Aim:Volume replacement with fi llers is regularly performed with the use of diverse volumetric materials to correct different structures around the face,depending on the volume enhancement required and the thickness o...Aim:Volume replacement with fi llers is regularly performed with the use of diverse volumetric materials to correct different structures around the face,depending on the volume enhancement required and the thickness of the soft tissue envelope.Differential fat harvesting and posterior grafting is performed to place the correct fat parcel size for each target area,expanding the potential applications of fat.Methods:Sixty patients consecutively recruited on a fi rst come basis undergone a facial fat grafting procedure,in private practice setting between March 2012 and October 2013.Fat grafting quantity and quality was predicted for each case.Differential harvesting was performed,with 2 fat parcels size.Processing was performed through washing.Fat infi ltration was carried out through small cannulas or needles depending on the treated area.Outcomes were analysed both by the physicians and the patients at 7 days,1 month,3 months and 6 months through a perceived satisfaction questionnaire.Parameters considered were downtime or discomfort,skin benefi ts,volume restoration,reabsorption rate estimated and overall improvement.Results:Full facial differential fat grafting procedure lasted an average of 1.5-2.5 h.Average downtime was 3-4 days.Follow-up was performed to a minimum of 6 months.Both patient and physician overall satisfaction rates were mostly excellent.Adverse events like lumps or irregularities were not encountered.Conclusion:Differential fat harvesting and posterior grafting is a valid alternative,to expand the repertoire of fat use,allow a more homogeneous effect,reduce the potential complications,speed up the process,improve graft survival,and to enhance overall aesthetic outcome.展开更多
文摘Aim:Volume replacement with fi llers is regularly performed with the use of diverse volumetric materials to correct different structures around the face,depending on the volume enhancement required and the thickness of the soft tissue envelope.Differential fat harvesting and posterior grafting is performed to place the correct fat parcel size for each target area,expanding the potential applications of fat.Methods:Sixty patients consecutively recruited on a fi rst come basis undergone a facial fat grafting procedure,in private practice setting between March 2012 and October 2013.Fat grafting quantity and quality was predicted for each case.Differential harvesting was performed,with 2 fat parcels size.Processing was performed through washing.Fat infi ltration was carried out through small cannulas or needles depending on the treated area.Outcomes were analysed both by the physicians and the patients at 7 days,1 month,3 months and 6 months through a perceived satisfaction questionnaire.Parameters considered were downtime or discomfort,skin benefi ts,volume restoration,reabsorption rate estimated and overall improvement.Results:Full facial differential fat grafting procedure lasted an average of 1.5-2.5 h.Average downtime was 3-4 days.Follow-up was performed to a minimum of 6 months.Both patient and physician overall satisfaction rates were mostly excellent.Adverse events like lumps or irregularities were not encountered.Conclusion:Differential fat harvesting and posterior grafting is a valid alternative,to expand the repertoire of fat use,allow a more homogeneous effect,reduce the potential complications,speed up the process,improve graft survival,and to enhance overall aesthetic outcome.
