福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedding,FFPE)是最常见的临床组织保存技术,FFPE组织具有标准化的制备流程、易于存储、标本量大、包含较完整的临床回顾性信息等特点,而成为疾病生物标志物发掘的良好载体。近年来...福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedding,FFPE)是最常见的临床组织保存技术,FFPE组织具有标准化的制备流程、易于存储、标本量大、包含较完整的临床回顾性信息等特点,而成为疾病生物标志物发掘的良好载体。近年来,基于临床FFPE组织的特点,发展了系列蛋白质组学研究方法,包括样本制备、消解、分离到蛋白质质谱鉴定等多个领域,总体呈现出微量、高灵敏度、高通量的技术特点,并已成功用于肿瘤精准医学等临床蛋白质组研究。该综述将对FFPE组织切片样本的蛋白质组学方法,以及其在肿瘤研究中的应用进行概述,从而为临床精准医学蛋白质组学的研究提供借鉴思路。展开更多
BACKGROUND Nucleic acid isolation from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue(FFPET)samples is a daily routine in molecular pathology laboratories, but extraction from FFPET is not always easily achieved. Choosing t...BACKGROUND Nucleic acid isolation from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue(FFPET)samples is a daily routine in molecular pathology laboratories, but extraction from FFPET is not always easily achieved. Choosing the right extraction technique is key for further examinations.AIM To compare the performance of four commercially available kits used for DNA extraction in routine practice.METHODS DNA isolation was performed on 46 randomly selected formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded(FFPE) colorectal adenocarcinoma(CRC) surgical specimens. Four commercially available extraction kits were used: two for manual DNA extraction(the Pure Link Genomic DNA Mini Kit from Invitrogen and the High Pure FFPE DNA Isolation Kit from Roche) and two for automated DNA extraction(the i Prep Genomic DNA Kit from Invitrogen and the Magna Pure LC DNA Isolation Kit from Roche). The DNA concentration and quality(odds ratio) among the four systems were compared. The results were correlated with the clinicopathological aspects of CRC cases: age, gender, localization, macro-and microscopic features,lymph node metastases, and the lymph node ratio.RESULTS The highest DNA concentration was obtained using the manual kits: 157.24 ±62.99 ng/μL for the Pure Link Genomic DNA Mini Kit and 86.64 ng/μL± 43.84 for the High Pure FFPE DNA Isolation Kit(P < 0.0001). Lower concentrations were obtained with automated systems: 20.39 ± 21.19 ng/μL for the Magna Pure LC DNA Isolation Kit and 8.722 ± 6.408 ng/μL for the i Prep Genomic DNA Kit,with differences between the systems used(P < 0.0001). The comparison between age, gender, tumor localization, pT or pN stage and the lymph node ratio indicated no statistically significant difference in DNA concentration using any of the nucleic acid isolation kits. DNA concentration was influenced by the macroscopic features and grade of differentiation. A higher DNA concentration was obtained for well-differentiated polypoid colorectal adenocarcinomas(CRCs), compared with undifferentiated ulcero-infiltrative carcinomas,irrespective of the kit used.CONCLUSION For research or diagnosis that needs high DNA concentrations, manual methods of DNA isolation should be used. A higher amount of DNA can be obtained from polypoid-type differentiated CRCs. Automated systems confer comfort and a lower amount of DNA that is, however, sufficient for classic polymerase chain reaction(PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR molecular examinations. All four commercially available kits can be successfully used in daily practice.展开更多
文摘福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedding,FFPE)是最常见的临床组织保存技术,FFPE组织具有标准化的制备流程、易于存储、标本量大、包含较完整的临床回顾性信息等特点,而成为疾病生物标志物发掘的良好载体。近年来,基于临床FFPE组织的特点,发展了系列蛋白质组学研究方法,包括样本制备、消解、分离到蛋白质质谱鉴定等多个领域,总体呈现出微量、高灵敏度、高通量的技术特点,并已成功用于肿瘤精准医学等临床蛋白质组研究。该综述将对FFPE组织切片样本的蛋白质组学方法,以及其在肿瘤研究中的应用进行概述,从而为临床精准医学蛋白质组学的研究提供借鉴思路。
基金the University of Medicine,Pharmacy,Science and Technology Research Grant,No.275/11.01.2017
文摘BACKGROUND Nucleic acid isolation from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue(FFPET)samples is a daily routine in molecular pathology laboratories, but extraction from FFPET is not always easily achieved. Choosing the right extraction technique is key for further examinations.AIM To compare the performance of four commercially available kits used for DNA extraction in routine practice.METHODS DNA isolation was performed on 46 randomly selected formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded(FFPE) colorectal adenocarcinoma(CRC) surgical specimens. Four commercially available extraction kits were used: two for manual DNA extraction(the Pure Link Genomic DNA Mini Kit from Invitrogen and the High Pure FFPE DNA Isolation Kit from Roche) and two for automated DNA extraction(the i Prep Genomic DNA Kit from Invitrogen and the Magna Pure LC DNA Isolation Kit from Roche). The DNA concentration and quality(odds ratio) among the four systems were compared. The results were correlated with the clinicopathological aspects of CRC cases: age, gender, localization, macro-and microscopic features,lymph node metastases, and the lymph node ratio.RESULTS The highest DNA concentration was obtained using the manual kits: 157.24 ±62.99 ng/μL for the Pure Link Genomic DNA Mini Kit and 86.64 ng/μL± 43.84 for the High Pure FFPE DNA Isolation Kit(P < 0.0001). Lower concentrations were obtained with automated systems: 20.39 ± 21.19 ng/μL for the Magna Pure LC DNA Isolation Kit and 8.722 ± 6.408 ng/μL for the i Prep Genomic DNA Kit,with differences between the systems used(P < 0.0001). The comparison between age, gender, tumor localization, pT or pN stage and the lymph node ratio indicated no statistically significant difference in DNA concentration using any of the nucleic acid isolation kits. DNA concentration was influenced by the macroscopic features and grade of differentiation. A higher DNA concentration was obtained for well-differentiated polypoid colorectal adenocarcinomas(CRCs), compared with undifferentiated ulcero-infiltrative carcinomas,irrespective of the kit used.CONCLUSION For research or diagnosis that needs high DNA concentrations, manual methods of DNA isolation should be used. A higher amount of DNA can be obtained from polypoid-type differentiated CRCs. Automated systems confer comfort and a lower amount of DNA that is, however, sufficient for classic polymerase chain reaction(PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR molecular examinations. All four commercially available kits can be successfully used in daily practice.
