为了有效去除阴影噪声对遥感影像水体提取的干扰,快速准确计算大区域范围内的水面率,本文提出基于GF6(高分六号卫星)影像,利用UWI(Urban Water Index,城市水体指数)并结合FROM-GLC10(Finer Resolution Observa-tion and Monitoring of G...为了有效去除阴影噪声对遥感影像水体提取的干扰,快速准确计算大区域范围内的水面率,本文提出基于GF6(高分六号卫星)影像,利用UWI(Urban Water Index,城市水体指数)并结合FROM-GLC10(Finer Resolution Observa-tion and Monitoring of Global Land Cover 10,全球陆地覆盖精细化观测与监测10)数据,通过求交计算和小碎斑删除实现水体提取结果的精细化,有效消除了阴影等噪声对水体提取的干扰,实现水面率的快速计算。本文选择中山市作为试验区,试验区域范围广、地物背景复杂,综合对比本文算法、NDWI(Normalized Water Index,归一化水体指数)算法和TSUWI(Two-Sted Urban Water Index,城市二类水体指数)算法,从定性与定量角度分析,结果表明:本文算法提取的水体连续完整、漏提和误提较少,可有效去除阴影、建筑、道路等噪声干扰,在总体精度、Kappa系数、错分误差、漏分误差等指标均取得了较好结果。利用UWI与FROM-GLC10数据相结合计算水面率具有可行性,为工程化、大面积、快速计算水面率提供了一种新的思路。展开更多
We report on a global cropland extent product at 30-m spatial resolution developed with two 30-m global land cover maps(i.e.FROM-GLC,Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring,Global Land Cover;FROM-GLC=agg)and a 250...We report on a global cropland extent product at 30-m spatial resolution developed with two 30-m global land cover maps(i.e.FROM-GLC,Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring,Global Land Cover;FROM-GLC=agg)and a 250-m cropland probability map.A common land cover validation sample database was used to determine optimal thresholds of cropland probability in different parts of the world to generate a cropland/noncropland mask according to the classification accuracies for cropland samples.A decision tree was then applied to combine two 250-m cropland masks:one existing mask from the literature and the other produced in this study,with the 30-m global land cover map FROM-GLC-agg.For the smallest difference with country-level cropland area in Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical(FAOSTAT)database,a final global cropland extent map was composited from the FROM-GLC,FROM-GLC-agg,and two masked crop=land layers.From this map FROM-GC(Global Cropland),we estimated the global cropland areas to be 1533.83 million hectares(Mha)in 2010,which is 6.95 Mha(0.45%)less than the area reported by the Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO)of the United Nations for the year 2010.A country-by=country comparison between the map and the FAOSTAT data showed a linear relationship(FROM-GC=1.05*FAOSTAT-1.2(Mha)with R^(2)=0.97).Africa,South America,Southeastern Asia,and Oceania are the regions with large discrepancies with the FAO survey.展开更多
Currently,the satellite data used to estimate terrestrial net primary productivity(NPP)in China are predominantly from foreign satellites,and very few studies have based their estimates on data from China’s Fengyun s...Currently,the satellite data used to estimate terrestrial net primary productivity(NPP)in China are predominantly from foreign satellites,and very few studies have based their estimates on data from China’s Fengyun satellites.Moreover,despite their importance,the influence of land cover types and the normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI)on NPP estimation has not been clarified.This study employs the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford approach(CASA)model to compute the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and the maximum light use efficiency suitable for the main vegetation types in China in accordance with the finer resolution observation and monitoring-global land cover(FROM-GLC)classification product.Then,the NPP is estimated from the Fengyun-3D(FY-3D)data and compared with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)NPP product.The FY-3D NPP is also validated with existing research results and historical field-measured NPP data.In addition,the effects of land cover types and the NDVI on NPP estimation are analyzed.The results show that the CASA model and the FY-3D satellite data estimate an average NPP of 441.2 g C m^(−2) yr^(−1) in 2019 for China’s terrestrial vegetation,while the total NPP is 3.19 Pg C yr^(−1).Compared with the MODIS NPP,the FY-3D NPP is overestimated in areas of low vegetation productivity and is underestimated in high-productivity areas.These discrepancies are largely due to the differences between the FY-3D NDVI and MODIS NDVI.Compared with historical field-measured data,the FY-3D NPP estimation results outperformed the MODIS NPP results,although the deviation between the FY-3D NPP estimate and the in-situ measurement was large and may exceed 20%at the pixel scale.The land cover types and the NDVI significantly affected the spatial distribution of NPP and accounted for NPP deviations of 17.0%and 18.1%,respectively.Additionally,the total deviation resulting from the two factors reached 29.5%.These results show that accurate NDVI products and land cover types are important prerequisites for NPP estimation.展开更多
Global land cover data could provide continuously updated cropland acreage and distribution information,which is essential to a wide range of applications over large geographical regions.Cropland area estimates were e...Global land cover data could provide continuously updated cropland acreage and distribution information,which is essential to a wide range of applications over large geographical regions.Cropland area estimates were evaluated in the conterminous USA from four recent global land cover products:MODIS land cover(MODISLC)at 500-m resolution in 2010,GlobCover at 300-m resolution in 2009,FROM-GLC and FROM-GLC-agg at 30-m resolution based on Landsat imagery circa 2010 against the US Department of Agriculture survey data.Ratio estimators derived from the 30-m resolution Cropland Data Layer were applied to MODIS and GlobCover land cover products,which greatly improved the estimation accuracy of MODISLC by enhancing the correlation and decreasing mean deviation(MDev)and RMSE,but were less effective on GlobCover product.We found that,in the USA,the CDL adjusted MODISLC was more suitable for applications that concern about the aggregated county cropland acreage,while FROM-GLC-agg gave the least deviation from the survey at the state level.Correlation between land cover map estimates and survey estimates is significant,but stronger at the state level than at the county level.In regions where most mismatches happen at the county level,MODIS tends to underestimate,whereas MERIS and Landsat images incline to overestimate.Those uncertainties should be taken into consideration in relevant applications.Excluding interannual and seasonal effects,R 2 of the FROM-GLC regression model increased from 0.1 to 0.4,and the slope is much closer to one.Our analysis shows that images acquired in growing season are most suitable for Landsat-based cropland mapping in the conterminous USA.展开更多
文摘为了有效去除阴影噪声对遥感影像水体提取的干扰,快速准确计算大区域范围内的水面率,本文提出基于GF6(高分六号卫星)影像,利用UWI(Urban Water Index,城市水体指数)并结合FROM-GLC10(Finer Resolution Observa-tion and Monitoring of Global Land Cover 10,全球陆地覆盖精细化观测与监测10)数据,通过求交计算和小碎斑删除实现水体提取结果的精细化,有效消除了阴影等噪声对水体提取的干扰,实现水面率的快速计算。本文选择中山市作为试验区,试验区域范围广、地物背景复杂,综合对比本文算法、NDWI(Normalized Water Index,归一化水体指数)算法和TSUWI(Two-Sted Urban Water Index,城市二类水体指数)算法,从定性与定量角度分析,结果表明:本文算法提取的水体连续完整、漏提和误提较少,可有效去除阴影、建筑、道路等噪声干扰,在总体精度、Kappa系数、错分误差、漏分误差等指标均取得了较好结果。利用UWI与FROM-GLC10数据相结合计算水面率具有可行性,为工程化、大面积、快速计算水面率提供了一种新的思路。
基金This research was partially supported by an Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science(OFSLRSS201202)a National High Technology Grant from China(2009AA12200101).
文摘We report on a global cropland extent product at 30-m spatial resolution developed with two 30-m global land cover maps(i.e.FROM-GLC,Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring,Global Land Cover;FROM-GLC=agg)and a 250-m cropland probability map.A common land cover validation sample database was used to determine optimal thresholds of cropland probability in different parts of the world to generate a cropland/noncropland mask according to the classification accuracies for cropland samples.A decision tree was then applied to combine two 250-m cropland masks:one existing mask from the literature and the other produced in this study,with the 30-m global land cover map FROM-GLC-agg.For the smallest difference with country-level cropland area in Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical(FAOSTAT)database,a final global cropland extent map was composited from the FROM-GLC,FROM-GLC-agg,and two masked crop=land layers.From this map FROM-GC(Global Cropland),we estimated the global cropland areas to be 1533.83 million hectares(Mha)in 2010,which is 6.95 Mha(0.45%)less than the area reported by the Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO)of the United Nations for the year 2010.A country-by=country comparison between the map and the FAOSTAT data showed a linear relationship(FROM-GC=1.05*FAOSTAT-1.2(Mha)with R^(2)=0.97).Africa,South America,Southeastern Asia,and Oceania are the regions with large discrepancies with the FAO survey.
基金Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFC1506500)Natural Science Program of China(U2142212)National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871028).
文摘Currently,the satellite data used to estimate terrestrial net primary productivity(NPP)in China are predominantly from foreign satellites,and very few studies have based their estimates on data from China’s Fengyun satellites.Moreover,despite their importance,the influence of land cover types and the normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI)on NPP estimation has not been clarified.This study employs the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford approach(CASA)model to compute the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and the maximum light use efficiency suitable for the main vegetation types in China in accordance with the finer resolution observation and monitoring-global land cover(FROM-GLC)classification product.Then,the NPP is estimated from the Fengyun-3D(FY-3D)data and compared with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)NPP product.The FY-3D NPP is also validated with existing research results and historical field-measured NPP data.In addition,the effects of land cover types and the NDVI on NPP estimation are analyzed.The results show that the CASA model and the FY-3D satellite data estimate an average NPP of 441.2 g C m^(−2) yr^(−1) in 2019 for China’s terrestrial vegetation,while the total NPP is 3.19 Pg C yr^(−1).Compared with the MODIS NPP,the FY-3D NPP is overestimated in areas of low vegetation productivity and is underestimated in high-productivity areas.These discrepancies are largely due to the differences between the FY-3D NDVI and MODIS NDVI.Compared with historical field-measured data,the FY-3D NPP estimation results outperformed the MODIS NPP results,although the deviation between the FY-3D NPP estimate and the in-situ measurement was large and may exceed 20%at the pixel scale.The land cover types and the NDVI significantly affected the spatial distribution of NPP and accounted for NPP deviations of 17.0%and 18.1%,respectively.Additionally,the total deviation resulting from the two factors reached 29.5%.These results show that accurate NDVI products and land cover types are important prerequisites for NPP estimation.
基金This research was supported by USGS(grant number G12AC20085).
文摘Global land cover data could provide continuously updated cropland acreage and distribution information,which is essential to a wide range of applications over large geographical regions.Cropland area estimates were evaluated in the conterminous USA from four recent global land cover products:MODIS land cover(MODISLC)at 500-m resolution in 2010,GlobCover at 300-m resolution in 2009,FROM-GLC and FROM-GLC-agg at 30-m resolution based on Landsat imagery circa 2010 against the US Department of Agriculture survey data.Ratio estimators derived from the 30-m resolution Cropland Data Layer were applied to MODIS and GlobCover land cover products,which greatly improved the estimation accuracy of MODISLC by enhancing the correlation and decreasing mean deviation(MDev)and RMSE,but were less effective on GlobCover product.We found that,in the USA,the CDL adjusted MODISLC was more suitable for applications that concern about the aggregated county cropland acreage,while FROM-GLC-agg gave the least deviation from the survey at the state level.Correlation between land cover map estimates and survey estimates is significant,but stronger at the state level than at the county level.In regions where most mismatches happen at the county level,MODIS tends to underestimate,whereas MERIS and Landsat images incline to overestimate.Those uncertainties should be taken into consideration in relevant applications.Excluding interannual and seasonal effects,R 2 of the FROM-GLC regression model increased from 0.1 to 0.4,and the slope is much closer to one.Our analysis shows that images acquired in growing season are most suitable for Landsat-based cropland mapping in the conterminous USA.