Hepatitis E virus(HEV)is hyperendemic in South Asia and Africa accounting for half of total Global HEV burden.There are eight genotypes of HEV.Among them,the four common ones known to infect humans,genotypes 1 and 2 a...Hepatitis E virus(HEV)is hyperendemic in South Asia and Africa accounting for half of total Global HEV burden.There are eight genotypes of HEV.Among them,the four common ones known to infect humans,genotypes 1 and 2 are prevalent in the developing world and genotypes 3 and 4 are causing challenge in the industrialized world.Asymptomatic HEV viremia in the general population,especially among blood donors,has been reported in the literature worldwide.The clinical implications related to this asymptomatic viremia are unclear and need further exploration.Detection of viremia due to HEV genotype 1 infection,apparently among healthy blood donors is also reported without much knowledge about its infection rate.Similarly,while HEV genotype 3 is known to be transmitted via blood transfusion in humans and has been subjected to screening in many European nations,instances of transmission have also been documented albeit without significant clinical consequences.Epidemiology of HEV genotype 1 in endemic areas often show waxing and waning pattern.Occasional sporadic occurrence of HEV infection interrupted by outbreaks have been frequently seen.In absence of known animal reservoir,where HEV exists in between outbreak is a mystery that needs further exploration.However,occurrence of asymptomatic HEV viremia due to HEV genotype 1 during epidemiologically quiescent period may explain that this phenomenon may act as a dynamic reservoir.Since HEV genotype 1 infection cannot cause chronicity,subclinical transient infection and transmission of virus might be the reason it sustains in interepidemic period.This might be the similar phenomenon with SARS COVID-19 corona virus infection which is circulating worldwide in distinct phases with peaks and plateaus despite vaccination against it.In view of existing evidence,we propose the concept of“Dynamic Human Reservoir.”Quiescent subclinical infection of HEV without any clinical consequences and subsequent transmission may contribute to the existence of the virus in a community.The potential for transmitting HEV infection by asymptomatic HEV infected individuals by fecal shedding of virus has not been reported in literature.This missing link may be a key to Pandora's box in understanding epidemiology of HEV infection in genotype 1 predominant region.展开更多
AIM: To determine whether adding vitamin D, a potent immunomodulator, improves the hepatitis C virus (HCV) response to antiviral therapy. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 were rand...AIM: To determine whether adding vitamin D, a potent immunomodulator, improves the hepatitis C virus (HCV) response to antiviral therapy. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 were randomized into two groups: the treatment group (n = 36, 50% male, mean age 47 ± 11 years) received Peg-α-2b interferon (1.5 μg/kg per week) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d) together with vitamin D3 (2000 IU/d, target serum level > 32 ng/mL), and the control group (n = 36, 60% male, mean age 49 ± 7 years) received identical therapy without vitamin D. HCV-RNA was assessed by realtime polymerase chain reaction (sensitivity, 10 IU/mL). The sustained virologic response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at 24 wk post-treatment. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The treatment group had a higher mean bodymass index (27 ± 4 kg/m2 vs 24 ± 3 kg/m2, P < 0.01), viral load (50% vs 42%, P < 0.01), and fibrosis score (> F2: 42% vs 19%, P < 0.001) than the controls. At week 4, 16 (44%) treated patients and 6 (17%) controls were HCV-RNA negative (P < 0.001). At week 12, 34 (94%) treated patients and 17 (48%) controls were HCV-RNA negative (P < 0.001). At 24 wk post-treatment (SVR), 31 (86%) treated patients and 15 (42%) controls were HCV-RNA negative (P < 0.001). Viral load, advanced fibrosis and vitamin D supplementation were strongly and independently associated with SVR (multivariate analysis). Adverse events were mild and typical of Peg-α-2b/ribavirin. CONCLUSION: Adding vitamin D to conventional Peg-α-2b/ribavirin therapy for treatment-na■ve patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection significantly improves the viral response.展开更多
AIM In order to study the association betweenthe null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and thegenetic susceptibility to hepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC).METHODS The genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1of 63 cases of HCC and 88 contro...AIM In order to study the association betweenthe null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and thegenetic susceptibility to hepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC).METHODS The genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1of 63 cases of HCC and 88 controls were detectedwith the multiple PCR technique.RESULTS The frequency of GSTM1 nullgenotype was 57.1% among the cases,and42.0% among the controls,the difference beingstatistically significant(χ~2=3.35,P=0.067),but χ~2 value approaching the significance level.The odds ratio was 1.84(95% Cl= 0.91-3.37).The frequency of GSTT1 non-null genotype was87.3% among the cases and 52.5% among thecontrols,the difference being statisticallysignificant(χ~2=11.42,P=0.0007274).The oddsratio was 4.13(95% Cl=1.64-10.70).According to the cross analysis,the GSTT1 non-null genotype was more closely associated withHCC than GSTM1 null genotype,and these twofactors play an approximate additive interactionin the occurrence of HCC.CONCLUSION The persons with GSTM1 nullgenotype and GSTT1 non-null genotype have theincreased risk to HCC.展开更多
AIM. To investigate the influence of HLA-DRB1 alleles and HBV genotypes on inberferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: HLA-DRBI*03, *07, *09,*12, *15 alleles were determined using polymerase chain re...AIM. To investigate the influence of HLA-DRB1 alleles and HBV genotypes on inberferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: HLA-DRBI*03, *07, *09,*12, *15 alleles were determined using polymerase chain reaction/sequence specific primer (PCR/SSP) technique in 126 patients with chronic hepatitis B and 76 normal control subjects in Shandong Province, and HBV genotypes were determined by nested-PCR analysis using type-specific primers in 126 patients. RESULTS: The positivity of HLA-DRB1*07 allele in chronic hepatitis B group was significantly higher than that in normal control group (X^2 = 6.33, P〈0.025, RR = 2.37). Among the 126 patients, genotype B was found in 38 (30.2%), genotype C in 69 (54.8%), and mixed genotype (B+C) in 19 (15.0%), genotypes D-F were not found. Among the 46 DRB1*07(+) patients, 7 were responders and 39 were non-responders among them (X^2 = 6.71, P〈0.05). The positivity of HLADRB1*07 and prevalence of HBV genotype C were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders. CONCLUSION: High positivities of HLA-DRB1 *07 allele and HBV genotype C are closely associated with the lower response to interferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B.展开更多
AIM To assess daclatasvir plus asunaprevir(d UAL) in treatment-na?ve patients from China's Mainland, Russia and South Korea with hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype 1 b infection. METHODS Patients were randomly assign...AIM To assess daclatasvir plus asunaprevir(d UAL) in treatment-na?ve patients from China's Mainland, Russia and South Korea with hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype 1 b infection. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned(3:1) to receive 24 wk of treatment with d UAL(daclatasvir 60 mg once daily and asunaprevir 100 mg twice daily) beginning on day 1 of the treatment period(immediate treatment arm) or following 12 wk of matching placebo(placebodeferred treatment arm). The primary endpoint was a comparison of sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) compared with the historical SVR rate for peg-interferon plus ribavirin(70%) among patients in the immediate treatment arm. The first 12 wk of the study were blinded. Safety was assessed in d UAL-treated patients compared with placebo patients during the first 12 wk(doubleblind phase), and during 24 wk of d UAL in both arms combined.RESULTS In total, 207 patients were randomly assigned to immediate(n = 155) or placebo-deferred(n = 52) treatment. Most patients were Asian(86%), female(59%) and aged < 65 years(90%). Among them, 13% had cirrhosis, 32% had IL28 B non-CC genotypes and 53% had baseline HCV RNA levels of ≥ 6 million IU/m L. Among patients in the immediate treatment arm, SVR12 was achieved by 92%(95% confidence interval: 87.2-96.0), which was significantly higher than the historical comparator rate(70%). SVR12 was largely unaffected by cirrhosis(89%), age ≥ 65 years(92%), male sex(90%), baseline HCV RNA ≥ 6 million(89%) or IL28 B non-CC genotypes(96%), although SVR12 was higher among patients without(96%) than among those with(53%) baseline NS5 A resistanceassociated polymorphisms(at L31 or Y93 H). during the double-blind phase, aminotransferase elevations were more common among placebo recipients than among patients receiving d UAL. during 24 wk of d UAL therapy(combined arms), the most common adverse events(≥ 10%) were elevated alanine aminotransferase and upper respiratory tract infection; emergent grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities were infrequently observed, and all grade 3-4 aminotransferase abnormalities(alanine aminotransferase, n = 9; aspartate transaminase, n = 6) reversed within 8-11 d. Two patients discontinued d UAL treatment; one due to aminotransferase elevations, nausea, and jaundice and the other due to a fatal adverse event unrelated to treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths.CONCLUSION d UAL was well-tolerated during this phase 3 study, and SVR12 with d UAL treatment(92%) exceeded thehistorical SVR rate for peg-interferon plus ribavirin of 70%.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the possibility of shortening the duration of peginterferon(Peg-IFN)plus ribavirin(RBV) combination therapy by incorporating interferon-β (IFN-β)induction therapy. METHODS:A one treatment arm,coho...AIM:To investigate the possibility of shortening the duration of peginterferon(Peg-IFN)plus ribavirin(RBV) combination therapy by incorporating interferon-β (IFN-β)induction therapy. METHODS:A one treatment arm,cohort prospective study was conducted on seventy one patients.The patients were Japanese adults with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C,HCV-RNA levels of≥5.0 Log IU/mL or 100 KIU/mL,and platelet counts of≥90 000/μL.The treatment regimen consisted of a 2 wk course of twicedaily administration of IFN-βfollowed by 24 wk PegIFN plus RBV combination therapy.We prolonged the duration of the Peg-IFN plus RBV therapy to 48 wk if the patient requested it. RESULTS:The patients,including 44%males,were characterized by an median age of 63 years(range: 32-78 years),an median platelet count of 13.9(range: 9.1-30.6)×10 4 /μL,62%IFN-na?ve,and median HCV- RNA of 6.1(range:5.1-7.2)Log IU/mL.The sustained virologic response(SVR)rates were 34%(Peg-IFN:1-24 wk,n=61,95%confidence interval(CI): 24%-47%)and 55%(Peg-IFN:20-24 wk,n=31,95% CI:38%-71%,P<0.001;vs Peg-IFN:1-19 wk).TheSVR rate when the administration was discontinued early was 13%(Peg-IFN:1-19 wk,n=30,95%CI: 5%-30%),and that when the administration was prolonged was 50%(Peg-IFN:25-48 wk,n=10,95% CI:24%-76%,P<0.05;vs Peg-IFN:1-19 wk).In the patients who received 20-24 wk of Peg-IFN plus RBV,only the higher platelet count(≥130 000/μL) was significantly correlated with the SVR(odds ratio: 11.680,95%CI:2.3064-79.474,P=0.0024).In 45% (14/31)of the patients with a higher platelet count (≥130000/μL)before therapy,the HCV-RNA level decreased to below 3.3 Log IU/mL at the completion of IFN-β,and their SVR rate was 93%(13/14)after 20-24 wk administration of Peg-IFN plus RBV. CONCLUSION:These results suggest the possibilities of shortening the duration of Peg-IFN plus RBV combination therapy by actively reducing HCV-RNA levels using the IFN-βinduction regimen.展开更多
AIM: To study the expression of HBV enhancer Ⅱ by transcription factor COUP-TF1. METHODS: In order to study the regulation of HBV variants in the vicinity of the NRRE we cloned luciferase constructs containing the HB...AIM: To study the expression of HBV enhancer Ⅱ by transcription factor COUP-TF1. METHODS: In order to study the regulation of HBV variants in the vicinity of the NRRE we cloned luciferase constructs containing the HBV enhancer Ⅱ from variants and from HBV genotypes A and D and cotransfected them together with expression vectors for COUP-TF1 into HepG2 cells. RESULTS: Our fi ndings show that enhancer Ⅱ of HBV genotype A is also repressed by COUP-TF1. In contrast, two different enhancer Ⅱ constructs of HBV genotype D were activated by COUP-TF1. The activation was independent of the NRRE because a natural variant with a deletion of nt 1763-1770 was still activated by COUP- TF1. CONCLUSION: Regulation of transcription of the HBV genome seems to differ among HBV genomes derived from different genotypes. These differences in transcriptional control among HBV genotypes may be the molecular basis for differences in the clinical course among HBV genotypes.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomi...AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, 602 patients were randomly assigned(2:1) to daclatasvir vs telaprevir, stratified by IL28 B rs12979860 host genotype(CC vs non-CC), cirrhosis status(compensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis), and HCV GT1 subtype(GT1a vs GT1b). Patients were selected by study inclusion criteria from a total of 793 enrolled patients. Patients received daclatasvir 60 mg once daily or telaprevir 750 mg 3 times daily plus peg IFN/RBV. Daclatasvir recipients received 24 wk of daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV; those without an extended rapid virologic response(e RVR; undetectable HCV-RNA at weeks 4 and 12) received an additional 24 wk of peg IFN/RBV. Telaprevir-treated patients received 12 wk of telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV followed by 12(with e RVR) or 36(no e RVR) wk of peg IFN/RBV. The primary objective was to compare for noninferiority of sustained virologic response rates at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) in GT1b-infected patients. Key secondary objectives were to demonstrate that the rates of anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) and rashrelated events, through week 12, were lower with daclatasvir + peg IFN/RBV than with telaprevir + peg IFN/RBV among GT1b-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed using population-based sequencing of the NS5 A region for all patients at baseline, and for patients with virologic failure or relapse and HCV-RNA ≥ 1000 IU/m L, to investigate any link between NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance and virologic outcome. RESULTS: Patient demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment arms; however, there was a higher proportion of black/African Americans in the daclatasvir groups(6.0% and 8.2% in the GT1 b and GT1 a groups, respectively) than in the telaprevir groups(2.2% and 3.0%). Among GT1 binfected patients, daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV was noninferior to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 [85%(228/268) vs 81%(109/134); difference, 4.3%(95%CI:-3.3% to 11.9%)]. Anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) was significantly less frequent with daclatasvir than with telaprevir [difference,-29.1%(95%CI:-38.8% to-19.4%)]. Rash-related events were also less common with daclatasvir than with telaprevir, but the difference was not statistically significant. In GT1 ainfected patients, SVR12 was 64.9% with daclatasvir and 69.7% with telaprevir. Among both daclatasvir and telaprevir treatment groups, across GT1b- or GT1a-infected patients, lower response rates were observed in patients with IL28 B non-CC and cirrhosis- factors known to affect response to peg IFN/RBV. Consistent with these observations, a multivariate logistic regression analysis in GT1b-infected patients d e m o n s t ra t e d t h a t S V R 1 2 wa s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h IL28 B host genotype(CC vs non-CC, P = 0.011) and cirrhosis status(absent vs present, P = 0.031). NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance(at L28, R30, L31, or Y93) were observed in 17.3% of GT1b-infected patients at baseline; such variants did not appear to be absolute predictors of failure since 72.1% of these patients achieved SVR12 compared with 86.9% without these polymorphisms. Among GT1b-infected patients, treatment was completed by 85.4%(229/268) in the daclatasvir group, and by 85.1%(114/134) in the telaprevir group, and among GT1a-infected patients, by 67.2%(90/134) and 69.7%(46/66), respectively. Discontinuations(of all 3 agents) due to an AE were more frequent with telaprevir than with daclatasvir, whereas discontinuations due to lack of efficacy were more frequent with daclatasvir, due, in part, to differences in futility criteria. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV demonstrated noninferiority to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 and was well-tolerated in treatment-naive GT1 binfected patients, supporting the use of daclatasvir with other direct-acting antivirals.展开更多
AIM To investigated the real-world effectiveness and safety of various regimens of interferon-free treatments in patients infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV).METHODS We performed an observational study to analyze dif...AIM To investigated the real-world effectiveness and safety of various regimens of interferon-free treatments in patients infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV).METHODS We performed an observational study to analyze different antiviral treatments administered to 462 HCV-infected patients, of which 56.7% had liver cirrhosis. HCV RNA after 4 wk of treatment and at 12 wk after treatment sustained virologic response(SVR) as well as serious adverse events(SAEs) was analyzed first for the whole cohort and then separately in patients who met or did not meet the inclusion criteria of a clinical trial(CT-met and CT-unmet, respectively).RESULTS The most frequently prescribed treatment was simeprevir/sofosbuvir(36.4%), followed by sofosbuvir/ledipasvir(24.9%) and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir(r)/dasabuvir(19.9%). Ribavirin(RBV) was administered in 198 patients(42.9%). SVRs occurred in 437/462 patients(94.6%). The SVRs ranged between 93.3% and 100% for genotypes 1-4. SVRs were achieved in 96.2% patients in the CTmet group vs 91.9% patients in the CT-unmet group(P = 0.049). Undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 occurred in 72.9% of the patients. In the univariate analysis, the factors associated with SVRs were lower liver stiffness, absence of cirrhosis, higher platelet count, higher albumin levels, no RBV dose reduction, undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 and CT-met group. In the multivariate analysis, only albumin was an independent predictor of treatment failure(P = 0.04). Eleven patients(2.4%) developed SAEs; 5.2% and 0.7% of the patients in the CT-unmet and CT-met groups, respectively(P = 0.003).CONCLUSION A high proportion of patients with HCV infection achieved SVRs. For patients who did not meet the CT criteria, treatment regimens must be optimized.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assi...AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assignment, unblinded study, we treated fifty-six menopausal women with HCV-G1, 46% F3-F4, and previous PEG-α/RBV failure(7% null, 41% non-responder, and 52% relapser) with 4 wk lead-in with PEG-IFNα2b/RBV followed by PEGIFNα2b/RBV+Boceprevir for 32 wk, with an additional 12 wk of PEG-IFN-α-2b/RBV if patients were HCV-RNApositive by week 8. In previous null-responders, 44 wk of triple therapy was used. The primary objective of retreatment was to verify whether a sustained virological response(SVR)(HCV RNA undetectable at 24 wk of follow-up) rate of at least 20% could be obtained. The secondary objective was the evaluation of the percent of patients with negative HCV RNA at week 4(RVR), 8(RVR BOC), 12(EVR), or at the end-of-treatment(ETR) that reached SVR. To assess the relationship between SVR and clinical and biochemical parameters, multiple logistic regression analysis was used.RESULTS: After lead-in, only two patients had RVR; HCV-RNA was unchanged in all but 62% who had ≤1 log10 decrease. After Boceprevir, HCV RNA became undetectable at week 8 in 32/56(57.1%) and at week 12 in 41/56(73.2%). Of these, 53.8% and 52.0%, respectively, achieved SVR. Overall, SVR was obtained in 25/56(44.6%). SVR was achieved in 55% previous relapsers vs. 41% non-responders(P = 0.250), in 44% F0-F2 vs 54% F3-F4(P = 0.488), and in 11/19(57.9%) of patients with cirrhosis. At univariate analysis for baseline predictors of SVR, only previous response to antiviral therapy(OR = 2.662, 95%CI: 0.957-6.881, P = 0.043), was related with SVR. When considering "on treatment" factors, 1 log10 HCV RNA decline at week 4(3.733, 95%CI: 1.676-12.658, P = 0.034) and achievement of RVR BOC(7.347, 95%CI: 2.156-25.035, P = 0.001) were significantly related with the SVR, although RVR BOC only(6.794, 95%CI: 1.596-21.644, P = 0.010) maintained significance at multivariate logistic regression analysis. Anemia and neutropenia were managed with Erythropoietin and Filgrastim supplementation, respectively. Only six patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Boceprevir obtained high SVR response independent of previous response, RVR or baseline fibrosis or cirrhosis. RVR BOC was the only independent predictor of SVR.展开更多
文摘Hepatitis E virus(HEV)is hyperendemic in South Asia and Africa accounting for half of total Global HEV burden.There are eight genotypes of HEV.Among them,the four common ones known to infect humans,genotypes 1 and 2 are prevalent in the developing world and genotypes 3 and 4 are causing challenge in the industrialized world.Asymptomatic HEV viremia in the general population,especially among blood donors,has been reported in the literature worldwide.The clinical implications related to this asymptomatic viremia are unclear and need further exploration.Detection of viremia due to HEV genotype 1 infection,apparently among healthy blood donors is also reported without much knowledge about its infection rate.Similarly,while HEV genotype 3 is known to be transmitted via blood transfusion in humans and has been subjected to screening in many European nations,instances of transmission have also been documented albeit without significant clinical consequences.Epidemiology of HEV genotype 1 in endemic areas often show waxing and waning pattern.Occasional sporadic occurrence of HEV infection interrupted by outbreaks have been frequently seen.In absence of known animal reservoir,where HEV exists in between outbreak is a mystery that needs further exploration.However,occurrence of asymptomatic HEV viremia due to HEV genotype 1 during epidemiologically quiescent period may explain that this phenomenon may act as a dynamic reservoir.Since HEV genotype 1 infection cannot cause chronicity,subclinical transient infection and transmission of virus might be the reason it sustains in interepidemic period.This might be the similar phenomenon with SARS COVID-19 corona virus infection which is circulating worldwide in distinct phases with peaks and plateaus despite vaccination against it.In view of existing evidence,we propose the concept of“Dynamic Human Reservoir.”Quiescent subclinical infection of HEV without any clinical consequences and subsequent transmission may contribute to the existence of the virus in a community.The potential for transmitting HEV infection by asymptomatic HEV infected individuals by fecal shedding of virus has not been reported in literature.This missing link may be a key to Pandora's box in understanding epidemiology of HEV infection in genotype 1 predominant region.
文摘AIM: To determine whether adding vitamin D, a potent immunomodulator, improves the hepatitis C virus (HCV) response to antiviral therapy. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 were randomized into two groups: the treatment group (n = 36, 50% male, mean age 47 ± 11 years) received Peg-α-2b interferon (1.5 μg/kg per week) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d) together with vitamin D3 (2000 IU/d, target serum level > 32 ng/mL), and the control group (n = 36, 60% male, mean age 49 ± 7 years) received identical therapy without vitamin D. HCV-RNA was assessed by realtime polymerase chain reaction (sensitivity, 10 IU/mL). The sustained virologic response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at 24 wk post-treatment. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The treatment group had a higher mean bodymass index (27 ± 4 kg/m2 vs 24 ± 3 kg/m2, P < 0.01), viral load (50% vs 42%, P < 0.01), and fibrosis score (> F2: 42% vs 19%, P < 0.001) than the controls. At week 4, 16 (44%) treated patients and 6 (17%) controls were HCV-RNA negative (P < 0.001). At week 12, 34 (94%) treated patients and 17 (48%) controls were HCV-RNA negative (P < 0.001). At 24 wk post-treatment (SVR), 31 (86%) treated patients and 15 (42%) controls were HCV-RNA negative (P < 0.001). Viral load, advanced fibrosis and vitamin D supplementation were strongly and independently associated with SVR (multivariate analysis). Adverse events were mild and typical of Peg-α-2b/ribavirin. CONCLUSION: Adding vitamin D to conventional Peg-α-2b/ribavirin therapy for treatment-na■ve patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection significantly improves the viral response.
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.39470628the Scientific Foundation of Ministry of Health,China,No.96-1-189
文摘AIM In order to study the association betweenthe null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and thegenetic susceptibility to hepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC).METHODS The genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1of 63 cases of HCC and 88 controls were detectedwith the multiple PCR technique.RESULTS The frequency of GSTM1 nullgenotype was 57.1% among the cases,and42.0% among the controls,the difference beingstatistically significant(χ~2=3.35,P=0.067),but χ~2 value approaching the significance level.The odds ratio was 1.84(95% Cl= 0.91-3.37).The frequency of GSTT1 non-null genotype was87.3% among the cases and 52.5% among thecontrols,the difference being statisticallysignificant(χ~2=11.42,P=0.0007274).The oddsratio was 4.13(95% Cl=1.64-10.70).According to the cross analysis,the GSTT1 non-null genotype was more closely associated withHCC than GSTM1 null genotype,and these twofactors play an approximate additive interactionin the occurrence of HCC.CONCLUSION The persons with GSTM1 nullgenotype and GSTT1 non-null genotype have theincreased risk to HCC.
文摘AIM. To investigate the influence of HLA-DRB1 alleles and HBV genotypes on inberferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: HLA-DRBI*03, *07, *09,*12, *15 alleles were determined using polymerase chain reaction/sequence specific primer (PCR/SSP) technique in 126 patients with chronic hepatitis B and 76 normal control subjects in Shandong Province, and HBV genotypes were determined by nested-PCR analysis using type-specific primers in 126 patients. RESULTS: The positivity of HLA-DRB1*07 allele in chronic hepatitis B group was significantly higher than that in normal control group (X^2 = 6.33, P〈0.025, RR = 2.37). Among the 126 patients, genotype B was found in 38 (30.2%), genotype C in 69 (54.8%), and mixed genotype (B+C) in 19 (15.0%), genotypes D-F were not found. Among the 46 DRB1*07(+) patients, 7 were responders and 39 were non-responders among them (X^2 = 6.71, P〈0.05). The positivity of HLADRB1*07 and prevalence of HBV genotype C were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders. CONCLUSION: High positivities of HLA-DRB1 *07 allele and HBV genotype C are closely associated with the lower response to interferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B.
文摘AIM To assess daclatasvir plus asunaprevir(d UAL) in treatment-na?ve patients from China's Mainland, Russia and South Korea with hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype 1 b infection. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned(3:1) to receive 24 wk of treatment with d UAL(daclatasvir 60 mg once daily and asunaprevir 100 mg twice daily) beginning on day 1 of the treatment period(immediate treatment arm) or following 12 wk of matching placebo(placebodeferred treatment arm). The primary endpoint was a comparison of sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) compared with the historical SVR rate for peg-interferon plus ribavirin(70%) among patients in the immediate treatment arm. The first 12 wk of the study were blinded. Safety was assessed in d UAL-treated patients compared with placebo patients during the first 12 wk(doubleblind phase), and during 24 wk of d UAL in both arms combined.RESULTS In total, 207 patients were randomly assigned to immediate(n = 155) or placebo-deferred(n = 52) treatment. Most patients were Asian(86%), female(59%) and aged < 65 years(90%). Among them, 13% had cirrhosis, 32% had IL28 B non-CC genotypes and 53% had baseline HCV RNA levels of ≥ 6 million IU/m L. Among patients in the immediate treatment arm, SVR12 was achieved by 92%(95% confidence interval: 87.2-96.0), which was significantly higher than the historical comparator rate(70%). SVR12 was largely unaffected by cirrhosis(89%), age ≥ 65 years(92%), male sex(90%), baseline HCV RNA ≥ 6 million(89%) or IL28 B non-CC genotypes(96%), although SVR12 was higher among patients without(96%) than among those with(53%) baseline NS5 A resistanceassociated polymorphisms(at L31 or Y93 H). during the double-blind phase, aminotransferase elevations were more common among placebo recipients than among patients receiving d UAL. during 24 wk of d UAL therapy(combined arms), the most common adverse events(≥ 10%) were elevated alanine aminotransferase and upper respiratory tract infection; emergent grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities were infrequently observed, and all grade 3-4 aminotransferase abnormalities(alanine aminotransferase, n = 9; aspartate transaminase, n = 6) reversed within 8-11 d. Two patients discontinued d UAL treatment; one due to aminotransferase elevations, nausea, and jaundice and the other due to a fatal adverse event unrelated to treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths.CONCLUSION d UAL was well-tolerated during this phase 3 study, and SVR12 with d UAL treatment(92%) exceeded thehistorical SVR rate for peg-interferon plus ribavirin of 70%.
文摘AIM:To investigate the possibility of shortening the duration of peginterferon(Peg-IFN)plus ribavirin(RBV) combination therapy by incorporating interferon-β (IFN-β)induction therapy. METHODS:A one treatment arm,cohort prospective study was conducted on seventy one patients.The patients were Japanese adults with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C,HCV-RNA levels of≥5.0 Log IU/mL or 100 KIU/mL,and platelet counts of≥90 000/μL.The treatment regimen consisted of a 2 wk course of twicedaily administration of IFN-βfollowed by 24 wk PegIFN plus RBV combination therapy.We prolonged the duration of the Peg-IFN plus RBV therapy to 48 wk if the patient requested it. RESULTS:The patients,including 44%males,were characterized by an median age of 63 years(range: 32-78 years),an median platelet count of 13.9(range: 9.1-30.6)×10 4 /μL,62%IFN-na?ve,and median HCV- RNA of 6.1(range:5.1-7.2)Log IU/mL.The sustained virologic response(SVR)rates were 34%(Peg-IFN:1-24 wk,n=61,95%confidence interval(CI): 24%-47%)and 55%(Peg-IFN:20-24 wk,n=31,95% CI:38%-71%,P<0.001;vs Peg-IFN:1-19 wk).TheSVR rate when the administration was discontinued early was 13%(Peg-IFN:1-19 wk,n=30,95%CI: 5%-30%),and that when the administration was prolonged was 50%(Peg-IFN:25-48 wk,n=10,95% CI:24%-76%,P<0.05;vs Peg-IFN:1-19 wk).In the patients who received 20-24 wk of Peg-IFN plus RBV,only the higher platelet count(≥130 000/μL) was significantly correlated with the SVR(odds ratio: 11.680,95%CI:2.3064-79.474,P=0.0024).In 45% (14/31)of the patients with a higher platelet count (≥130000/μL)before therapy,the HCV-RNA level decreased to below 3.3 Log IU/mL at the completion of IFN-β,and their SVR rate was 93%(13/14)after 20-24 wk administration of Peg-IFN plus RBV. CONCLUSION:These results suggest the possibilities of shortening the duration of Peg-IFN plus RBV combination therapy by actively reducing HCV-RNA levels using the IFN-βinduction regimen.
基金Supported by grant 10-1854-Scha I from Deutsche Krebshilfe, grant Scha778/2-1 from DFG to S.S. and Graduiertenkolleg Nu-cleoprotein complexes to S.S. and W.H.G.
文摘AIM: To study the expression of HBV enhancer Ⅱ by transcription factor COUP-TF1. METHODS: In order to study the regulation of HBV variants in the vicinity of the NRRE we cloned luciferase constructs containing the HBV enhancer Ⅱ from variants and from HBV genotypes A and D and cotransfected them together with expression vectors for COUP-TF1 into HepG2 cells. RESULTS: Our fi ndings show that enhancer Ⅱ of HBV genotype A is also repressed by COUP-TF1. In contrast, two different enhancer Ⅱ constructs of HBV genotype D were activated by COUP-TF1. The activation was independent of the NRRE because a natural variant with a deletion of nt 1763-1770 was still activated by COUP- TF1. CONCLUSION: Regulation of transcription of the HBV genome seems to differ among HBV genomes derived from different genotypes. These differences in transcriptional control among HBV genotypes may be the molecular basis for differences in the clinical course among HBV genotypes.
文摘AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, 602 patients were randomly assigned(2:1) to daclatasvir vs telaprevir, stratified by IL28 B rs12979860 host genotype(CC vs non-CC), cirrhosis status(compensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis), and HCV GT1 subtype(GT1a vs GT1b). Patients were selected by study inclusion criteria from a total of 793 enrolled patients. Patients received daclatasvir 60 mg once daily or telaprevir 750 mg 3 times daily plus peg IFN/RBV. Daclatasvir recipients received 24 wk of daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV; those without an extended rapid virologic response(e RVR; undetectable HCV-RNA at weeks 4 and 12) received an additional 24 wk of peg IFN/RBV. Telaprevir-treated patients received 12 wk of telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV followed by 12(with e RVR) or 36(no e RVR) wk of peg IFN/RBV. The primary objective was to compare for noninferiority of sustained virologic response rates at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) in GT1b-infected patients. Key secondary objectives were to demonstrate that the rates of anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) and rashrelated events, through week 12, were lower with daclatasvir + peg IFN/RBV than with telaprevir + peg IFN/RBV among GT1b-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed using population-based sequencing of the NS5 A region for all patients at baseline, and for patients with virologic failure or relapse and HCV-RNA ≥ 1000 IU/m L, to investigate any link between NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance and virologic outcome. RESULTS: Patient demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment arms; however, there was a higher proportion of black/African Americans in the daclatasvir groups(6.0% and 8.2% in the GT1 b and GT1 a groups, respectively) than in the telaprevir groups(2.2% and 3.0%). Among GT1 binfected patients, daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV was noninferior to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 [85%(228/268) vs 81%(109/134); difference, 4.3%(95%CI:-3.3% to 11.9%)]. Anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) was significantly less frequent with daclatasvir than with telaprevir [difference,-29.1%(95%CI:-38.8% to-19.4%)]. Rash-related events were also less common with daclatasvir than with telaprevir, but the difference was not statistically significant. In GT1 ainfected patients, SVR12 was 64.9% with daclatasvir and 69.7% with telaprevir. Among both daclatasvir and telaprevir treatment groups, across GT1b- or GT1a-infected patients, lower response rates were observed in patients with IL28 B non-CC and cirrhosis- factors known to affect response to peg IFN/RBV. Consistent with these observations, a multivariate logistic regression analysis in GT1b-infected patients d e m o n s t ra t e d t h a t S V R 1 2 wa s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h IL28 B host genotype(CC vs non-CC, P = 0.011) and cirrhosis status(absent vs present, P = 0.031). NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance(at L28, R30, L31, or Y93) were observed in 17.3% of GT1b-infected patients at baseline; such variants did not appear to be absolute predictors of failure since 72.1% of these patients achieved SVR12 compared with 86.9% without these polymorphisms. Among GT1b-infected patients, treatment was completed by 85.4%(229/268) in the daclatasvir group, and by 85.1%(114/134) in the telaprevir group, and among GT1a-infected patients, by 67.2%(90/134) and 69.7%(46/66), respectively. Discontinuations(of all 3 agents) due to an AE were more frequent with telaprevir than with daclatasvir, whereas discontinuations due to lack of efficacy were more frequent with daclatasvir, due, in part, to differences in futility criteria. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV demonstrated noninferiority to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 and was well-tolerated in treatment-naive GT1 binfected patients, supporting the use of daclatasvir with other direct-acting antivirals.
基金Supported by Fundación Burgos por la Investigación de la Salud and Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León,No.BUO/06/15
文摘AIM To investigated the real-world effectiveness and safety of various regimens of interferon-free treatments in patients infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV).METHODS We performed an observational study to analyze different antiviral treatments administered to 462 HCV-infected patients, of which 56.7% had liver cirrhosis. HCV RNA after 4 wk of treatment and at 12 wk after treatment sustained virologic response(SVR) as well as serious adverse events(SAEs) was analyzed first for the whole cohort and then separately in patients who met or did not meet the inclusion criteria of a clinical trial(CT-met and CT-unmet, respectively).RESULTS The most frequently prescribed treatment was simeprevir/sofosbuvir(36.4%), followed by sofosbuvir/ledipasvir(24.9%) and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir(r)/dasabuvir(19.9%). Ribavirin(RBV) was administered in 198 patients(42.9%). SVRs occurred in 437/462 patients(94.6%). The SVRs ranged between 93.3% and 100% for genotypes 1-4. SVRs were achieved in 96.2% patients in the CTmet group vs 91.9% patients in the CT-unmet group(P = 0.049). Undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 occurred in 72.9% of the patients. In the univariate analysis, the factors associated with SVRs were lower liver stiffness, absence of cirrhosis, higher platelet count, higher albumin levels, no RBV dose reduction, undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 and CT-met group. In the multivariate analysis, only albumin was an independent predictor of treatment failure(P = 0.04). Eleven patients(2.4%) developed SAEs; 5.2% and 0.7% of the patients in the CT-unmet and CT-met groups, respectively(P = 0.003).CONCLUSION A high proportion of patients with HCV infection achieved SVRs. For patients who did not meet the CT criteria, treatment regimens must be optimized.
文摘AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assignment, unblinded study, we treated fifty-six menopausal women with HCV-G1, 46% F3-F4, and previous PEG-α/RBV failure(7% null, 41% non-responder, and 52% relapser) with 4 wk lead-in with PEG-IFNα2b/RBV followed by PEGIFNα2b/RBV+Boceprevir for 32 wk, with an additional 12 wk of PEG-IFN-α-2b/RBV if patients were HCV-RNApositive by week 8. In previous null-responders, 44 wk of triple therapy was used. The primary objective of retreatment was to verify whether a sustained virological response(SVR)(HCV RNA undetectable at 24 wk of follow-up) rate of at least 20% could be obtained. The secondary objective was the evaluation of the percent of patients with negative HCV RNA at week 4(RVR), 8(RVR BOC), 12(EVR), or at the end-of-treatment(ETR) that reached SVR. To assess the relationship between SVR and clinical and biochemical parameters, multiple logistic regression analysis was used.RESULTS: After lead-in, only two patients had RVR; HCV-RNA was unchanged in all but 62% who had ≤1 log10 decrease. After Boceprevir, HCV RNA became undetectable at week 8 in 32/56(57.1%) and at week 12 in 41/56(73.2%). Of these, 53.8% and 52.0%, respectively, achieved SVR. Overall, SVR was obtained in 25/56(44.6%). SVR was achieved in 55% previous relapsers vs. 41% non-responders(P = 0.250), in 44% F0-F2 vs 54% F3-F4(P = 0.488), and in 11/19(57.9%) of patients with cirrhosis. At univariate analysis for baseline predictors of SVR, only previous response to antiviral therapy(OR = 2.662, 95%CI: 0.957-6.881, P = 0.043), was related with SVR. When considering "on treatment" factors, 1 log10 HCV RNA decline at week 4(3.733, 95%CI: 1.676-12.658, P = 0.034) and achievement of RVR BOC(7.347, 95%CI: 2.156-25.035, P = 0.001) were significantly related with the SVR, although RVR BOC only(6.794, 95%CI: 1.596-21.644, P = 0.010) maintained significance at multivariate logistic regression analysis. Anemia and neutropenia were managed with Erythropoietin and Filgrastim supplementation, respectively. Only six patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Boceprevir obtained high SVR response independent of previous response, RVR or baseline fibrosis or cirrhosis. RVR BOC was the only independent predictor of SVR.