期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Chinese GF-1 and GF-3 satellites observed the giant iceberg calving off the Larsen C Ice Shelf 被引量:1
1
作者 SHI Lijian WANG Qimao +1 位作者 ZENG Tao LIANG Chao 《Acta Oceanologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第11期115-115,共1页
A massive iceberg, named A-68 by National Ice Center (NIC) officially, calved away from the Larsen C Ice Shelf in Antarctica on luly 12, 2017. The iceberg A-68 is about 5 800 km2, weighs more than a trillion tons an... A massive iceberg, named A-68 by National Ice Center (NIC) officially, calved away from the Larsen C Ice Shelf in Antarctica on luly 12, 2017. The iceberg A-68 is about 5 800 km2, weighs more than a trillion tons and it is one of the biggest ever recorded icebergs. Chinese satellites Gaofen-1 (GF-1) and Gaofen-3 (GF-3) data was used to monitoring the propagation of the rift and the iceberg by National Satellite Ocean Application Service (NSOAS). 展开更多
关键词 GF SAR Chinese gf-1 and gf-3 satellites observed the giant iceberg calving off the Larsen C Ice Shelf Figure
下载PDF
Performances of conventional fusion methods evaluated for inland water body observation using GF-1 image 被引量:3
2
作者 Yong Du Xiaoyu Zhang +1 位作者 Zhihua Mao Jianyu Chen 《Acta Oceanologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第1期172-179,共8页
Satellite remote sensing of inland water body requires a high spatial resolution and a multiband narrow spectral resolution, which makes the fusion between panchromatic(PAN) and multi-spectral(MS) images particularly ... Satellite remote sensing of inland water body requires a high spatial resolution and a multiband narrow spectral resolution, which makes the fusion between panchromatic(PAN) and multi-spectral(MS) images particularly important. Taking the Daquekou section of the Qiantang River as an observation target, four conventional fusion methods widely accepted in satellite image processing, including pan sharpening(PS), principal component analysis(PCA), Gram-Schmidt(GS), and wavelet fusion(WF), are utilized to fuse MS and PAN images of GF-1.The results of subjective and objective evaluation methods application indicate that GS performs the best,followed by the PCA, the WF and the PS in the order of descending. The existence of a large area of the water body is a dominant factor impacting the fusion performance. Meanwhile, the ability of retaining spatial and spectral informations is an important factor affecting the fusion performance of different fusion methods. The fundamental difference of reflectivity information acquisition between water and land is the reason for the failure of conventional fusion methods for land observation such as the PS to be used in the presence of the large water body. It is suggested that the adoption of the conventional fusion methods in the observing water body as the main target should be taken with caution. The performances of the fusion methods need re-assessment when the large-scale water body is present in the remote sensing image or when the research aims for the water body observation. 展开更多
关键词 gf-1 satellite IMAGE FUSION methods FUSION evaluation INLAND water body
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部