期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
One More Assertion to Fermat’s Last Theorem
1
作者 Balasubramani Prema Rangasamy 《Advances in Pure Mathematics》 2020年第6期359-369,共11页
Around 1637, Fermat wrote his Last Theorem in the margin of his copy “<em>It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes, or a fourth power into two fourth powers, or in general, any power higher than the s... Around 1637, Fermat wrote his Last Theorem in the margin of his copy “<em>It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes, or a fourth power into two fourth powers, or in general, any power higher than the second, into two like powers</em>”. With <em>n, x, y, z</em> <span style="white-space:nowrap;">&#8712;</span> <strong>N</strong> (meaning that <em>n, x, y, z</em> are all positive numbers) and <em>n</em> > 2, the equation <em>x<sup>n</sup></em> + <em>y<sup>n</sup></em> = <em>z<sup>n</sup></em><sup> </sup>has no solutions. In this paper, I try to prove Fermat’s statement by reverse order, which means no two cubes forms cube, no two fourth power forms a fourth power, or in general no two like powers forms a single like power greater than the two. I used roots, powers and radicals to assert Fermat’s last theorem. Also I tried to generalize Fermat’s conjecture for negative integers, with the help of radical equivalents of Pythagorean triplets and Euler’s disproven conjecture. 展开更多
关键词 fermat’s Last Theorem fermat’s conjecture Euler’s Disproved conjecture Other Way of Taxi Cab Number and N-Tangled Object Root of Prime Bases and Root of Integer Bases
下载PDF
The Resolution of the Great 20th Century Debate in the Foundations of Mathematics 被引量:1
2
作者 Edgar E. Escultura 《Advances in Pure Mathematics》 2016年第3期144-158,共15页
The paper resolves the great debate of the 20th century between the three philosophies of mathematics-logicism, intuitionism and formalism—founded by Bertrand Russell and A. N. Whitehead, L. E. J. Brouwer and David H... The paper resolves the great debate of the 20th century between the three philosophies of mathematics-logicism, intuitionism and formalism—founded by Bertrand Russell and A. N. Whitehead, L. E. J. Brouwer and David Hilbert, respectively. The issue: which one provides firm foundations for mathematics? None of them won the debate. We make a critique of each, consolidate their contributions, rectify their weakness and add our own to resolve the debate. The resolution forms the new foundations of mathematics. Then we apply the new foundations to assess the status of Hilbert’s 23 problems most of which in foundations and find out which ones have been solved, which ones have flawed solutions that we rectify and which ones are open problems. Problem 6 of Hilbert’s problems—Can physics be axiomatized?—is answered yes in E. E. Escultura, Nonlinear Analysis, A-Series: 69(2008), which provides the solution, namely, the grand unified theory (GUT). We also point to the resolution of the 379-year-old Fermat’s conjecture (popularly known as Fermat’s last theorem) in E. E. Escultura, Exact Solutions of Fermat’s Equations (Definitive Resolution of Fermat’s Last Theorem), Nonlinear Studies, 5(2), (1998). Likewise, the proof of the 274-year-old Goldbach’s conjecture is in E. E. Escultura, The New Mathematics and Physics, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 138(1), 2003. 展开更多
关键词 Axiom of Choice Banach-Tarski Paradox Goldbach’s conjecture LOGICISM CONSTRUCTIVISM fermat’s conjecture Field Axioms Formalism Qualitative Modelling Rational Thought SELF-REFERENCE
下载PDF
On the Diophantine System a^2+b^2=c^3 and a^x+b^y=c^z for b is an Odd Prime 被引量:3
3
作者 Mao Hua LE 《Acta Mathematica Sinica,English Series》 SCIE CSCD 2008年第6期917-924,共8页
Let a, b and c be fixed coprime positive integers. In this paper we prove that if a^2 + b^2 = c^3 and b is an odd prime, then the equation a^x + b^y = c^z has only the positive integer solution (x, y, z) = (2,2,3).
关键词 exponential diophantine equation positive integer solution generalized fermat conjecture
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部