Prediction,prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy:An update

Achalasia cardia,the most prevalent primary esophageal motility disorder,is predominantly characterized by symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation.The principal therapeutic approaches for achalasia encompass pneumatic dilatation(PD),Heller's myotomy,and the more recent per-oral endoscopic myotomy(POEM).POEM has been substantiated as a safe and efficacious modality for the management of achalasia.Although POEM demonstrates superior efficacy compared to PD and an efficacy parallel to Heller's myotomy,the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)following POEM is notably higher than with the aforementioned techniques.While symptomatic reflux post-POEM is relatively infrequent,the significant occurrence of erosive esophagitis and heightened esophageal acid exposure necessitates vigilant monitoring to preclude long-term GERD-related complications.Contemporary advancements in the field have enhanced our comprehension of the risk factors,diagnostic methodologies,preventative strategies,and therapeutic management of GERD subsequent to POEM.This review focuses on the limitations inherent in the 24-h pH study for evaluating post-POEM reflux,potential modifications in the POEM technique to mitigate GERD risk,and the strategies for managing reflux following POEM.

Therapeutic effect of Wendan Decoction combined with mosapride on gastroesophageal reflux disease after esophageal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)is a common complication of esophageal cancer surgery that can affect quality of life and increase the risk of esophageal stricture and anastomotic leakage.Wendan Decoction(WDD)is a traditional Chinese herbal formula used to treat various gastrointestinal disorders,such as gastritis,functional dyspepsia,and irritable bowel syndrome.Mosapride,a prokinetic agent,functions as a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 agonist,enhancing gastrointestinal motility.AIM To evaluate the therapeutic effects of WDD combined with mosapride on GERD after esophageal cancer surgery.METHODS Eighty patients with GERD were randomly divided into treatment(receiving WDD combined with mosapride)and control(receiving mosapride alone)groups.The treatment was conducted from January 2021 to January 2023.The primary outcome was improved GERD symptoms as measured using the reflux disease questionnaire(RDQ).The secondary outcomes were improved esophageal motility(measured using esophageal manometry),gastric emptying(measured using gastric scintigraphy),and quality of life[measured via the Short Form-36(SF-36)Health Survey].RESULTS The treatment group showed a notably reduced RDQ score and improved esophageal motility parameters,such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure,peristaltic amplitude,and peristaltic velocity compared to the control group.The treatment group showed significantly higher gastric emptying rates and SF-36 scores(in both physical and mental domains)compared to the control group.No serious adverse effects were observed in either group.CONCLUSION WDD combined with mosapride is an effective and safe therapy for GERD after esophageal cancer surgery.It can improve GERD symptoms,esophageal motility,gastric emptying,and the quality of life of patients.Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: What’s new right now?

Gastroesophageal reflux(GER)in children is very common and refers to the involuntary passage of gastric contents into the esophagus.This is often physiological and managed conservatively.In contrast,GER disease(GERD)is a less common pathologic process causing troublesome symptoms,which may need medical management.Apart from abnormal transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter,other factors that play a role in the pathogenesis of GERD include defects in esophageal mucosal defense,impaired esophageal and gastric motility and clearance,as well as anatomical defects of the lower esophageal reflux barrier such as hiatal hernia.The clinical manifestations of GERD in young children are varied and nonspecific prompting the necessity for careful diagnostic evaluation.Management should be targeted to the underlying aetiopathogenesis and to limit complications of GERD.The following review focuses on up-to-date information regarding of the pathogenesis,diagnostic evaluation and management of GERD in children.

Ineffective esophageal motility is associated with acute rejection after lung transplantation independent of gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux is associated with poorer outcomes after lung transplant,likely through recurrent aspiration and allograft injury.Although prior studies have demonstrated a relationship between impedance-pH results and transplant outcomes,the role of esophageal manometry in the assessment of lung transplant patients remains debated,and the impact of esophageal dysmotility on transplant outcomes is unclear.Of particular interest is ineffective esophageal motility(IEM)and its associated impact on esophageal clearance.AIM To assess the relationship between pre-transplant IEM diagnosis and acute rejection after lung transplantation.METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients at a tertiary care center between 2007 and 2018.Patients with pre-transplant anti-reflux surgery were excluded.Manometric and reflux diagnoses were recorded from pre-transplant esophageal function testing.Time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate outcome of first episode of acute cellular rejection,defined histologically per International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines.Subjects not meeting this endpoint were censored at time of post-transplant anti-reflux surgery,last clinic visit,or death.Fisher’s exact test for binary variables and student’s t-test for continuous variables were performed to assess for differences between groups.RESULTS Of 184 subjects(54%men,mean age:58,follow-up:443 person-years)met criteria for inclusion.Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis represented the predominant pulmonary diagnosis(41%).During the follow-up period,60 subjects(33.5%)developed acute rejection.The all-cause mortality was 16.3%.Time-to-event univariate analyses demonstrated significant association between IEM and acute rejection[hazard ratio(HR):1.984,95%CI:1.03-3.30,P=0.04],confirmed on Kaplan-Meier curve.On multivariable analysis,IEM remained independently associated with acute rejection,even after controlling for potential confounders such as the presence of acid and nonacid reflux(HR:2.20,95%CI:1.18-4.11,P=0.01).Nonacid reflux was also independently associated with acute rejection on both univariate(HR:2.16,95%CI:1.26-3.72,P=0.005)and multivariable analyses(HR:2.10,95%CI:1.21-3.64,P=0.009),adjusting for the presence of IEM.CONCLUSION Pre-transplant IEM was associated with acute rejection after transplantation,even after controlling for acid and nonacid reflux.Esophageal motility testing may be considered in lung transplant to predict outcomes.

24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Analysis of intraesophageal pH monitoring values recorded in distal and proximal channel at diagnosis

AIM: To assess values of 24-h esophageal pH-monitoring parameters with dual-channel probe (distal and proximal channel) in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: 264 children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were enrolled in a study (mean age χ = 20.78 ± 17.23 mo). The outcomes of this study, immunoallerrgological tests and positive result of oral food challenge test with a potentially noxious nutrient, enabled to qualify children into particular study groups. RESULTS: 32 (12.1%) infants (group 1) had physiological GER diagnosed. Pathological acid GER was confirmed in 138 (52.3%) children. Primary GER was diagnosed in 76 (28.8%) children (group 2) and GER secondary to allergy to cow milk protein and/or other food (CMA/FA) in 62 (23.5%) children (group 3). 32 (12.1%) of them had CMA/FA (group 4-reference group), and in remaining 62 (23.5%) children neither GER nor CMA/FA was confirmed (group 5). Mean values of pH monitoring parameters measured in distal and proximal channel were analyzed in individual groups. This analysis showed statistically significant differentiation of mean values in the case of: number of episodes of acid GER, episodes of acid GER lasting > 5 min, duration of the longest episode of acid GER in both channels, acid GER index total and supine in proximal channel. Statistically significant differences of mean values among examined groups, especially between group 2 and 3 in the case of total acid GER index (only distal channel) were confirmed. CONCLUSION: 24-h esophageal pH monitoring confirmed pathological acid GER in 52.3% of children with typical and atypical symptoms of GERD. The similar pH-monitoring values obtained in group 2 and 3 confirm the necessity of implementation of differential diagnosis for primary vs secondary cause of GER.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease:From pathophysiology to treatment

This review focuses on the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its implications for treatment. The role of the natural anti-reflux mechanism (lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal peristalsis, diaphragm, and trans-diaphragmatic pressure gradient), mucosal damage, type of refluxate, presence and size of hiatal hernia, Helicobacter pylori infection, and Barrett’s esophagus are reviewed. The conclusions drawn from this review are: (1) the pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial; (2) because of the pathophysiology of the disease, surgical therapy for GERD is the most appropriate treatment; and (3) the genesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: Update on inflammation and symptom perception

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)is a common disorder in Western countries,with a significant impact on quality of life and healthcare costs,the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of symptoms remain to be fully elucidated.GERD symptoms and complications may result from a multifactorial mechanism,in which acid and acid-pepsin are the important noxious factors involved.Prolonged contact of the esophageal mucosa with the refluxed content,probably caused by a defective anti-reflux barrier and luminal clearance mechanisms,would appear to be responsible for macroscopically detectable injury to the esophageal squamous epithelium.Receptors on acid-sensitive nerve endings may play a role in nociception and esophageal sensitivity,as suggested in animal models of chronic acid exposure.Meanwhile,specific cytokine and chemokine profiles would appear to underlie the various esophageal phenotypes of GERD,explaining,in part,the genesis of esophagitis in a subset of patients.Despite these findings,which show a significant production of inflammatory mediators and neurotransmitters in the pathogenesis of GERD,the relationship between the hypersensitivity and esophageal inflammation is not clear.Moreover,the large majority of GERD patients(up to 70%)do not develop esophageal erosions,a variant of the condition called non-erosive reflux disease.This summary aims to explore the inflammatory pathway involved in GERD pathogenesis,to better understand the possible distinction between erosive and non-erosive reflux disease patients and to provide new therapeutic approaches.

Stretta:A valuable endoscopic treatment modality for gastroesophageal reflux disease

One potential option for the management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease(GERD)is the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the gastro-esophageal junction(Stretta).This endoscopic therapy is safe,effective,durable,and repeatable if necessary and serves an unmet need for many GERD sufferers.Stretta could be effective in decreasing esophageal sensitivity to acid and in decreasing the gastro-esophageal junction compliance,which in turn contributes to symptomatic benefit by decreasing refluxate volume.Therefore,Stretta may serve as an endoscopic pain modulator and should be considered in patients with refractory symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors,as well as in patients with functional heartburn.

Fiber-enriched diet helps to control symptoms and improves esophageal motility in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM To investigate the effect of dietary fiber on symptoms and esophageal function testing parameters in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)(NERD) patients.METHODS Thirty-six NERD patients with low(< 20 g/d) dietary fiber intake were enrolled in the study. They were examined with the use of symptom questionnaire(GERD-Q), highresolution esophageal manometry, 24-h esophageal p Himpedance examinations, and food frequency questionnaire before and after 10 d of usual diet supplemented by psyllium 5.0 g TID. Complete data of 30 patients were available to the final analysis. The obtained results were analyzed with the use of non-parametric statistics(Wilcoxon matched pairs test). RESULTS The number of patients experiencing heartburn was less(93.3% at baseline vs 40% at the end of the study, P < 0.001) and the GERD-Q score decreased(mean ± SD: 10.9 ± 1.7 vs 6.0 ± 2.3, P < 0.001) after the treatment period. Minimal resting lower esophageal sphincter(LES) pressure increased from 5.41 ± 10.1 to 11.3 ± 9.4 mm Hg(P = 0.023), but no change in residual LES pressure and mean resting pressure was found. Total number of gastroesophageal refluxes(GER) decreased from 67.9 ± 17.7 to 42.4 ± 13.5(P < 0.001) predominantly by acid and weak acid types of GERs. No significant change in mean esophageal p H and % of time p H < 4 was registered. Maximal reflux time decreased from 10.6 ± 12.0 min to 5.3 ± 3.7 min(P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Fiber-enriched diet led to a significant increase of minimal lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, a decrease of number of gastroesophageal refluxes, and a decrease of heartburn frequency per week in NERD.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comprehensive review

AIM:To analyze the potential relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)and the development of atrial fibrillation(AF).METHODS:Using the key words"atrial fibrillation and gastroesophageal reflux","atrial fibrillation and esophagitis,peptic","atrial fibrillation and hernia,hiatal"the PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,OVIDSP,WILEY databases were screened for relevant publications on GERD and AF in adults between January 1972-December 2013.Studies written in languages other than English or French,studies not performed in humans,reviews,case reports,abstracts,conference presentations,letters to the editor,editorials,comments and opinions were not taken into consideration.Articles treating the subject of radiofrequency ablation of AF and the consecutive development of GERD were also excluded.RESULTS:Two thousand one hundred sixty-one titles were found of which 8 articles met the inclusion criteria.The presence of AF in patients with GERD was reported to be between 0.62%-14%,higher compared to those without GERD.Epidemiological data provided by these observational studies showed that patients with GERD,especially those with more severe GERD-related symptoms,had an increased risk of developing AF compared with those without GERD,but a causal relationship between GERD and AF could not be established based on these studies.The mechanisms of AF as a consequence of GERD remain largely unknown,with inflammation and vagal stimulation playing a possible role in the development of these disorders.Treatment with proton pomp inhibitors may improve symptoms related to AF and facilitate conversion to sinus rhythm.CONCLUSION:Although links between AF and GERD exist,large randomized clinical studies are required for a better understanding of the relationship between these two entities.

Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Esophageal motility abnormalities are among the main factors implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The recent introduction in clinical and research practice of novel esophageal testing has markedly improved our understanding of the mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease, allowing a better management of patients with this disorder. In this context, the present article intends to provide an overview of the current literature about esophageal motility dysfunctions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal manometry, by recording intraluminal pressure, represents the gold standard to diagnose esophagealmotility abnormalities. In particular, using novel techniques, such as high resolution manometry with or without concurrent intraluminal impedance monitoring, transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations, hypotensive LES, ineffective esophageal peristalsis and bolus transit abnormalities have been better defined and strongly implicated in gastroesophageal reflux disease development. Overall, recent findings suggest that esophageal motility abnormalities are increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of reflux disease, from nonerosive reflux disease to erosive reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus. Characterizing esophageal dysmotility among different subgroups of patients with reflux disease may represent a fundamental approach to properly diagnose these patients and, thus, to set up the best therapeutic management. Currently, surgery represents the only reliable way to restore the esophagogastric junction integrity and to reduce transient LES relaxations that are considered to be the predominant mechanism by which gastric contents can enter the esophagus. On that ground, more in depth future studies assessing the pathogenetic role of dysmotility in patients with reflux disease are warranted.

Overlap of functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease with irritable bowel syndrome

Several studies indicate a significant degree of overlap between irritable bowel syndrome(IBS)and gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).Likewise,both functional heartburn(FH)and IBS are functional digestive disorders that may occur in the same patients.However,data establishing a solid link between FH and IBS are lacking,mainly because the clinical definition of FH has undergone substantial changes over the years.The available literature on the overlap between GERD or FH and IBS highlights considerable heterogeneity in terms of the criteria and diagnostic procedures used to assess heartburn and IBS.In particular,several epidemiological studies included patients with concomitant IBS and GERD without any attempt to distinguish FH(as defined by the RomeⅢcriteria)from GERD via pathophysiological investigations.Independent of these critical issues,there is preliminary evidence supporting a significantdegree of FH-IBS overlap.This underscores the need for studies based on updated diagnostic criteria and accurate pathophysiological classifications,particularly to distinguish FH from GERD.This distinction would represent an essential starting point to achieving a better understanding of pathophysiology in the subclasses of patients with GERD and FH and properly assessing the different degrees of overlap between IBS and the subcategories of heartburn.The present review article intends to appraise and critically discuss current evidence supporting a possible concomitance of GERD or FH with IBS in the same patients and to highlight the pathophysiological relationships between these disorders.

Heartburn and regurgitation have different impacts on life quality of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM:To investigate the impact of heartburn and regurgitation on the quality of life among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).METHODS:Data from patients with GERD,who were diagnosed according to the Montreal definition,were collected between January 2009 and July 2010.The enrolled patients were assigned to a heartburn or a regurgitation group,and further assigned to an erosive esophagitis(EE)or a non-erosive reflux disease(NERD)subgroup,depending on the predominant symptoms and endoscopic findings,respectively.The general demographic data,the scores of the modified Chinese version of the GERDQ and the Short-form 36(SF-36)questionnaire scores of these groups of patients were compared.RESULTS:About 108 patients were classified in the heartburn group and 124 in the regurgitation group.The basic characteristics of the two groups were similar,except for male predominance in the regurgitation group.Patients in the heartburn group had more sleep interruptions(22.3%daily vs 4.8%daily,P=0.021),more eating or drinking problems(27.8%daily vs 9.7%daily,P=0.008),more work interferences(11.2%daily vs none,P=0.011),and lower SF-36 scores(57.68 vs64.69,P=0.042),than patients in the regurgitation group did.Individuals with NERD in the regurgitation group had more impaired daily activities than those with EE did.CONCLUSION:GERD patients with heartburn or regurgitation predominant had similar demographics,but those with heartburn predominant had more severely impaired daily activities and lower general health scores.The NERD cases had more severely impaired daily activity and lower scores than the EE ones did.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) is a common disease with a prevalence as high as 10%-20% in the western world. The disease can manifest in various symptoms which can be grouped into typical,atypi-cal and extra-esophageal symptoms. Those with the highest specificity for GERD are acid regurgitation and heartburn. In the absence of alarm symptoms,these symptoms can allow one to make a presumptive diagnosis and initiate empiric therapy. In certain situations,further diagnostic testing is needed to confirm the diagnosis as well as to assess for complications or alternate causes for the symptoms. GERD complications include erosive esophagitis,peptic stricture,Barrett's esophagus,esophageal adenocarcinoma and pulmonary disease. Management of GERD may involve lifestyle modification,medical therapy and surgical therapy. Life-style modifications including weight loss and/or head of bed elevation have been shown to improve esophageal pH and/or GERD symptoms. Medical therapy involves acid suppression which can be achieved with antacids,histamine-receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors. Whereas most patients can be effectively managed with medical therapy,others may go on to require anti-reflux surgery after undergoing a proper pre-operative evaluation. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of gas-troesophageal reflux disease.

Evidence-based appraisal in laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To demonstrate the optimal surgical procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline, Elsevier, Springerlink and Embase over the last 16 years were searched. All clinical trials involved in the outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) were identified. The data of assessment in benefits and adverse results of LNF and LTF were extracted and compared using metaanalysis. RESULTS: We ultimately identified a total of 32 references reporting nine randomized controlled trials, eight prospective cohort trials and 15 retrospective trials. These studies reported a total of 6236 patients, of whom 4252 (68.18%) underwent LNF and 1984 (31.82%) underwent LTF. There were no differences between LNF and LTF in patients' satisfaction, perioperative complications, postoperative heartburn, refluxrecurrence and reoperation. Both LNF and LTF enhanced the function of lower esophageal sphincter and improved esophagitis. The postoperative dysphagia, gasbloating syndrome, inability to belch and the need for dilatation after LNF were more common than after LTF. Subgroup analyses showed that dysphagia after LNF and LTF was similar in patients with normal esophageal peristalsis (EP), but occurred more frequently in patients with weak EP after LNF than after LTF. Furthermore, patients with normal EP after LNF still had a higher risk of developing dysphagia than did patients with abnormal EP after LTF.CONCLUSION: Compared with LNF, LTF offers equivalent symptom relief and reduces adverse results.

Modified Xiaochaihu Decoction for gastroesophageal reflux disease:A randomized double-simulation controlled trial

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)has a high prevalence worldwide,and its incidence is increasing annually.Modified Xiaochaihu Decoction(MXD)could relieve the symptoms of GERD,but the effects of MXD on GERD manifestations and relapse prevention need to be further explained.Therefore,we performed a prospective,double-blind,and double-simulation study.AIM To verify the efficacy of MXD for GERD and its effect on esophageal motility.METHODS Using randomization,double-blinding,and a simulation design,288 participants with GERD were randomized to the treatment group and control group and received herbs(MXD)plus omeprazole simulation and omeprazole plus herbs simulation,respectively,for 4 wk.The GERD-Q scale score and esophageal manometry were measured at baseline,after treatment,and at 1 mo and 3 mo follow-up visits when medication was complete to evaluate recurrence indicators.RESULTS The GERD-Q scale score in both groups decreased significantly compared to those before treatment(P<0.01).However,no significant difference was observed between the two groups(P>0.05).Esophageal manometry showed that participants with lower esophageal sphincter pressure reduction and the proportion of ineffective swallowing(more than 50%)improved in both groups from baseline(P<0.01),especially in the treatment group(P<0.05).The percentage of small intermittent contractions,large intermittent contractions,and increased pre-phase contractions in the treatment group significantly improved compared with baseline(P<0.05)but did not improve in the control group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between the groups after treatment(P>0.05).The percentage of weak esophageal contractility(distal contractile integral<450 mmHg·s·cm),improved in both groups(P<0.01),but no significant difference was observed between the groups after treatment(P>0.05).The relapse rate in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group at the 1 mo(P<0.01)and 3 mo follow-up(P<0.05).CONCLUSION MXD has a similar therapeutic effect to omeprazole in mild-to-moderate GERD.The therapeutic effect may be related to increased pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter and reduced ineffective swallowing.

Manometric findings in patients with isolated distal gastroesophageal reflux

AIM:To analyze manometric abnormalities in patients with isolated distal reflux and compare these findings in patients with erosive and non-erosive disease. METHODS:Five hundred and fifty patients who presented to the outpatient clinic of Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital with gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms were enrolled.Each individual was evaluated with esophageal manometry,24-h ambulatory pH monitoring,and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Manometric findings for the patients with isolated distal reflux were compared to findings in controls who were free of reflux disorders or hypersensitive esopha- gus.Findings for isolated distal reflux patients with and without erosive reflux disease were also compared. RESULTS:Of the 550 subjects enrolled,97(17.6%, mean age 48 years)had isolated distal reflux and 100 had no abnormalities on ambulatory pH monitoring (control group,mean age 45 years).There were no significant differences between the isolated distal reflux group and control group with respect to age,body mass index,and esophageal body contraction amplitude (EBCA).Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly higher in the control group(12.7±10.3 mmHg vs 9.6±7.4 mmHg,P=0.01).Fifty-five(56.7%) of the 97 patients with isolated distal reflux had erosive reflux disease.There were no statistical differences be- tween the erosive reflux disease and non-erosive reflux disease subgroups with respect to mean EBCA,lower esophageal sphincter pressure,or DeMeester score.However,13%of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease had distal wave amplitudes≤30 mmHg, whereas none of the patients with non-erosive reflux disease had distal wave amplitudes in this low category. CONCLUSION:Patients with erosive and non-erosive disease present with similar manometric abnormalities. The only striking difference is the observation of very low EBCA exclusively in patients with erosive disease.

Effect of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients refractory to proton pump inhibitors

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of lower esophageal sphincter(LES)-electrical stimulation therapy(EST) in a subgroup of patients that reported only partial response to proton pump inhibitors(PPIs) therapy, compared to a group of patient with complete response.METHODS: Bipolar stitch electrodes were laparoscopically placed in the LES and connected to an implantable pulse generator(EndoS tim BV, the Hague, the Netherlands), placed subcutaneously in the anterior abdominal wall. Stimulation at 20 Hz, 215 μsec, 3-8 m Amp in 30 min sessions was delivered starting on day 1 post-implant. Patients were evaluated using gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)-HRQL, symptom diaries; esophageal p H and esophageal manometry before and up to 24 mo after therapy and results were compared between partial and complete responders.RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with GERD on LESEST were enrolled and received continuous per-protocol stimulation through 12 mo and 21 patients completed 24 mo of therapy. Of the 23 patients, 16(8 male, mean age 52.1 ± 12 years) had incomplete response to PPIs prior to LES-EST, while 7 patients(5 male, mean age 52.7 ± 4.7) had complete response to PPIs. In the sub-group with incomplete response to PPIs, median(IQR) composite GERD-HRQL score improved significantly from 9.5(9.0-10.0) at baseline on-PPI and 24.0(20.8-26.3) at baseline off-PPI to 2.5(0.0-4.0) at 12-mo and 0.0(0.0-2.5) at 24-mo follow-up(P < 0.05 compared to on-and off-PPI at baseline). Median(IQR) % 24-h esophageal pH < 4.0 at baseline in this sub-group improved significantly from 9.8%(7.8-11.5) at baseline to 3.0%(1.9-6.3) at 12 mo(P < 0.001) and 4.6%(2.0-5.8) at 24 mo follow-up(P < 0.01). At their 24-mo follow-up, 9/11 patients in this sub-group were completely free of PPI use. These results were comparable to the sub-group that reported complete response to PPI therapy at baseline. No unanticipated implantation or stimulation-related adverse events, or any untoward sensation due to stimulation were reported in either group and LES-EST was safely tolerated by both groups. CONCLUSION: LES-EST is safe and effective in controlling symptoms and esophageal acid exposure in GERD patients with incomplete response to PPIs. These results were comparable to those observed PPI responders.

Gastroesophageal reflux in cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices

AIM: To evaluate the esophageal motility and abnormal acid and bile reflux incidence in cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices (EV). METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with liver cirrhosis without EV confirmed by upper gastroesophageal endoscopy and 30 healthy control volunteers were prospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients were evaluated using a modified protocol including Child-Pugh score, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, simultaneous ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. All the patients and volunteers accepted the manometric study. RESULTS: In the liver cirrhosis group, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP, 15.32 ± 2.91 mmHg), peristaltic amplitude (PA, 61.41 ± 10.52 mmHg), peristaltic duration (PD, 5.32 ± 1.22 s), and peristaltic velocity (PV, 5.22 ± 1.11 cm/s) were all significantly abnormal in comparison with those in the control group (P < 0.05), and LESP was negatively correlated with Child-Pugh score. The incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) and pathologic reflux was 37.18% and 55.13%, respectively(vs control, P < 0.05). And the incidence of isolated abnormal acid reflux, bile reflux and mixed reflux was 12.82%, 14.10% and 28.21% in patients with liver cirrhosis without EV. CONCLUSION: Cirrhotic patients without EV presented esophageal motor disorders and mixed acid and bile reflux was the main pattern; the cirrhosis itself was an important causative factor.