Objective:To analyze the effect of locking compression plate on the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery.Methods:120 patients with limb fractures from March 2018 to March 2020 were randomly...Objective:To analyze the effect of locking compression plate on the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery.Methods:120 patients with limb fractures from March 2018 to March 2020 were randomly divided into control group(60 cases)and observation group(60 cases).The control group was treated with plate screw internal fixation,The observation group used locking compression plate internal fixation,Compare the effect of treatment,the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery.results:compared the effective rate of the two groups,the observation group(93.33%)was significantly higher than the control group(75.00%).Compared with the two groups,the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery,the observed composition power was higher than that of the control group,and the postoperative recovery time was lower than that of the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion:The use of locking compression plate for the treatment of limb fracture can significantly increase the probability of successful operation,shorten the recovery time after operation,the overall curative effect is ideal,and the clinical popularization value is high.展开更多
目的观察解剖型腓骨髓内支撑锁定钢板内固定术(lock compression plate with fibular allograft,F-LCP)治疗老年粉碎性肱骨近端骨折的中远期临床疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年12月住院接受手术的肱骨近端四部分骨折患者49例,接受肩关...目的观察解剖型腓骨髓内支撑锁定钢板内固定术(lock compression plate with fibular allograft,F-LCP)治疗老年粉碎性肱骨近端骨折的中远期临床疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年12月住院接受手术的肱骨近端四部分骨折患者49例,接受肩关节置换术(hemiarthroplasty,HA)20例作为对照组,接受解剖型腓骨髓内支撑锁定钢板内固定术29例作为观察组,比较两组疗效指标,包括肩关节功能评分(constant-murley score,CMS)、肩手残疾评分(disability of the arm,shoulder and hand,DASH)、肩关节活动范围、患者满意度等。结果两组患者性别、年龄、受伤机制、骨密度等差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。HA组平均随访时间63.2(48~72)个月,F-LCP组平均随访时间60.5(48~72)个月。F-LCP组CMS评分(70.3±13.9)明显高于HA组(57.3±12.7),肩关节活动范围(22.5±8.9)优于HA组(15.3±3.1)(P<0.05),两组DASH评分差异无统计学意义。观察组中1例出现肱骨头坏死、1例出现螺钉切出。对照组中1例出现感染、4例出现肩关节僵硬、1例出现大结节移位。其他均达到临床愈合标准。结论解剖型腓骨支撑锁定钢板内固定术术后患肢功能恢复优于肩关节置换术。展开更多
文摘Objective:To analyze the effect of locking compression plate on the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery.Methods:120 patients with limb fractures from March 2018 to March 2020 were randomly divided into control group(60 cases)and observation group(60 cases).The control group was treated with plate screw internal fixation,The observation group used locking compression plate internal fixation,Compare the effect of treatment,the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery.results:compared the effective rate of the two groups,the observation group(93.33%)was significantly higher than the control group(75.00%).Compared with the two groups,the success rate of operation and the time of postoperative recovery,the observed composition power was higher than that of the control group,and the postoperative recovery time was lower than that of the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion:The use of locking compression plate for the treatment of limb fracture can significantly increase the probability of successful operation,shorten the recovery time after operation,the overall curative effect is ideal,and the clinical popularization value is high.
文摘目的观察解剖型腓骨髓内支撑锁定钢板内固定术(lock compression plate with fibular allograft,F-LCP)治疗老年粉碎性肱骨近端骨折的中远期临床疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年12月住院接受手术的肱骨近端四部分骨折患者49例,接受肩关节置换术(hemiarthroplasty,HA)20例作为对照组,接受解剖型腓骨髓内支撑锁定钢板内固定术29例作为观察组,比较两组疗效指标,包括肩关节功能评分(constant-murley score,CMS)、肩手残疾评分(disability of the arm,shoulder and hand,DASH)、肩关节活动范围、患者满意度等。结果两组患者性别、年龄、受伤机制、骨密度等差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。HA组平均随访时间63.2(48~72)个月,F-LCP组平均随访时间60.5(48~72)个月。F-LCP组CMS评分(70.3±13.9)明显高于HA组(57.3±12.7),肩关节活动范围(22.5±8.9)优于HA组(15.3±3.1)(P<0.05),两组DASH评分差异无统计学意义。观察组中1例出现肱骨头坏死、1例出现螺钉切出。对照组中1例出现感染、4例出现肩关节僵硬、1例出现大结节移位。其他均达到临床愈合标准。结论解剖型腓骨支撑锁定钢板内固定术术后患肢功能恢复优于肩关节置换术。