the Interdisciplinary Supervisor Team for Graduates Programs of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission[Grant Number YDSTD1923]the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities[Grant Number 2021CDJSKZX07]the Graduate Research Innovation Program of Chongqing[Grant Number CYS22081].
文摘With its rising number of publications and expanding international collaborations,China's humanities and social sciences(HSS)research is displaying its potential for global prominence.Researchers have been exploring the development of China's HSS from different perspectives.However,the examinations from the perspective of sentiment analysis are scanty.Our aim is then to examine the sentiment features in Chinese HSS academic writing,by analyzing a large-scale corpus with over 275 million characters and with a time span from 2000 to 2020.Considering that most studies only focused on abstracts,we examined both the abstracts and the full texts,as well as a direct comparison between them.We found that Chinese HSS academic writing has evolved to be more positively biased in the past two decades,showing an upward trend in the use of positive words and a slight downward trend in the use of negative words.However,the upward trend of positive words in the full texts is not that clear,resembling a fluctuating pattern.Regarding the comparison,the abstracts are more likely to use positive words while the full texts tend to use more negative words.These phenomena can be explained with the social cognitive theory,in that they may be shaped by a joint force of the nature of human beings,the nature of language,the particular socio-cultural background in China and the features of the academic genre.
文摘【目的】优质稿源是英文科技期刊学术质量的保障,编辑通过参加国际学术会议可以达到宣传期刊扩充稿源的目的。【方法】总结调研获取国际学术会议信息的方式以及参加会议前的准备,研究如何发挥参会期间的主观能动性,做好会后的追踪工作。【结果】结合Chinese Journal of Aeronautics编辑部参加国际学术会议的策略与具体实践,对编辑提出参加学术会议的建议。【结论】有针对性地参加国际学术会议有助于英文科技期刊加快国际化进程,提升国际影响力。
