Research Progress of Radical Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Based on Drug Sensitivity Test as First-Line Treatment

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is a global problem that affects about half of the world’s population and requires sufficient attention in clinical and scientific work. Due to differences in economic and medical conditions among countries around the world, there is currently no unified treatment plan for anti-HP. In China, empirical quadruple therapy is mainly used. With the abuse of antibiotics, many patients face the problem of secondary eradication after failure, and the resistance rate of HP is gradually increasing. After eradication failure, drug sensitivity cultivation is carried out to choose sensitive antibiotics for treatment. A new strategy is currently needed to address how to improve the eradication rate of HP during the first eradication. This article aims to discuss the first-line treatment plans and research progress for eradicating HP based on drug sensitivity testing before eradication. Compared with traditional empirical therapies, treatment based on drug sensitivity results can effectively improve the eradication rate of HP, and reduce drug resistance rates, and adverse reactions, among other benefits. .

Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposome versus paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin in the first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer:a multicenter,open-label,non-inferiority,randomized controlled trial

Background:The paclitaxel liposome formulation,encapsulating paclitaxel within a phospholipid bilayer,ad-dresses the insolubility of traditional paclitaxel formulations,thereby reducing toxicity without compromising its antitumor efficacy.Methods:This multicenter,open-label,non-inferiority randomized controlled trial(ChiCTR2000038555)evalu-ates the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposome in comparison to the standard regimen of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin(PLC vs.PC)as first-line therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.Results:An analysis of median progression-free survival(PFS)revealed non-inferior outcomes between 263 pa-tients in the PLC group and 260 patients in the PC group(32.3 vs.29.9 months,hazard ratio[HR],0.89[95%CI,0.64−1.25]),using a non-inferior margin of 1.3.Although the overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was comparable between groups,the PLC group experienced significantly fewer non-hematologic toxicities than those treated with the PC regimen.Conclusion:The findings affirm the non-inferiority of paclitaxel liposome compared to the combination of pa-clitaxel and carboplatin regarding therapeutic efficacy,with an enhanced safety profile marked by reduced non-hematologic toxicities.

Serum basic fibroblast growth factor and interleukin-1βpredict the effect of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND The incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in China are the second-highest in the world,and most patients with gastric cancer lose their chance of surgery by the time of their diagnosis.AIM To explore the predictive potential of serum basic fibroblast growth factor and interleukin-1βlevels for the effect of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.METHODS From the gastric cancer patients admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to April 2023,84 patients were selected and randomly and equally assigned to the experimental or control group.The FLOT group received the FLOT chemotherapy regimen(composed of oxaliplatin+calcium folinate+fluorouracil+paclitaxel),while the SOX group received the SOX chemotherapy regimen(composed of oxaliplatin+tiga capsules).The clinical efficacy,tumor marker levels,adverse reactions,and survival rates of the two groups were compared 7 days after the end of the relevant treatments.RESULTS The target effective rate of the FLOT group was 54.76%,which was much higher than that of the SOX group(33.33%;P<0.05).After treatment,both the groups demonstrated lower levels of cancer antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199),and peptide tissue antigen(TPS).For several patients before treatment(P<0.05).Third and fourth grades.In terms of adverse reactions,the level of white blood cells in both the groups was lower.Moreover,the incidence of hand-foot skin reactions in these two study groups was lower(P<0.05),while those of peripheral neuritis,vomiting,diarrhea,and abnormal liver function were significant(P<0.05).No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups(P<0.05).The 1-year survival rate was higher in the FLOT group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The FLOT regimen was effective in reducing the serum CEA,CA199,and TPS levels as well as in improving the 1-year survival rate of patients with good tolerability,making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Weekly albumin-bound paclitaxel/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:A phase II open-label clinical study

Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare both the efficacy and the safety of a weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel(nab-paclitaxel) plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods: A total of 84 participants received either 100 mg/m^2 nab-paclitaxel each week on d 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, as well as cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(nab-TP arm); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m^2 on d 1 and 8, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(GP arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival(PFS). The secondary end points were overall response rate(ORR) and overall survival(OS).Results: According to our analysis, the median PFS was 4.8 months for the nab-TP arm vs. 5.2 months for the GP arm(P=0.55). Analysis showed the median OS was 14.6 months for participants who were in the nab-TP arm vs. 15.1 months for those in the GP arm(P=0.94). Besides, nab-TP showed OS advantages over GP in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutation(26.7 vs. 15.3 months, P=0.046) and patients with a performance status of 0(23.5 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.020). It was found that incidences of drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were comparable between the two treatment arms.Conclusions: Therefore, it can be seen that weekly nab-TP treatment has a similar efficacy and tolerability to GP treatment for patients who are undergoing their first-line treatment for NSCLC. It could be that survival differences among platinum doublets in the context of both EGFR mutation and performance status have the potential to be the basis for our further clinical trials.

Role of cetuximab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)has evolved considerably in the last decade,currently allowing most mCRC patients to live more than two years.Monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)and vascular endothelial growth factor play an important role in the current treatment of these patients.However,only antibodies directed against EGFR have a predictive marker of response,which is the mutation status of v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog(KRAS).Cetuximab has been shown to be effective in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC.The CRYSTAL study showed that adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI(regimen of irinotecan,infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin)significantly improved results in the first-line treatment of KRAS wildtype mCRC.However,results that evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in this setting are contradictory.On the other hand,recent advances in the management of colorectal liver metastases have improved survival in these patients.Adding cetuximab to standard chemotherapy increases the response rate in patients with wild-type KRAS and can thus increase the resectability rate of liver metastases in this group of patients.In this paper we review the different studies assessing the efficacy of cetuximab in the first-line treatment of mCRC.

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential and hybrid therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy(MBST) versus hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From August 2014 to January 2015, 284 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized to receive a 14-d course of MBST(MBST group, n = 140) or hybrid(Hybrid group, n = 144) therapy. The MBST group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d, followed by 20 mg rabeprazole and 500 mg metronidazole twice daily, and 400 mg moxifloxacin once daily for 7 d. The Hybrid group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 14 d. In addition, the Hybrid group received 500 mg metronidazole and 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily for the final 7 d. Successful eradication of H. pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of treatment. Patient compliance was defined as "good" if drug intake was at least 85%. H. pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with treatment, and adverse event rates were evaluated.RESULTS: The eradication rates in the intention-totreat(ITT) analysis were 91.4%(128/140; 95%CI: 90.2%-92.9%) in the MBST group and 79.2%(114/144; 95%CI: 77.3%-80.7%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.013). The eradication rates in the perprotocol(PP) analysis were 94.1%(128/136; 95%CI: 92.9%-95.6%) in the MBST group and 82.6%(114/138; 95%CI: 80.6%-84.1%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.003). The H. pylori eradication rate in the MBST group was significantly higher than that of the Hybrid group for both the ITT(P = 0.013) and the PP analyses(P = 0.003). Both groups exhibited full compliance with treatment(MBST/Hybrid group: 100%/100%). The rate of adverse events was 11.8%(16/136) and 19.6%(27/138) in the MBST and Hybrid group, respectively(P = 0.019). The majority of adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity; none were severe enough to cause discontinuation of treatment in either group.CONCLUSION: MBST was more effective and led to fewer adverse events than hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

First-line endoscopic treatment with over-the-scope clips significantly improves the primary failure and rebleeding rates in high-risk gastrointestinal bleeding: A single-center experience with 100 cases

AIM To evaluate rebleeding, primary failure(PF) and mortality of patients in whom over-the-scope clips(OTSCs) were used as first-line and second-line endoscopic treatment(FLET, SLET) of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB, LGIB).METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database identified all patients with UGIB and LGIB in a tertiary endoscopic referral center of the University of Freiburg, Germany, from 04-2012 to 05-2016(n= 93) who underwent FLET and SLET with OTSCs. The complete Rockall risk scores were calculated from patients with UGIB. The scores were categorized as < or ≥ 7 and were compared with the original Rockall data. Differences between FLET and SLET were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the factors that influenced rebleeding after OTSC placement.RESULTS Primary hemostasis and clinical success of bleeding lesions(without rebleeding) was achieved in 88/100(88%) and 78/100(78%), respectively. PF was significantly lower when OTSCs were applied as FLET compared to SLET(4.9% vs 23%, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients who had OTSC placement as SLET had a significantly higher rebleeding risk compared to those who had FLET(OR 5.3; P = 0.008). Patients with Rockall risk scores ≥ 7 had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those with scores < 7(35% vs 10%, P = 0.034). No significant differences were observed in patients with scores < or ≥ 7 in rebleeding and rebleeding-associated mortality.CONCLUSION Our data show for the first time that FLET with OTSC might be the best predictor to successfully prevent rebleeding of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to SLET. The type of treatment determines the success of primary hemostasis or primary failure.

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy for first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastrointestinal disease

AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of 14-d moxifloxacinbased sequential therapy as first-line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:From December 2013 to August 2014, 161 patients with confirmed H.pylori infection randomly received 14 d of moxifloxacin-based sequential group(MOX-ST group, n = 80) or clarithromycin-based sequential group(CLA-ST group, n = 81) therapy.H.pylori infection was defined on the basis of at least one of the following three tests:a positive 13C-urea breath test; histologic evidence of H.pylori by modified Giemsa staining; or a positive rapid urease test(CLOtest; Delta West, Bentley, Australia) by gastric mucosal biopsy.Successful eradication therapy for H.pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test four weeks after the end of eradication treatment.Compliance was defined as good when drug intake was at least 85%.H.pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with drug treatment, adverse event rates, and factors influencing the efficacy of eradication therapy were evaluated.RESULTS:The eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 91.3%(73/80;95%CI:86.2%-95.4%)in the MOX-ST group and 71.6%(58/81;95%CI:65.8%-77.4%)in the CLA-ST group(P=0.014).The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis were 93.6%(73/78;95%CI:89.1%-98.1%)in the MOX-ST group and 75.3%(58/77;95%CI:69.4%-81.8%)in the CLAST group(P=0.022).Compliance was 100%in both groups.The adverse event rates were 12.8%(10/78)and 24.6%(19/77)in the MOX-ST and CLA-ST group,respectively(P=0.038).Most of the adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity;there was none serious enough to cause discontinuation of treatmentin either group.In multivariate analysis,advanced age(≥60 years)was a significant independent factor related to the eradication failure in the CLA-ST group(adjusted OR=2.13,95%CI:1.97-2.29,P=0.004),whereas there was no significance in the MOX-ST group.CONCLUSION:The 14-d moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy is effective.Moreover,it shows excellent patient compliance and safety compared to the 14-d clarithromycin-based sequential therapy.

Hormonal therapy might be a better choice as maintenance treatment than capecitabine after response to first-line capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative,metastatic breast cancer

Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthracycline?containing regimens.However,no clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of MCT and HT after response to first?line capecitabine?based combination chemotherapy(FCCT) in patients with hormone receptor(HR)?positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)?negative breast cancer.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 138 HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients who were in non?progression status after FCCT and who were treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,in Beijing,China.The median number of first?line chemotherapy cycles was 6(range,4–8);combined agents included taxanes,vinorelbine,or gemcitabine.Of these 138 patients,79 received MCT,and 59 received HT.Single?agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days,followed by a 7?day rest period,repeated every 3 weeks.Of the 59 patients who received HT,37 received aromatase inhibitors(AIs),8 received selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs),and 14 received goserelin plus either AIs or SERMs.We then compared the MCT group and HT group in terms of treatment efficacy.Results:With a median follow?up of 43 months,patients in the HT group had a much longer TTP than patients in the MCT group(13 vs.8 months,P ease?free surviv= 0.011).When TTP was adjusted for age,menopausal status,Karnofsky performance status score,disal,site of metastasis,number of metastatic sites,and response status after FCCT,extended TTP was still observed for patients in the HT group(hazard ratio:0.63;95% confidence interval:0.44–0.93;P = 0.020).We also observed a trend of overall survival advantage for patients in the HT group vs.patients in the MCT group,but the difference was not significant(43 vs.37 months,P tients in the MCT g= 0.400).In addition,patients in the HT group gen?erally tolerated the treatment well,whereas paroup experienced grades 3–4 adverse events,the most frequent of which were hand?foot syndrome(15.8%) and hematologic abnormalities(7.6%).Conclusion:For HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients,HT might be considered a treatment after response to FCCT but prior to MCT as a long?term administration.

Non-bismuth quadruple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication:A randomized study in Japan

AIM:To find the way to improve the eradication rate of first-line therapy in Japanese patients.METHODS:We prospectively compared the effectiveness of 7-d quadruple therapy to standard 7 d triple therapy in Japanese patients infected with Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori).One hundred and nineteen patients were randomly assigned to receive 7-d non-bismuth quadruple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin,clarithromycin and metronidazole(LACM7) or 7-d triple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin(LAC7).After three months,H.pylori status was analyzed by 13C-urea breath test.Incidence rates of adverse events were evaluated by use of questionnaires.RESULTS:By intention-to-treat(ITT) analysis,the eradication rate in the LACM7 group was 94.9%,which was significantly higher than the LAC7 group(68.3%,P < 0.001).Per protocol analysis also showed a significantly higher eradication rate in the LACM7 group(98.3%) than the LAC7 group(73.2%,P < 0.001).Nevertheless,the incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups(RR:1.10,95% CI:0.70-1.73,P = 0.67).CONCLUSION:Seven day non-bismuth quadruple therapy(LACM7) was superior to standard 7-d triple therapy(LAC7) for first-line eradication.

Quadruple therapy with moxifloxacin and bismuth for first-line treatment ofHelicobacter pylori

AIM:To compare triple therapy vs quadruple therapy for 10 d as first-line treatment ofHelicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:Consecutive H.pylori positive patients never treated in the past for this infection were randomly treated with triple therapy of pantoprazole(PAN) 20 mg bid,amoxicillin(AMO) 1 g bid and moxifloxacin(MOX) 400 mg bid for 10 d(PAM) or with quadruple therapy of PAN 20 mg bid,AMO 1 g bid,MOX 400 mg bid and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg bid for 10 d(PAMB).All patients were found positive at 13 C-Urea breath test(UBT) performed within ten days prior to the start of the study.A successful outcome was confirmed with an UBT performed 8 wk after the end of treatment.χ 2 analysis was used for statistical comparison.Per protocol(PP) and intention-to-treat(ITT) values were also calculated.RESULTS:Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the PAM group and 50 in the PAMB group.One patient in each group did not return for further assessment.Eradication was higher in the PAMB group(negative:46 and positive:3) vs the PAM group(negative:44 and positive:12).The H.pylori eradication rate was statistically significantly higher in the PAMB group vs the PAM group,both with the PP and ITT analyses(PP:PAMB 93.8%,PAM 78.5%,P < 0.02;ITT:PAMB 92%,PAM 77.1 %,P <0.03).CONCLUSION:The addition of bismuth subcitrate can be considered a valuable adjuvant to triple therapy in those areas where H.pylori shows a high resistance to fluoroquinolones.

First-line cisplatin,docetaxel,and cetuximab for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer:A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND The targeted therapy cetuximab[directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)]in combination with 5-fluorouracil and platinum-based chemotherapy(the EXTREME regimen)has shown substantial efficacy for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck(R/M SCCHN).Thus,this scheme has been established as the preferred first-line option for these patients.However,more recently,a new strategy combining platinum,taxanes,and cetuximab(the TPEx regimen)has demonstrated similar efficacy with a more favorable toxicity profile in clinical trials.AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TPEx scheme as first-line therapy in advanced SCCHN in a multicenter cohort study.METHODS This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic SCCHN treated with first-line TPEx at five medical centers in Argentina between January 1,2017 and April 31,2020.Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of docetaxel,cisplatin,and cetuximab followed by cetuximab maintenance therapy.Clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles were collected from medical charts.Treatment response was assessed by the investigator in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(version 1.1).Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(version 4.0).RESULTS Twenty-four patients were included.The median age at diagnosis was 58 years(range:36-77 years).The majority of patients(83.3%)received at least four chemotherapy cycles in the initial phase.In the included group,the overall response rate was 62.5%,and 3 patients achieved a complete response(12.5%).The median time to response was 2.4 mo[95% confidence interval(CI):1.3-3.5].With a median follow-up of 12.7 mo(95%CI:8.8-16.6),the median progression-free survival(PFS)was 6.9 mo(95%CI:6.5-7.3),and the overall survival rate at 12 mo was 82.4%.Patients with documented tumor response showed a better PFS than those with disease stabilization or progression[8.5 mo(95%CI:5.5-11.5)and 4.5 mo(95%CI:2.5-6.6),respectively;P=0.042].Regarding the safety analysis,two-thirds of patients reported at least one treatment-related adverse event,and 25% presented grade 3 toxicities.Of note,no patient experienced grade 4 adverse events.CONCLUSION TPEx was an adequately tolerated regimen in our population,with low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events.The median PFS were consistent with those in recent reports of clinical trials evaluating this treatment combination.This regimen may be considered an attractive therapeutic strategy due to its simplified administration,decreased total number of chemotherapy cycles,and treatment tolerability.

Sequential chemotherapy and icotinib as first-line treatment for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND Icotinib could have potential effect and tolerability when used sequentially with chemotherapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy followed by icotinib maintenance therapy as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.METHODS This multicenter,open-label,pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 68 EGFRmutated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients randomized 2:3 to the icotinib alone and chemotherapy+icotinib groups.RESULTS The median progression-free survival in the icotinib alone and chemotherapy+icotinib groups was 8.0 mo(95%CI:3.84-11.63)and 13.4 mo(95%CI:10.18-16.33),respectively(P=0.0249).No significant differences were found in the curative effect when considering different cycles of chemotherapy or chemotherapy regimen(all P>0.05).CONCLUSION A sequential combination of chemotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor is feasible for stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

Efficacy of gefitinib as a first-line single agent treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective： To assess the efficacy and toxicity of gefitinib as a single agent treatment in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： Forty-five patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with gefitinib at 250 mg daily until the disease progressed or the patient could not tolerate the toxicity. Results： None of the patients achieved a complete response （CR）, while 15 patients achieved a partial remission （PR） and 17 experienced a stable disease （SD）. Thirteen patients continued to have a progressive disease （PD）. The response rate and the disease control rate were 33.3% and 71.1%, respectively. The symptom remission rate was 72.5%, and the median remission time was 8 days. The median survival time was 15.3 months. The median progression-free survival time was 6.0 months. The most common toxicities included rash （53.3%） and diarrhea （33.3%）. Dehydration and pruritus of the skin developed in 26.7% and 22.2% of the patients, respectively. Hepatic toxicity occurred in 6.7% of patients and oral ulceration occurred in 4.4% of patients. Conclusion： Single agent treatment with gefitinib is effective against advanced NSCLC, and is well tolerated in Chinese patients.

Follow-up Study of Retreatment TB Patients with Sputum Smear and/or Culture Positive Two Years after They were Declared Cured with First-line Anti-TB Drugs in Shandong Province

This study aimed to learn the recurrence rate in the retreatment TB patients with sputum smear and/or culture positive （ss＋ and/or c＋） two years after they were declared cured, and to explore causes of recurrence in order to improve long-time treatment outcome. 5 cities were selected as research locations. Recurrence of TB was judged by chest X-ray examination together with sputum smear and culture examination.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line therapies for eradication of antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains:A network metaanalysis

BACKGROUND As a first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)infection,antibiotic therapy is widely used worldwide.However,the question of increasing antibiotic resistance must be considered.Given this issue,we need to find ways to reduce drug resistance.This study examined all currently available first-line regimens and compared them with standard triple treatment through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs).AIM To compare first-line treatment regimens for eradication of antibiotic-resistant H.pylori strains.METHODS To compare the effectiveness of the first-line regimens for treating H.pylori infection,a Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to process data extracted from RCTs.The plausible ranking for each regimen was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA).In addition,we conducted a relevant search by reference citation analysis.RESULTS Twenty-five RCTs involving 12029 participants[including 1602 infected with clarithromycin(CAM)-resistant strains and 1716 infected with metronidazole(MNZ)-resistant strains]were included,in which a total of seven regimens were used for H.pylori eradication.The results showed that dual therapy containing a high-dose proton pump inhibitor(HDDT)[odds ratio(OR):4.20,95%confidence interval(CI):2.29-8.13]was superior to other therapies for all patients,including those with CAM/MNZ-resistant H.pylori infection.In the comparative effectiveness ranking,for CAM-resistant H.pylori,HDDT(OR:96.80,95%CI:22.46-521.9)had the best results,whereas standard triple therapy ranked last(SUCRA:98.7%vs 0.3%).In the subgroup of high cure rates(≥90%),HDDT was also generally better than other therapies.CONCLUSION For the eradication of CAM-and MNZ-resistant H.pylori strains,HDDT exhibited considerable advantages.The studies of CAM-resistant H.pylori were based on small samples due to a lack of antibiotic sensitivity tests in many RCTs,but the results showed that all patients,including those with CAM-resistant H.pylori infection,had a concordant trend.Overall,HDDT may be a reference for RCTs and other studies of H.pylori eradication.

Clinical study on gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereotactic radiotherapy for senile patients with adenocarcinoma of lung as the first-line regimen

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereo-tactic radiotherapy for senile patients with adenocarcinoma of lung as the first-line regimen. Methods: The 153 senile patients with adenocarcinoma of lung were divided into 4 groups according to the therapy method. Group A was the 35 patients treated with gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereotactic radiotherapy. Group B was the 45 patients treated with γ-ray stereotactic radio-therapy. Group C was the 42 patients treated with gefitinib. Group D was the 31 patients treated with best supportive therapy. The patients received gefitinib of 250 mg/d from the first day until disease progression or other reasons. The patients were treated with γ-ray stereotactic radiotherapy from the second day. Dose curve of this group of cases was 50%-80%. Encircled dose was 4.0-6.5 Gy per fraction and the range of total dose was 36-48 Gy. The total number of treatment was 8-12 and treated six times every week. Results: All the patients were examined by enhanced double helix CT at the second month. The tumor response rate (RR) of group A was 68.6% (24/35). Disease control rate (DCR) was 88.6% (31/35). The median survival time (MST) was 13.4 months (range 3-34 months ) and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.8 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 40.0% (14/35). The main side effects included skin rash and diarrhea. The RR of group B was 51.1% (23/45). DCR was 71.1% (32/45). MST was 9.6 months (range, 3-18 months ) and PFS was 5.3 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 15.6 % (7/45). The RR of group C was 40.5 % (17/42). DCR was 61.9% (26 /42). MST was 10.3 months (range, 3-26 months ) and PFS was 5.1 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 35.7 % (15/42). The main side effects included skin rash and diarrhea. The MST of group D was 5.6 months (range, 2-11 months ) and PFS was 1.7 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 0. The short-term therapeutic effects (RR) of group A was higher than group C (P = 0.014 < 0.05, χ2 = 6.053) but has no significant difference with group B (P = 0.116 > 0.05, χ2 = 2.477). The long-term therapeutic effects (overall 1-year survival rate) of group A was higher than group B (P = 0.014 < 0.05, χ2 = 6.077) but has no significant difference with group C (P = 0.642 > 0.05, χ2 = 0.216). Conclusion: Gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereotactic radiotherapy is feasible and effective for treatment in senile patients with adenocarcinoma of lung as the first-line regimen.

Efficacy of cetuximab combination with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer first-line setting:the summary based on publications

Objective： The combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy was not widely studied though it was recommended by NCCN 2009 to apply in non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） first-line setting. The aim of this study was to summary the efficacy and safety profiles of all the NSCLC patients available in openly published papers treated with above mentioned regimens. Methods： The PubMed database was used to search all the papers on NSCLC associated with cetuximab treatment, and only the clinical trails applied cetuximab combined with doublets cytotoxic chemotherapy in first-line setting till to 30 November 2009 were collected. And the medians and their 95% CI of objective response rate （ORR）, progression free survival （PFS）, overall survival （OS）, and the common adverse events were calculated. Results： （1） Eight papers including 1032 patients were collected, and all cases were at advanced stage. （2） The ratio of male and female patients was 1.6, 50.1% patients were adenocarcinoma and 28.2% patients were squamous cell carcinoma （SCC）, 90.0% patients were PS = 0-1, and 78.2% patients were white ethnic. （3） The disease control rate （DCR）, ORR, PFS, and OS were 65.2% （95% CI： 60.7%-69.7%）, 33.2% （95% CI： 30.3%-36.1%）, 5.0 months （95% CI： 4.7-5.3） and 10.9 months （95% Cl： 9.6-12.2）, respectively. Conclusion： This is the first study to summarize the efficacy and safety profiles of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in NSCLC first-line setting based on all available patients. The addition of cetuximab caused promising prognosis and acceptable side effects excepting higher incidence of neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia.

FOLFOXIRI vs FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX regimen is the first-line reference chemotherapy(L1)in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(aPDAC).FOLFOXIRI,a schedule with a lower dose of irinotecan and no bolus 5-fluorouracil,has demonstrated efficacy and feasibility in colorectal cancer.AIM To investigate the potential clinical value of FOLFOXIRI in patients with aPDAC in routine clinical practice.METHODS Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated in L1 between January 2011 and December 2017 in two French institutions,with either FOLFOXIRI(n=165)or FOLFIRINOX(n=124)regimens.FOLFOXIRI consisted of irinotecan(165 mg/m2),oxaliplatin(85 mg/m2),leucovorin(200 mg/m2)and 5-fluorouracil(3200 mg/m2 as a 48-h continuous infusion)every 2 wk.Ninety-six pairs of patients were selected through propensity score matching,and clinical outcomes of the two treatment regimens were compared.RESULTS Median overall survival was 11.1 mo in the FOLFOXIRI and 11.6 mo in the FOLFIRINOX cohorts,respectively.After propensity score matching,survival rates remained similar between the two regimens in terms of overall survival(hazard ratio=1.22;P=0.219)and progression-free survival(hazard ratio=1.27;P=0.120).The objective response rate was 37.1%in the FOLFOXIRI group vs 47.8%in the FOLFIRINOX group(P=0.187).Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 28.7%of patients in the FOLFOXIRI cohort vs 19.5%in the FOLFIRINOX cohort(P=0.079).FOLFOXIRI was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 digestive adverse events.Hematopoietic growth factors were used after each chemotherapy cycle and the low hematological toxicity rates were below 5%with both regimens.CONCLUSION FOLFOXIRI is feasible in L1 in patients with aPDAC but does not confer any therapeutic benefit as compared with FOLFIRINOX.The low hematological toxicity rates strengthened the relevance of primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic growth factors.

Gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy has better efficacy than gefitinib alone for senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations as first-line regimen

Objective： The senile lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring an activating epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） mutation shows good and rapid response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors （TKIs）. Whether gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy has better efficacy than gefitinib alone for senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations as first-line regimen is still under investigation. Methods： The 42 senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations were divided into 2 groups according to the therapy method. Group A was the 22 patients treated with gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy （SBRT）. Group B was the 20 patients treated with gefitinib alone. All of the patients received gefitinib of 250 mg/d from the first day until disease progression or other reasons. The patients of Group A were treated with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy from the second day. Radiation fields included the primary lesions and the integration of lymph nodes. Dose curve of this group was 50%-80%. Encircled dose was 4.0-6.5 Gy per fraction and the range of total dose was 40-52 Gy. We treated the patients 8-12 times and treated five times every week. Results： All the patients were examined by enhanced double helix CT at the second month. The tumor response rate （RR） of group A was 81.8% （18/22）. Disease control rate （DCR） was 90.9% （20/22）. The median overall survival （OS） was 24.2 months （range 8-58 months ） and the progression-free survival （PFS） was 18.6 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 72.3% （16/22） and 2-year survival rate was 54.5% （12/22）. The main side effects included skin rash and diarrhea. The RR of group B was 50.0 % （10/20）. DCR was 75.0% （15/20）. OS was 17.4 months （range 6-32 months ） and PFS was 12.1 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 60.0% （12/20） and 2-year survival rate was 40.0% （8/20）. The main side effects included skin rash and diarrhea. The group A who were treated with gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy had a higher short term therapeutic effects （RR） and long term therapeutic effects （OS） than group B who were treated with gefitinib alone respectively （81.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.029 〈 0.05, x2 = 4.773 and 24.2 vs 17.4, P = 0.024 〈 0.05, X2 = 5.098）. Conclu. sion： Gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy has better efficacy than gefitinib alone for senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations as first-line regimen. The side affects are acceptable.