The relatively conserved 18S is often used in the phylogenetic analysis of microalgae. However, whether it can really help in barcoding microalgae needs to be evaluated. In this study the multiple approaches of coales...The relatively conserved 18S is often used in the phylogenetic analysis of microalgae. However, whether it can really help in barcoding microalgae needs to be evaluated. In this study the multiple approaches of coalescent, distance and character-based barcoding are first employed in C hlorella and Scenedesmus to test the efficiency of 18S sequences for barcoding green microalgae. We show that most Chlorella and Scenedesmus species, including the cryptic species, can be distinguished by 18S sequences with all coalescent General Mixed Yule-coalescent(GMYC), poisson tree process(PTP), and P ID, distance(ABGD) and character-based approaches. Both GMYC and PTP analyses produce more genetic groups. The P ID and ABGD analyses only cluster some species. All species(apart from a few of lineages) can be separated in character-based barcoding analysis with more than three character attributes. In comparison with previous barcoding results with r bcL, tufA, ITS and 16 S, 18S produces good resolution in identifying Chlorella and Scenedesmus. Our results reveal that 18S is highly efficient in identifying taxa of green microalgae at species level, based on a combination of multiple barcoding approaches. Combining 18S with other gene markers may be useful in barcoding microalgae.展开更多
[目的]为了探究3种常用物种界定方法(jMOTU、ABGD、GMYC)的界定效果。[方法]本研究以中国北京周边地区10个采样点483个舟蛾科样品为例,利用线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶Ⅰ亚基基因(Cytochrome c oxidase subunitⅠgene,COⅠ或COX1,约650 bp)...[目的]为了探究3种常用物种界定方法(jMOTU、ABGD、GMYC)的界定效果。[方法]本研究以中国北京周边地区10个采样点483个舟蛾科样品为例,利用线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶Ⅰ亚基基因(Cytochrome c oxidase subunitⅠgene,COⅠ或COX1,约650 bp)的部分序列,进行3种物种界定算法(jMOTU、ABGD、GMYC)的实例比较研究。[结果]3种物种界定方法的鉴定效力存在差异,与形态学结果相比较,ABGD方法划分物种的准确率为100%,基于BEAST的GMYC模型结果与形态学结果一致,产生的置信区间(64~68)覆盖了形态学的结果(67)。然而,基于d8tree/MPLtree的GMYC方法倾向于高估MOTUs,jMOTU方法倾向于低估物种数目。[结论]结果显示,ABGD方法和基于BEAST的GMYC模型方法对于本文研究对象舟蛾科能够较好地划分,可以对基于形态学的物种界定进行有效补充。展开更多
基金Supported by the China Post-doctoral Science Foundation(Nos.2014M561661,2015T80558)the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(No.BK20150680)+1 种基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.31600294)the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China(No.Y0201600141)
文摘The relatively conserved 18S is often used in the phylogenetic analysis of microalgae. However, whether it can really help in barcoding microalgae needs to be evaluated. In this study the multiple approaches of coalescent, distance and character-based barcoding are first employed in C hlorella and Scenedesmus to test the efficiency of 18S sequences for barcoding green microalgae. We show that most Chlorella and Scenedesmus species, including the cryptic species, can be distinguished by 18S sequences with all coalescent General Mixed Yule-coalescent(GMYC), poisson tree process(PTP), and P ID, distance(ABGD) and character-based approaches. Both GMYC and PTP analyses produce more genetic groups. The P ID and ABGD analyses only cluster some species. All species(apart from a few of lineages) can be separated in character-based barcoding analysis with more than three character attributes. In comparison with previous barcoding results with r bcL, tufA, ITS and 16 S, 18S produces good resolution in identifying Chlorella and Scenedesmus. Our results reveal that 18S is highly efficient in identifying taxa of green microalgae at species level, based on a combination of multiple barcoding approaches. Combining 18S with other gene markers may be useful in barcoding microalgae.
文摘[目的]为了探究3种常用物种界定方法(jMOTU、ABGD、GMYC)的界定效果。[方法]本研究以中国北京周边地区10个采样点483个舟蛾科样品为例,利用线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶Ⅰ亚基基因(Cytochrome c oxidase subunitⅠgene,COⅠ或COX1,约650 bp)的部分序列,进行3种物种界定算法(jMOTU、ABGD、GMYC)的实例比较研究。[结果]3种物种界定方法的鉴定效力存在差异,与形态学结果相比较,ABGD方法划分物种的准确率为100%,基于BEAST的GMYC模型结果与形态学结果一致,产生的置信区间(64~68)覆盖了形态学的结果(67)。然而,基于d8tree/MPLtree的GMYC方法倾向于高估MOTUs,jMOTU方法倾向于低估物种数目。[结论]结果显示,ABGD方法和基于BEAST的GMYC模型方法对于本文研究对象舟蛾科能够较好地划分,可以对基于形态学的物种界定进行有效补充。