The inflection point is an important feature of sigmoidal height-diameter(H-D)models.It is often cited as one of the properties favoring sigmoidal model forms.However,there are very few studies analyzing the inflectio...The inflection point is an important feature of sigmoidal height-diameter(H-D)models.It is often cited as one of the properties favoring sigmoidal model forms.However,there are very few studies analyzing the inflection points of H-D models.The goals of this study were to theoretically and empirically examine the behaviors of inflection points of six common H-D models with a regional dataset.The six models were the Wykoff(WYK),Schumacher(SCH),Curtis(CUR),HossfeldⅣ(HOS),von Bertalanffy-Richards(VBR),and Gompertz(GPZ)models.The models were first fitted in their base forms with tree species as random effects and were then expanded to include functional traits and spatial distribution.The distributions of the estimated inflection points were similar between the two-parameter models WYK,SCH,and CUR,but were different between the threeparameter models HOS,VBR,and GPZ.GPZ produced some of the largest inflection points.HOS and VBR produced concave H-D curves without inflection points for 12.7%and 39.7%of the tree species.Evergreen species or decreasing shade tolerance resulted in larger inflection points.The trends in the estimated inflection points of HOS and VBR were entirely opposite across the landscape.Furthermore,HOS could produce concave H-D curves for portions of the landscape.Based on the studied behaviors,the choice between two-parameter models may not matter.We recommend comparing seve ral three-parameter model forms for consistency in estimated inflection points before deciding on one.Believing sigmoidal models to have inflection points does not necessarily mean that they will produce fitted curves with one.Our study highlights the need to integrate analysis of inflection points into modeling H-D relationships.展开更多
目的:系统评价经颅直流电刺激对帕金森患者运动功能的康复疗效,并比较经颅直流电刺激作用于不同靶点对帕金森患者运动功能的疗效差异,为临床中经颅直流电刺激的靶点选择提供理论依据。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of ...目的:系统评价经颅直流电刺激对帕金森患者运动功能的康复疗效,并比较经颅直流电刺激作用于不同靶点对帕金森患者运动功能的疗效差异,为临床中经颅直流电刺激的靶点选择提供理论依据。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、维普和万方数据库,以“帕金森、经颅直流电刺激”为中文检索词,以“Parkinson,transcranial direct current stimulation”为英文检索词,收集从各数据库建库至2023年1月发表的关于经颅直流电刺激改善帕金森患者运动功能的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具和PEDro量表对纳入研究进行质量评价。采用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0软件对结局指标进行Meta分析。结果:①最终纳入15项随机对照试验,PEDro量表评估显示均为高质量或极高质量研究。②Meta分析显示,与对照组相比经颅直流电刺激可显著提高UPDRS-Ⅲ评分(MD=-2.49,95%CI:-4.42至-0.55,P<0.05)、步频评分(MD=0.07,95%CI:0.03-0.11,P<0.05)和步速评分(MD=0.02,95%CI:0.00-0.05,P<0.05),但对BBS评分(MD=2.57,95%CI:-0.74-5.87,P>0.05)的提高不明显。③网状Meta分析概率排序结果显示,在UPDRS-Ⅲ评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为背外侧前额叶皮质(52.4%)>初级皮质运动区(45.8%)>大脑中央点(1.8%)>常规康复治疗(0%);在步频评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为小脑(50.1%)>大脑中央点(45.8%)>背外侧前额叶皮质(3.9%)>初级皮质运动区(0.2%)>常规康复治疗(0%);在步速评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为小脑(64.8%)>背外侧前额叶皮质(23.8%)>大脑中央点(9.4%)>初级皮质运动区(1.7%)>常规康复治疗(0.4%);在BBS评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为:小脑(77.4%)>背外侧前额叶皮质(20.7%)>大脑中央点(0.7%)>常规康复治疗(0.2%)。结论:经颅直流电刺激可显著改善帕金森患者运动功能,其中刺激背外侧前额叶皮质区域对改善帕金森患者运动协调方面疗效更佳,而刺激小脑区域对改善帕金森患者步行和平衡方面疗效更佳。展开更多
In this work, we present a computational method for solving nonlinear Fredholm-Volterra integral equations of the second kind which is based on replacement of the unknown function by truncated series of well known Blo...In this work, we present a computational method for solving nonlinear Fredholm-Volterra integral equations of the second kind which is based on replacement of the unknown function by truncated series of well known Block-Pulse functions (BPfs) expansion. Error analysis is worked out that shows efficiency of the method. Finally, we also give some numerical examples.展开更多
目的:观察基于危害分析及关键控制点(hazard analysis and critical control point,HACCP)原则的集束化护理在高血压脑出血患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年3月至2021年10月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院诊治的132例高血压脑出血患...目的:观察基于危害分析及关键控制点(hazard analysis and critical control point,HACCP)原则的集束化护理在高血压脑出血患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年3月至2021年10月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院诊治的132例高血压脑出血患者为研究对象。按照随机数字表法,分为研究组与对照组,每组66例。对照组给予常规护理,研究组给予基于HACCP原则的集束化护理。出院前,比较2组护理前后舒张压、收缩压、Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale,FMAS)评分及并发症发生率。结果:护理前,2组患者的舒张压、收缩压相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);护理后,2组患者的舒张压、收缩压明显降低,且研究组明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。护理前,2组患者的FMAS评分相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,2组FMAS评分明显升高,且研究组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的并发症发生率为12.12%,明显低于对照组的31.82%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:基于HACCP原则的集束化护理应用于高血压脑出血患者中可有效改善血压状况及运动功能,同时能降低并发症发生率,值得应用推广。展开更多
文摘The inflection point is an important feature of sigmoidal height-diameter(H-D)models.It is often cited as one of the properties favoring sigmoidal model forms.However,there are very few studies analyzing the inflection points of H-D models.The goals of this study were to theoretically and empirically examine the behaviors of inflection points of six common H-D models with a regional dataset.The six models were the Wykoff(WYK),Schumacher(SCH),Curtis(CUR),HossfeldⅣ(HOS),von Bertalanffy-Richards(VBR),and Gompertz(GPZ)models.The models were first fitted in their base forms with tree species as random effects and were then expanded to include functional traits and spatial distribution.The distributions of the estimated inflection points were similar between the two-parameter models WYK,SCH,and CUR,but were different between the threeparameter models HOS,VBR,and GPZ.GPZ produced some of the largest inflection points.HOS and VBR produced concave H-D curves without inflection points for 12.7%and 39.7%of the tree species.Evergreen species or decreasing shade tolerance resulted in larger inflection points.The trends in the estimated inflection points of HOS and VBR were entirely opposite across the landscape.Furthermore,HOS could produce concave H-D curves for portions of the landscape.Based on the studied behaviors,the choice between two-parameter models may not matter.We recommend comparing seve ral three-parameter model forms for consistency in estimated inflection points before deciding on one.Believing sigmoidal models to have inflection points does not necessarily mean that they will produce fitted curves with one.Our study highlights the need to integrate analysis of inflection points into modeling H-D relationships.
文摘目的:系统评价经颅直流电刺激对帕金森患者运动功能的康复疗效,并比较经颅直流电刺激作用于不同靶点对帕金森患者运动功能的疗效差异,为临床中经颅直流电刺激的靶点选择提供理论依据。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、维普和万方数据库,以“帕金森、经颅直流电刺激”为中文检索词,以“Parkinson,transcranial direct current stimulation”为英文检索词,收集从各数据库建库至2023年1月发表的关于经颅直流电刺激改善帕金森患者运动功能的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具和PEDro量表对纳入研究进行质量评价。采用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0软件对结局指标进行Meta分析。结果:①最终纳入15项随机对照试验,PEDro量表评估显示均为高质量或极高质量研究。②Meta分析显示,与对照组相比经颅直流电刺激可显著提高UPDRS-Ⅲ评分(MD=-2.49,95%CI:-4.42至-0.55,P<0.05)、步频评分(MD=0.07,95%CI:0.03-0.11,P<0.05)和步速评分(MD=0.02,95%CI:0.00-0.05,P<0.05),但对BBS评分(MD=2.57,95%CI:-0.74-5.87,P>0.05)的提高不明显。③网状Meta分析概率排序结果显示,在UPDRS-Ⅲ评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为背外侧前额叶皮质(52.4%)>初级皮质运动区(45.8%)>大脑中央点(1.8%)>常规康复治疗(0%);在步频评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为小脑(50.1%)>大脑中央点(45.8%)>背外侧前额叶皮质(3.9%)>初级皮质运动区(0.2%)>常规康复治疗(0%);在步速评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为小脑(64.8%)>背外侧前额叶皮质(23.8%)>大脑中央点(9.4%)>初级皮质运动区(1.7%)>常规康复治疗(0.4%);在BBS评分方面,刺激靶点疗效的概率排序结果为:小脑(77.4%)>背外侧前额叶皮质(20.7%)>大脑中央点(0.7%)>常规康复治疗(0.2%)。结论:经颅直流电刺激可显著改善帕金森患者运动功能,其中刺激背外侧前额叶皮质区域对改善帕金森患者运动协调方面疗效更佳,而刺激小脑区域对改善帕金森患者步行和平衡方面疗效更佳。
文摘In this work, we present a computational method for solving nonlinear Fredholm-Volterra integral equations of the second kind which is based on replacement of the unknown function by truncated series of well known Block-Pulse functions (BPfs) expansion. Error analysis is worked out that shows efficiency of the method. Finally, we also give some numerical examples.
文摘目的:观察基于危害分析及关键控制点(hazard analysis and critical control point,HACCP)原则的集束化护理在高血压脑出血患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年3月至2021年10月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院诊治的132例高血压脑出血患者为研究对象。按照随机数字表法,分为研究组与对照组,每组66例。对照组给予常规护理,研究组给予基于HACCP原则的集束化护理。出院前,比较2组护理前后舒张压、收缩压、Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale,FMAS)评分及并发症发生率。结果:护理前,2组患者的舒张压、收缩压相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);护理后,2组患者的舒张压、收缩压明显降低,且研究组明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。护理前,2组患者的FMAS评分相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,2组FMAS评分明显升高,且研究组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的并发症发生率为12.12%,明显低于对照组的31.82%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:基于HACCP原则的集束化护理应用于高血压脑出血患者中可有效改善血压状况及运动功能,同时能降低并发症发生率,值得应用推广。
