The habitat structure and floristic composition examined <span style="font-family:Verdana;">for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">this study are of great importance, provi...The habitat structure and floristic composition examined <span style="font-family:Verdana;">for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">this study are of great importance, providing a scientific baseline of information for developing a biodiversity database and in supporting crucial information for the management decision-making process of the buffer zones. The primary objective of this study was to examine the current status of species composition and stand structure of moist evergreen forests distributed in the TNR buffer zone. Forest inventory was conducted in the primary moist evergreen forest (~1 ha) and secondary moist evergreen forest (~1 ha). In the TNR buffer zone, 83 species belonging to 31 families in the primary moist evergreen forest and 86 species belonging to 32 families in the secondary moist evergreen forest were found. The most dominant families in the primary moist evergreen forest were Dipterocarpaceae, Sapindaceae, Meliaceae, Myrtaceae, and Myristicaceae;at species level</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">;</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">this forest was composed of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nephelium</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>lappaceum</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Myristica</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>malabarica</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nephelium</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>laurium</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aglaia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>andamanica</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Diospyros</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>peregrine</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The most dominant families in the secondary moist evergreen forest were Myrtaceae, Sapindaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Myristicaceae, and Lauraceae, while </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nephelium</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>lappaceum</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Syzygium</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">claviflorum</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Syzygium</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sp-1</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Eugenia</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">oblate</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Myristica</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>angustifolia</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were the most dominant at the species level. The results of S?rensen’s similarity index based on common species (Ks) and the similarity index based on species dominance (Kd) were observed at about 55% and 75% between the primary and secondary moist evergreen forests. The basal area (51.39 </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2.</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ha<sup>-</sup></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sup>1</sup></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) of the primary moist evergreen forest was higher than that (44.50 </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sup>.</sup>ha<span style="font-size:10px;"><sup>-1</sup></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) of the secondary moist evergreen forest. Between these two forest types, the Shannon-Wiener, the Simpson and the Evenness indices were not significantly different at (p < 0.05). The total number of trees per hectare (n/ha) of the primary and secondary moist evergreen forests w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 910 (±184) and 991</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(±183).</span> <div class="__kindeditor_paste__" style="position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px;overflow:hidden;left:-1981px;top:202px;white-space:nowrap;"> <table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="outline:0px;border-spacing:0px;width:772px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;overflow-wrap:break-word;color:#333333;font-family:-apple-system, " font-size:14px;background-color:#ffffff;"=""> <tbody style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;border:0px;overflow-wrap:break-word;"> <tr style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;border-width:1px 0px 0px;border-right-style:initial;border-bottom-style:initial;border-left-style:initial;border-right-color:initial;border-bottom-color:initial;border-left-color:initial;border-image:initial;border-top-style:solid;border-top-color:#DDDDDD;overflow-wrap:break-word;"> <td style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;padding:8px;margin:0px;overflow-wrap:break-word;border:1px solid #DDDDDD;font-size:14px;color:#4F4F4F;line-height:22px;"> <p align="left" style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;padding:0px;overflow:auto hidden;line-height:22px;"> ? </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div>展开更多
文摘The habitat structure and floristic composition examined <span style="font-family:Verdana;">for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">this study are of great importance, providing a scientific baseline of information for developing a biodiversity database and in supporting crucial information for the management decision-making process of the buffer zones. The primary objective of this study was to examine the current status of species composition and stand structure of moist evergreen forests distributed in the TNR buffer zone. Forest inventory was conducted in the primary moist evergreen forest (~1 ha) and secondary moist evergreen forest (~1 ha). In the TNR buffer zone, 83 species belonging to 31 families in the primary moist evergreen forest and 86 species belonging to 32 families in the secondary moist evergreen forest were found. The most dominant families in the primary moist evergreen forest were Dipterocarpaceae, Sapindaceae, Meliaceae, Myrtaceae, and Myristicaceae;at species level</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">;</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">this forest was composed of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nephelium</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>lappaceum</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Myristica</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>malabarica</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nephelium</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>laurium</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aglaia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>andamanica</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Diospyros</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>peregrine</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The most dominant families in the secondary moist evergreen forest were Myrtaceae, Sapindaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Myristicaceae, and Lauraceae, while </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nephelium</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>lappaceum</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Syzygium</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">claviflorum</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Syzygium</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sp-1</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Eugenia</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">oblate</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Myristica</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>angustifolia</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were the most dominant at the species level. The results of S?rensen’s similarity index based on common species (Ks) and the similarity index based on species dominance (Kd) were observed at about 55% and 75% between the primary and secondary moist evergreen forests. The basal area (51.39 </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2.</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ha<sup>-</sup></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sup>1</sup></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) of the primary moist evergreen forest was higher than that (44.50 </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sup>.</sup>ha<span style="font-size:10px;"><sup>-1</sup></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) of the secondary moist evergreen forest. Between these two forest types, the Shannon-Wiener, the Simpson and the Evenness indices were not significantly different at (p < 0.05). The total number of trees per hectare (n/ha) of the primary and secondary moist evergreen forests w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 910 (±184) and 991</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(±183).</span> <div class="__kindeditor_paste__" style="position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px;overflow:hidden;left:-1981px;top:202px;white-space:nowrap;"> <table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="outline:0px;border-spacing:0px;width:772px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;overflow-wrap:break-word;color:#333333;font-family:-apple-system, " font-size:14px;background-color:#ffffff;"=""> <tbody style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;border:0px;overflow-wrap:break-word;"> <tr style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;border-width:1px 0px 0px;border-right-style:initial;border-bottom-style:initial;border-left-style:initial;border-right-color:initial;border-bottom-color:initial;border-left-color:initial;border-image:initial;border-top-style:solid;border-top-color:#DDDDDD;overflow-wrap:break-word;"> <td style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;padding:8px;margin:0px;overflow-wrap:break-word;border:1px solid #DDDDDD;font-size:14px;color:#4F4F4F;line-height:22px;"> <p align="left" style="box-sizing:border-box;outline:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;padding:0px;overflow:auto hidden;line-height:22px;"> ? </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div>