Products of Odd Numbers or Prime Number Can Generate the Three Members’ Families of Fermat Last Theorem and the Theorem Is Valid for Summation of Squares of More Than Two Natural Numbers

Fermat’s last theorem, had the statement that there are no natural numbers A, B, and C such that An + Bn = Cn, in which n is a natural number greater than 2. We have shown that any product of two odd numbers can generate Fermat or Pythagoras triple (A, B, C) following n = 2 and also it is applicable A2 + B2 + C2 + D2 + so on =An2 where all are natural numbers.

On Fermat Last Theorem: The New Efficient Expression of a Hypothetical Solution as a Function of Its Fermat Divisors

Denote by a non-trivial primitive solution of Fermat’s equation (p prime).We introduce, for the first time, what we call Fermat principal divisors of the triple defined as follows. , and . We show that it is possible to express a,b and c as function of the Fermat principal divisors. Denote by the set of possible non-trivial solutions of the Diophantine equation . And, let (p prime). We prove that, in the first case of Fermat’s theorem, one has . In the second case of Fermat’s theorem, we show that , ,. Furthermore, we have implemented a python program to calculate the Fermat divisors of Pythagoreans triples. The results of this program, confirm the model used. We now have an effective tool to directly process Diophantine equations and that of Fermat. .

Whole Perfect Vectors and Fermat’s Last Theorem

A naïve discussion of Fermat’s last theorem conundrum is described. The present theorem’s proof is grounded on the well-known properties of sums of powers of the sine and cosine functions, the Minkowski norm definition, and some vector-specific structures.

New Asymptotic Results on Fermat-Wiles Theorem

We analyse the Diophantine equation of Fermat xp yp = zp with p > 2 a prime, x, y, z positive nonzero integers. We consider the hypothetical solution (a, b, c) of previous equation. We use Fermat main divisors, Diophantine remainders of (a, b, c), an asymptotic approach based on Balzano Weierstrass Analysis Theorem as tools. We construct convergent infinite sequences and establish asymptotic results including the following surprising one. If z y = 1 then there exists a tight bound N such that, for all prime exponents p > N , we have xp yp zp.

Very Original Proofs of Two Famous Problems: “Are There Any Odd Perfect Numbers?” (Unsolved until to Date) and “Fermat’s Last Theorem: A New Proof of Theorem (Less than One and a Half Pages) and Its Generalization”

This article presents very original and relatively brief or very brief proofs about of two famous problems: 1) Are there any odd perfect numbers? and 2) “Fermat’s last theorem: A new proof of theorem and its generalization”. They are achieved with elementary mathematics. This is why these proofs can be easily understood by any mathematician or anyone who knows basic mathematics. Note that, in both problems, proof by contradiction was used as a method of proof. The first of the two problems to date has not been resolved. Its proof is completely original and was not based on the work of other researchers. On the contrary, it was based on a simple observation that all natural divisors of a positive integer appear in pairs. The aim of the first work is to solve one of the unsolved, for many years, problems of the mathematics which belong to the field of number theory. I believe that if the present proof is recognized by the mathematical community, it may signal a different way of solving unsolved problems. For the second problem, it is very important the fact that it is generalized to an arbitrarily large number of variables. This generalization is essentially a new theorem in the field of the number theory. To the classical problem, two solutions are given, which are presented in the chronological order in which they were achieved. Note that the second solution is very short and does not exceed one and a half pages. This leads me to believe that Fermat, as a great mathematician was not lying and that he had probably solved the problem, as he stated in his historic its letter, with a correspondingly brief solution. To win the bet on the question of whether Fermat was telling truth or lying, go immediately to the end of this article before the General Conclusions.

An Elementary Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem for Epsilons

The author presents a new approach which is used to solve an important Diophantine problem. An elementary argument is used to furnish another fully transparent proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. This was first stated by Pierre de Fermat in the seventeenth century. It is widely regarded that no elementary proof of this theorem exists. The author provides evidence to dispel this belief.

THE PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM

i) Instead of x￣n+ y￣n = z￣n ,we use as the general equation of Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT),where a and b are two arbitrary natural numbers .By means of binomial expansion ,(0.1) an be written as Because a￣r-(-b)￣r always contains a +b as its factor ,(0.2) can be written as where φ_r =[a￣r-(-b)￣r]/ (a+b ) are integers for r=1 . 2, 3. ...n (ii) Lets be a factor of a+b and let (a +b) = se. We can use x= sy to transform (0.3 ) to the following (0.4)(iii ) Dividing (0.4) by s￣2 we have On the left side of (0.5) there is a polynomial of y with integer coefficient and on the right side there is a constant cφ/s .If cφ/s is not an integer ,then we cannot find an integer y to satisfy (0.5), and then FLT is true for this case. If cφ_n/s is an integer ,we may change a and c such the cφ_n/s≠an integer .

A COMMENT ON THE PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM

In this paper, some conmments on the proof of Fermat’s last theorem are proposed.The main resuilt is thai the proof proposed by Wong Chiahe is only part of proof for fermat’s last theorem. That is to sqy ,the proof is not all-full proof to Fermat’s last theorem.

A Brief New Proof to Fermat’s Last Theorem and Its Generalization

This article presents a brief and new solution to the problem known as the “Fermat’s Last Theorem”. It is achieved without the use of abstract algebra elements or elements from other fields of modern mathematics of the twentieth century. For this reason it can be easily understood by any mathematician or by anyone who knows basic mathematics. The important thing is that the above “theorem” is generalized. Thus, this generalization is essentially a new theorem in the field of number theory.

From Pythagoras Theorem to Fermat’s Last Theorem and the Relationship between the Equation of Degree <i>n</i>with One Unknown

The most interesting and famous problem that puzzled the mathematicians all around the world is much likely to be the Fermat’s Last Theorem. However, since the Theorem was proposed, people can’t find a way to solve the problem until Andrew Wiles proved the Fermat’s Last Theorem through a very difficult method called Modular elliptic curves in 1995. In this paper, I firstly constructed a geometric method to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem, and in this way we can easily get the conclusion below: If a and b are integer and?a = b, n ∈ Q and n > 1, the value of c satisfies the function an + bn = cn that can never be integer;if a, b and c are integer and a ≠ b, n is integer and n > 2, the function an + bn = cn cannot be established.

One More Assertion to Fermat’s Last Theorem

Around 1637, Fermat wrote his Last Theorem in the margin of his copy “It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes, or a fourth power into two fourth powers, or in general, any power higher than the second, into two like powers”. With n, x, y, z ∈ N (meaning that n, x, y, z are all positive numbers) and n > 2, the equation xn + yn = zn has no solutions. In this paper, I try to prove Fermat’s statement by reverse order, which means no two cubes forms cube, no two fourth power forms a fourth power, or in general no two like powers forms a single like power greater than the two. I used roots, powers and radicals to assert Fermat’s last theorem. Also I tried to generalize Fermat’s conjecture for negative integers, with the help of radical equivalents of Pythagorean triplets and Euler’s disproven conjecture.

Solutions to Beal’s Conjecture, Fermat’s Last Theorem and Riemann Hypothesis

A Simple Mathematical Solutions to Beal’s Conjecture and Fermat’s Marginal Conjecture in his diary notes, Group Theoretical and Calculus Solutions to Fermat’s Last theorem & Integral Solution to Riemann Hypothesis are discussed.

On a Simpler, Much More General and Truly Marvellous Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem (I)

English mathematics Professor, Sir Andrew John Wiles of the University of Cambridge finally and conclusively proved in 1995 Fermat’s Last Theorem which had for 358 years notoriously resisted all gallant and spirited efforts to prove it even by three of the greatest mathematicians of all time—such as Euler, Laplace and Gauss. Sir Professor Andrew Wiles’s proof employed very advanced mathematical tools and methods that were not at all available in the known World during Fermat’s days. Given that Fermat claimed to have had the “truly marvellous” proof, this fact that the proof only came after 358 years of repeated failures by many notable mathematicians and that the proof came from mathematical tools and methods which are far ahead of Fermat’s time, has led many to doubt that Fermat actually did possess the “truly marvellous” proof which he claimed to have had. In this short reading, via elementary arithmetic methods, we demonstrate conclusively that Fermat’s Last Theorem actually yields to our efforts to prove it.

Small Modular Solutions to Fermat’s Last Theorem

The proof by Andrew Wiles of Fermat’s Last Theorem in 1995 resolved the existence question for non-trivial solutions in integers x,y,zto the equation xn+yn=znfor n>2. There are none. Surprisingly, there are infinitely many solutions if the problem is recast in terms of modular arithmetic. Over a hundred years ago Issai Schur was able to show that for any n there is always a sufficiently large prime p0such that for all primes p≥p0the congruence xn+yn≡zn(modp)has a non-trivial solution. Schur’s argument wasnon-constructive, and there is no systematic method available at present to construct specific examples for small primes. We offer a simple method for constructing all possible solutions to a large class of congruences of this type.

多项式环中的Fermat定理

首先介绍了多项式与多项式的基本式之间的一些性质,然后得到了定理:对于交换的无零因子环R,若满足条件:R[x]中任意两个多项式f(x)、g(x)都有最大公因式,那么对于R[x]中的任意互素的多项式f(x)、g(x)、h(x),且不全为常数,以及任何自然数n≥3,等式fn(x)+gn(x)=hn(x)永远不成立。

Euclidean环中的Fermat定理

介绍了基本多项式与多项式之间的关系,得到了定理:对于Euclidean环D上任意互素的多项式f(x),g(x),h(x),且不全为常数,以及任何自然数n≥3,等式fn(x)+gn(x)=hn(x)永远不成立.

Fermat大定理的初等证明

目的探寻费尔马大定理的初等证明。方法利用二项式定理展开式、代数方程根与系数的关系,及其初等数论的知识,采用反证的方法,用初等方法对费尔马大定理进行论证。结果费尔马大定理对任意的正整数n>2时,不定方程x^n+y^n=z^n没有正整数解。结论费尔马大定理可以用初等方法直接证明其结论的正确性。避弃了烦琐的间接初等证明法,避开了高深的高等解法,在学习和应用时给出了解决问题的思维方式和思路。

多项式环中的Fermat定理

本文首先介绍了基本多项式与多项式的根的个数的关系，然后得到了定理：对于闭域K上任意互素的多项式f（X），g（X），h（X），且不全为常数，以及任何自然数n≥3，等式f（x）^n＋g（x）^n=h（x）^n永远不成立，并将此结论推广到整环上也成立。

从Fermat大定理看数学问题在数学发展中的作用

回顾费马大定理的解决过程,从一个侧面论述了数学问题对数学发展的推动作用.

Fermat大定理的证明

本文应用Faltings定理与超椭圆曲线亏格定理,证明了Fermat大定理.