With our country’s social development,the gap between urban and rural education has become increasingly obvious,especially the difference in student achievement.This study aims to explore the impact of the urban-rura...With our country’s social development,the gap between urban and rural education has become increasingly obvious,especially the difference in student achievement.This study aims to explore the impact of the urban-rural education gap on student achievement.The study adopts a quantitative analysis method to collect and analyze the academic performance,learning resources,and social resources of urban and rural students.The results show that the unbalanced distribution of educational resources in urban and rural areas is the key factor leading to the gap in students’achievement.For example,urban education resources are abundant while rural education resources are relatively scarce.At the same time,the difference in social environment and family economic status also have a significant impact on student achievement.The differences between urban and rural areas,particularly in terms of family economic conditions and their ability to invest in education,further widen the gap between urban and rural education.The results of this study can provide a reference for reducing the gap between urban and rural education and improving the academic performance of rural students.A fair education policy is essential to narrow the gap between urban and rural education resources distribution,so as to improve the equality of education in society.展开更多
为量化比较各地区环境经济形势,为生态环境管理决策提供重要数据依据,考虑经济水平、绿色发展、生态环境三方面,建立包括15个指标的评价模型。通过构建指标加权总分(Sum of Indicators,SoI)与指标得分耦合协调度(Coupling Coordination ...为量化比较各地区环境经济形势,为生态环境管理决策提供重要数据依据,考虑经济水平、绿色发展、生态环境三方面,建立包括15个指标的评价模型。通过构建指标加权总分(Sum of Indicators,SoI)与指标得分耦合协调度(Coupling Coordination Degree,CCD)分别表征地区发展水平与发展协调度,两量相乘获得环境经济形势指数(Environmental and Economic Situation Index,以下简称“EESI”)。根据截止2020年第二季度31个省(自治区、直辖市)和新疆生产建设兵团(以下简称31地区)数据,核算并分析(1)空间分布层面,31地区EESI总体呈现南方表现优于北方,东部优于西部的规律;(2)SoI和CCD度线性相关性层面,31地区大部分相关度明显;(3)经济水平-绿色发展-生态环境三系统关联性层面,指标加权总分较高地区正相关明显,总分较低地区负相关性明显。本文指标体系与评价方法应用既为整合已有信息,也可探索更深层次形势分析,用于不同尺度研究对象彼此比较。展开更多
文摘With our country’s social development,the gap between urban and rural education has become increasingly obvious,especially the difference in student achievement.This study aims to explore the impact of the urban-rural education gap on student achievement.The study adopts a quantitative analysis method to collect and analyze the academic performance,learning resources,and social resources of urban and rural students.The results show that the unbalanced distribution of educational resources in urban and rural areas is the key factor leading to the gap in students’achievement.For example,urban education resources are abundant while rural education resources are relatively scarce.At the same time,the difference in social environment and family economic status also have a significant impact on student achievement.The differences between urban and rural areas,particularly in terms of family economic conditions and their ability to invest in education,further widen the gap between urban and rural education.The results of this study can provide a reference for reducing the gap between urban and rural education and improving the academic performance of rural students.A fair education policy is essential to narrow the gap between urban and rural education resources distribution,so as to improve the equality of education in society.
文摘为量化比较各地区环境经济形势,为生态环境管理决策提供重要数据依据,考虑经济水平、绿色发展、生态环境三方面,建立包括15个指标的评价模型。通过构建指标加权总分(Sum of Indicators,SoI)与指标得分耦合协调度(Coupling Coordination Degree,CCD)分别表征地区发展水平与发展协调度,两量相乘获得环境经济形势指数(Environmental and Economic Situation Index,以下简称“EESI”)。根据截止2020年第二季度31个省(自治区、直辖市)和新疆生产建设兵团(以下简称31地区)数据,核算并分析(1)空间分布层面,31地区EESI总体呈现南方表现优于北方,东部优于西部的规律;(2)SoI和CCD度线性相关性层面,31地区大部分相关度明显;(3)经济水平-绿色发展-生态环境三系统关联性层面,指标加权总分较高地区正相关明显,总分较低地区负相关性明显。本文指标体系与评价方法应用既为整合已有信息,也可探索更深层次形势分析,用于不同尺度研究对象彼此比较。
