Objective This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesia and recovery of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with serratus anterior plane block(ESPB combined with SAPB)versus thoracic parave...Objective This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesia and recovery of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with serratus anterior plane block(ESPB combined with SAPB)versus thoracic paravertebral block(PVB)after thoracoscopic surgery.Methods Ninety-two patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS)were randomly divided into group S(n=46)and group P(n=46).After anesthesia induction,the same anesthesiologist performed ultrasound-guided ESPB at T5 and T7 levels combined with SAPB at the level of the fifth rib in the midaxillary line in group S and ultrasound-guided PVB at T5 and T7 levels in group P.Patients in both groups were given 40 mL of 0.4%ropivacaine.Eighty-six patients completed the study(group S,n=44;group P,n=42).The morphine consumption,visual analogue scale(VAS)scores at rest and coughing,and frequency of remedial analgesia were recorded at 1,2,4,8,and 24 h postoperatively.Pulmonary function parameters were recorded at 1,4,and 24 h postoperatively,and the quality of recovery(QoR)-15 score at 24 h postoperatively.The adverse effects,duration of chest tube drainage and length of stay were also recorded.Results The morphine consumption at postoperative 4 and 8 h and the incidence of ipsilateral shoulder pain(ISP)were significantly lower in group S than in group P.The QoR-15 questionnaire score at postoperative 24 h was significantly lower in group P than in group S(P<0.05).The morphine consumption was lower at 24 h postoperatively in group S than in group P,with no significant difference found yet.The morphine consumption at other observed times,VAS scores,pulmonary function parameters,frequency of remedial analgesia,duration of chest tube drainage,length of stay,and incidence of other adverse events were comparable between group S and group P.Conclusion Ultrasound-guided ESPB combined with SAPB is non-inferior to PVB in terms of morphine consumption at postoperative 24 h and postoperative recovery.But,this approach can significantly reduce morphine consumption in the early postoperative period(0–8 h)after thoracoscopy with lower incidence of ISP.It is a simpler and safer operation.展开更多
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block that was first described in 2016. It is considered an alternative for brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgeries as the erector spinae muscle extends ...Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block that was first described in 2016. It is considered an alternative for brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgeries as the erector spinae muscle extends to the cervical level. Herein, we present a successful multilevel ESPB plus an interscalene block using liposomal bupivacaine in a 45-year-old female patient with metastatic sarcoma who presented for scapula and proximal humerus resection. The post-operative course was smooth, and the patient was discharged home on post-operative day 2 with minimal narcotic requirements.展开更多
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery usually suffer severe pain in the postoperative period.The erector spinae plane block(ESPB),first published in 2016,can anesthetize the ventral and dorsal rami of th...BACKGROUND Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery usually suffer severe pain in the postoperative period.The erector spinae plane block(ESPB),first published in 2016,can anesthetize the ventral and dorsal rami of thoracic nerves and produce an extensive multi-dermatomal sensory block.AIM To assess whether bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB at a lower thoracic level could improve pain control and quality of recovery in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.METHODS A total of 60 patients aged 18-80 years scheduled to undergo lumbar spine surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups:ESPB group(preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB at T10 vertebral level)and control group(no preoperative ESPB).Both groups received standard general anesthesia.The main indicator was the duration to the first patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)bolus.RESULTS In the ESPB group,the duration to the first PCIA bolus was significantly longer than that in the control group(h)[8.0(4.5,17.0)vs 1.0(0.5,6),P<0.01],and resting and coughing numerical rating scale(NRS)scores at 48 h post operation were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding resting and coughing NRS scores at 24 h post operation.Sufentanil consumption during the operation was significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the control group(P<0.01),while there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding morphine consumption at 24 or 48 h post operation.In the ESPB group,Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score within 20 min after extubation was higher and duration in the post-anesthesia care unit was shorter than those in the control group(P<0.01).CONCLUSION In patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery,ultrasound-guided ESPB at a lower thoracic level improves the analgesic effect,reduces opioid consumption,and improves postoperative recovery.展开更多
Epidural analgesia has long been regarded as the gold standard in abdominal surgery. However, concerns regarding risks associated with central neuraxial blockade, catheter placement and the presence of coagulopathy in...Epidural analgesia has long been regarded as the gold standard in abdominal surgery. However, concerns regarding risks associated with central neuraxial blockade, catheter placement and the presence of coagulopathy in patients undergoing liver resection have limited its use. Bilateral erector spinae plane blocks and catheter placement may mimic the effects of epidural analgesia by blocking both somatic and visceral pain while concomitantly avoiding central neuraxial blockade and catheter placement. We describe our experience in using the erector spinae plane block and catheter placement as part of a multimodal analgesia approach in a patient undergoing laparoscopic and another patient undergoing open liver resection. Our findings concur with previous reports which suggest that erector spinae plane blocks may be more efficacious as somatic rather than visceral analgesia. However, we conclude that further studies on factors affecting its efficacy should be conducted in view of the present lack of researched evidence.展开更多
<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In...<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated patients who underwent elective lumbar stenosis surgery between February 1, 2019, and April 1, 2019. Patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis under general anesthesia alone were compared with those who underwent general anesthesia combined with erector spinae plane block.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aims:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">We aimed to retrospectively evaluate whether erector spinae plane block reduced opioid consumption following surgery for spinal stenosis.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study Design:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective observational study</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">We collected data on the pain scores, time for the first requirement for patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia dose, requirement for rescue analgesia, time to first stand up postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Sixty patients were included in the study. The numerical rating scale</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">’</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s pain scores were significantly lower in the erector spinae plane group at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours than in the general anesthesia group. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was higher in the general anesthesia group than in the ESP group [212.0 (6.6) mg, vs. 107.3 (36.9 mg), (p <0.001)]. The time to first stand up after surgery was significantly longer in the general anesthesia group (p = 0.011).</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ESP block appear to be an effective method to relieve pain after lumbar surgery.</span>展开更多
Since the original publication on the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in 2016, the technique of the ESP block has evolved significantly in the last few years. This review highlights recent developments in the techniq...Since the original publication on the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in 2016, the technique of the ESP block has evolved significantly in the last few years. This review highlights recent developments in the technique for administering the ESP block and proposes directions for future research. Continuous efforts are being aimed at improving understanding regarding the administration of the ESP block. Current reports suggest that the ESP block provides effective analgesia in thoracic and abdominal sites in patients of all ages. However, no cohort studies or randomized controlled trials were performed in 2016 and 2017. The ESP block is an effective analgesic tool in a wide range of sites. However. We are uncertain how effective the ESP block is compared to other types of regional anesthesia. Therefore, more research on ESP blocks is required.展开更多
目的:探讨超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在后腹膜外腔镜手术中的镇痛效果及对生命体征指标、视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)疼痛评分、舒适度评分的影响。方法:选取2020年1月—2022年6月郑州市中心医院收治的145例后腹膜外腔镜手术患者作为研...目的:探讨超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在后腹膜外腔镜手术中的镇痛效果及对生命体征指标、视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)疼痛评分、舒适度评分的影响。方法:选取2020年1月—2022年6月郑州市中心医院收治的145例后腹膜外腔镜手术患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为对照组(n=72)和观察组(n=73)。对照组接受气管插管全麻,观察组在接受气管插管全麻前,先行超声引导ESPB。比较两组患者生命体征指标(心率和平均动脉压)、疼痛程度(VAS评分)、舒适度量表(BCS)评分、不良反应情况。结果:两组患者心率和平均动脉压t1、t2、t3、t4比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.6834、1.8482、1.7399、1.7494、0.6387、0.7817、1.5779、0.5542,P>0.05);观察组患者术后3 h、12 h、24 h VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=34.6829、36.1259、28.9776,P<0.05);观察组患者术后3 h、12 h、24 h BCS评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=100.4104、49.0955、45.8380,P<0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.1139,P>0.05)。结论:将超声引导ESPB应用于腹膜外腔镜手术中,术后镇痛效果好,患者舒适度高,安全且有效。展开更多
文摘Objective This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesia and recovery of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with serratus anterior plane block(ESPB combined with SAPB)versus thoracic paravertebral block(PVB)after thoracoscopic surgery.Methods Ninety-two patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS)were randomly divided into group S(n=46)and group P(n=46).After anesthesia induction,the same anesthesiologist performed ultrasound-guided ESPB at T5 and T7 levels combined with SAPB at the level of the fifth rib in the midaxillary line in group S and ultrasound-guided PVB at T5 and T7 levels in group P.Patients in both groups were given 40 mL of 0.4%ropivacaine.Eighty-six patients completed the study(group S,n=44;group P,n=42).The morphine consumption,visual analogue scale(VAS)scores at rest and coughing,and frequency of remedial analgesia were recorded at 1,2,4,8,and 24 h postoperatively.Pulmonary function parameters were recorded at 1,4,and 24 h postoperatively,and the quality of recovery(QoR)-15 score at 24 h postoperatively.The adverse effects,duration of chest tube drainage and length of stay were also recorded.Results The morphine consumption at postoperative 4 and 8 h and the incidence of ipsilateral shoulder pain(ISP)were significantly lower in group S than in group P.The QoR-15 questionnaire score at postoperative 24 h was significantly lower in group P than in group S(P<0.05).The morphine consumption was lower at 24 h postoperatively in group S than in group P,with no significant difference found yet.The morphine consumption at other observed times,VAS scores,pulmonary function parameters,frequency of remedial analgesia,duration of chest tube drainage,length of stay,and incidence of other adverse events were comparable between group S and group P.Conclusion Ultrasound-guided ESPB combined with SAPB is non-inferior to PVB in terms of morphine consumption at postoperative 24 h and postoperative recovery.But,this approach can significantly reduce morphine consumption in the early postoperative period(0–8 h)after thoracoscopy with lower incidence of ISP.It is a simpler and safer operation.
文摘Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block that was first described in 2016. It is considered an alternative for brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgeries as the erector spinae muscle extends to the cervical level. Herein, we present a successful multilevel ESPB plus an interscalene block using liposomal bupivacaine in a 45-year-old female patient with metastatic sarcoma who presented for scapula and proximal humerus resection. The post-operative course was smooth, and the patient was discharged home on post-operative day 2 with minimal narcotic requirements.
文摘BACKGROUND Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery usually suffer severe pain in the postoperative period.The erector spinae plane block(ESPB),first published in 2016,can anesthetize the ventral and dorsal rami of thoracic nerves and produce an extensive multi-dermatomal sensory block.AIM To assess whether bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB at a lower thoracic level could improve pain control and quality of recovery in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.METHODS A total of 60 patients aged 18-80 years scheduled to undergo lumbar spine surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups:ESPB group(preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB at T10 vertebral level)and control group(no preoperative ESPB).Both groups received standard general anesthesia.The main indicator was the duration to the first patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)bolus.RESULTS In the ESPB group,the duration to the first PCIA bolus was significantly longer than that in the control group(h)[8.0(4.5,17.0)vs 1.0(0.5,6),P<0.01],and resting and coughing numerical rating scale(NRS)scores at 48 h post operation were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding resting and coughing NRS scores at 24 h post operation.Sufentanil consumption during the operation was significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the control group(P<0.01),while there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding morphine consumption at 24 or 48 h post operation.In the ESPB group,Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score within 20 min after extubation was higher and duration in the post-anesthesia care unit was shorter than those in the control group(P<0.01).CONCLUSION In patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery,ultrasound-guided ESPB at a lower thoracic level improves the analgesic effect,reduces opioid consumption,and improves postoperative recovery.
文摘Epidural analgesia has long been regarded as the gold standard in abdominal surgery. However, concerns regarding risks associated with central neuraxial blockade, catheter placement and the presence of coagulopathy in patients undergoing liver resection have limited its use. Bilateral erector spinae plane blocks and catheter placement may mimic the effects of epidural analgesia by blocking both somatic and visceral pain while concomitantly avoiding central neuraxial blockade and catheter placement. We describe our experience in using the erector spinae plane block and catheter placement as part of a multimodal analgesia approach in a patient undergoing laparoscopic and another patient undergoing open liver resection. Our findings concur with previous reports which suggest that erector spinae plane blocks may be more efficacious as somatic rather than visceral analgesia. However, we conclude that further studies on factors affecting its efficacy should be conducted in view of the present lack of researched evidence.
文摘<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated patients who underwent elective lumbar stenosis surgery between February 1, 2019, and April 1, 2019. Patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis under general anesthesia alone were compared with those who underwent general anesthesia combined with erector spinae plane block.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aims:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">We aimed to retrospectively evaluate whether erector spinae plane block reduced opioid consumption following surgery for spinal stenosis.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study Design:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective observational study</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">We collected data on the pain scores, time for the first requirement for patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia dose, requirement for rescue analgesia, time to first stand up postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Sixty patients were included in the study. The numerical rating scale</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">’</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s pain scores were significantly lower in the erector spinae plane group at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours than in the general anesthesia group. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was higher in the general anesthesia group than in the ESP group [212.0 (6.6) mg, vs. 107.3 (36.9 mg), (p <0.001)]. The time to first stand up after surgery was significantly longer in the general anesthesia group (p = 0.011).</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ESP block appear to be an effective method to relieve pain after lumbar surgery.</span>
文摘Since the original publication on the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in 2016, the technique of the ESP block has evolved significantly in the last few years. This review highlights recent developments in the technique for administering the ESP block and proposes directions for future research. Continuous efforts are being aimed at improving understanding regarding the administration of the ESP block. Current reports suggest that the ESP block provides effective analgesia in thoracic and abdominal sites in patients of all ages. However, no cohort studies or randomized controlled trials were performed in 2016 and 2017. The ESP block is an effective analgesic tool in a wide range of sites. However. We are uncertain how effective the ESP block is compared to other types of regional anesthesia. Therefore, more research on ESP blocks is required.
文摘目的:探讨超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在后腹膜外腔镜手术中的镇痛效果及对生命体征指标、视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)疼痛评分、舒适度评分的影响。方法:选取2020年1月—2022年6月郑州市中心医院收治的145例后腹膜外腔镜手术患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为对照组(n=72)和观察组(n=73)。对照组接受气管插管全麻,观察组在接受气管插管全麻前,先行超声引导ESPB。比较两组患者生命体征指标(心率和平均动脉压)、疼痛程度(VAS评分)、舒适度量表(BCS)评分、不良反应情况。结果:两组患者心率和平均动脉压t1、t2、t3、t4比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.6834、1.8482、1.7399、1.7494、0.6387、0.7817、1.5779、0.5542,P>0.05);观察组患者术后3 h、12 h、24 h VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=34.6829、36.1259、28.9776,P<0.05);观察组患者术后3 h、12 h、24 h BCS评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=100.4104、49.0955、45.8380,P<0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.1139,P>0.05)。结论:将超声引导ESPB应用于腹膜外腔镜手术中,术后镇痛效果好,患者舒适度高,安全且有效。
