Treatment of a femoral neck fracture combined with ipsilateral femoral head and intertrochanteric fractures: A case report

BACKGROUND This article presents a rare case of a complex hip fracture involving the ipsilateral femoral neck,trochanter,and femoral head,that was accompanied by hip dislocation.Currently,there is no established standard treatment method for this specific type of fracture.Therefore,it is crucial to comprehensively consider factors such as patient age,fracture type,and degree of displacement to achieve a successful outcome.CASE SUMMARY A 38-year-old man sustained a comminuted fracture of his right hip as a result of a car accident.The injuries included a fracture of the femoral head,a fracture of the femoral neck,an intertrochanteric fracture of the femur,and a posterior dislocation of the hip on the same side.We opted for a treatment approach combining the use of a proximal femoral locking plate,cannulated screws,and Kirschner wires.Following the surgery,we developed an individualized rehabil-itation program to restore patient limb function.CONCLUSION For this complex fracture,we selected appropriate internal fixation and for-mulated individualized rehabilitation,which ultimately achieved good results.

Finite Element Analysis of Coronal Shear Fractures of the Femoral Neck: Displacement of the Femoral Head and Effect of Osteosynthetic Implants

Coronal shear fractures of the femoral neck (CSFF) are the most challenging to treat among proximal femur fractures, directly affecting the life expectancy of patients with osteoporosis. However, an adequate osteosynthesis method has not been elucidated yet. This study investigated the displacement direction of the femoral head fragment and its effect on the bone using finite element method. A finite element model for CSFF was developed from CT image data of a patient with osteoporosis using Mechanical Finder (ver. 11). Subsequently, finite element analyses were performed on six osteosynthesis models under maximum load applied during walking. The compressive stresses, tensile stresses, and compressive strains of each model were examined. The results suggested that the compressive and tensile stress distributions were concentrated on the anterior side of the femoral neck. Compressive strain distribution in the femoral head and neck was concentrated in four areas: at the tip of the blade or lag screw, the anteroinferior side of the blade or lag screw near the fracture site, and the upper right and lower left near the junction of the blade or lag screw and nail. Thus, the distribution of both these stresses revealed that the femoral head fragment was prone to anterior and inferior displacement. Distribution of compressive strains revealed the direction of the stress exerted by the osteosynthetic implant on the bone. The same results were observed in all osteosynthetic implants;thus, the findings could lay the foundation for developing methods for placing osteosynthetic implants less prone to displacement and the osteosynthetic implants themselves. In particular, the study provides insight into the optimal treatment of CSFF.

Efficacy of the femoral neck system in femoral neck fracture treatment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Controversy remains around the available choices for the internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture.The femoral neck system(FNS)was developed in 2018 and has been widely applied since then as it can provide rigid fixation stability with less damage to the bone mass around the fracture.However,no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of traditional internal fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures.AIM To assess the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of cannulated compression screws(CCS)in the treatment of femoral fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS Five electronic databases(PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and Wanfang)were searched from the earliest publication date to December 31,2021.Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/)was used to check the results and further analyze the related articles.Controlled trials were included if the FNS was applied for the femoral neck fracture in adults and if it was compared with CCS for the achievement of internal fixation.The measurement outcomes included the required operation time,observed patient’s blood loss,extent of fracture healing,patient’s Harris Hip score(HHS)at the last follow-up,and records of any complications(such as failure of internal fixation,femoral neck shortness,avascular necrosis of the femoral head,and delayed union or nonunion).RESULTS Ten retrospective controlled studies(involving 711 participants)were included in this metaanalysis.The meta-analysis showed that compared with CCS,use of the FNS could not decrease the operation time[standardized mean difference(SMD):-0.38,95%confidence interval(CI):-0.98 to 0.22,P=0.21,I2=93%),but it could increase the intraoperative blood loss(SMD:0.59,95%CI:0.15 to 1.03,P=0.009,I2=81%).The pooled results also showed that compared with CCS,the FNS could better promote fracture healing(SMD:-0.97,95%CI:-1.65 to-0.30,P=0.005,I2=91%),improve the HHS at the last follow-up(SMD:0.76,95%CI:0.31 to 1.21,P=0.0009,I2=84%),and reduce the chances of developing femoral neck shortness(OR:0.29,95%CI:0.14 to 0.61,P=0.001,I2=0%)and delayed union or nonunion(OR:0.47,95%CI:0.30 to 0.73,P=0.001;I2=0%)in adult patients with femoral neck fractures.However,there was no statistically significant difference between the FNS and CCS in terms of failure of internal fixation(OR:0.49,95%CI:0.23 to 1.06,P=0.07,I2=0%)and avascular necrosis of the femoral head(OR:0.46,95%CI:0.20 to 1.10,P=0.08,I2=0%).CONCLUSION Compared with CCS,the FNS could decrease the chances of developing femoral neck shortness and delayed union or nonunion in adults with femoral neck fractures.Simultaneously,it could accelerate fracture healing and improve the HHS in these patients.

Revisiting Pauwels' classification of femoral neck fractures

Pauwels’femoral neck fracture classification is based on the biomechanical principle that shear stress and varus force increase along more vertically oriented fractures,resulting in higher risk of fracture displacement and ultimately nonunion.This principle continues to guide construct selection for femoral neck fracture internal fixation and is the foundation for treating non-union with valgus osteotomy.However,with poor inter-and intra-rater reliability,dated treatment recommendations,and unreliable prognostic value,the Pauwels classification cannot be directly applied in its entirety to the management of femoral neck fractures in modern practice.

Unilateral Femoral Neck Fracture after Epileptic Seizure in Young Patient: A Case Report

Femoral neck fracture occurring after an epileptic seizure is a rare and under-diagnosed injury. The majority of the reported cases in literature are old patients with osteoporosis. Younger patients present several risk factors of osteopenia and the treatment remains controversial. We present an outcome of a 23 years old patient with unilateral femoral neck fracture occurring during an epileptic seizure and we discuss the associated multiple risk factors of osteopenia and osteonecrosis of the hip. The patient was brought to the emergency department of Teaching Hospital of Kamenge (CHUK) complaining of pain in his left hip that had been progressing for one month after an epileptic seizure. There is a history of HIV infection since birth and epileptic seizures with ongoing treatments for both diseases. Despite the high risk of avascular necrosis, the treatment choice has been influenced by the patient’s age and a conservative surgery by internal fixation with Dynamic Hip Screw has been made. Unfortunately, this treatment early resulted in osteonecrosis of the hip since HIV infection itself and the highly active anti-retroviral therapy increase its risk.

Effect of canulate compression bone screws and iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel on functional restoration of hip joint after femoral neck fracture of young people

Objective To retrospect therapeutic effects of iliac flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel with canulate compression bone screws internal fixation on femoral neck fracture of young people. Method 34 cases of femoral neck fracture had been treated with pedicle bone flap with deep iliac circumflex artery and canulate bone screws internal fixation. Result By follow up for 1 to 1.5 years, 32 cases were healing by first intention, and patients obtained satisfactory joint function. Conclusion Femoral neck fracture can be treated by transplanting pedicle bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel and canulate bone screws internal fixation.

Pilot study on the Non-Invasive Detectability of Femoral Neck Fractures with Frequency Response Functions

A suspicion of a femoral neck fracture is a frequently recurring situation, especially in nursing homes. For the clarification of such a suspicion normally imaging techniques are used. Such equipment is expensive and therefore is located in hospitals. In addition to the costs, a transport causes stress for the patient. This pilot study is devoted to the question whether the detection of a femoral neck fracture with vibration measurements is possible in principal. In such a case, the clarification could be done on-site by an ordinary person using much cheaper equipment. This would reduce the stress for the patient and save money. For this purpose vibration measurements on a dead body with intact, with partially fractured and with complete cut femoral neck have been performed. Two different methods for the vibration initiation have been investigated, the so called impact testing and the shaker testing. The frequency response function has been determined for all combinations on both sides of the body. It turned out that there is a clear difference in the frequency response functions of the fractured bone with respect to the intact bone when shaker testing is used. This indicates that the method could have the potential to be a cost-saving alternative to imaging techniques. However, in a next step a statistically reliable clinical survey on living persons needs to be done.

Study on biomechanics of comminuted fracture of distal femur fixed by double plates

AIM:To develop a new internal fixation device for comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal femur,and to offer a guide for management of these injuries based on biomechanical studies.METHODS:Ten fresh adult femurs of cadavers.All femurs were similarly made of the models of supracondylar intercondylar fractures,then double plating with a plate in combination with a polythene plate,and the conventional sigle plating was served as the control.The biomechanic tests (compression,bending,torsion) were performed.RESULTS:The bending and torsion tests demonstrated that the double plating groups were much stronger (P< 0.01) than the single plating groups in anti bending and anti torsion.During the tests loading to failure, the double plating groups failed at a mean peak load of 11 540 N in axial compression,700 N in anterior bending 1 082 N in posterior bending,593 N in medial bending,1 010 N in lateral bending.CONCLUSION: Double plating with a plate in combination with a polythene plate is an excellent technique and design modification for severely comminuted fractures of the distal femur,which may provide a high stability and solidness so that early mobilization and weight bearing are allowed.

Biomechanical analysis of the computer-assisted internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture

The number and spatial configuration of the screws will affect the stability and prognosis of the fractures.In our study,we assessed the biomechanical effects of the double-head cannulated compression screw(DhCCS)and ordinary cannulated compression screw(OCCS)for the treatment of femoral neck fractures by using computer finite element analysis.The original digital imaging and communications in medicine(DICOM)data of a proximal femur were imported into Materialise’s interactive medical image control system(MIMICS)software for modeling.Both DhCCS and OCCS 3D-models were obtained by using the 3D scan technique.Using the fracture model and internal fixation assembly model with an inverted triangle,two horizontal and vertical distribution were established in UG software.Next,the displacement and stress distribution were calculated in ANSYS software.The displacement value of the femoral head in the DhCCS group was smaller than that in the OCCS group,and the displacement value in the two horizontal groups was smaller than that in the vertical group.The stress distribution in the DhCCS group was concentrated on the screw rod at the fracture block and thread end,while only at the fracture block in the OCCS group.The stress in the horizontal group was more dispersed on the screws than that in the vertical group.DhCCS has reliable stability for the fixation of femoral neck fractures and applied in the clinical work and 2 horizontal fixation can be used when two screws are selected.

Arthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly： Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- and Long-term Effectiveness

Background：There is conflicting evidence as to whether the femoral head should be preserved or replaced in elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.In this article,we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the short-and long-term effectiveness of arthroplasty （AR） and internal fixation （IF）.Methods：PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically up to January 2016.All randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of AR and IF for displaced intracapsular fracture were retrieved with no limitation on language or publication year.Results：In total,eight prospective randomized studies involving 2206 patients were included.The results of our study showed that patients in the AR group reported significantly lower complication （risk ratio：0.56,95% confidence interval [CI] =0.38-0.80）,re-operation （risk ratio：0.17,95% CI =0.13-0.22）,revision rates （risk ratio：0.11,95% CI：0.08-0.16）,and better function compared with their IF counterparts,and they were less likely to suffer postoperative pain.No statistically significant differences for the rates of mortality,infection,and/or deep vein thrombosis between AR and IF were found.Conclusions：Based on our analysis,we recommend that AR should be used as the primary treatment for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly.However,IF may be appropriate for those who are very frail.

Closed reduction and internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture

Objective： To compare the clinical effects between closed reduction and internal fixation （CRIF） and total hip arthroplasty （THA） for displaced femoral neck fracture. Methods： In this prospective randomized study, 285 patients aged above 65 years with hip fractures （Garden III or IV） were included from January 2001 to December 2005. The cases were randomly allocated to either the CRIF group or THA group. Patients with pathological fractures （bone tumors or metabolic bone disease）, preoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, hemiplegia, long-term bed rest and complications affecting hip functions were excluded. Results： During the had significantly higher 5-year follow-up, CRIF group rates of complication in hipjoint, general complication and reoperation than THA group （38.3% vs. 12.7%, P〈0.01; 45.3% vs. 21.7%, P〈0.01; 33.6% vs. 10.2%, P〈0.05 respectively）. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Postoperative function of the hip joint in THA group recovered favorably with higher Harris scores. Conclusion： For displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients, THA can achieve a lower rate of complication and reoperation, as well as better postoperative recovery of hip joint function compared with CRIF.

Efficacy Evaluation for the Treatment of Subcapital Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults by Capsulotomy Reduction and Closed Reduction

Background：Subcapital femoral neck fracture in young adults has many complications,and the incidence is increasing year-by-year.The selection of the proper operation method to avoid them is an ambiguous matter.This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of subcapital femoral neck fracture by the capsulotomy and internal fixation with iliac bone grafting or closed reduction and intemal fixation in young adults.Methods：From March 2003 to February 2010,65 young patients with subcapital femoral neck fractures were treated,including 39 males and 26 females with average age of 34.5 years （range,19-50 years）; 29 cases of the left side and 36 cases of the right side.They were randomly divided into Group A with 34 cases treated by closed reduction and internal fixation and Group B with 31 cases treated by the capsulotomy and internal fixation with iliac bone grafting.The two groups had no significant differences in sex,age,body mass index and preoperative Harris Hip Score.The observation criteria involved the length of the incision,blood loss,operation time,nonunion rate,avascular necrosis of the femoral head （ANFH） rate and Harris Hip Score.Results：Four of 65 patients were lost follow-up,and the follow-up rate was 93.8％,the average follow-up time was 38.7 months （range,33-47 months）.In Group A,the incision length was 5.1 ± 2.2 cm,blood loss was 84.0 ± 13.2 ml,and operation time was 52.9 ± 10.2 min.In Group B,the incision length was 15.4 ± 4.6 cm,blood loss was 396.0 ± 21.3 ml,and operation time was 1 16.5 ± 15.3 min.Nonunion occurred in 8 patients （25.2％） in Group A and 1 patient （3.3％） in Group B.ANFH occurred in 9 patients （29.1％） in Group A and 2 patients （6.7％） in Group B.Postoperative Harris Hip Score was 89.0 ± 5.6 in Group A and 95.0 ± 4.5 in Group B.The above index of two groups was considered statistically significant （P ＜ 0.05）.Conclusions：Capsulotomy and internal fixation with iliac bone grafting can improve fracture healing,reduce ANFH in young adults.It is a safe and effective operation for subcapital femoral neck fracture.

Effect of dynamic hip system blade on the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis

Objective：To discuss the curative effect of the dynamic hip system blade （DHS-blade） on the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis.Methods：A retrospective study was conducted to analyse the clinical data of 60 elderly patients with osteoporosis who had been treated for femoral neck fractures with DHS-blade in our department between September 2012 and February 2014.There were 22 males and 38 females with a mean age of （66.8±3.2） years.According to the Singh Index Classification,all the patients＇ Singh index was below level 3.The Harris criterion and function recovery after operation were analysed.Results：All patients were followed up for 12-17 months （mean 14 months）.No femoral head necrosis,femoral neck shortening,internal fixation loosening or backing out of the nails occurred.Bone nonunion was found in one case and he had a good recovery after total hip arthroplasty.The time for fracture healing ranged from 3-6 months （average 3.5 months）.According to Harris criterion,35 cases were rated as excellent,22 good,2 fair and 1 poor.The Harris scale was significantly improved from 28.46±2.35 preoperatively to 91.98±3.26 at 6 months postoperatively （P＜0.05）.Conclusion：DHS-blade,being minimally invasive,allowing earlier postoperative exercise and avoiding the complications elicited by traditional internal fixation,is advisable for treatment of femoral neck fractured patients with osteoporosis.

Quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone flap transplantation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for Chinese young and middle-aged patients： A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose： To compare the efficacy of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone flap transplantation combined with hollow compression screw fixation versus AO hollow compression screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for Chinese young and middle-aged patients. Methods： Case-controlled studies （CCTs） were used to compare the two operative methods in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Data were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, Pubmed Database, CNKI, Chinese Biomedical Database. Wanfang Data published during the period of January 2005 to December 2014. Methodological quality of the trials was critically assessed, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical Software Revman S.0 was used for data-analysis. Results： Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that there was statistical significance in the rate of fracture healing [OR = 5.43, 95% CI （2.89, 10.20）, p 〈 0.05], the rate of good function of hip joint [OR=5.12, 95% CI （3.21, 8.17）, p 〈 0.05], the rate of femoral head necrosis [OR = 4.21, 95% CI （2.02, 8.76）, p 〈 0.05], the time of fracture healing [WMD = -46.85, 95% CI （-65.13, -28.56）, p 〈 0.05] between the two groups. Conclusions： For the treatment of femoral neck fractures, the transplantation of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone flap combined with hollow compression screw; fixation is superior to the AO hollow compression screw fixation in terms of the rate; of fracture healing, the rate of good function of hip joint, the rate of femoral head： necrosis and the time of fracture healing.

Treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures

Objective：To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment options and causes of misdiagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. Methods： Among 20 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures, 19 were treated operatively and 1 was treated conservatively. Sixteen cases of femoral shaft fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with compressive plate, and 2 cases were treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing. Eighteen femoral neck fractures were treated with cannulated screws. Another patient was treated with proximal femoral nail to fix both the neck and shaft. Delayed diagnosis for femoral neck frac-tures occurred in 2 cases preoperatively. Results： A total of 19 patients were followed up. The follow up period ranged from 5 to 48 months with an average of 15 months. All the fractures were healed. Conclusion： For case of femoral shaft fracture caused by high energy injury, an AP pelvic film should be routinely taken. Once the femoral neck fracture is recognized, operative reduction and fixation should be performed in time. Femoral neck and shaft fractures should be fixed separately.

Cure of an old pediatric femoral neck fracture: a case report

The femoral neck in children is much stronger than that in adults and can only be fractured by a severe force. It is therefore rare and often associated with severe injury once it takes place. Besides, as the blood supply to the femoral head is precarious, the fracture can lead to a high incidence of post-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head.^(1,2) So, much attention should be paid to the treatment of femoral fractures in children. The authors have successfully cured an old femoral neck fracture of a girl by open reduction and internal fixation with 3 Kirschner wires supplemented by an external fixator across the hip joint and cancellous allograft at the fracture site. The patient has gotten a satisfactory functional recovery of the hip.

股骨颈动力交叉钉联合空心钉治疗Pauwels Ⅱ型中青年股骨颈骨折的有限元分析

背景:股骨颈骨折是一种还未被解决的骨折,虽然涌现了空心螺钉、动力髋螺钉及股骨颈动力交叉钉等效果较好的植入物,但对于Pauwels角和剪切力较大的股骨颈骨折的最佳内固定方案尚无定论。目的:采用有限元分析法研究不同置钉位置的股骨颈动力交叉钉联合空心螺钉治疗PauwelsⅡ型中青年股骨颈骨折的生物力学特性。方法:根据提取的志愿者股骨CT数据建立Pauwels角为50°的股骨颈骨折模型,将股骨颈均分为3等分,构建4组模型:A组股骨颈动力交叉钉主钉位于股骨颈中间1/3;B组股骨颈动力交叉钉主钉位于股骨颈下1/3;C组股骨颈动力交叉钉主钉位于股骨颈下1/3+空心螺钉位于股骨颈上1/3;D组股骨颈动力交叉钉主钉位于股骨颈中间偏前内侧1/3+空心螺钉位于股骨颈中间偏后内侧1/3。在1200 N的载荷下测量4组股骨、内固定模型的应力分布及峰值、最大变形情况和骨折断面的应力分布。结果与结论:①通过有限元分析可知,C组的股骨及内固定模型的应力分布及峰值、最大变形情况和骨折断面的应力均小于其余3组;②B组相较于A组有着更小的股骨骨质、内固定物和骨折断面应力和位移,说明股骨颈动力交叉钉头钉放置于股骨颈下1/3比中1/3更稳定;③结果表明,股骨颈动力交叉钉头钉位于股骨颈下1/3联合股骨颈上1/3平行放置螺钉对青壮年PauwelsⅡ型股骨颈骨折具有更好的稳定性,是治疗该类型骨折的有效选择。

髓内与髓外固定股骨颈基底部骨折的有限元分析:PFNA与FNS

背景:股骨颈基底部骨折生物力学稳定性差,治疗方案与传统股骨颈骨折有所差别,目前临床上治疗青年股骨颈基底部骨折的手术方案仍未达成统一。目的:通过有限元分析比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉与股骨颈动力交叉钉治疗股骨颈基底部骨折的生物力学特征。方法:首先使用Mimics Medical 21.0软件提取健康青年女性志愿者右侧股骨CT数据建立初步模型;然后将该模型导入Geomagic Wrap 2021软件进一步光滑处理;利用SOLIDWORKS 2021软件建立股骨颈基底部骨折模型、股骨近端防旋髓内钉模型、股骨颈动力交叉钉模型并进行装配;最后将装配后的模型导入Workbench 2021 R1软件进行生物力学分析。结果与结论:(1)应力分布:股骨近端防旋髓内钉组股骨模型应力分布主要在骨折线附近及股骨内侧,应力峰值为151.90 MPa;股骨颈动力交叉钉组股骨模型应力分布主要在骨折线附近,应力峰值为290.74 MPa;股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定应力主要分布在螺旋刀片及主钉近端,应力峰值为102.95 MPa;股骨颈动力交叉钉内固定应力分布主要由支撑棒向两边延伸,应力峰值为184.69 MPa;(2)总位移:股骨近端防旋髓内钉组股骨模型最大位移为4.032 3 mm,股骨颈动力交叉钉组股骨模型最大位移为4.648 9 mm,最大位移均位于股骨头;股骨近端防旋髓内钉组内固定与股骨颈动力交叉钉组内固定位移峰值分别为2.709 4 mm与3.130 3 mm,两组内固定位移均主要集中在内固定近端,逐渐向远端递减;(3)提示在股骨颈基底部骨折的模型中,无论是股骨模型还是内固定模型,股骨近端防旋髓内钉相较于股骨颈动力交叉钉应力分布更分散、应力峰值更低、股骨头位移更小,生物力学稳定性更优。

三种内固定方法治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折伴前内侧骨缺损的有限元分析

背景:不稳定型股骨颈骨折伴前内侧骨缺损是非常少见且难以处理的,治疗此种骨折的最佳内固定方案一直是骨科医生中持续争论的话题。目的:通过有限元分析评估不同内固定方式治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折伴前内侧缺损的生物力学性能,以期为临床手术决策提供实验支撑。方法:利用Mimics 21.0、Geomagic和Solidworks软件构建伴有前内侧缺损且Pauwels角为70°的股骨颈骨折模型,模拟3种内固定方法:A组(3枚空心钉+内侧钢板)、B组(股骨颈动力交叉钉+1枚空心钉)和C组(4枚空心钉“菱形固定”)。在3倍体质量2100 N的载荷下分析3组模型股骨、内固定以及股骨头的应力和位移变化。结果与结论:①A组模型的股骨整体应力最小,且受力更加均匀且分散;B组内固定模型的应力较小,说明其具有更好的应力分散和抗剪切的作用;A组股骨应力侧的应力明显小于其余两组,且未发生应力集中现象;②A组无论是整体股骨模型、内固定或是股骨头的位移均小于其余两组,说明空心钉联合内侧钢板能够起到更好的稳定作用,可减少髋内翻的发生;③3枚螺钉联合内侧支撑钢板应用于垂直、不稳定且前内侧骨缺损的股骨颈骨折,可显著提高骨折的稳定性,提高对变形力的抵抗力,是治疗该类型骨折的不错选择。