The FIB-4 index is a simple and noninvasive algorithm consisting to evaluate liver fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Aim: To evaluate the utility of FIB-4 index as a noninvasive marker to assess liver fibrosis in chr...The FIB-4 index is a simple and noninvasive algorithm consisting to evaluate liver fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Aim: To evaluate the utility of FIB-4 index as a noninvasive marker to assess liver fibrosis in chronic HCV infection in comparison to transient elastography. Patients and Methods: We studied 30 patients having chronic HCV infection based on clinical features, laboratory tests, diagnostics images, Fibroscan and FIB-4 score. According to the results of Fibroscan, the 30 patients were classified into two groups in order to obtain a cutoff value to exclude patient with significant fibrosis: group Ia: 7 patients with no or mild liver fibrosis (F0-F1) and group Ib: 23 pa-tients with significant fibrosis or cirrhosis (F2-F3-F4). Group IIa: 17 patients with no or significant fibrosis (F0-F1-F2-F3) and group IIb (F4): 13 patients with cirrhosis (F4). Results: The mean of FIB-4 index increased with the increase of the fibrosis score. FIB-4 index proved to be sensitive and specific in differentiation between patients with no or mild fibrosis (F0-F1) and patients with significant fibrosis or cirrhosis (F2-F3-F4) with the best cutoff value at 1.61. It also proved to be sensitive and specific in differentiation between patients with no or significant fibrosis (F0-F1-F2-F3) and patients with cirrhosis (F4) with cutoff value at 1.88. Conclusion: The FIB-4 index enabled the correct identification of extreme types of fibrosis. Using these cutoffs (1.61 - 1.88), 87% of patients fell outside these ranges and could thus avoid liverbiopsy with an overall accuracy of 70%.展开更多
Background and Objectives: The indication for treatment in HBsAg-positive patients with low viral load and normal transaminases requires an assessment of fibrosis. In resource-limited settings, free hepatic fibrosis e...Background and Objectives: The indication for treatment in HBsAg-positive patients with low viral load and normal transaminases requires an assessment of fibrosis. In resource-limited settings, free hepatic fibrosis evaluation tests can aid in therapeutic decision-making. Our study aims to demonstrate the utility of assessing hepatic fibrosis using non-invasive markers (APRI and FIB-4) in patients with chronic B viral hepatitis without cytolytic activity and low viral replication in our context. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted between January 2018 and December 2021 at the University Hospital Center of Bouaké. Included were all patients aged ≥18 with normal transaminases (Results: Our study included 241 patients, with a mean age of 36.19 years (±10.52 years) and a male predominance of 52%. The mean FibroScan<sup>®</sup> value was 6.44 ± 2.3 kPa, and 68 patients (28.22%) had fibrosis >7 kPa. To exclude significant fibrosis (FS Conclusion: A significant proportion of HBV-infected patients with normal ALT and low viral load have active liver disease. Both FIB-4 and APRI biological scores are useful in identifying individuals without significant fibrosis with a good negative predictive value (>50%).展开更多
目的:探讨aMAP(age-male-ALBI-platelet,aMAP)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/血小板比率指数(aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index,APRI)、基于4因子的肝纤维化指数(fibrosis index based on the 4 factors,FIB-4)及肝硬度值(...目的:探讨aMAP(age-male-ALBI-platelet,aMAP)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/血小板比率指数(aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index,APRI)、基于4因子的肝纤维化指数(fibrosis index based on the 4 factors,FIB-4)及肝硬度值(liver stiffness measurement,LSM)评估乙型肝炎(乙肝)肝硬化患者食管胃静脉曲张(esophageal gastric varices,EGV)程度的价值。方法:选取2018年4月到2022年5月期间在上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院确诊并接受治疗的乙肝肝硬化患者114例,对其进行肝功能、血常规、LSM、胃镜等检查,根据计算公式计算aMAP、APRI、FIB-4。根据胃镜结果将患者分为无EGV组(39例)、轻度EGV组(30例)、中度EGV组(23例)及重度EGV组(22例),比较4组间的aMAP、APRI、FIB-4。采用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC曲线)分析aMAP、APRI、FIB-4及LSM评估乙肝肝硬化患者EGV程度的价值。结果:EGV患者(包括轻度、中度及重度EGV组)的aMAP、APRI、FIB-4、LSM均显著高于无EGV的患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。轻度、中度及重度EGV组间的aMAP、APRI、FIB-4差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);轻度EGV组与中度、重度EGV组间LSM差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。aMAP评估EGV程度的ROC曲线下面积(the area under ROC curve,AUROC)为0.76,灵敏度为85.9%,特异度为65.7%;APRI、FIB-4和LSM评估EGV程度的AUROC分别为0.86、0.85、0.79,灵敏度分别为81.30%、82.80%、88.40%,特异度分别为82.90%、77.10%、66.80%。aMAP、APRI、FIB-4和LSM对肝硬化患者是否合并EGV有较好诊断价值(P<0.05)。aMAP、APRI、FIB-4对乙肝肝硬化患者的EGV程度有一定诊断价值(P<0.05),但特异度较低。结论:aMAP、APRI、FIB-4及LSM诊断乙肝肝硬化患者伴EGV的价值较高,而aMAP、APRI及FIB-4对其EGV程度有一定评估价值,可作为不适合做胃镜患者评估EGV的补充参考,为EGV的预防及治疗提供依据。展开更多
目的观察卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声2022版(O-RADS US v2022)及其联合恶性风险指数4(RMI4)鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析126例手术病理诊断为附件肿瘤患者,根据O-RADS US v2022将1~3类归为良性病变、4~5类归为恶性病变,...目的观察卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声2022版(O-RADS US v2022)及其联合恶性风险指数4(RMI4)鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析126例手术病理诊断为附件肿瘤患者,根据O-RADS US v2022将1~3类归为良性病变、4~5类归为恶性病变,以450为RMI4分类的临界值,基于二者进行联合分类。以病理结果为金标准,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估单一O-RADS US v2022、RMI4及其联合鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的效能。结果126例附件肿瘤中,良性94例、恶性32例。O-RADS US v2022鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的敏感度、特异度、准确率及AUC分别为78.13%、80.85%和80.16%、0.795,RMI4分别为71.88%、84.04%和80.95%、0.780;二者联合的特异度及准确率(93.62%、92.06%)均高于单一O-RADS US v2022(χ^(2)=7.322、5.967,P=0.007、0.015)或RMI4(χ^(2)=4.625、5.331,P=0.032、0.021),而敏感度及AUC(87.50%、0.906)差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论O-RADS US v2022能有效鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤,联合RMI4可提高鉴别特异度及准确率。展开更多
目的:探究血清甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数、摄食抑制因子-1(nesfatin-1)、视黄醇结合蛋白4(RBP4)联合预测糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的价值,为DR早期预测提供支持。方法:回顾性分析。收集2022-02/2023-12我院接诊的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者164例...目的:探究血清甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数、摄食抑制因子-1(nesfatin-1)、视黄醇结合蛋白4(RBP4)联合预测糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的价值,为DR早期预测提供支持。方法:回顾性分析。收集2022-02/2023-12我院接诊的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者164例的临床资料,按照眼底检查结果分为DR组43例(其中增殖性DR 19例,非增殖性DR 24例),不合并DR的T2DM组121例。入院后记录患者基本资料,检查血清TyG指数、nesfatin-1、RBP4水平。结果:DR组病程长于T2DM组,空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白及TyG指数、RBP4水平高于T2DM组,高密度脂蛋白、nesfatin-1水平低于T2DM组(均P<0.001)。多因素Logistic回归分析可知,T2DM病程(OR=1.338,95%CI:1.059-1.690)、糖化血红蛋白(OR=5.065,95%CI:1.659-15.470)、低密度脂蛋白(OR=12.715,95%CI:2.385-67.790)、TyG指数(OR=23.057,95%CI:2.936-181.073)、RBP4(OR=1.319,95%CI:1.028-1.692)是T2DM患者发生DR的危险因素,nesfatin-1(OR=0.007,95%CI:0.003-0.016)为保护因素。绘制ROC曲线显示,TyG指数、nesfatin-1、RBP4均对T2DM患者并发DR具有一定预测价值,曲线下面积(areas under curve,AUC)分别为0.804、0.878、0.738,各指标联合预测时AUC为0.946,预测敏感度为83.72%、特异度为92.56%。增殖性DR患者TyG指数、RBP4水平高于非增殖性DR患者,nesfatin-1水平低于非增殖性DR患者(均P<0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,TyG指数、RBP4水平与DR病情程度呈正相关,nesfatin-1水平与DR病情程度呈负相关(r_(s)=0.557、0.392、-0.359,均P<0.05)。Pearson相关分析显示,T2DM并发DR患者TyG指数与nesfatin-1水平呈负相关,与RBP4水平呈正相关,nesfatin-1与RBP4水平呈负相关(r=-0.486、0.538、-0.592,均P<0.05)。结论:血清TyG指数、nesfatin-1、RBP4水平与DR发病风险及病情程度有关,可作为DR早期预测的标志物,且联合预测效能更好。展开更多
AIM To assess the diagnostic value of FIB-4, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index(APRI), and liver stiffness measurement(LSM) in patients with hepatitis B virus infection who have persistently normal ala...AIM To assess the diagnostic value of FIB-4, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index(APRI), and liver stiffness measurement(LSM) in patients with hepatitis B virus infection who have persistently normal alanine transaminase(PNALT).METHODS We enrolled 245 patients with chronic hepatitis B: 95 in PNALT group, 86 in intermittently elevated alanine transaminase(PIALT1) group [alanine transaminase(ALT) within 1-2 × upper limit of normal value(ULN)], and 64 in PIALT2 group(ALT > 2 × ULN). All the patients received a percutaneous liver biopsy guided by ultrasonography. LSM, biochemical tests, and complete blood cell counts were performed.RESULTS The pathological examination revealed moderate inflammatory necrosis ratios of 16.81%(16/95), 32.56%(28/86), and 45.31%(28/64), and moderate liverfibrosis of 24.2%(23/95), 33.72%(29/86), and 43.75%(28/64) in the PNALT, PIALT1, and PIALT2 groups, respectively. The degrees of inflammation and liver fibrosis were significantly higher in the PIALT groups than in the PNALT group(P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the areas under the curve(AUCs) between APRI and FIB-4 in the PNALT group; however, significant differences were found between APRI and LSM, and between FIB-4 and LSM in the PNALT group(P < 0.05 for both). In the PIALT1 and PIALT2 groups, no significant difference(P > 0.05) was found in AUCs for all comparisons(P > 0.05 for all). In the overall patients, a significant difference in the AUCs was found only between LSM and APRI(P < 0.05).CONCLUSION APRI and FIB-4 are not the ideal noninvasive hepatic fibrosis markers for PNALT patients. LSM is superior to APRI and FIB-4 in PNALT patients because of the influence of liver inflammation and necrosis.展开更多
Hepatitis C infection in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) poses management challenges. Of the world’s population, 3% are estimated to have chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection, which is resp...Hepatitis C infection in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) poses management challenges. Of the world’s population, 3% are estimated to have chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection, which is responsible for about 70% of cases of chronic hepatitis (accelerated chronicity in the presence of HIV and for such major complications as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) and Aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) scores are simple, inexpensive tests accessible to most people, and their performance has not yet been studied in C?te d’Ivoire. Objective: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores in liver damage in those co-infected with HIV/HCV in C?te d’Ivoire. Methods: This study was conducted over three months. The patients came from national blood transfusion center of the cities of Man and Daloa. The criteria for selecting respondents were at least 18 years of age and a positive test for HIV and HCV. APRI and FIB-4 scores were calculated for each patient from biological data obtained by COBAS C311 (Roche Hitachi, Japan). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad and MED-CALC software. Results: Our study involved 30 patients (men) of middle age (25 - 52 years), with extremes ranging from 0.67 to 8 for APRI and 0.201 to 22 for FIB-4. A predictive APRI and FIB4 score of significant hepatic fibrosis was observed in 23% of patients;however, 46% and 54% of patients for the APRI and FIB-4 score, respectively, would not have significant fibrosis. An APRI and FIB4 score not included in the classification limits of the type of fibrosis hepatitis was observed in 31% and 23% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The performance of the APRI and FIB-4 biological scores analyzed according to the interpretation of their cut-off values would enable classifying about 70% and 77%, respectively, of the patient population in the stages of hepatitis C fibrosis.展开更多
文摘The FIB-4 index is a simple and noninvasive algorithm consisting to evaluate liver fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Aim: To evaluate the utility of FIB-4 index as a noninvasive marker to assess liver fibrosis in chronic HCV infection in comparison to transient elastography. Patients and Methods: We studied 30 patients having chronic HCV infection based on clinical features, laboratory tests, diagnostics images, Fibroscan and FIB-4 score. According to the results of Fibroscan, the 30 patients were classified into two groups in order to obtain a cutoff value to exclude patient with significant fibrosis: group Ia: 7 patients with no or mild liver fibrosis (F0-F1) and group Ib: 23 pa-tients with significant fibrosis or cirrhosis (F2-F3-F4). Group IIa: 17 patients with no or significant fibrosis (F0-F1-F2-F3) and group IIb (F4): 13 patients with cirrhosis (F4). Results: The mean of FIB-4 index increased with the increase of the fibrosis score. FIB-4 index proved to be sensitive and specific in differentiation between patients with no or mild fibrosis (F0-F1) and patients with significant fibrosis or cirrhosis (F2-F3-F4) with the best cutoff value at 1.61. It also proved to be sensitive and specific in differentiation between patients with no or significant fibrosis (F0-F1-F2-F3) and patients with cirrhosis (F4) with cutoff value at 1.88. Conclusion: The FIB-4 index enabled the correct identification of extreme types of fibrosis. Using these cutoffs (1.61 - 1.88), 87% of patients fell outside these ranges and could thus avoid liverbiopsy with an overall accuracy of 70%.
文摘Background and Objectives: The indication for treatment in HBsAg-positive patients with low viral load and normal transaminases requires an assessment of fibrosis. In resource-limited settings, free hepatic fibrosis evaluation tests can aid in therapeutic decision-making. Our study aims to demonstrate the utility of assessing hepatic fibrosis using non-invasive markers (APRI and FIB-4) in patients with chronic B viral hepatitis without cytolytic activity and low viral replication in our context. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted between January 2018 and December 2021 at the University Hospital Center of Bouaké. Included were all patients aged ≥18 with normal transaminases (Results: Our study included 241 patients, with a mean age of 36.19 years (±10.52 years) and a male predominance of 52%. The mean FibroScan<sup>®</sup> value was 6.44 ± 2.3 kPa, and 68 patients (28.22%) had fibrosis >7 kPa. To exclude significant fibrosis (FS Conclusion: A significant proportion of HBV-infected patients with normal ALT and low viral load have active liver disease. Both FIB-4 and APRI biological scores are useful in identifying individuals without significant fibrosis with a good negative predictive value (>50%).
文摘目的:探讨aMAP(age-male-ALBI-platelet,aMAP)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/血小板比率指数(aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index,APRI)、基于4因子的肝纤维化指数(fibrosis index based on the 4 factors,FIB-4)及肝硬度值(liver stiffness measurement,LSM)评估乙型肝炎(乙肝)肝硬化患者食管胃静脉曲张(esophageal gastric varices,EGV)程度的价值。方法:选取2018年4月到2022年5月期间在上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院确诊并接受治疗的乙肝肝硬化患者114例,对其进行肝功能、血常规、LSM、胃镜等检查,根据计算公式计算aMAP、APRI、FIB-4。根据胃镜结果将患者分为无EGV组(39例)、轻度EGV组(30例)、中度EGV组(23例)及重度EGV组(22例),比较4组间的aMAP、APRI、FIB-4。采用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC曲线)分析aMAP、APRI、FIB-4及LSM评估乙肝肝硬化患者EGV程度的价值。结果:EGV患者(包括轻度、中度及重度EGV组)的aMAP、APRI、FIB-4、LSM均显著高于无EGV的患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。轻度、中度及重度EGV组间的aMAP、APRI、FIB-4差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);轻度EGV组与中度、重度EGV组间LSM差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。aMAP评估EGV程度的ROC曲线下面积(the area under ROC curve,AUROC)为0.76,灵敏度为85.9%,特异度为65.7%;APRI、FIB-4和LSM评估EGV程度的AUROC分别为0.86、0.85、0.79,灵敏度分别为81.30%、82.80%、88.40%,特异度分别为82.90%、77.10%、66.80%。aMAP、APRI、FIB-4和LSM对肝硬化患者是否合并EGV有较好诊断价值(P<0.05)。aMAP、APRI、FIB-4对乙肝肝硬化患者的EGV程度有一定诊断价值(P<0.05),但特异度较低。结论:aMAP、APRI、FIB-4及LSM诊断乙肝肝硬化患者伴EGV的价值较高,而aMAP、APRI及FIB-4对其EGV程度有一定评估价值,可作为不适合做胃镜患者评估EGV的补充参考,为EGV的预防及治疗提供依据。
文摘目的观察卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声2022版(O-RADS US v2022)及其联合恶性风险指数4(RMI4)鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析126例手术病理诊断为附件肿瘤患者,根据O-RADS US v2022将1~3类归为良性病变、4~5类归为恶性病变,以450为RMI4分类的临界值,基于二者进行联合分类。以病理结果为金标准,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估单一O-RADS US v2022、RMI4及其联合鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的效能。结果126例附件肿瘤中,良性94例、恶性32例。O-RADS US v2022鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的敏感度、特异度、准确率及AUC分别为78.13%、80.85%和80.16%、0.795,RMI4分别为71.88%、84.04%和80.95%、0.780;二者联合的特异度及准确率(93.62%、92.06%)均高于单一O-RADS US v2022(χ^(2)=7.322、5.967,P=0.007、0.015)或RMI4(χ^(2)=4.625、5.331,P=0.032、0.021),而敏感度及AUC(87.50%、0.906)差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论O-RADS US v2022能有效鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤,联合RMI4可提高鉴别特异度及准确率。
文摘目的:探究血清甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数、摄食抑制因子-1(nesfatin-1)、视黄醇结合蛋白4(RBP4)联合预测糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的价值,为DR早期预测提供支持。方法:回顾性分析。收集2022-02/2023-12我院接诊的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者164例的临床资料,按照眼底检查结果分为DR组43例(其中增殖性DR 19例,非增殖性DR 24例),不合并DR的T2DM组121例。入院后记录患者基本资料,检查血清TyG指数、nesfatin-1、RBP4水平。结果:DR组病程长于T2DM组,空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白及TyG指数、RBP4水平高于T2DM组,高密度脂蛋白、nesfatin-1水平低于T2DM组(均P<0.001)。多因素Logistic回归分析可知,T2DM病程(OR=1.338,95%CI:1.059-1.690)、糖化血红蛋白(OR=5.065,95%CI:1.659-15.470)、低密度脂蛋白(OR=12.715,95%CI:2.385-67.790)、TyG指数(OR=23.057,95%CI:2.936-181.073)、RBP4(OR=1.319,95%CI:1.028-1.692)是T2DM患者发生DR的危险因素,nesfatin-1(OR=0.007,95%CI:0.003-0.016)为保护因素。绘制ROC曲线显示,TyG指数、nesfatin-1、RBP4均对T2DM患者并发DR具有一定预测价值,曲线下面积(areas under curve,AUC)分别为0.804、0.878、0.738,各指标联合预测时AUC为0.946,预测敏感度为83.72%、特异度为92.56%。增殖性DR患者TyG指数、RBP4水平高于非增殖性DR患者,nesfatin-1水平低于非增殖性DR患者(均P<0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,TyG指数、RBP4水平与DR病情程度呈正相关,nesfatin-1水平与DR病情程度呈负相关(r_(s)=0.557、0.392、-0.359,均P<0.05)。Pearson相关分析显示,T2DM并发DR患者TyG指数与nesfatin-1水平呈负相关,与RBP4水平呈正相关,nesfatin-1与RBP4水平呈负相关(r=-0.486、0.538、-0.592,均P<0.05)。结论:血清TyG指数、nesfatin-1、RBP4水平与DR发病风险及病情程度有关,可作为DR早期预测的标志物,且联合预测效能更好。
文摘AIM To assess the diagnostic value of FIB-4, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index(APRI), and liver stiffness measurement(LSM) in patients with hepatitis B virus infection who have persistently normal alanine transaminase(PNALT).METHODS We enrolled 245 patients with chronic hepatitis B: 95 in PNALT group, 86 in intermittently elevated alanine transaminase(PIALT1) group [alanine transaminase(ALT) within 1-2 × upper limit of normal value(ULN)], and 64 in PIALT2 group(ALT > 2 × ULN). All the patients received a percutaneous liver biopsy guided by ultrasonography. LSM, biochemical tests, and complete blood cell counts were performed.RESULTS The pathological examination revealed moderate inflammatory necrosis ratios of 16.81%(16/95), 32.56%(28/86), and 45.31%(28/64), and moderate liverfibrosis of 24.2%(23/95), 33.72%(29/86), and 43.75%(28/64) in the PNALT, PIALT1, and PIALT2 groups, respectively. The degrees of inflammation and liver fibrosis were significantly higher in the PIALT groups than in the PNALT group(P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the areas under the curve(AUCs) between APRI and FIB-4 in the PNALT group; however, significant differences were found between APRI and LSM, and between FIB-4 and LSM in the PNALT group(P < 0.05 for both). In the PIALT1 and PIALT2 groups, no significant difference(P > 0.05) was found in AUCs for all comparisons(P > 0.05 for all). In the overall patients, a significant difference in the AUCs was found only between LSM and APRI(P < 0.05).CONCLUSION APRI and FIB-4 are not the ideal noninvasive hepatic fibrosis markers for PNALT patients. LSM is superior to APRI and FIB-4 in PNALT patients because of the influence of liver inflammation and necrosis.
文摘Hepatitis C infection in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) poses management challenges. Of the world’s population, 3% are estimated to have chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection, which is responsible for about 70% of cases of chronic hepatitis (accelerated chronicity in the presence of HIV and for such major complications as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) and Aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) scores are simple, inexpensive tests accessible to most people, and their performance has not yet been studied in C?te d’Ivoire. Objective: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores in liver damage in those co-infected with HIV/HCV in C?te d’Ivoire. Methods: This study was conducted over three months. The patients came from national blood transfusion center of the cities of Man and Daloa. The criteria for selecting respondents were at least 18 years of age and a positive test for HIV and HCV. APRI and FIB-4 scores were calculated for each patient from biological data obtained by COBAS C311 (Roche Hitachi, Japan). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad and MED-CALC software. Results: Our study involved 30 patients (men) of middle age (25 - 52 years), with extremes ranging from 0.67 to 8 for APRI and 0.201 to 22 for FIB-4. A predictive APRI and FIB4 score of significant hepatic fibrosis was observed in 23% of patients;however, 46% and 54% of patients for the APRI and FIB-4 score, respectively, would not have significant fibrosis. An APRI and FIB4 score not included in the classification limits of the type of fibrosis hepatitis was observed in 31% and 23% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The performance of the APRI and FIB-4 biological scores analyzed according to the interpretation of their cut-off values would enable classifying about 70% and 77%, respectively, of the patient population in the stages of hepatitis C fibrosis.
