The volume of shale (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span s...The volume of shale (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) is a critical parameter in petrophysical analysis that enables the accurate estimation of other petrophysical parameters like effective porosity, saturation and Net-to-Gross. This is an important step in characterization of reservoirs as well as valuation of hydrocarbon potentials. GR (Gamma </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Ray), Neutron and Density as well as Potassium, Uranium and Thorium logs were adopted to estimate and analy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">z</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for sand 4 reservoir interval across</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> five wells using the empirical (GR-linear and non-linear) and Neutron-Density methods. Results show that </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> estimated by the different methods varied from 0.24</span></span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.39 for the GR linear method (highest), 0.12</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.24 for the Larionov me</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">thod (intermediate), and 0.04</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.28 for the Neutron-Density method (lowest). Although the Neutron-Density method gives the lowest values of volume of shale, this does not translate to the most accurate and reliable results. This may be attributed to the non-singularity in measurements and varying sensitivities of the well logs used in this method as well as the complexities of the wellbore condition. The GR non-linear (Larionov) method provides consistent and comparable volume of shale estimations with the neutron-density method than the linear GR method and consequently, the non-linear GR method is recommended for estimation of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in the studied field.展开更多
文摘The volume of shale (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) is a critical parameter in petrophysical analysis that enables the accurate estimation of other petrophysical parameters like effective porosity, saturation and Net-to-Gross. This is an important step in characterization of reservoirs as well as valuation of hydrocarbon potentials. GR (Gamma </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Ray), Neutron and Density as well as Potassium, Uranium and Thorium logs were adopted to estimate and analy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">z</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for sand 4 reservoir interval across</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> five wells using the empirical (GR-linear and non-linear) and Neutron-Density methods. Results show that </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> estimated by the different methods varied from 0.24</span></span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.39 for the GR linear method (highest), 0.12</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.24 for the Larionov me</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">thod (intermediate), and 0.04</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.28 for the Neutron-Density method (lowest). Although the Neutron-Density method gives the lowest values of volume of shale, this does not translate to the most accurate and reliable results. This may be attributed to the non-singularity in measurements and varying sensitivities of the well logs used in this method as well as the complexities of the wellbore condition. The GR non-linear (Larionov) method provides consistent and comparable volume of shale estimations with the neutron-density method than the linear GR method and consequently, the non-linear GR method is recommended for estimation of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">V</span></i><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sh</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in the studied field.