Percutaneous transhepatic intraportal biopsy using gastroscope biopsy forceps for diagnosis of a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm:A case report

BACKGROUND Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(PNENs)are a rare group of neoplasms originating from the islets of the Langerhans.Portal vein tumor thrombosis has been reported in 33%of patients with PNENs.While the histopathological diagnosis of PNENs is usually based on percutaneous biopsy or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(EUS-FNA),these approaches may be impeded by gastric varices,poor access windows,or anatomically contiguous critical structures.Obtaining a pathological diagnosis using a gastroscope biopsy forceps via percutaneous transhepatic intravascular pathway is an innovative method that has rarely been reported.CASE SUMMARY A 72-year-old man was referred to our hospital for abdominal pain and melena.Abdominal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed a wellenhanced tumor(size:2.4 cm×1.2 cm×1.2 cm)in the pancreatic tail with portal vein invasion.Traditional pathological diagnosis via EUS-FNA was not possible because of diffuse gastric varices.We performed a percutaneous transportal biopsy of the portal vein tumor thrombus using a gastroscope biopsy forceps.Histopathologic examination revealed a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm(G2)with somatostatin receptors 2(+),allowing systemic treatment.CONCLUSION Intravascular biopsy using gastroscope biopsy forceps appears to be a safe and effective method for obtaining a histopathological diagnosis.Although welldesigned clinic trials are required to obtain more definitive evidence,this procedure may help improve the diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis and related diseases.

Active gastrointestinal bleeding:Use of hemostatic forceps beyond endoscopic submucosal dissection

To the best of our knowledge,this is the f irst report of the application of hemostatic forceps in active gastrointestinal(GI) bleeding that is not related to endoscopic submucosal dissection.An 86-year-old woman with chronic intake of low-dose aspirin had a Dieulafoy's lesion of the third duodenal portion.Bleeding control with epinephrine injection was unsuccessful.A 60-year-old man presented with a bleeding ulcer in the duodenal bulb.Ten days after combined endotherapy,he had recurrent bleeding from two minimal lesions in the same location.A 66-year-old woman under combined antithrombotic treatment was referred to us for chronic GI bleeding of unexplained origin.Endoscopy revealed active diverticular bleeding in the second duodenal portion.A 61-year-old woman underwent endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial gastric adenocarcinoma,which was complicated with immediate bleeding.In all cases,the blood was washed out using a water-jet-equipped,single-channel gastroscope with a large working channel.The bleeding points were pinched and retracted with hemostatic forceps.Monopolar electrocoagulation was performed using an electrosurgical current generator.Hemostasis was achieved.No complications occurred.In conclusion,hemostatic forceps may be an effective as well as safe alternative approach for active GI bleeding of various origins.

A new breakthrough:ESD using a newly developed grasping type scissor forceps for early gastrointestinal tract neoplasms

Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) has allowed the achievement of histologically curative en bloc resection of gastrointestinal neoplasms regardless of size,permitting the resection of previously non-resectable tumors.The ESD technique for treatment of early gastric cancer has spread rapidly in Japan and a few other Asian countries due to its excellent eradication rate compared to endoscopic mucosal resection.Although numerous electrosurgical knives have been developed for ESD,technical difficulties and high complication rates(bleeding and perforation) have limited their use worldwide.We developed the grasping type scissor forceps(GSF) to resolve such ESD-related problems.Our animal and preliminary clinical studies showed that ESD using GSF is a safe(no intraoperative complication) and technically efficient(curative en bloc resection rate 92%) method for dissection of early gastrointestinal tumors.The use of GSF is a promising option for performing ESD on early stage GI tract tumors both safely and effectively.

Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy

AIM: To determine the accuracy of endoscopic polyp size measurements using disposable graduated biopsy forceps(DGBF). METHODS: Gradations accurate to 1 mm were assessed with the wire of disposable graduated biopsy forceps. When a polyp was noted, endoscopists determined the width of the polyp; then, the graduated biopsy forceps was inserted and the largest diameter of the tumor was measured. After excision, during surgery or endoscopy, the polyp was measured using the vernier caliper.RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three colorectal polyps from 119 patients were studied. The mean diameter, by post-polypectomy measurement, was 0.92 ± 0.69 cm; 83 were < 1 cm, 36 were between 1 and 2 cm, and 14 were > 2 cm. The mean diameter, by visual estimation, was 1.15 ± 0.88 cm; compared to the actual size measured using vernier calipers, the difference was statistically significant. The mean diameter measured using the DGBF was 0.93 ± 0.68 cm; compared to the actual size measured using vernier calipers, this difference was not statistically significant. The ratio between the mean size estimated by visual estimation and the actual size was significantly different from that between the mean size estimated using the DGBF and the actual size(1.26 ± 0.30 vs 1.02 ± 0.11).CONCLUSION: The accuracy of polyp size estimation was low by visual assessment; however, it improved when the DGBF was used.

Removal of a large foreign body in the rectosigmoid colon by colonoscopy using gastrolith forceps

Rectal foreign bodies are man-made injury that occurs occasionally.The management depends on its depth and the consequence it caused.We here report a case of rectal foreign body(a glass bottle measuring about 38 mm×75 mm)which was located 13-15 cm from the anus.The patient had no sign of perforation,and we managed to remove it using endoscopy with gastrolith forceps.

Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?

Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps(DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety. This has led to confusion and a gap in clinical practice. This article discusses the usefulness and contemporary practical applicability of hot biopsy forceps and provides wellintentioned criticism of the new European guidelines for the treatment of DCPs. Diminutive colorectal polyps are a source of frustration for the endoscopist since their small size is accompanied by a considerable risk of premalignant neoplasia and a small but nonnegligible risk of advanced neoplasia and even cancer. Since the proportion of diminutive colorectal polyps is substantial and exceeds that of larger polyps, their effective removal poses a considerable workload and a therapeutic challenge. During the last decade, the introduction of cold snaring to routine endoscopy practice has attempted to overcome the use of prior techniques, such as hot biopsy forceps. It is important to recognize that with the exception of endoscopic methods that are obviously unsafe and inadequate to serve their purpose, all other interventional endoscopic methods are operator-dependent in the sense that specific expertise and training are obligatory for the success of any therapeutic intervention. Since relevant publications on hot biopsy forceps are still in favor of its careful use, as it has not yet demonstrated inferiority compared with newer techniques, it would be prudent for any medical practitioner to evaluate the available tools and judge any new proposed technique based on the evidence before it is adopted.

A new application of capsulorhexis forceps in phacoemulsification: capsulorhexis forceps-assisted prechop technique

Dear Editor,I am Dr.Jian-Cen Tang,from the Department of Ophthalmology,Shanghai East Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai.I write to present a new application of capsulorhexis forceps in phacoemulsification,which is called capsulorhexis forceps-assisted prechop technique.

Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus

AIM:To assess the sampling quality of four different forceps(three large capacity and one jumbo) in patients with Barrett's esophagus.METHODS:This was a prospective,single-blind study.A total of 37 patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled.Targeted or random biopsies with all four forceps were obtained from each patient using a diagnostic endoscope during a single endoscopy.The following forceps were tested:A:FB-220 K disposable large capacity;B:BI01-D3-23 reusable large capacity;C:GBF-02-23-180 disposable large capacity;and jumbo:disposable Radial Jaw 4 jumbo.The primary outcome measurement was specimen adequacy,defined as a well-oriented biopsy sample 2 mm or greater with the presence of muscularis mucosa.RESULTS:A total of 436 biopsy samples were analyzed.We found a significantly higher proportion of adequate biopsy samples with jumbo forceps(71%)(P < 0.001 vs forceps A:26%,forceps B:17%,and forceps C:18%).Biopsies with jumbo forceps had the largest diameter(median 2.4 mm)(P < 0.001 vs forceps A:2 mm,forceps B:1.6 mm,and forceps C:2mm).There was a trend for higher diagnostic yield per biopsy with jumbo forceps(forceps A:0.20,forceps B:0.22,forceps C:0.27,and jumbo:0.28).No complications related to specimen sampling were observed with any of the four tested forceps.CONCLUSION:Jumbo biopsy forceps,when used with a diagnostic endoscope,provide more adequate specimens as compared to large-capacity forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

A standardized method to create peripheral nerve injury in dogs using an automatic non-serrated forceps

This study describes a method that not only generates an automatic and standardized crush injury in the skull base, but also provides investigators with the option to choose from a range of varying pressure revels. We designed an automatic, non-serrated forceps that exerts a varying force of 0 to 100 g and lasts for a defined period of 0 to 60 seconds. This device was then used to generate a crush injury to the right oculomotor nerve of dogs with a force of 10 g for 15 seconds, resulting in a deficit in the pupil-light reflex and ptosis. Further testing of our model with Toluidine-blue staining demonstrated that, at 2 weeks post-surgery disordered oculomotor nerve fibers, axonal loss, and a thinner than normal myelin sheath were visible. Electrophysiological examination showed occasional spontaneous potentials. Together, these data verified that the model for oculomotor nerve injury was successful, and that the forceps we designed can be used to establish standard mechanical injury models of peripheral nerves.

Evaluation of novel slim biopsy forceps for diagnosis of biliary strictures: Single-institutional study of consecutive 360 cases(with video)

AIM To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy for the diagnosis of biliary strictures.METHODS A total of 360 patients(241 men) who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary strictures with biopsy from April 2012 to March 2016 at Tokyo Medical University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board(No. 3516). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. The biopsy specimens were obtained using a novel slim biopsy forceps(Radial Jaw 4P, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA, United States).RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 69.6%, 100%, 100%, 59.1%, and 78.8%, respectively. The sensitivity was 75.6% in bile duct cancer, 64% in pancreatic cancer, 61.1% in gallbladder cancer, and 57.1% in metastasis. In bile duct cancer, a lower sensitivity was observed for perihilar bile duct stricture(68.7%) than for distal bile duct stricture(83.1%). In terms of the stricture lengths of pancreatic cancer, gallbladder cancer, and metastasis, a longer stenosis resulted in a better sensitivity. In particular, there was a significant difference between pancreatic cancer and gallbladder cancer(P < 0.05). One major complication was perforation of the extrahepatic bile duct with bile leakage. CONCLUSION Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy alone using novel slim biopsy forceps is feasible and reliable, but restrictive. Biopsy should be performed in consideration of the stricture level, stricture length, and cancer type.

Removal of intraocular foreign body in anterior chamber angle with prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps

AIM：To introduce a novel approach in removal of anterior chamber angle foreign body（ACFB） using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps.METHODS：Data of 42 eyes of 42 patients who had undergone removal of ACFB using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps from January 2008 to October 2013 were collected and analyzed. Twenty eyes in group A received the conventional approach by using toothed forceps through corneal limbus incision, and 22 eyes in group B underwent the novel method through the opposite corneal limbus incision. RESULTS：The success rate of ACFB once removal was 75%（15/20） in group A, and 100%（22/22） in group B. The average operation time of group A was significantly longer compared with group B（34.9±9.88 min vs 22.13±8.85min; P〈0.05）. The average size of corneal limbus incision in group A was significantly larger than that of group B（4.85±1.89 mm vs 3.95±1.17 mm; P〈0.05）. The corneal limbus incision suturing were conducted in all eyes in group A, and only 5 eyes in group B. CONCLUSION：Removal of ACFB using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps is a safer, more effective, and convenient technique compared with the conventional approach.

Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Newly Developed Forceps to Remove Intrauterine Foreign Bodies

Clinical use of a new forceps for foreign body removal (Intrauterine forceps) is introduced in this paper. The forceps can fit in uterine cavity during operation. A total of 310 foreign bodies in uterus, including IUD breakage, IUD embedment and remained fetal bone were removed satisfactorily by the new forceps. Two case failed. The two failed cases were not diagnosed before operation. One was a broken stainless steel ring and embedded into myometrium deeply. It was difficult to remove the IUD and the patient was advised to undergo a hysteroscopy diagnosis. Another one was a stainless steel V shaped Cu IUD, which was broken into several pieces and removed by the forceps, but a small piece remained and was removed with aid of hysteroscopy. The new type of foeceps was proved to be effective and should be popularized.

Comparison between Forceps, Single Blade Forceps and Manual Extraction of Fetal Head in Elective Caesarean Section: A Randomized Control Trial—Forceps Delivery in Cesarean Section

Objective: The fundal pressure exerted by the assistant to deliver fetal head is often painful to the patient. This study assesses the use of double blade forceps in delivery of fetal head at time of elective Cesarean Section (CS). Methods: A prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted among 150 women with repeat elective CS at Ain Shams university hospital, Air Force Specialized hospital and October 6th university hospital. Women were classified into 3 groups (each 50 women). Forceps group: A double blade of forceps was used without fundal pressure. Single blade group: single blade of forceps was used assisted by fundal pressure. Manual group: manual extraction was used assisted by fundal pressure. The outcome of study were;Pain expectation score , pain score during delivery of head, unintended uterine extension, uterine vessels injury and need for additional stitches. The collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: High Statistically significant difference in pain score during delivery of head in favor of forceps group (P = 0.001). No differences were found among 3 groups as regarding pain expectation, uterine extension, uterine vessel injury and in need of haemostatic stitches (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Use of double blade forceps is less painful for the patients during delivery of head in CS.

Forceps Delivery at the Maternity Ward of Donka National Teaching Hospital Conakry (Guinea): Indications and Maternal-F&#339;tal Prognosis

Objectives: The objectives of this work were to describe the socio-demographic, clinical and prognostic characteristics of forceps deliveries at the maternity ward of the Donka National Teaching Hospital of Conakry. Parturients and Method: This was a prospective and descriptive study of all forceps deliveries performed at the Donka National Hospital maternity ward over a 6-month period from April 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018. Results: We performed 90 fetal extractions by forceps on 3518 deliveries i.e. a frequency of 2.55%. The socio-demographic profile of the parturient women was that of a young primiparous woman with an average age of 21.20 years and a full-term pregnancy with an average gestational age of 39 weeks of amenorrhoea. Fore position varieties were the most frequent with, in order of frequency, the fore left occipito-iliac (61.3%) and the fore right occipito-iliac (22.22%). Posterior varieties accounted for 15.55% of cases. Clinical pelvimetry showed that 88.89% of parturients had a practicable pelvis, while 11.11% had a moderately narrow pelvis. Acute fetal suffering was the most common indication (55.56%), followed by maternal exhaustion (27.78%) and prolonged expulsion (16.67%). All forceps were performed by doctors. We noted 8 cases of forceps failure (8.88%) that required a cesarean section. Maternal complications were dominated by soft tissue lesions, including 7 cases of perineal tearing (7.77%);4 cases of vaginal tearing (4.44%);3 cases of cervical tearing (3.33%) and 2 cases of hemorrhage of delivery by uterine atony (2.22%). No cases of maternal death have been recorded. The majority of newborns had a normal birth weight (88.88%) and more than half of newborns (66.66%) had an Apgar score below 7 out of 10 at the first minute. By the fifth minute there was an improvement in Apgar’s score from an average of 5 to 8 out of 10. Five newborns died, or 5.55%. Conclusion: Forceps extractions are less and less practiced in our maternity wards. Their bad reputation has something to do with it, but this is not always justified, because complications are rare and minimal if the indications are well laid out and the operator experienced. It therefore seems important to reposition this instrument, which still retains its place in obstetrical practices.

Advances in endoscopic therapy using grasping-type scissors forceps(with video)

Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)is a globally accepted minimally invasive therapy for early-stage gastrointestinal tract tumors.Although numerous electrosurgical knives have been developed for ESD,technical difficulties and high complication rates(bleeding and perforation)have limited their use worldwide.The grasping-type scissors forceps[clutch cutter(CC)]is the first forceps-type resection device developed with reference to hemostatic forceps.The aim was to allow easy and safe ESD throughout the gastro-intestinal tract,as a biopsy technique,using one device.The CC can grasp the target tissue accurately and pull it away from the underlying muscle layer prior to energizing the tissue,for safe and effective incision and hemostasis during ESD.Reported clinical studies showed that ESD using the CC(ESD-CC)is a safe(perforation rate:0%-3.6%;delayed bleeding rate:0%-4.2%),technically efficient(en-bloc resection rate:88.9%-100%),and single-device method for dissecting early-stage gastrointestinal tract tumors.The ESD-CC technique is simple and easy to learn because it can be completed simply by repeating the grasp,pull,and coagulate and/or incise actions using an electrosurgical current.The reported self-completion rate by nonexperts was significantly better with the CC than with conventional knives(61.7%vs 24.5%,respectively;P<0.001).Furthermore,the CC is used for other endoscopic therapies,such as endoscopic polypectomy for large pedunculated polyps,endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s diverticulum,endoscopic treatment of buried bumper syndrome,and endoscopic necrosectomy for wall-off pancreatic necrosis.The initial reports using CC for these therapies have shown favorable results.In this review,we describe the structural features of the CC,how to use the instrument,efficacies of ESD-CC,and other unique endoscopic therapies using the CC.

Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy

AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy(CSP) and hot forceps biopsy(HFB) for diminutive colorectal polyps.METHODS This prospective, randomized single-center clinical trial included consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age with diminutive colorectal polyps 3-5 mm from December 2014 to October 2015. The primary outcome measures were en-bloc resection(endoscopic evaluation) and complete resection rates(pathological evaluation). The secondary outcome measures were the immediate bleeding or immediate perforation rate after polypectomy, delayed bleeding or delayed perforation rate after polypectomy, use of clipping for bleeding or perforation, and polyp retrieval rate. Prophylactic clipping after polyp removal wasn't routinely performed.RESULTS Two hundred eight patients were randomized into the CSP(102), HFB(106) and 283 polyps were evaluated(CSP: 148, HFB: 135). The en-bloc resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [99.3%(147/148) vs 80.0%(108/135), P < 0.0001]. The complete resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [80.4%(119/148) vs 47.4%(64/135), P < 0.0001]. The immediate bleeding rate was similar between the groups [8.6%(13/148) vs 8.1%(11/135), P = 1.000], and endoscopic hemostasis with hemoclips was successful in all cases. No cases of perforation or delayed bleeding occurred. The rate of severe tissue injury to the pathological specimen was higher HFB than CSP [52.6%(71/135) vs 1.3%(2/148), P < 0.0001]. Polyp retrieval failure was encountered CSP(7), HFB(2).CONCLUSION CSP is more effective than HFB for resecting diminutive polyps. Further long-term follow-up study is required.

Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity of brush cytology and forceps biopsy in a homogeneous patient group with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.METHODS: Brush cytology and forceps biopsy were routinely performed in patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures. Fifty-eight consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) including forceps biopsy and brush cytology in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 1995-2005.RESULTS: Positive results for malignancy were obtained in 24/58 patients (41.4%) by brush cytology and in 31/58 patients (53.4%) by forceps biopsy. The combination of both techniques brush cytology and forceps biopsy resulted only in a minor increase in diagnostic sensitivity to 60.3% (35/58 patients). In 20/58 patients (34.5%), diagnosis were obtained by both positive cytology and positive histology, in 11/58 (19%) by positive histology (negative cytology) and only 4/58 patients (6.9%) were confirmed by positive cytology (negative histology).CONCLUSION: Brush cytology and forceps biopsy have only limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant hilar tumors. In our eyes, additional diagnostic techniques should be evaluated and should become routine in patients with negative cytological and histological findings.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal carcinoid tumor using grasping type scissors forceps

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with a knife is a technically demanding procedure associated with a high complication rate. The shortcomings of this method are the inability to fix the knife to the target lesion, and compression of the lesion. These can lead to major complications such as perforation and bleeding. To reduce the risk of complications related to ESD, we developed a new grasping type scissors forceps (GSF), which can grasp and incise the targeted tissue using electrosurgical current. Colonoscopy on a 55-year-old woman revealed a 10-mm rectal submucosal nodule. The histological diagnosis of the specimen obtained by biopsy was carcinoid tumor. Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated a hypoechoic solid tumor limited to the submucosa without lymph node involvement. It was safely and accurately resected without unexpected incision by ESD using a GSF. No delayed hemorrhage or perforation occurred. Histological examination confirmed the carcinoid tumor was completely excised with negative resection margin.

Successful endoscopic fragmentation of large hardened fecaloma using jumbo forceps

We present a rare case of fecaloma, 7 cm in size, in the setting of systemic scleroderma. A colonoscopy revealed a giant brown fecaloma occupying the lumen of the colon and a colonic ulcer that was caused by the fecaloma. The surface of the fecaloma was hard, large and slippery, and fragmentation was not possible despite the use of various devices, including standard biopsy forceps, an injection needle, and a snare. However, jumbo forceps were able to shave the surface of the fecaloma and break it successfully by repeated biting for 6 h over 2 d. The ability of the jumbo forceps to collect large mucosal samples was also appropriate for achieving fragmentation of the giant fecaloma.