Effects of Shenqi Xiangyi granules in advanced gastric cancer chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Owing to the absence of specific symptoms in early-stage gastric cancer,most patients are diagnosed at intermediate or advanced stages.As a result,treatment often shifts from surgery to other therapies,with chemotherapy and targeted therapies being the primary options for advanced gastric cancer treatment.A total of 116 patients with advanced gastric cancer,admitted from January 2021 to December 2023,were selected and divided into two groups of 58 each using the random number table method.The control group received FOLFOX4 chemothe-rapy(oxaliplatin+calcium+folinate+5-fluorouracil)combined with intravenous sindilizumab.The observation group received the same treatment as the control group,supplemented by oral administration of Senqi Shiyiwei granules.Both groups underwent treatment cycles of 3 weeks,with a minimum of two cycles.The therapeutic efficacy,immune mechanisms,and treatment-related toxicity and side effects were compared between the groups.The objective remission rate in the observation group(55.17%)was higher than that of the control group(36.21%)(P<0.05).After two treatment cycle,CD3+,CD4+,and CD4+/CD8+levels were higher in the observation group compared to the control group,while CD8+,regulatory T cells,and natural killer cells were lower(P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of leukopenia,nausea,and vomiting was lower in observed group(P<0.05).No significant differences were observed in the incidence of other adverse reactions(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy with Shenqixian granules may enhance the efficacy of simudizumab combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer and the immune function by increasing immune cell counts,making it a valuable option in clinical treatment.

PhaseⅠdose-finding study of sorafenib with FOLFOX4 as firstline treatment in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Objective： To determine the maximum tolerated dose（MTD）, dose-limiting toxicity（DLT） and efficacy of sorafenib in combination with FOLFOX4（oxaliplatin/leucovorin（LV）/5-fluorouracil） as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, we performed a phase I dose-finding study in nine evaluable patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods： According to modified Fibonacci method, the design of this study was to guide elevation of the sorafenib dosage to the next level（from 200 mg twice daily to 400 mg twice daily and then, if tolerated, 600 mg twice daily）. If the patient achieved complete response（CR）, partial response（PR） or stable disease（SD） after eight cycles of treatment, combination chemotherapy was scheduled to be discontinued and sorafenib monotherapy continued at the original dose until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results： In sorafenib 200 mg twice daily group, DLT was observed in 1 of 6 patients, and in 400 mg twice daily group, it was observed in 2 of 3 patients. Seven of 9（77.8%） evaluable patients achieved PR, with a median overall survival（OS） of 11.8 [95% confidence interval（CI）： 8.9-14.7] months. Common adverse effects include hand-foot syndrome, leukopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and nausea.Conclusions： Twice-daily dosing of sorafenib 200 mg in combination with FOLFOX4 was proven effective and safe for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and could be an appropriate dosage for subsequent phase II clinical studies.

Clinical analysis of HCPT plus FOLFOX4 regimen as salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic as well as side effects of hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) plus FOLFOX4 regimen as salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 19 patients with advanced gastric cancer received HCPT plus FOLFOX4 as salvage therapy, in detail, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 was given intravenously on day 1, CF 200 mg/m2, 5-Fu 400 mg/m2 given in bolus immediately after CF, days 1-2; 5-Fu 600 mg/m2 given continuously after bolus for 22 h on day 1, day 2, HCPT given intravenously at dosage of 10 mg/m2 on days 1-2. Therapeutic effects were evaluated at least after two cycles of treatment. Results: 17 cases among the 19 patients were valid for response evaluation, with CR 1 , PR 6, SD 4, PD 6. The response rate was 41.2%. For the 12 patients with liver metastasis, response rate of the liver foci was 50%. The main toxicities were bone marrow suppression, nausea and vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy; there were no chemotherapy-related deaths. Conclusion: The combination regimen with HCPT plus FOFLOX4 regimen was effective as salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer, with particularly high response rate for liver metastasis, and the side effects were tolerable and manageable.

改良DCF方案与FOLFOX 4方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效

目的：探讨改良DCF方案与FOLFOX 4方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和安全性。方法收集本院2010年1月至2013年7月收治的晚期胃癌患者47例，根据化疗方案分为改良DCF组（多西他赛60mg／m2静滴，d1；奥沙利铂100mg／m2静滴，d1；氟尿嘧啶400mg／m2静滴，d1～d2；氟尿嘧啶600mg／m248h持续泵入d2～d3；3周为1周期；n＝24）和FOLFOX 4组（奥沙利铂85mg／m2静滴，d1；亚叶酸钙200mg／m2静滴，d1～d2；氟尿嘧啶400mg／m2静滴，d1～d2；氟尿嘧啶600 mg／m2持续静滴22h；2周为1周期；n＝23）。每6周评价疗效。比较两组的有效率（ RR）、疾病控制率（ DCR）、无进展生存期（ PFS）和总生存期（ OS）。结果47例患者均可评价疗效。改良 DCF 组获 PR 6例、SD 16例、PD 2例， RR 为25.0％， DCR 为91.6％；FOLFOX 4组获PR 2例、SD 16例、PD 5例，RR为8.6％，DCR为78.2％。两组RR和DCR的差异无统计学意义（ P＞0.05）。改良DCF组的中位PFS为8.2个月，中位OS为11.5个月；FOLFOX 4组的中位PFS为5.8个月，中位OS为10.1个月，两组差异无统计学意义（ P＞0.05）。两组主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和消化道反应，均以1～2级为主，两组差异无统计学意义（ P＞0.05）。结论改良DCF方案与FOLFOX 4方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应相当，值得临床进一步探索。

榄香烯乳注射液联合FOLFOX 4方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的评价榄香烯乳注射液联合FOLFOX 4方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和不良反应。方法 49例晚期胃癌随机分为榄香烯乳注射液联合化疗(治疗组)25例和单纯化疗(对照组)24例,两组均应用FOLFOX 4方案(奥沙利铂85mg/m2静滴,第1天;亚叶酸钙50mg静滴,第1、2天;氟尿嘧啶400mg/m2静推,600mg/m2静脉持续滴注22h,第1、2天;2周为1周期)化疗,治疗组同时加用榄香烯乳注射液(500mg静滴,2周为1周期),治疗4周期后比较两组的疗效及毒副反应。结果治疗组获CR 3例,PR 12例,有效率(RR)为60.0%;对照组获CR 2例,PR 8例,RR为41.7%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组和对照组的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为7.1个月和5.2个月,中位生存时间(OS)分别为11.0个月和9.3个月,两组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组中性粒细胞减少、恶心呕吐、腹泻发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗组Karnofsky评分提高为48%,高于对照组的25%(P<0.05)。结论榄香烯乳注射液能够有效提高FOLFOX 4方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效,减轻其不良反应,改善患者的生存质量并延长生存时间。

FOLFOX方案治疗胃癌的疗效及对血清INF-γ和IL-4水平的影响

目的:探讨FOLFOX方案治疗胃癌的疗效及对血清干扰素-γ(INF-γ)和白细胞介素-4(IL-4)水平的影响。方法:选择我院2011年1月至2014年1月收治的胃癌患者80例,按随机数字表法平均分为两组,研究组及对照组各40例,以3周为1个疗程,治疗3个疗程。研究组患者给予FOLFOX方案治疗,对照组患者给予ELF化疗方案,3个疗程后,比较两组患者治疗有效率,同时比较两组患者治疗前后血清INF-γ和IL-4水平变化及不良反应发生情况。结果:3个疗程后,研究组患者治疗有效率为57.5%,明显高于对照组37.5%,比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗后血清INF-γ水平及INF-γ/IL-4值较治疗前明显升高,而IL-4水平较治疗前明显下降,且研究组患者两种细胞因子水平改善程度均明显优于对照组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者白细胞减少、血小板下降及恶心呕吐不良反应发生率分别为22.5%、7.5%及27.5%,与对照组25.0%、10.0%及32.5%,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:FOLFOX方案治疗胃癌效果显著,可有效改善患者机体免疫水平,提高抗肿瘤效果,值得临床推广应用。

斯普林联合化疗治疗老年晚期胃癌

目的探讨斯普林注射液辅助化疗治疗老年晚期胃癌的近期疗效及其对免疫功能的影响。方法 83例老年晚期胃癌分为两组,斯普林联合化疗组（联合组）42例,采用FOLFOX 4方案治疗,化疗第1天斯普林10m l静脉滴注,d1-d10;对照组41例,单用FOLFOX 4方案化疗。14天为1周期,4周期后分别对疗效、免疫功能以及不良反应进行评价。结果联合组总有效率为45.2%,高于对照组的41.4%,但差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;疾病控制率斯普林联合化疗组为73.8%,优于单纯化疗组的58.5%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;联合组和对照组中位疾病进展时间分别为8.5个月和7.8个月,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;联合组治疗后CD3、CD4阳性细胞百分率以及CD4/CD8比值明显提高,与治疗前以及对照组治疗后比较,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论斯普林注射液联合化疗治疗老年晚期胃癌的疗效略有提高,不良反应减轻,机体免疫力得到明显改善。

FOLFOX 4与FLP方案在晚期胃癌化疗中的疗效分析

目的:观察FOLFOX 4与FLP化疗方案在晚期胃癌患者化疗中的疗效和毒副反应。方法:选取2011年1月—2012年9月我院的117例晚期胃癌住院患者,并均经病理确诊。FOLFOX 4方案:奥沙利铂(L-OHP)85mg/m2静滴,d1;氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)400mg/m2静推,600mg/m2持续静滴22h,d1～2;亚叶酸钙(LV)200mg/m2静滴2h,d1～2;3周为1个周期。FLP方案:顺铂(DDP)30mg/m2静滴,d1～3;5-FU 500mg/m2静滴4h,d1～5;LV200mg/m2静滴2h,d1～5;3周为1个周期。观察和比较FOLFOX 4与FLP两组的完全缓解情况和功能改善及毒副反应情况。结果:FOLFOX 4方案的总有效率为55.17%,FLP方案的总有效率为52.54%,两者无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两种化疗方案在改善患者的功能状态方面无差异(P>0.05)。FOLFOX 4方案组的神经毒性的发生率高于FLP组,而恶心呕吐的消化道反应的发生率明显低于FLP组(P<0.05)。结论:FOLFOX 4方案治疗晚期胃癌效果与FLP化疗方案相当,但是其毒副反应轻,患者生存质量改善更佳,可以作为胃癌晚期患者的化疗方案在临床上推广使用。