Background: Internal fixation is appropriate for most intertrochanteric fractures. Optimal fixation is based on the stability of fracture. The mainstay of treatment of intertrochanteric fracture is fixation with a scr...Background: Internal fixation is appropriate for most intertrochanteric fractures. Optimal fixation is based on the stability of fracture. The mainstay of treatment of intertrochanteric fracture is fixation with a screw slide plate device or intramedullary device. So it is a matter of debate that which one is the best treatment, dynamic hip screw or proximal femoral nailing. Method: A prospective randomized and comparative study of 2 years duration was conducted on 60 patients admitted in the Department of Orthopedics in our hospital with intertrochanteric femur fracture. They were treated by a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. Patients were operated under image intensifier control. The parameters studied were functional outcome of Harris hip score, total duration of operation, rate of union, amount of collapse. These values were statistically evaluated and two tailed p-values were calculated and both groups were statistically compared. Result: The average age of our patient is 67.8 years. Among the fracture, 31% were stable, 58% were unstable, 11% were reverse oblique fracture. The average blood loss was 100 and 250 ml in PFN and DHS group, respectively. In PFN there was more no. of radiation exposure intraoperatively. The average operating time for the patients treated with PFN was 45 min as compared to 70 min in patients treated with DHS. The patients treated with PFN started early ambulation as they had better Harris Hip Score in the early period (at 1 and 3 months). In the long term both the implants had almost similar functional outcomes. Conclusion: In our study we have found that the unstable pattern was more common in old aged patients with higher grade of osteoporosis and PFN group has a better outcome in this unstable and osteoporotic fracture. PFN group has less blood loss and less operating time compared to DHS group. In PFN group patients have started early ambulation compared to DHS group.展开更多
Objective:To compare the outcomes of dynamic hip screws(DHS)and intramedullary nailing(IMN)in the treatment of extra-capsular metastatic carcinoma of the proximal femur.Methods:A retrospective case analysis method was...Objective:To compare the outcomes of dynamic hip screws(DHS)and intramedullary nailing(IMN)in the treatment of extra-capsular metastatic carcinoma of the proximal femur.Methods:A retrospective case analysis method was used to examine data of patients with proximal metastatic cancer of the femur who were treated with internal fixation in Department of Orthopaedics,Beijing Friendship Hospital,from January 2007 to December 2018.Blood loss,postoperative pain,functional score,length of stay,and survival rates were compared,and postoperative complications were assessed.Results:Complete follow-up data were available for 33 patients.The mean follow-up period was 12.2±3.6(range:9-32)months and the average age was 72.3±4.7(range:59-83)years old.There were 20 females and 13 males.Twenty-three patients had undergone IMN and 10 DHS,according to bone defects and the patient’s overall condition.The median survival time was 10 months in the IMN group and 11 months in the DHS group.Duration of surgery(t=-7.366,P<0.001)and length of hospital stay(t=-3.509,P<0.001)differed significantly between the two groups.There was one case of breakage of internal fixation in the IMN group.Conclusions:There was no significant difference between DHS and IMN in terms of surgical efficacy.IMN and DHS were different in terms of surgical time and hospital stay.However,due to the limited number of cases in this study,multi-factor analysis has not been performed and needs to be further verified in future analysis.When developing a surgical plan,it is recommended to consider the patient’s condition and the surgeon’s experience.展开更多
Introduction: Standard procedures for surgical fixation of proximal femoral fractures (PFF) require an image intensifier which in developing countries remains a luxury. We hypothesized that, with a well-codified techn...Introduction: Standard procedures for surgical fixation of proximal femoral fractures (PFF) require an image intensifier which in developing countries remains a luxury. We hypothesized that, with a well-codified technique, the Watson Jones approach (WJA) without image intensifier nor traction table, can allow open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of PFF using Dynamic hip screw (DHS), with satisfactory outcome. Patients and methods: Forty one consecutive patients (mean age 59.5 ± 21.6 years, 61% males) who were followed in a Teaching Hospital for PFF treated by ORIF using the WJA and DHS from January 2016 to December 2020 were reassessed. The outcome measures were the quality of the reduction, the positioning of the implants, the tip-apex distance (TAD), the rate and delay of consolidation, the functional results using Postel Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) score, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and the overall mortality. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with mechanical failure. Results: The mean follow-up period was 33.8 ± 15.0 months. Fracture reduction was good in 31 (75.6%) cases and acceptable in 8(19.5%) cases. Implant position was fair to good in 37 (90.2%) patients. The mean TAD was 26.1 ± 3.9 mm. Three patients developed SSI. Consolidation was achieved in 38 (92.6%) patients. The functional results were good to excellent in 80.5% of patients. The overall mortality rate was 7.3%. There were an association between mechanical failure and osteoporosis (p = 0.04), fracture reduction (p = 0.003), and TAD (p = 0.025). In multivariate logistic regression, no independent factors were predictive of mechanical failure. Conclusion: This study shows that ORIF using DHS for PFF via the Watson-Jones approach without an image intensifier can give satisfactory anatomical and functional outcomes in low-resource settings. It provides and validates a reliable and reproducible technique that deserves to be diffused to surgeons in austere areas over the world.展开更多
Introduction: Early surgical treatment (within 48 hours) has been recommended for femoral neck fractures in order to avoid complications and reduce mortality rate, regardless of presence and severity of comorbidity an...Introduction: Early surgical treatment (within 48 hours) has been recommended for femoral neck fractures in order to avoid complications and reduce mortality rate, regardless of presence and severity of comorbidity and preoperative status (ASA score). However some studies evidenced that early surgery doesn’t always have a beneficial effect on mortality and complications. Therefore further studies could be useful in order to better assess risk related factors of patients requiring surgical treatment for femoral neck fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative ASA score and timing of surgery on mortality, complications and clinical outcome. Methods: All 336 patients operated in our center from January 2013 to December 2014 were selected for this retrospective study. Patients were divided in three groups as follows: group 1 patients treated within 48 hours;group 2 patients treated between 48 to 96 hours;group 3 patients treated over 96 hours. The preoperative ASA score was recorded for each patient. Complication, clinical outcome and mortality at one-year follow-up were evaluated. At follow-up ambulation was graded as: confined to bed, assisted ambulation, and normal ambulation. Complications both local (infections, malunion, dislocation) and systemic (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, lung infections, ischemic disorders of heart) were recorded as well as number of transfusions. Statistical analysis was performed with chi square test and P value Results: 308 patients’ data were fully available for this study. At one-year follow-up return to normal ambulation was higher for patients of group 1 as compared with group 2 and 3 and in group 2 as compared with group 3 (P = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality and return to ambulation between patients with ASA score 1 and 2 (P = 0.06);patients with ASA score ≥ 3 showed a statistically significant higher mortality (P = 0.004) and rate of complications (0.0008) regardless of timing of surgery. There was no statistically significance in blood transfusion among the three groups. Discussion and Conclusion: Clinical outcome, complications and mortality have been previously reported from many authors and most studies agreed that early surgical treatment is recommended regardless of age and preoperative status of the patient. The present study suggests that early surgical treatment is actually able to reduce mortality and complications and to improve clinical outcome in patients with better preoperative conditions, while for patients with ASA score ≥ 3 treatment within 48 hours seems not to prevent mortality and complications and improve clinical outcome.展开更多
目的分析补中益气汤联合股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)对股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗效果。方法便利选取2019年6月—2022年6月莆田市中医医院诊治的股骨粗隆间骨折患者102例为研究对象,基于入院先后顺序分为...目的分析补中益气汤联合股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)对股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗效果。方法便利选取2019年6月—2022年6月莆田市中医医院诊治的股骨粗隆间骨折患者102例为研究对象,基于入院先后顺序分为对照组与研究组,各51例,两组患者均接受PFNA手术治疗,分别在术后接受碳酸钙与补中益气汤治疗。对比两组患者髋关节功能恢复优良率、临床指标、血流动力学与并发症发生率。结果研究组髋关节功能恢复优良率为94.12%,高于对照组的78.43%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.299,P<0.05)。治疗后,与对照组比较,研究组骨密度有提高,疼痛评分有降低,步幅与步速有显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗后研究组全血低切黏度、全血高切黏度、血浆黏度表达水平显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对股骨粗隆间骨折患者开展PFNA手术后加强补中益气汤进行治疗,有助于促进患者髋关节功能恢复,疗效确切,且安全性高。展开更多
目的:比较股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)与动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip screw,DHS)对老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后疼痛应激、骨代谢、凝血指标的影响。方法:选取2019年1月至2020年12月衡水市第四人民医...目的:比较股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)与动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip screw,DHS)对老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后疼痛应激、骨代谢、凝血指标的影响。方法:选取2019年1月至2020年12月衡水市第四人民医院骨科收治的240例老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,根据手术方法分为DHS组(n=124)与PFNA组(n=116)。比较2组患者的手术指标、疗效指标。对2组患者术前和术后24 h的视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)评分及血清前列腺素E_(2)(prostaglandin E_(2),PGE_(2))、P物质(substance P,SP)、5-羟色胺(5-hydroxy tryptamine,5-HT)、去甲肾上腺素(norepinephrine,NE)及血管紧张素II(angiotensin II,AngII)水平进行比较。对2组患者术前和术后3个月的血浆甲状旁腺素(parathyroid hormone,PTH)、骨钙素(osteocalcin,BGP)、骨碱性磷酸酶(bone alkaline phosphatase,BALP)、I型前胶原氨基端前肽(procollagen type I Nterminal propeptide,PINP)、I型前胶原羟基端肽(propeptide of type I procollagen,PICP)、I型胶原羧基端肽β特殊序列(beta C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen,β-CTX)、25-二羟维生素D3[25-dihydroxyvitamin D3,25-(OH)2D3]、纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen,FBG)、D-二聚体水平及凝血活酶时间(prothrombin time,PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(activated partial thromboplastin time,APTT)进行比较。结果:PFNA组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后6个月的Harris评分高于DHS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后24 h的VAS评分、血清PGE_(2)、SP、5-HT、NE、AngII水平均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后3个月的血浆PTH、25-(OH)2D3、BGP、BALP、PINP、PICP水平均高于DHS组,血浆β-CTX、FBG、D-二聚体水平及PT、APTT均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:在老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的内固定手术治疗中,与DHS比较,PFNA在提升疗效、减少手术创伤、减轻术后疼痛应激、改善骨代谢指标和凝血功能指标方面具有更好的效果,临床医师应根据患者实际情况合理选择术式,以达到改善患者预后、减少并发症的目的。展开更多
文摘Background: Internal fixation is appropriate for most intertrochanteric fractures. Optimal fixation is based on the stability of fracture. The mainstay of treatment of intertrochanteric fracture is fixation with a screw slide plate device or intramedullary device. So it is a matter of debate that which one is the best treatment, dynamic hip screw or proximal femoral nailing. Method: A prospective randomized and comparative study of 2 years duration was conducted on 60 patients admitted in the Department of Orthopedics in our hospital with intertrochanteric femur fracture. They were treated by a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. Patients were operated under image intensifier control. The parameters studied were functional outcome of Harris hip score, total duration of operation, rate of union, amount of collapse. These values were statistically evaluated and two tailed p-values were calculated and both groups were statistically compared. Result: The average age of our patient is 67.8 years. Among the fracture, 31% were stable, 58% were unstable, 11% were reverse oblique fracture. The average blood loss was 100 and 250 ml in PFN and DHS group, respectively. In PFN there was more no. of radiation exposure intraoperatively. The average operating time for the patients treated with PFN was 45 min as compared to 70 min in patients treated with DHS. The patients treated with PFN started early ambulation as they had better Harris Hip Score in the early period (at 1 and 3 months). In the long term both the implants had almost similar functional outcomes. Conclusion: In our study we have found that the unstable pattern was more common in old aged patients with higher grade of osteoporosis and PFN group has a better outcome in this unstable and osteoporotic fracture. PFN group has less blood loss and less operating time compared to DHS group. In PFN group patients have started early ambulation compared to DHS group.
基金Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research(No.2018-1-2072)。
文摘Objective:To compare the outcomes of dynamic hip screws(DHS)and intramedullary nailing(IMN)in the treatment of extra-capsular metastatic carcinoma of the proximal femur.Methods:A retrospective case analysis method was used to examine data of patients with proximal metastatic cancer of the femur who were treated with internal fixation in Department of Orthopaedics,Beijing Friendship Hospital,from January 2007 to December 2018.Blood loss,postoperative pain,functional score,length of stay,and survival rates were compared,and postoperative complications were assessed.Results:Complete follow-up data were available for 33 patients.The mean follow-up period was 12.2±3.6(range:9-32)months and the average age was 72.3±4.7(range:59-83)years old.There were 20 females and 13 males.Twenty-three patients had undergone IMN and 10 DHS,according to bone defects and the patient’s overall condition.The median survival time was 10 months in the IMN group and 11 months in the DHS group.Duration of surgery(t=-7.366,P<0.001)and length of hospital stay(t=-3.509,P<0.001)differed significantly between the two groups.There was one case of breakage of internal fixation in the IMN group.Conclusions:There was no significant difference between DHS and IMN in terms of surgical efficacy.IMN and DHS were different in terms of surgical time and hospital stay.However,due to the limited number of cases in this study,multi-factor analysis has not been performed and needs to be further verified in future analysis.When developing a surgical plan,it is recommended to consider the patient’s condition and the surgeon’s experience.
文摘Introduction: Standard procedures for surgical fixation of proximal femoral fractures (PFF) require an image intensifier which in developing countries remains a luxury. We hypothesized that, with a well-codified technique, the Watson Jones approach (WJA) without image intensifier nor traction table, can allow open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of PFF using Dynamic hip screw (DHS), with satisfactory outcome. Patients and methods: Forty one consecutive patients (mean age 59.5 ± 21.6 years, 61% males) who were followed in a Teaching Hospital for PFF treated by ORIF using the WJA and DHS from January 2016 to December 2020 were reassessed. The outcome measures were the quality of the reduction, the positioning of the implants, the tip-apex distance (TAD), the rate and delay of consolidation, the functional results using Postel Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) score, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and the overall mortality. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with mechanical failure. Results: The mean follow-up period was 33.8 ± 15.0 months. Fracture reduction was good in 31 (75.6%) cases and acceptable in 8(19.5%) cases. Implant position was fair to good in 37 (90.2%) patients. The mean TAD was 26.1 ± 3.9 mm. Three patients developed SSI. Consolidation was achieved in 38 (92.6%) patients. The functional results were good to excellent in 80.5% of patients. The overall mortality rate was 7.3%. There were an association between mechanical failure and osteoporosis (p = 0.04), fracture reduction (p = 0.003), and TAD (p = 0.025). In multivariate logistic regression, no independent factors were predictive of mechanical failure. Conclusion: This study shows that ORIF using DHS for PFF via the Watson-Jones approach without an image intensifier can give satisfactory anatomical and functional outcomes in low-resource settings. It provides and validates a reliable and reproducible technique that deserves to be diffused to surgeons in austere areas over the world.
文摘Introduction: Early surgical treatment (within 48 hours) has been recommended for femoral neck fractures in order to avoid complications and reduce mortality rate, regardless of presence and severity of comorbidity and preoperative status (ASA score). However some studies evidenced that early surgery doesn’t always have a beneficial effect on mortality and complications. Therefore further studies could be useful in order to better assess risk related factors of patients requiring surgical treatment for femoral neck fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative ASA score and timing of surgery on mortality, complications and clinical outcome. Methods: All 336 patients operated in our center from January 2013 to December 2014 were selected for this retrospective study. Patients were divided in three groups as follows: group 1 patients treated within 48 hours;group 2 patients treated between 48 to 96 hours;group 3 patients treated over 96 hours. The preoperative ASA score was recorded for each patient. Complication, clinical outcome and mortality at one-year follow-up were evaluated. At follow-up ambulation was graded as: confined to bed, assisted ambulation, and normal ambulation. Complications both local (infections, malunion, dislocation) and systemic (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, lung infections, ischemic disorders of heart) were recorded as well as number of transfusions. Statistical analysis was performed with chi square test and P value Results: 308 patients’ data were fully available for this study. At one-year follow-up return to normal ambulation was higher for patients of group 1 as compared with group 2 and 3 and in group 2 as compared with group 3 (P = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality and return to ambulation between patients with ASA score 1 and 2 (P = 0.06);patients with ASA score ≥ 3 showed a statistically significant higher mortality (P = 0.004) and rate of complications (0.0008) regardless of timing of surgery. There was no statistically significance in blood transfusion among the three groups. Discussion and Conclusion: Clinical outcome, complications and mortality have been previously reported from many authors and most studies agreed that early surgical treatment is recommended regardless of age and preoperative status of the patient. The present study suggests that early surgical treatment is actually able to reduce mortality and complications and to improve clinical outcome in patients with better preoperative conditions, while for patients with ASA score ≥ 3 treatment within 48 hours seems not to prevent mortality and complications and improve clinical outcome.
文摘目的分析补中益气汤联合股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)对股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗效果。方法便利选取2019年6月—2022年6月莆田市中医医院诊治的股骨粗隆间骨折患者102例为研究对象,基于入院先后顺序分为对照组与研究组,各51例,两组患者均接受PFNA手术治疗,分别在术后接受碳酸钙与补中益气汤治疗。对比两组患者髋关节功能恢复优良率、临床指标、血流动力学与并发症发生率。结果研究组髋关节功能恢复优良率为94.12%,高于对照组的78.43%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.299,P<0.05)。治疗后,与对照组比较,研究组骨密度有提高,疼痛评分有降低,步幅与步速有显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗后研究组全血低切黏度、全血高切黏度、血浆黏度表达水平显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对股骨粗隆间骨折患者开展PFNA手术后加强补中益气汤进行治疗,有助于促进患者髋关节功能恢复,疗效确切,且安全性高。
文摘目的:比较股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)与动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip screw,DHS)对老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后疼痛应激、骨代谢、凝血指标的影响。方法:选取2019年1月至2020年12月衡水市第四人民医院骨科收治的240例老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,根据手术方法分为DHS组(n=124)与PFNA组(n=116)。比较2组患者的手术指标、疗效指标。对2组患者术前和术后24 h的视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)评分及血清前列腺素E_(2)(prostaglandin E_(2),PGE_(2))、P物质(substance P,SP)、5-羟色胺(5-hydroxy tryptamine,5-HT)、去甲肾上腺素(norepinephrine,NE)及血管紧张素II(angiotensin II,AngII)水平进行比较。对2组患者术前和术后3个月的血浆甲状旁腺素(parathyroid hormone,PTH)、骨钙素(osteocalcin,BGP)、骨碱性磷酸酶(bone alkaline phosphatase,BALP)、I型前胶原氨基端前肽(procollagen type I Nterminal propeptide,PINP)、I型前胶原羟基端肽(propeptide of type I procollagen,PICP)、I型胶原羧基端肽β特殊序列(beta C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen,β-CTX)、25-二羟维生素D3[25-dihydroxyvitamin D3,25-(OH)2D3]、纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen,FBG)、D-二聚体水平及凝血活酶时间(prothrombin time,PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(activated partial thromboplastin time,APTT)进行比较。结果:PFNA组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后6个月的Harris评分高于DHS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后24 h的VAS评分、血清PGE_(2)、SP、5-HT、NE、AngII水平均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后3个月的血浆PTH、25-(OH)2D3、BGP、BALP、PINP、PICP水平均高于DHS组,血浆β-CTX、FBG、D-二聚体水平及PT、APTT均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:在老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的内固定手术治疗中,与DHS比较,PFNA在提升疗效、减少手术创伤、减轻术后疼痛应激、改善骨代谢指标和凝血功能指标方面具有更好的效果,临床医师应根据患者实际情况合理选择术式,以达到改善患者预后、减少并发症的目的。
