Sporadic gastrinoma with refractory benign esophageal stricture:A case report

BACKGROUND Gastrinoma is characterized by an excessive release of gastrin,leading to hypersecretion of gastric acid,subsequently resulting in recurrent peptic ulcers,chronic diarrhea,and even esophageal strictures.This case report aims to improve awareness and facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of gastrinoma by presenting a rare case of gastrinoma with refractory benign esophageal stricture(RBES).Additionally,it highlights the persistent challenges that gastroenterologists encounter in managing RBES.CASE SUMMARY This case demonstrates a patient with gastrinoma who developed RBES and complete esophageal obstruction despite management with maximal acid suppressive therapy,multiple endoscopic bougie dilations and endoscopic incisional therapy(EIT).CONCLUSION It is essential to diagnose gastrinoma as early as possible,as inadequately controlled acid secretion over an extended period increases the risk of developing severe esophageal strictures.In patients with esophageal strictures causing complete luminal obstruction,blind reopening EIT presents challenges and carries a high risk of perforation.

Endoscopic treatment of extreme esophageal stenosis complicated with esophagotracheal fistula: A case report

BACKGROUND At present,there is no unified and effective treatment for extreme corrosive esophageal stenosis(CES)with esophagotracheal fistula(ETF).This case had extreme and severe esophageal stenosis(ES)and ETF after ingesting an enzyme-based chemical detergent,resulting in a serious pulmonary infection and severe malnutrition.Upper gastrointestinal imaging showed that he had an ETF,and endoscopy showed that he had extreme and severe esophageal stricture.This case was complex and difficult to treat.According to the domestic and foreign lite-rature,there is no universal treatment that is low-risk.CASE SUMMARY A patient came to our hospital with extreme ES,an ETF,and severe malnutrition complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis 1 mo after the consumption of an enzy-me-based detergent.The ES was serious,and the endoscope was unable to pass through the esophagus.We treated him by endoscopic incision method(EIM),esophageal stent placement(ESP),and endoscopic balloon dilation(EBD)by using the bronchoscope and gastroscope.This treatment not only closed the ETF,but also expanded the esophagus,with minimal trauma,greatly reducing the pain of the patient.According to the literature,there are no similar reported cases.CONCLUSION We report,for the first time,a patient with extreme CES complicated with ETF,where the endoscope could not be passed through his esophagus but he could be examined by bronchoscopy and treated by EIM,ESP,and EBD.

Management of urethral strictures and stenosis caused by the endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasiad-a single-center experience

Objective:Urethral stricture disease after endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a sparsely described complication.We describe management of five categories of these strictures in this retrospective observational case series.Methods:One hundred and twenty-one patients presenting with symptoms of bladder outflow obstruction after endo-urological intervention for BPH from February 2016 to March 2019 were evaluated.Among them,76 were eligible for this study and underwent reconstructive surgery.Preoperative and postoperative assessments were done with symptom scores,uroflowmetry,ultrasound for post-void residue,and urethrogram.Any intervention during follow-up was classed as a failure.The recurrence and 95%confidence interval for recurrence percentage were calculated.Results:The following five categories of patients were identified:Bulbo-membranous(33[43.4%]),navicular fossa(21[27.6%]),penile/peno-bulbar(8[10.5%]),bladder neck stenosis(6[7.9%]),and multiple locations(8[10.5%]).The average age was 69 years(range:60-84 years).Overall average symptom score,flow rate,and post-void residue changed from 21 to 7,6 mL/s to 19 mL/s,and 210 mL to 20 mL,respectively.The average follow-up was 34 months(range:12-58 months).Overall recurrence and complication rates were 10.5%and 9.2%,respectively.The recurrence in each category was seen in 3,1,2,1,and 1 patient,respectively.Overall 95% confidence interval for recurrence percentage was 4.66-19.69.Conclusion:Urethral stricture disease is a major long-term complication of endo-urological treatment of BPH.The bulbo-membranous strictures need continence preserving approach.Navicular fossa strictures require minimally invasive and cosmetic consideration.Peno-bulbar strictures require judicious use of grafts and flaps.Bladder neck stenosis in this cohort could be treated with endoscopic measures.Multiple locations need treatment based on their sites in single-stage as far as possible.

Combined treatment of refractory benign stricture after esophageal endoscopic mucosal dissection:A case report

BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)post-procedure stricture is a relatively common long-term complication following ESD treatment.A range of approaches has been implemented for the treatment of post-procedural stricture using endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic dilation,self-expandable metallic stent insertion,local steroid injection in the esophagus,oral steroid administration,radial incision and cutting(RIC).The actual efficacy of these different therapeutic options is highly variable,and uniform international standards for the prevention or treatment of stricture.CASE SUMMARY In this report,we describe the case of a 51-year-old male diagnosed with early esophageal cancer.To protect against esophageal stricture,the patient was administered oral steroids and underwent self-expandable metallic stent insertion for 45 d.Despite these interventions,stricture was detected at the lower edge of the stent following its removal.The patient remained refractory to multiple rounds of endoscopic bougie dilation treatment,and thus suffered from complex refractory benign esophageal stricture.As such,RIC combined with bougie dilation and steroid injection was employed to treat this patient more effectively,ultimately achieving satisfactory therapeutic efficacy.CONCLUSION Combination of RIC,dilation,and steroid injection can be safely and effectively implemented to treat cases of post-ESD refractory esophageal stricture.

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal diseases: A pooled analysis of the literature

AIM: To analyze the outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal strictures and benign esophageal leaks in the literature.METHODS: The Pub Med, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 2000 and July 2014. Eight prospective studies were identified that analyzed the outcomes of stent placement for refractory benign esophageal strictures. The outcomes of stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforations and fistulae were extracted from 20 retrospective studies that were published after the inclusion period of a recent systematic review. Data were pooled and analyzed using descriptive statistics.RESULTS: Fully covered self-expandable metal stents(FC SEMS)(n = 85), biodegradable(BD) stents(n = 77) and self-expandable plastic stents(SEPS)(n = 70) were inserted in 232 patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures. The overall clinical success rate was 24.2% and according to stent type 14.1% for FC SEMS, 32.9% for BD stents and 27.1% for SEPS. Stent migration occurred in 24.6% of cases. The overall complication rate was 31.0%, including major(17.7%) and minor(13.4%) complications. A total of 643 patients were treated with self-expandable stents mainly for postsurgical leaks(64.5%), iatrogenic perforations(19.6%), Boerhaave's syndrome(7.8%) and fistulae(3.7%). FC SEMS and partially covered SEMS were used in the majority of patients. Successful closure of the defect was achieved in 76.8% of patients and according to etiology in 81.4% for postsurgical leaks, 86.0% for perforations and 64.7% for fistulae. The pooled stent migration rate was 16.5%. Stent-related complications occurred in 13.4% of patients, including major(7.8%) and minor(5.5%) complications.CONCLUSION: The outcomes of stent placement for refractory benign esophageal strictures were poor. However, randomized trials are needed to put this into perspective. The evidence on successful stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforationsand fistulae is promising.

Intralesional steroid is beneficial in benign refractory esophageal strictures:A meta-analysis

AIM To analyze the effect of intralesional steroid injections in addition to endoscopic dilation of benign refractory esophageal strictures.METHODS A comprehensive search was performed in three databases from inception to 10 April 2017 to identify trials, comparing the efficacy of endoscopic dilation to dilation combined with intralesional steroid injections. Following the data extraction, meta-analytical calculations were performed on measures of outcome by the randomeffects method of Der Simonian and Laird. Heterogeneity of the studies was tested by Cochrane's Q and I^2 statistics. Risk of quality and bias was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and JADAD assessment tools.RESULTS Eleven articles were identified suitable for analyses, involving 343 patients, 235 cases and 229 controls in total. Four studies used crossover design with 121 subjects enrolled. The periodic dilation index(PDI) was comparable in 4 studies, where the pooled result showed a significant improvement of PDI in the steroid group(MD:-1.12 dilation/month, 95% CI:-1.99 to -0.25 P = 0.012; I^2 = 74.4%). The total number of repeat dilations(TNRD) was comparable in 5 studies and showed a non-significant decrease(MD:-1.17, 95%CI:-0.24-0.05, P = 0.057; I^2 = 0), while the dysphagia score(DS) was comparable in 5 studies and did not improve(SMD: 0.35, 95%CI:-0.38, 1.08, P = 0.351; I^2 = 83.98%) after intralesional steroid injection.CONCLUSION Intralesional steroid injection increases the time between endoscopic dilations of benign refractory esophageal strictures. However, its potential role needs further research.

Silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium stent for treating benign esophageal stricture in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND Stent insertion can effective alleviate the symptoms of benign esophageal strictures(BES).Magnesium alloy stents are a good candidate because of biological safety,but show a poor corrosion resistance and a quick loss of mechanical support in vivo.AIM To test the therapeutic and adverse effects of a silicone-covered magnesium alloy biodegradable esophageal stent.METHODS Fifteen rabbits underwent silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium stent insertion into the benign esophageal stricture under fluoroscopic guidance(stent group).The wall reconstruction and tissue reaction of stenotic esophagus in the stent group were compared with those of six esophageal stricture models(control group).Esophagography was performed at 1,2,and 3 weeks.Four,six,and five rabbits in the stent group and two rabbits in the control groups were euthanized,respectively,at each time point for histological examination.RESULTS All stent insertions were well tolerated.The esophageal diameters at immediately,1,2 and 3 wk were 9.8±0.3 mm,9.7±0.7 mm,9.4±0.8 mm,and 9.2±0.5 mm,respectively(vs 4.9±0.3 mm before stent insertion;P<0.05).Magnesium stents migrated in eight rabbits[one at 1 wk(1/15),three at 2 wk(3/11),and four at 3 wk(4/5)].Esophageal wall remodeling(thinner epithelial and smooth muscle layers)was found significantly thinner in the stent group than in the control group(P<0.05).Esophageal injury and collagen deposition following stent insertion were similar and did not differ compared to rabbits with esophageal stricture and normal rabbits(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Esophageal silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium stent insertion is feasible for BES without causing severe injury or tissue reaction.Our study suggests that insertion of silicone-covered magnesium esophageal stent is a promising approach for treating BES.

Application of Paclitaxel as Adjuvant Treatment for Benign Cicatricial Airway Stenosis

Benign cicatricial airway stenosis（BCAS） is a potentially life-threatening disease.Recurrence occurs frequently after endoscopic treatment.Paclitaxel is known to prevent restenosis,but its clinical efficacy and safety is undetermined.Therefore,in this study,we investigated the efficacy and associated complications of paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for BCAS of different etiologies.The study cohort included 28 patients with BCAS resulting from tuberculosis,intubation,tracheotomy,and other etiologies.All patients were treated at the Department of Respiratory Diseases,Beijing Tian Tan Hospital,Capital Medical University,China,between January 2010 and August 2014.After primary treatment by balloon dilation,cryotherapy,and/or high-frequency needle-knife treatment,paclitaxel was applied to the airway mucosa at the site of stenosis using a newly developed local instillation catheter.The primary outcome measures were the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment,and the incidence of complications was observed as well.According to our criteria for evaluating the clinical effects on BCAS,24 of the 28 cases achieved durable remission,three cases had remission,and one case showed no remission.Thus,the durable remission rate was 85.7%,and the combined effective rate was 96.4%.No differences in outcomes were observed among the different BCAS etiologies（P=0.144）,and few complications were observed.Our results indicated that paclitaxel as an adjuvant treatment has greater efficacy than previously reported BCAS treatment methods.

Benign esophageal stricture after thermal injury treated with esophagectomy and ileocolon interposition

Thermal injuries of the esophagus are rare causes of benign esophageal stricture, and all published cases were successfully treated with conservative management. A 28-year-old Japanese man with a thermal esophageal injury caused by drinking a cup of hot coffee six months earlier was referred to our hospital. The hot coffee was consumed in a single gulp at a party. Although the patient had been treated conservatively at another hospital, his symptoms of dysphagia gradually worsened after discharge. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and computed tomography revealed a pinhole like area of stricture located 19 cm distally from the incisors to the esophagogastric junction, as well as circumferential stenosis with notable wall thickness at the same site. The patient underwent a thoracoscopic esophageal resection with reconstruction using ileocolon interposition. The pathological findings revealed wall thickening along the entire length of the esophagus, with massive fibrosis extending to the muscularis propria and adventitia at almost all levels. Treatment with balloon dilation for long areas of stricture is generally difficult, and stent placement in patients with benign esophageal stricture, particularly young patients, is not yet widely accepted due to the incidence of late adverse events. Considering the curability and qualityof-life associated with a long expected prognosis, we determined that surgery was the best treatment option for this young patient. In this case, we decided to perform an esophagectomy and reconstruction with ileocolon interposition in order to preserve the reservoir function of the stomach and to avoid any problems related to the reflux of gastric contents. In conclusion, resection of the esophagus is a treatment option in patients with benign esophageal injury, especially in cases involving young patients with refractory esophageal stricture. In addition, ileocolon interposition may help to improve the quality-of-life of patients.

Development and validation of a model to determine risk of refractory benign esophageal strictures

BACKGROUND Current research has identified several risk factors for refractory benign esophageal strictures (RBES), but research is scarce on the prediction of RBES in benign esophageal strictures patients. Meanwhile, the long-term outcomes of RBES remain unclear. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a model to determine the progression of RBES in patients with benign esophageal strictures. And we also explored the long-term outcomes and safety in patients with RBES. AIM To develop and validate a model to determine the progression of RBES in patients with benign esophageal strictures, based on the demographic data and endoscopic findings. METHODS A total of 507 benign esophageal stricture patients treated by dilation alone or in combination with stenting were retrospectively enrolled between January 2009 and February 2018. The primary outcome was to establish a risk-scoring model predicting RBES in benign esophageal strictures. The secondary outcome was to explore the clinical effectiveness and adverse events in patients with RBES. RESULTS In the study, age, etiology, and number and length of strictures were the independent risk factors for the refractory performance of benign esophageal strictures. According to risk factors of benign esophageal strictures, a risk-scoring model for predicting RBES in benign esophageal strictures was established: The risk score ranged from 0 to 8 points, and the risk scores were divided into low risk (0-2 points), intermediate risk (3-5 points), and high risk (6-8 points). The proportions of RBES in the corresponding risk categories were 1.0%, 12.2%, and 76.0%, respectively. Among 507 patients, 57 had RBES (39 males;median age, 60 years). The success rate of dilation treatment (51.2%, 21/41) was higher than that of stent placement (37.5%, 6/16). CONCLUSION In this study, 11.3%(57/507) patients had RBES at our hospital. The risk-scoring model predicting RBES in benign esophageal strictures could predict the longterm outcome of patients with strictures ahead.

Endoscopic magnetic compression stricturoplasty for congenital esophageal stenosis:A case report

BACKGROUND Congenital esophageal stenosis(CES)is a rare malformation of the digestive tract.Endoscopic dilation and thoracotomy have been the main treatments for CES.However,there is no well-defined management protocol.Magnetic compression stricturoplasty(MCS)has been used in refractory esophageal stricture in children after esophageal atresia.CASE SUMMARY We describe the first case of MCS for CES in one female child patient.The child(aged 3 years and 1 mo)was admitted due to frequent vomiting and choking after eating complementary food since 7 mo old.Esophagography and gastroendoscopy showed that there was stenosis in the lower esophagus,suggesting a diagnosis of CES.The patient did not receive any treatment for esophageal stricture including surgery or endoscopic dilation procedures before MCS.MCS procedure was smoothly conducted without complications.At 24 mo after MCS,durable esophageal patency without dysphagia was achieved.CONCLUSION MCS may serve as an alternative and efficient method for patients with CES.

Stent type used does not impact complication rate or placement time but can decrease treatment cost for benign and malignant esophageal lesions

AIM: To evaluate if differences exist between selfexpanding esophageal metal stents(SEMS) and selfexpanding esophageal plastic stents(SEPS) when used for benign or malignant esophageal disorders with regard to safety, efficacy, clinical outcomes, placement ease and cost.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate outcome in patients having SEPS/SEMS placed for malignant or benign esophageal conditions from January 2005 to April 2012. Inclusion criteria was completed SEMS/SEPS placement. Outcomes assessed included technical success of and time required for stent placement, procedure-related complications, need for repeat intervention, hospital stay, mortality and costs.RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent stent placement for either benign/malignant esophagealdisease during the study period. Thirty patients had SEMS(25 male, mean age 59.6 years old) and 13 patients had SEPS(10 male, mean age 61.7 years old). Placement outcome as well as complication rate(SEPS 23.1%, SEMS 25.2%) and in-hospital mortality(SEPS 7.7%, SEMS 6.7%) after placement did not differ between stent types. Migration was the most frequent complication reported occurring equally between types(SEPS 66.7%, SEMS 57.1%). SEPS was less costly than SEMS, decreasing institutional cost by $255/stent.CONCLUSION: SEPS and SEMS have similar outcomes when used for benign or malignant esophageal conditions. However, SEPS use results in decreased costs without impacting care.

Safety and outcome using endoscopic dilatation for benign esophageal stricture without fluoroscopy

AIM:To investigate the use of Savary-Gilliard marked dilators in tight esophageal strictures without fluoros-copy. METHODS:Seventy-two patients with signif icant dysphagia from benign strictures due to a variety of causes were dilated endoscopically. Patients with achalasia, malignant lesions or external compression were excluded. The procedure consisted of two parts. First, a guide wire was placed through video endoscopy and then dilatation was performed without fluoroscopy. In general, "the rule of three" was followed. Effective treatment was defi ned as the ability of patients, with or without repeated dilatations, to maintain a solid or semisolid diet for more than12mo. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty two dilatations in a total of72patients were carried out. The success rate for placement of a guide wire was100%and for dilatation97%,without use of fluoroscopy, after6mo to4years of follow-up.The number of sessions per patient was between1and7,with an average of2sessions.The ability of patients, after 1 or more sessions of dilatation, to maintain a solid or semisolid diet for more than 12mo was obtained in70patients(95.8%).For very tight esophageal strictures, all patients improved clinically without complications after the endoscopic procedure without fluoroscopy, but we noted3failures. CONCLUSION:Dilatation using Savary-Gilliard dilators without fluoroscopy is safe and effective in the treatment of very tight esophageal strictures if performed with care.

Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a patient with esophageal stenosis: A case report

BACKGROUND Superior mesenteric artery syndrome(SMAS)is a rare condition,characterized by duodenal obstruction caused by compression of its third part by the superior mesenteric artery(SMA).Most cases of SMAS are associated with weight loss,and the most frequent clinical manifestations are nausea,vomiting,postprandial fullness,and abdominal pain.Treatment of SMAS is usually conservative,consisting mainly of adequate nutritional support,but in refractory cases surgery may be necessary,with gastrojejunostomy and duodenojejunostomy being the most commonly performed procedures.CASE SUMMARY We describe the case of a man in his forties with a pre-existing diagnosis of esophageal stricture due to sodium hydroxide ingestion,who suffered significant weight loss after replacement of his jejunostomy tube.He was admitted to the hospital due to pain and abdominal distension.A computerized tomography scan showed significant distension of the stomach and duodenum with narrowing of the duodenum at the point at which it is crossed by the superior mesenteric artery,thus establishing the diagnosis of SMAS.Due to the presence of the esophageal stricture,the patient was incapable of emesis;however,passage of a nasogastric tube for decompression was not possible.Considering the risk of gastric perforation due to distention,we opted for surgical treatment in the form of a surgical gastrojejunostomy after which he showed complete resolution of all symptoms and was discharged from the hospital 5 d after the procedure.CONCLUSION Diagnosis of SMAS can be challenging in patients with esophageal stenosis,and risk of gastric perforation may preclude conservative treatment.

Endoscopic management of esophageal stenosis in children:New and traditional treatments

Post-esophageal atresia anastomotic strictures and postcorrosive esophagitis are the most frequent types of cicatricial esophageal stricture. Congenital esophageal stenosis has been reported to be a rare but typical disease in children; other pediatric conditions are peptic, eosinophilic esophagitis and dystrophic recessive epidermolysis bullosa strictures. The conservative treatment of esophageal stenosis and strictures(ES) rather than surgery is a well-known strategy for children. Before planning esophageal dilation, the esophageal morphology should be assessed in detail for its length, aspect, number and level, and different conservative strategies should be chosen accordingly. Endoscopic dilators and techniques that involve different adjuvant treatment strategies have been reported and depend on the stricture's etiology, the availability of different tools and the operator's experience and preferences. Balloon and semirigid dilators are the most frequently used tools. No high-quality studies have reported on the differences in the efficacies and rates of complications associated with these two types of dilators. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the frequency of dilations or the diameter that should be achieved. The use of adjuvant treatments has been reported in cases of recalcitrant stenosis or strictures with evidence of dysphagic symptoms. Corticosteroids(either systemically or locally injected), the local application of mitomycin C, diathermy and laser ES sectioning have been reported. Some authors have suggested that stenting can reduce both the number of dilations and the treatment length. In many cases, this strategy is effective when either metallic or plastic stents are utilized. Treatment complications, such esophageal perforations, can be conservatively managed, considering surgery only in cases with severe pleural cavity involvement. In cases of stricture relapse,even if such relapses occur following the execution of well-conducted conservative strategies, surgical stricture resection and anastomosis or esophageal substitution are the only remaining options.

Endoscopic management for congenital esophageal stenosis: A systematic review

Congenital esophageal stenosis(CES) is an extremely rare malformation, and standard treatment have not been completely established. By years of clinical research, evidence has been accumulated. We conducted systematic review to assess outcomes of the treatment for CES, especially the role of endoscopic modalities. A total of 144 literatures were screened and reviewed. CES was categorized in fibromuscularthickening, tracheobronchial remnants(TBR) and membranous web, and the frequency was 54%, 30% and 16%, respectively. Therapeutic option includes surgery and dilatation, and surgery tends to be reserved for ineffective dilatation. An essential point is that dilatation for TBR type of CES has low success rate and high rate of perforation. TBR can be distinguished by using endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS). Overall success rate of dilatation for CES with or without case selection by using EUS was 90% and 29%, respectively. Overall rate of perforation with or without case selection was 7% and 24%, respectively. By case selection using EUS, high success rate with low rate of perforation could be achieved. In conclusion, endoscopic dilatation has been established as a primary therapy for CES except TBR type. Repetitive dilatation with gradual step-up might be one of safe ways to minimize the risk of perforation.

Recurrent cervical esophageal stenosis after colon conduit failure:Use of myocutaneous flap

A 53-year-old male developed cervical esophageal stenosis after esophageal bypass surgery using a right colon conduit.The esophageal bypass surgery was performed to treat multiple esophageal strictures resulting from corrosive ingestion three years prior to presentation.Although the patient underwent several endoscopic stricture dilatations after surgery,he continued to suffer from recurrent esophageal stenosis.We planned cervical patch esophagoplasty with a pedicled skin flap of sternocleidomastoid(SCM) muscle.Postoperative recovery was successful,and the patient could eat a solid meal without difficulty and has been well for 18 mo.SCM flap esophagoplasty is an easier and safer method of managing complicated and recurrent cervical esophageal strictures than other operations.

Esophageal stenosis with sloughing esophagitis:A curious manifestation of graft-vs-host disease

We report a case of a 56-year-old woman with a history of allogenic bone marrow transplantation for two years,complaining with dysphagia and weight loss. Upper endoscopy revealed esophageal stenosis and extensive mucosa sloughing. Biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of graft-vs-host disease(GVHD). Balloon dilation,corticosteroids and cyclosporin resulted in marked clinical improvement. Gastrointestinal tract is involved in the majority of patients with chronic GVHD. Esophageal manifestations are rare and include vesiculobullous disease,ulceration,esophageal webs,casts or strictures. Sloughing esophagitis along with severe stenosis requiring endoscopic dilation has never been reported in this context.

Use of tunnel endoscopy for diagnosis of obscure submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma:A case report and review of the literature with emphasis on causes of esophageal stenosis

BACKGROUND The tunnel endoscopic technique is the treatment of choice for submucosal tumors. However, the use of tunnel endoscopy to diagnose adenocarcinoma of the esophagus originating from the submucosa has not been well studied.CASE SUMMARY A 74-year-old man who presented with dysphagia for half a year underwent a series of checks, such as gastroendoscopy, X-ray contrast examination of the upper digestive tract, endoscopic ultrasonography, high-resolution esophageal manometry, and positron emission computed tomography. It should be noted that the stenosis of the esophagus was too narrow for endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine needle aspiration. The cause remained undiagnosed. Eventually, the tunnel endoscopic technique was perform for the pathological examination in the submucosa and the final diagnosis was adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The patient and family members chose expectant treatment due to the patient's age and the high costs of surgical treatment.CONCLUSION Tunnel endoscopy could be used to diagnose tumors. Moreover, we review the literature to provide guidance regarding the causes of esophagostenosis.

Surgical treatment of cicatricial esophageal stenosis in infants

Objective To review the results of surgical management of cicatricial esophageal stenosis secondary to chemical burn. Methods Retrospective study was carried out on 30 children ( male 20, female 10 ) with esophagageal cicatricial stenosis. The mean age was 29 months (17 to 60 months) and body weight ranged from 5 to 20 kilograms. One child ingested pesticide whereas the remaining ingested acidic of caustic solutions. There children had complete obliteration of cervical esophagus, 5 had near-complete obliteration and the remaining showed stringy esophageal outline on barium meal study. Five children developed stridor and inspiratory dyspnea. Six children had previous gastrostomy. All patients underwent retrosternal colonic replacement based on left ascending colonic artery. Results Post-operatively, one patient developed anastomotic leakage and one anastomotic stenosis. One patient underwent a post-operative tracheostomy. There was no mortality. All patients were followed-up for 4-20 years with normal