Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our...Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 60 cases in the experimental group and 60 in the control group.The experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention measures,while the control group was given epidural anesthesia intervention measures.The analgesic effect,tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and other observation indicators were analyzed after anesthesia intervention.Result:After the intervention,the analgesic effect and the evaluation results of the subjects in the experimental group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05);the obtained values of TNF-αand CRP levels in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention demonstrated positive outcomes.The analgesic effect of patients during surgery and their inflammatory factor levels improved,which makes this intervention worthy of clinical application and promotion.展开更多
Objective: To discuss the effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on the levels of pain media, stress indicators and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing high altitude cesarean section. Methods: Eight...Objective: To discuss the effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on the levels of pain media, stress indicators and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing high altitude cesarean section. Methods: Eighty patients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2017 to April 2019 were enrolled in the hospital. They were divided into two groups according to the patient's anesthesia. Fourty patients receiving epidural anesthesia were included in the control group, and another 40 patients received lumbar stiffness. The combined anesthesia patient was included in the observation group. Changes in pain mediators [Serum neuropeptide Y (NPY), endorphin (β-EP), substance P (SP)], stress indicators [Serum cortisol (Cor), C-peptide (C-P), advanced oxidative protein product (AOPP)], inflammatory factor levels [Hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)], and immunoglobulin levels [Serum IgA, IgG, IgM] were compared between the two groups. Results: Before anesthesia, there were no significant difference in pain media, stress index, inflammatory factor level and immunoglobulin level between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 h after operation, the two groups of patients were NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor. The levels of C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were higher than those before operation (P<0.05). The levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were lower than those before operation (P<0.05). Among them, observation group NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor, C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The serum levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia can more effectively alleviate maternal pain in high altitude cesarean section, more effectively reduce the inflammatory stress response of patients, promote the humoral immune function of patients, and is beneficial to the early recovery of maternal postoperative, and has high clinical value.展开更多
Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery.Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia.Pati...Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery.Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia.Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological,pulmonary,cardiovascular,and hematological assessments.Neuraxial blocks include spinal,epidural,and combined spinal epidural.Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene,supraclavicular,infraclavicular,and axillary.Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block,saphenous nerve block,sciatic nerve block,iPACK block,ankle block and lumbar plexus block.The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon,the anesthesiologist,and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment.The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation,patient positing,operative structures,operative manipulation,tourniquet use and the impact of postoperative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy.Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity(LAST),nerve injury,falls,hematoma,infection and allergic reactions.Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications.LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications(intralipid)should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.展开更多
目的评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润...目的评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉组(F/I组)和腰硬联合麻醉组(CSEA组),每组60例。F/I组中男32例,女28例,年龄(38.75±11.35)岁;CSEA组中男25例,女35例,年龄(37.80±10.85)岁。比较两组术中补救例数、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后感觉恢复时间及首次下地活动时间、术后并发症、住院花费及住院天数等指标的差异。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验、Fisher确切概率法。结果F/I组术后6 h VAS评分低于CSEA组[(2.08±0.61)分比(2.54±0.64)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-2.484,P=0.018)。F/I组感觉恢复时间长于CSEA组[(6.25±0.40)h比(3.60±0.31)h,首次下地活动时间短于CESA组[(2.99±1.05)h比(8.14±1.88)h],差异均有统计学意义(t=14.095、-12.263,均P<0.001)。术后并发症:F/I组术中加用麻醉发生率3.3%(2/60)、尿潴留发生率0、下肢静脉血栓发生率1.7%(1/60)、恶心呕吐发生率3.3%(2/60),CSEA组术中加用麻醉发生率0、尿潴留发生率10.0%(6/60)、下肢静脉血栓发生率5.0%(3/60)、恶心呕吐发生率16.7%(10/60),两组尿潴留、恶心呕吐发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。F/I组住院时间为(3.90±0.63)d、住院费用为(9612.67±507.15)元,CESA组分别为(5.27±0.75)d、(11401.52±530.01)元,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.862、-15.425,均P<0.001)。结论股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中能够减少术后并发症、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用,并提供良好的麻醉效果。展开更多
目的:探究间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇的影响。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年10月泉州市第一医院收治的100例待剖宫产产妇。根据随机数表法将其分为腰硬联合麻醉组和联合治疗组,各50例。腰硬联合麻醉组给予腰硬联合麻醉,联合治疗...目的:探究间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇的影响。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年10月泉州市第一医院收治的100例待剖宫产产妇。根据随机数表法将其分为腰硬联合麻醉组和联合治疗组,各50例。腰硬联合麻醉组给予腰硬联合麻醉,联合治疗组给予间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉。比较两组麻醉前、术后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心输出量(CO)、心率(HR)、心脏指数(CI),手术指标,新生儿缺氧情况及不良反应。结果:术后,两组DBP、SBP、MAP下降,但联合治疗组DBP、SBP、MAP均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,两组HR、CO、CI均降低,但联合治疗组HR、CO、CI均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术时间、术中失血量、术中液体输注量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合治疗组不良反应发生率低于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇进行干预,能较好地维护产妇血压、心率水平,调节产妇血流动力学,对新生儿Apgar评分有较小的影响,效果显著。展开更多
目的比较腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)与硬膜外麻醉在分娩镇痛中的应用效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月于上饶东信第五医院分娩的40名产妇作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组20例。对照组实施硬膜外麻醉,观察组实施腰硬...目的比较腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)与硬膜外麻醉在分娩镇痛中的应用效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月于上饶东信第五医院分娩的40名产妇作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组20例。对照组实施硬膜外麻醉,观察组实施腰硬联合麻醉,比较两组镇痛起效时间、产程(第一产程、第二产程)、应激指标[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肾上腺素(ADR)与皮质醇(Cor)、一氧化氮(NO)]、疼痛数字分级法(NRS)评分及镇痛药物用量及自控镇痛次数、产后泌乳指标[泌乳始动时间、产后12h催乳素(PRL)]和泌乳情况及不良反应发生情况。结果观察组镇痛起效时间、第一产程、第二产程均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。镇痛5、30min,观察组NRS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组镇痛前后其他时间点NRS评分比较差异无统计学意义。分娩后24h,两组Cor、ADR、IL-6、NO水平均高于产前,但观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组芬太尼用量、罗哌卡因用量、自控镇痛次数均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组泌乳始动时间短于对照组,产后12 h PRL水平、泌乳有效率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与硬膜外麻醉相比,CSEA用于分娩镇痛中效果良好,可有效缩短产程,缓解患者疼痛感,控制机体应激水平,促进产妇产后泌乳,减少不良反应的发生。展开更多
目的研究腰-硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩中的应用效果。方法选取2021年1月至2022年12月景德镇市第二人民医院收治的100例无痛分娩的产妇作为研究对象。依据麻醉方案不同将其分成观察组(n=52)和对照组(n=48)。对照组接受硬膜外麻醉,观察组接受...目的研究腰-硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩中的应用效果。方法选取2021年1月至2022年12月景德镇市第二人民医院收治的100例无痛分娩的产妇作为研究对象。依据麻醉方案不同将其分成观察组(n=52)和对照组(n=48)。对照组接受硬膜外麻醉,观察组接受腰-硬联合麻醉。比较两组患者的麻醉起效时间、产程、疼痛程度、麻醉不良反应、妊娠结局及新生儿Apgar评分。结果观察组产妇的麻醉起效时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组产妇的第一、第二产程短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组第三产程比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组产妇麻醉后5、30和60 min的疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组产妇的麻醉相关不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组新生儿的出生后1 min Apgar评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论无痛分娩中选择硬膜外麻醉与腰-硬联合麻醉均可实现镇痛效果,但腰-硬联合麻醉方案优势更为明显,主要体现在麻醉起效迅速,术中可获得良好镇痛效果,缩短产程,可提高麻醉安全性避免相关并发症的出现,具备临床推广价值。展开更多
基金Weifang Municipal Science and Technology Bureau(Medical)Project“Effects and Mechanisms of Oxycodone and Alfentanil on IgFs in Mouse Ovarian Granulosa Cells”(2021YX035)。
文摘Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 60 cases in the experimental group and 60 in the control group.The experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention measures,while the control group was given epidural anesthesia intervention measures.The analgesic effect,tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and other observation indicators were analyzed after anesthesia intervention.Result:After the intervention,the analgesic effect and the evaluation results of the subjects in the experimental group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05);the obtained values of TNF-αand CRP levels in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention demonstrated positive outcomes.The analgesic effect of patients during surgery and their inflammatory factor levels improved,which makes this intervention worthy of clinical application and promotion.
基金supported by Scientific Project of Sichuan Hygiene and Family Planning Committee(No.18PJ169).
文摘Objective: To discuss the effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on the levels of pain media, stress indicators and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing high altitude cesarean section. Methods: Eighty patients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2017 to April 2019 were enrolled in the hospital. They were divided into two groups according to the patient's anesthesia. Fourty patients receiving epidural anesthesia were included in the control group, and another 40 patients received lumbar stiffness. The combined anesthesia patient was included in the observation group. Changes in pain mediators [Serum neuropeptide Y (NPY), endorphin (β-EP), substance P (SP)], stress indicators [Serum cortisol (Cor), C-peptide (C-P), advanced oxidative protein product (AOPP)], inflammatory factor levels [Hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)], and immunoglobulin levels [Serum IgA, IgG, IgM] were compared between the two groups. Results: Before anesthesia, there were no significant difference in pain media, stress index, inflammatory factor level and immunoglobulin level between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 h after operation, the two groups of patients were NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor. The levels of C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were higher than those before operation (P<0.05). The levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were lower than those before operation (P<0.05). Among them, observation group NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor, C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The serum levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia can more effectively alleviate maternal pain in high altitude cesarean section, more effectively reduce the inflammatory stress response of patients, promote the humoral immune function of patients, and is beneficial to the early recovery of maternal postoperative, and has high clinical value.
文摘Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery.Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia.Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological,pulmonary,cardiovascular,and hematological assessments.Neuraxial blocks include spinal,epidural,and combined spinal epidural.Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene,supraclavicular,infraclavicular,and axillary.Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block,saphenous nerve block,sciatic nerve block,iPACK block,ankle block and lumbar plexus block.The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon,the anesthesiologist,and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment.The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation,patient positing,operative structures,operative manipulation,tourniquet use and the impact of postoperative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy.Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity(LAST),nerve injury,falls,hematoma,infection and allergic reactions.Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications.LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications(intralipid)should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.
文摘目的评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉组(F/I组)和腰硬联合麻醉组(CSEA组),每组60例。F/I组中男32例,女28例,年龄(38.75±11.35)岁;CSEA组中男25例,女35例,年龄(37.80±10.85)岁。比较两组术中补救例数、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后感觉恢复时间及首次下地活动时间、术后并发症、住院花费及住院天数等指标的差异。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验、Fisher确切概率法。结果F/I组术后6 h VAS评分低于CSEA组[(2.08±0.61)分比(2.54±0.64)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-2.484,P=0.018)。F/I组感觉恢复时间长于CSEA组[(6.25±0.40)h比(3.60±0.31)h,首次下地活动时间短于CESA组[(2.99±1.05)h比(8.14±1.88)h],差异均有统计学意义(t=14.095、-12.263,均P<0.001)。术后并发症:F/I组术中加用麻醉发生率3.3%(2/60)、尿潴留发生率0、下肢静脉血栓发生率1.7%(1/60)、恶心呕吐发生率3.3%(2/60),CSEA组术中加用麻醉发生率0、尿潴留发生率10.0%(6/60)、下肢静脉血栓发生率5.0%(3/60)、恶心呕吐发生率16.7%(10/60),两组尿潴留、恶心呕吐发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。F/I组住院时间为(3.90±0.63)d、住院费用为(9612.67±507.15)元,CESA组分别为(5.27±0.75)d、(11401.52±530.01)元,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.862、-15.425,均P<0.001)。结论股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中能够减少术后并发症、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用,并提供良好的麻醉效果。
文摘目的:探究间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇的影响。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年10月泉州市第一医院收治的100例待剖宫产产妇。根据随机数表法将其分为腰硬联合麻醉组和联合治疗组,各50例。腰硬联合麻醉组给予腰硬联合麻醉,联合治疗组给予间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉。比较两组麻醉前、术后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心输出量(CO)、心率(HR)、心脏指数(CI),手术指标,新生儿缺氧情况及不良反应。结果:术后,两组DBP、SBP、MAP下降,但联合治疗组DBP、SBP、MAP均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,两组HR、CO、CI均降低,但联合治疗组HR、CO、CI均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术时间、术中失血量、术中液体输注量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合治疗组不良反应发生率低于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇进行干预,能较好地维护产妇血压、心率水平,调节产妇血流动力学,对新生儿Apgar评分有较小的影响,效果显著。
文摘目的比较腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)与硬膜外麻醉在分娩镇痛中的应用效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月于上饶东信第五医院分娩的40名产妇作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组20例。对照组实施硬膜外麻醉,观察组实施腰硬联合麻醉,比较两组镇痛起效时间、产程(第一产程、第二产程)、应激指标[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肾上腺素(ADR)与皮质醇(Cor)、一氧化氮(NO)]、疼痛数字分级法(NRS)评分及镇痛药物用量及自控镇痛次数、产后泌乳指标[泌乳始动时间、产后12h催乳素(PRL)]和泌乳情况及不良反应发生情况。结果观察组镇痛起效时间、第一产程、第二产程均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。镇痛5、30min,观察组NRS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组镇痛前后其他时间点NRS评分比较差异无统计学意义。分娩后24h,两组Cor、ADR、IL-6、NO水平均高于产前,但观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组芬太尼用量、罗哌卡因用量、自控镇痛次数均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组泌乳始动时间短于对照组,产后12 h PRL水平、泌乳有效率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与硬膜外麻醉相比,CSEA用于分娩镇痛中效果良好,可有效缩短产程,缓解患者疼痛感,控制机体应激水平,促进产妇产后泌乳,减少不良反应的发生。
文摘目的研究腰-硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩中的应用效果。方法选取2021年1月至2022年12月景德镇市第二人民医院收治的100例无痛分娩的产妇作为研究对象。依据麻醉方案不同将其分成观察组(n=52)和对照组(n=48)。对照组接受硬膜外麻醉,观察组接受腰-硬联合麻醉。比较两组患者的麻醉起效时间、产程、疼痛程度、麻醉不良反应、妊娠结局及新生儿Apgar评分。结果观察组产妇的麻醉起效时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组产妇的第一、第二产程短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组第三产程比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组产妇麻醉后5、30和60 min的疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组产妇的麻醉相关不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组新生儿的出生后1 min Apgar评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论无痛分娩中选择硬膜外麻醉与腰-硬联合麻醉均可实现镇痛效果,但腰-硬联合麻醉方案优势更为明显,主要体现在麻醉起效迅速,术中可获得良好镇痛效果,缩短产程,可提高麻醉安全性避免相关并发症的出现,具备临床推广价值。
