Abdominal and pelvic pain of psychogenic origin is a widespread, disabling, difficult to identify, and often inadequately treated medical condition. This condition is often associated with poor quality of life due to ...Abdominal and pelvic pain of psychogenic origin is a widespread, disabling, difficult to identify, and often inadequately treated medical condition. This condition is often associated with poor quality of life due to high pain interference with daily activities. Cognitive behavioral psychological therapy and neuromodulation with biofeedback are validated therapies for the treatment of this condition. Aim of the present research work is the validation of a therapeutic protocol that involves the use of both techniques in combination. 20 patients diagnosed with psychogenic abdominal pain, of both sexes, aged between 18 and 60 years who had not benefited from pharmacological therapies were enrolled. 10 patients were randomly assigned to the control group (psychological treatment only), another 10 patients were assigned to the study group (neuromodulation with biofeedback-Galvanic skin response-extinction in combination with psychological therapy). For both groups, the pain score, interference of pain with daily living activities, pain relief, and the share of anxiety associated with the pain condition were evaluated (pre- and post-treatment). The patients who underwent the combined treatment achieved statistically significant better scores than patients in the control group, respectively −4.9 ± 0.9 vs −1.0 ± 0.4 for Pain;−5.1 ± 1.1 vs −0.9 ± 0.3 for Interference with life;−7.2 ± 3.7 vs −2.2 ± 2.1 for HAMA;4.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.6 for Relief.展开更多
目的探讨多种听力学检测方法在听性脑干反应(ABR)最大输出未引出患儿的听力学诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析69例(138耳)ABR最大强度未引出患儿的临床资料,年龄42天到5岁,平均1岁6个月,鼓室导抗图均为A型或正向单峰,声反射均未引出,...目的探讨多种听力学检测方法在听性脑干反应(ABR)最大输出未引出患儿的听力学诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析69例(138耳)ABR最大强度未引出患儿的临床资料,年龄42天到5岁,平均1岁6个月,鼓室导抗图均为A型或正向单峰,声反射均未引出,影像学检查内耳无畸形。69例患儿均进行ABR、耳蜗微音电位(CM)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)和听性稳态反应(ASSR)测试。结果69例138耳中,8例16耳(11.59%)记录到CM,其中10耳(7.25%)记录到DPOAE,0.5、1、2、4 kHz ASSR反应阈值分别为83.2±13.1、82.9±13.0、75.3±12.4、63.1±9.1 dB nHL,结合其他检查结果诊断为听神经病。余61例(122耳)CM和DPOAE均未引出,0.5、1、2、4 kHz的ASSR引出率分别为82.3%、81.9%、76.9%、60.2%,其中20耳ASSR各频率均未引出,102耳至少一个频率引出,0.5、1、2、4 kHz ASSR反应阈分别为93.2±6.1、99.8±7.0、105.4±5.4、108.2±9.8 dB nHL,诊断为极重度感音神经性聋。结论对于ABR最大输出强度未引出的患儿,CM和/或DPOAE引出且ASSR各频率反应阈低于感音神经性聋患儿,有助于听神经病的诊断;CM和DPOAE均未引出有助于极重度感音神经性聋的诊断,ASSR测试有助于评估其残余听力。展开更多
文摘Abdominal and pelvic pain of psychogenic origin is a widespread, disabling, difficult to identify, and often inadequately treated medical condition. This condition is often associated with poor quality of life due to high pain interference with daily activities. Cognitive behavioral psychological therapy and neuromodulation with biofeedback are validated therapies for the treatment of this condition. Aim of the present research work is the validation of a therapeutic protocol that involves the use of both techniques in combination. 20 patients diagnosed with psychogenic abdominal pain, of both sexes, aged between 18 and 60 years who had not benefited from pharmacological therapies were enrolled. 10 patients were randomly assigned to the control group (psychological treatment only), another 10 patients were assigned to the study group (neuromodulation with biofeedback-Galvanic skin response-extinction in combination with psychological therapy). For both groups, the pain score, interference of pain with daily living activities, pain relief, and the share of anxiety associated with the pain condition were evaluated (pre- and post-treatment). The patients who underwent the combined treatment achieved statistically significant better scores than patients in the control group, respectively −4.9 ± 0.9 vs −1.0 ± 0.4 for Pain;−5.1 ± 1.1 vs −0.9 ± 0.3 for Interference with life;−7.2 ± 3.7 vs −2.2 ± 2.1 for HAMA;4.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.6 for Relief.
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.22273104,No.22022306,No.22288201)the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology(No.2021ZD 0303305)+2 种基金the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(No.XDB0450202)Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program(No.XLYC 2203062)the Dalian Innovation Support Program(No.2021RD05).
文摘目的探讨多种听力学检测方法在听性脑干反应(ABR)最大输出未引出患儿的听力学诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析69例(138耳)ABR最大强度未引出患儿的临床资料,年龄42天到5岁,平均1岁6个月,鼓室导抗图均为A型或正向单峰,声反射均未引出,影像学检查内耳无畸形。69例患儿均进行ABR、耳蜗微音电位(CM)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)和听性稳态反应(ASSR)测试。结果69例138耳中,8例16耳(11.59%)记录到CM,其中10耳(7.25%)记录到DPOAE,0.5、1、2、4 kHz ASSR反应阈值分别为83.2±13.1、82.9±13.0、75.3±12.4、63.1±9.1 dB nHL,结合其他检查结果诊断为听神经病。余61例(122耳)CM和DPOAE均未引出,0.5、1、2、4 kHz的ASSR引出率分别为82.3%、81.9%、76.9%、60.2%,其中20耳ASSR各频率均未引出,102耳至少一个频率引出,0.5、1、2、4 kHz ASSR反应阈分别为93.2±6.1、99.8±7.0、105.4±5.4、108.2±9.8 dB nHL,诊断为极重度感音神经性聋。结论对于ABR最大输出强度未引出的患儿,CM和/或DPOAE引出且ASSR各频率反应阈低于感音神经性聋患儿,有助于听神经病的诊断;CM和DPOAE均未引出有助于极重度感音神经性聋的诊断,ASSR测试有助于评估其残余听力。
