A new cooperative approach for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients to receive timely and effective percutaneous coronary reperfusion in China

Background Acute myocardial infarction （AMI） is the most serious type of coronary heart disease. However, less than 30% of these patients have been treated effectively in China. Delayed treatment is a leading cause. This study aimed to evaluate a new regional cooperative model for improving the first medical contact-to-device time and the therapeutic effects on AMI patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 458 ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients was performed. Patients were divided into two groups in terms of before or after the model were implemented. First medical contact-to-device time （FMC2D）, Door to device time （D2D）, referral time, cardiac functions, mean cost, days of hospitalization, and major adverse cardiac events （MACE） were analyzed. Results The mean FMC2D time, D2D time and referral time of the model group were significantly lower than the control group. The left ventricular ejection fraction of the model group increased but the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension decreased compared with the control group at 6 months after discharge. These re- sults also showed that mean costs and days of hospitalization were reduced. The MACE rate was reduced in the model group. Conclusions These results suggested that the new model decreased the FMC2D time, which could improve the cardiac function and therapeutic effect of STEMI patients as well as decreased the financial burden.

Prehospital system delay in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Singapore

BACKGROUND: Timely reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)improves outcomes. System delay is that between first medical contact and reperfusion therapy,comprising prehospital and hospital components. This study aimed to characterize prehospital system delay in Singapore.METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 462 consecutive STEMI patients presenting to a tertiary hospital from December 2006 to April 2008. Patients with cardiac arrest secondarily presented were excluded. For those who received emergency medical services(EMS),ambulance records were reviewed. Time intervals in the hospital were collected prospectively. The patients were divided into two equal groups of high/low prehospital system delay using visual binning technique.RESULTS: Of 462 patients, 76 received EMS and 52 of the 76 patients were analyzed. The median system delay was 125.5 minutes and the median prehospital system delay was 33.5minutes(interquartile range [IQR]=27.0, 42.0). Delay between call-received-by-ambulance and ambulance-dispatched was 2.48 minutes(IQR=1.47, 16.55); between ambulance-dispatch and arrival-at-patient-location was 8.07 minutes(IQR=1.30, 22.13); between arrival-at- and departurefrom-patient-location was 13.12 minutes(IQR=3.12, 32.2); and between leaving-patient-location to ED-registration was 9.90 minutes(IQR=1.62, 32.92). Comparing patients with prehospital system delay of less than 35.5 minutes versus more showed that the median delay between ambulancedispatch and arrival-at-patient-location was shorter(5.75 vs. 9.37 minutes, P<0.01). The median delay between arrival-at-patient-location and leaving-patient-location was also shorter(10.78 vs.14.37 minutes, P<0.01).CONCLUSION: Prehospital system delay in our patients was suboptimal. This is the first attempt at characterizing prehospital system delay in Singapore and forms the basis for improving efficiency of STEMI care.

Challenges in managing ST elevation myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)may contribute to delayed presentations of acute myocardial infarction.Delayed presentation with late reperfusion is often associated with an increased risk of mechanical complications and adverse outcomes.Inherent delays are possible as every patient who is acutely sick is being considered a potential case or a career of COVID-19.Also,standardized personal protective equipment precautions are established for all members of the team,regardless of pending COVID-19 testing which might further add to delays.AIM To compare performance measures and clinical outcomes of all patients who presented to our facility with ST elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)during the COVID-19 pandemic to same time cohort from 2019.METHODS All patients who presented to our facility with STEMI during the pandemic were compared to a matched cohort during the same time period in 2019.STEMI with unknown time of symptom onset and inpatient STEMI patients were excluded.Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events(MACE)in-hospital and up to 14 d after STEMI,including death,myocardial infarction,cardiac arrest,or stroke.Significant differences among groups for continuous variables were tested through ANOVA,using SYSTAT,version 13.Chi-square tests of association were used to compare patient characteristics among groups using SYSTAT.Relative risk scores and associated tests for significance were calculated for discrete variables using MedCalc(MedCalc Software,Ostend,Belgium).RESULTS There was a significantly longer time interval from symptom onset to first medical contact(FMC)in the COVID-19 group(P<0.02).Time to first electrocardiogram,door-to-balloon time,and FMC to balloon time were not significantly affected.The right coronary artery was the most common culprit for STEMI in both the cohorts.Over 60%of patients had one or more obstructive(>50%)lesion(s)remote from the culprit site.In-hospital and 14 d MACE were more prevalent in the COVID-19 group(P<0.01 and P<0.001).CONCLUSION This single academic center study in the United States suggests that there is a delay in patients with STEMI seeking medical attention during the COVID-19 pandemic which could be translating into worse clinical outcomes.