Since the Contributions Wanted for Written Discussion of Reform and Development of Statistics has been published in 7th issue of statistical research in 2007, the statistical research journal receives many papers writ...Since the Contributions Wanted for Written Discussion of Reform and Development of Statistics has been published in 7th issue of statistical research in 2007, the statistical research journal receives many papers written by the people coming from the statistical system, statistical teaching and researching fields and caring for statistics, who put forward some profound suggestions for governmental statistics, statistical administration system, statistical methods and local statistical work. These papers also include the authors’ concern and deep thinking of statistical reform. Some authors introduce international useful experience to promote China’s governmental statistics to be geared to international standards; some authors devote to researching advanced system and approach to improve the quality of statistical data; the other authors put forward feasible suggestions to solve the problems in their practical work, etc. The editor chooses more than twenty representative papers and compiles them to publish in this issue, which will provide reference for China’s statistical reform, promote the rapid development of socialistic statistics, accelerate the reform of governmental statistics and serve for building the harmonious society.展开更多
关于中国GDP数据可信度的争论由来已久。2001年,中国的经济问题研究专家,时任盖匹茨堡大学教授的Rawski在《Chian Economic Review》4月刊上发表了一篇名为《What's happening to China's GDP statis-tics?》利用简单而且非常...关于中国GDP数据可信度的争论由来已久。2001年,中国的经济问题研究专家,时任盖匹茨堡大学教授的Rawski在《Chian Economic Review》4月刊上发表了一篇名为《What's happening to China's GDP statis-tics?》利用简单而且非常直观的数据比较和推理,对中国的官方发布的GDP数据的真实性提出的质疑,提出了所谓的“四大悖论”。两位中国学者张新和蒋殿春,从GDP计算体系和经济增加值(EVA)分析方法着眼,针对性的回答了Rawski所提出的质疑,并且系统分析了中国经济增长的微观基础。本文目的在于评述这篇回应Rawski的论文,并对张和蒋论文中的论据提供一些补充。展开更多
文摘Since the Contributions Wanted for Written Discussion of Reform and Development of Statistics has been published in 7th issue of statistical research in 2007, the statistical research journal receives many papers written by the people coming from the statistical system, statistical teaching and researching fields and caring for statistics, who put forward some profound suggestions for governmental statistics, statistical administration system, statistical methods and local statistical work. These papers also include the authors’ concern and deep thinking of statistical reform. Some authors introduce international useful experience to promote China’s governmental statistics to be geared to international standards; some authors devote to researching advanced system and approach to improve the quality of statistical data; the other authors put forward feasible suggestions to solve the problems in their practical work, etc. The editor chooses more than twenty representative papers and compiles them to publish in this issue, which will provide reference for China’s statistical reform, promote the rapid development of socialistic statistics, accelerate the reform of governmental statistics and serve for building the harmonious society.
文摘关于中国GDP数据可信度的争论由来已久。2001年,中国的经济问题研究专家,时任盖匹茨堡大学教授的Rawski在《Chian Economic Review》4月刊上发表了一篇名为《What's happening to China's GDP statis-tics?》利用简单而且非常直观的数据比较和推理,对中国的官方发布的GDP数据的真实性提出的质疑,提出了所谓的“四大悖论”。两位中国学者张新和蒋殿春,从GDP计算体系和经济增加值(EVA)分析方法着眼,针对性的回答了Rawski所提出的质疑,并且系统分析了中国经济增长的微观基础。本文目的在于评述这篇回应Rawski的论文,并对张和蒋论文中的论据提供一些补充。
