BACKGROUND Studies have shown elevated C-reactive protein(CRP)to predict mechanical ventilation(MV)in patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).Its utility is unknown in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD...BACKGROUND Studies have shown elevated C-reactive protein(CRP)to predict mechanical ventilation(MV)in patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).Its utility is unknown in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD),who have elevated baseline CRP levels due to chronic inflammation and reduced renal clearance.AIM To assess whether an association exists between elevated inflammatory markers and MV rate in patients with stagesⅢb-ⅤCKD and COVID-19.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with COVID-19 and stagesⅢb-ⅤCKD.The primary outcome was the rate of invasive MV,the rate of noninvasive MV,and the rate of no MV.Statistical analyses used unpaired t-test for continuous variables and chi-square analysis for categorical variables.Cutoffs for variables were CRP:100 mg/L,ferritin:530 ng/mL,D-dimer:0.5 mg/L,and lactate dehydrogenase(LDH):590 U/L.RESULTS 290 were screened,and 118 met the inclusion criteria.CRP,D-dimer,and ferritin were significantly different among the three groups.On univariate analysis for invasive MV(IMV),CRP had an odds ratio(OR)-5.44;ferritin,OR-2.8;LDH,OR-7.7;D-dimer,OR-3.9,(P<0.05).The admission CRP level had an area under curve-receiver operator characteristic(AUROC):0.747 for the IMV group(sensitivity-80.8%,specificity-50%)and 0.663 for the non-IMV(NIMV)group(area under the curve,sensitivity-69.2%,specificity-53%).CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate a positive correlation between CRP,ferritin,and D-dimer levels and MV and NIMV rates in CKD patients.The AUROC demonstrates a good sensitivity for CRP levels in detecting the need for MV in patients with stagesⅢb-ⅤCKD.This may be because of the greater magnitude of increased inflammation due to COVID-19 itself compared with increased inflammation and reduced clearance due to CKD alone.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the in-hospital outcome of moderate to severe COVID-19 patients admitted in High Dependency Unit(HDU)in relation to invasive vs.non-invasive mode of ventilation.Methods:In this study,the patients...Objective:To evaluate the in-hospital outcome of moderate to severe COVID-19 patients admitted in High Dependency Unit(HDU)in relation to invasive vs.non-invasive mode of ventilation.Methods:In this study,the patients required either non-invasive[oxygen≤10 L/min or>10 L/min through mask or nasal prongs,rebreather masks and bilevel positive airway pressure(BiPAP)]or invasive ventilation.For analysis of 30-day in hospital mortality in relation to use of different modes of oxygen,Kaplan Meier and log rank analyses were used.In the end,independent predictors of survival were determined by Cox regression analysis.Results:Invasive ventilation was required by 15.1%patients while 84.9%patients needed non-invasive ventilation.Patients with evidence of thromboembolism,high inflammatory markers and hypoxemia mainly required invasive ventilation.The 30-day in hospital mortality was 72.7%for the invasive group and 12.9%for the non-invasive group(1.8%oxygen<10 L/min,0.9%oxygen>10 L/min,3.6%rebreather mask and 4.5%BiPAP).The median time from hospital admission to outcome was 7 days for the invasive group and 18 days for the non-invasive group(P<0.05).Age,presence of co-morbidities,number of days requiring oxygen,rebreather,BiPAP and invasive ventilation were independent predictors of outcome.Conclusions:Invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with adverse outcomes possibly due to ventilator associated lung injury.Thus,protective non-invasive ventilation remains the necessary and safe treatment for severely hypoxic COVID-19 patients.展开更多
Severe acute respiratory syndrome is frequently complicated by respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support. We aimed to compare the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation against invasive mechanical ventilation tr...Severe acute respiratory syndrome is frequently complicated by respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support. We aimed to compare the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation against invasive mechanical ventilation treating respiratory failure in this disease.展开更多
Background:Surfactant replacement therapy has been used for few decades for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS)and has significantly improved morbidity and mortality in premature infants.Non-invasive r...Background:Surfactant replacement therapy has been used for few decades for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS)and has significantly improved morbidity and mortality in premature infants.Non-invasive respiratory support has recently emerged as a strategy in the early management of RDS.In this review,we discuss the different strategies of early management of RDS.Data sources:A literature search of PubMed database was conducted to review the subject.The quality of evidence of key clinical studies was graded according to a modified grading system of the international GRADE group.Results:Continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP)with selective surfactant is a safe alternative to routine intubation,surfactant and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with spontaneous breathing,and such an approach has been associated with decreased risk of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.There is a risk of pneumothorax when using a high pressure of CPAP(≥8 cm of H_(2)O),a high partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PCO_(2)>75 mm of Hg),and a high fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO_(2)>0.6)as a threshold for intubation while on CPAP.Conclusion:Not all preterm infants need surfactant treatment,and non-invasive respiratory support is a safe and effective approach.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Studies have shown elevated C-reactive protein(CRP)to predict mechanical ventilation(MV)in patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).Its utility is unknown in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD),who have elevated baseline CRP levels due to chronic inflammation and reduced renal clearance.AIM To assess whether an association exists between elevated inflammatory markers and MV rate in patients with stagesⅢb-ⅤCKD and COVID-19.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with COVID-19 and stagesⅢb-ⅤCKD.The primary outcome was the rate of invasive MV,the rate of noninvasive MV,and the rate of no MV.Statistical analyses used unpaired t-test for continuous variables and chi-square analysis for categorical variables.Cutoffs for variables were CRP:100 mg/L,ferritin:530 ng/mL,D-dimer:0.5 mg/L,and lactate dehydrogenase(LDH):590 U/L.RESULTS 290 were screened,and 118 met the inclusion criteria.CRP,D-dimer,and ferritin were significantly different among the three groups.On univariate analysis for invasive MV(IMV),CRP had an odds ratio(OR)-5.44;ferritin,OR-2.8;LDH,OR-7.7;D-dimer,OR-3.9,(P<0.05).The admission CRP level had an area under curve-receiver operator characteristic(AUROC):0.747 for the IMV group(sensitivity-80.8%,specificity-50%)and 0.663 for the non-IMV(NIMV)group(area under the curve,sensitivity-69.2%,specificity-53%).CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate a positive correlation between CRP,ferritin,and D-dimer levels and MV and NIMV rates in CKD patients.The AUROC demonstrates a good sensitivity for CRP levels in detecting the need for MV in patients with stagesⅢb-ⅤCKD.This may be because of the greater magnitude of increased inflammation due to COVID-19 itself compared with increased inflammation and reduced clearance due to CKD alone.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the in-hospital outcome of moderate to severe COVID-19 patients admitted in High Dependency Unit(HDU)in relation to invasive vs.non-invasive mode of ventilation.Methods:In this study,the patients required either non-invasive[oxygen≤10 L/min or>10 L/min through mask or nasal prongs,rebreather masks and bilevel positive airway pressure(BiPAP)]or invasive ventilation.For analysis of 30-day in hospital mortality in relation to use of different modes of oxygen,Kaplan Meier and log rank analyses were used.In the end,independent predictors of survival were determined by Cox regression analysis.Results:Invasive ventilation was required by 15.1%patients while 84.9%patients needed non-invasive ventilation.Patients with evidence of thromboembolism,high inflammatory markers and hypoxemia mainly required invasive ventilation.The 30-day in hospital mortality was 72.7%for the invasive group and 12.9%for the non-invasive group(1.8%oxygen<10 L/min,0.9%oxygen>10 L/min,3.6%rebreather mask and 4.5%BiPAP).The median time from hospital admission to outcome was 7 days for the invasive group and 18 days for the non-invasive group(P<0.05).Age,presence of co-morbidities,number of days requiring oxygen,rebreather,BiPAP and invasive ventilation were independent predictors of outcome.Conclusions:Invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with adverse outcomes possibly due to ventilator associated lung injury.Thus,protective non-invasive ventilation remains the necessary and safe treatment for severely hypoxic COVID-19 patients.
文摘Severe acute respiratory syndrome is frequently complicated by respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support. We aimed to compare the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation against invasive mechanical ventilation treating respiratory failure in this disease.
文摘Background:Surfactant replacement therapy has been used for few decades for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS)and has significantly improved morbidity and mortality in premature infants.Non-invasive respiratory support has recently emerged as a strategy in the early management of RDS.In this review,we discuss the different strategies of early management of RDS.Data sources:A literature search of PubMed database was conducted to review the subject.The quality of evidence of key clinical studies was graded according to a modified grading system of the international GRADE group.Results:Continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP)with selective surfactant is a safe alternative to routine intubation,surfactant and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with spontaneous breathing,and such an approach has been associated with decreased risk of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.There is a risk of pneumothorax when using a high pressure of CPAP(≥8 cm of H_(2)O),a high partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PCO_(2)>75 mm of Hg),and a high fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO_(2)>0.6)as a threshold for intubation while on CPAP.Conclusion:Not all preterm infants need surfactant treatment,and non-invasive respiratory support is a safe and effective approach.
