目的探讨脑氧摄取率(CERO_(2))、脑氧饱和度(rSO_(2))与重症颅脑损伤神经功能预后不良的关系及其预测神经功能预后的价值。方法回顾性分析2018年1月—2019年6月医院收治的106例重症颅脑损伤术后患者和同时期本院收治的可疑脑损伤但是经...目的探讨脑氧摄取率(CERO_(2))、脑氧饱和度(rSO_(2))与重症颅脑损伤神经功能预后不良的关系及其预测神经功能预后的价值。方法回顾性分析2018年1月—2019年6月医院收治的106例重症颅脑损伤术后患者和同时期本院收治的可疑脑损伤但是经检查健康的96例的资料,分别记为观察组和对照组。对观察组患者随访6个月依据格拉斯哥预后(GOS)评分进行重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后评价。对比观察组与对照组脑代谢指标(CERO_(2)、rSO_(2))、观察组中预后良好者与预后不良者术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2),分析术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)与重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的关系,分析术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)与重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的关系及预测价值。结果观察组CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)均低于对照组(P<0.05);重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良发生率为23.58%;观察组术后神经功能预后不良者术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)均低于神经功能预后良好者(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,年龄、合并基础疾病、开放性颅脑损伤、受伤至手术开始时间、术前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分中特重型、首次开颅手术时间、首次开颅手术中出血量、脑疝形成、颅内感染、康复治疗不依从、术后24 h CERO_(2)和术后24 h rSO_(2)均是重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的影响因素(P<0.05);术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)联合预测重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的灵敏度、曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于单独指标预测(P<0.05)。结论重症颅脑损伤患者术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)均偏低,且二者均是重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的影响因素,联合预测神经功能预后不良的价值高。展开更多
Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the p...Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.Methods:This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older.All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan,Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images.The patients’demographic data such as age,gender,history of comorbid conditions,mechanism of trauma,Glasgow coma scale,CT images,length of hospital stay,and surgical procedures were recorded.The Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines.The included patients'6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended.M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0.Sensitivity,specificity,negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.Results:Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria,with the mean age of(44.9±20.2)years.Most patients were male(80.7%),had traffic related injuries(83.1%)and mild TBIs(64.3%).Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores.Among all the scoring systems,the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’outcomes(kappa=0.657,p<0.001).The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity(90.1%)in predicting death of TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity(89.8%)in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.Conclusion:The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.展开更多
文摘目的探讨脑氧摄取率(CERO_(2))、脑氧饱和度(rSO_(2))与重症颅脑损伤神经功能预后不良的关系及其预测神经功能预后的价值。方法回顾性分析2018年1月—2019年6月医院收治的106例重症颅脑损伤术后患者和同时期本院收治的可疑脑损伤但是经检查健康的96例的资料,分别记为观察组和对照组。对观察组患者随访6个月依据格拉斯哥预后(GOS)评分进行重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后评价。对比观察组与对照组脑代谢指标(CERO_(2)、rSO_(2))、观察组中预后良好者与预后不良者术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2),分析术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)与重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的关系,分析术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)与重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的关系及预测价值。结果观察组CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)均低于对照组(P<0.05);重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良发生率为23.58%;观察组术后神经功能预后不良者术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)均低于神经功能预后良好者(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,年龄、合并基础疾病、开放性颅脑损伤、受伤至手术开始时间、术前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分中特重型、首次开颅手术时间、首次开颅手术中出血量、脑疝形成、颅内感染、康复治疗不依从、术后24 h CERO_(2)和术后24 h rSO_(2)均是重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的影响因素(P<0.05);术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)联合预测重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的灵敏度、曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于单独指标预测(P<0.05)。结论重症颅脑损伤患者术后24 h CERO_(2)、rSO_(2)均偏低,且二者均是重症颅脑损伤术后神经功能预后不良的影响因素,联合预测神经功能预后不良的价值高。
文摘目的:探讨入院时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,NLR)对高血压脑出血(hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage,HICH)患者近期预后的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2020年4月至2022年4月海南省第三人民医院保亭医院收治的225例HICH住院患者。依据入院90 d格拉斯哥预后评分(Glasgow Outcome Score,GOS)的随访情况,分为预后不良组(GOS≤3分)78例和预后良好组(GOS>3分)147例。比较2组相关资料,重点分析入院时NLR水平与近期预后的关系。结果:预后不良组入院时NLR明显高于预后良好组(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示:发病至入院时间、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(Glasgow Coma Score,GCS)、血肿量和入院时NLR均是HICH患者近期预后的独立影响因素(均P<0.05)。入院时NLR预测HICH患者近期预后的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.872(95%CI 0.807~0.937),与入院时GCS评分[AUC为0.824(95%CI 0.717~0.932)]比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:入院时NLR与HICH患者近期预后紧密相关,可作为临床预测患者近期预后的有效指标。
基金This study was supported by deputy of research,Kashan University of Medical Sciences(Grant no:99116).
文摘Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.Methods:This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older.All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan,Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images.The patients’demographic data such as age,gender,history of comorbid conditions,mechanism of trauma,Glasgow coma scale,CT images,length of hospital stay,and surgical procedures were recorded.The Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines.The included patients'6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended.M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0.Sensitivity,specificity,negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.Results:Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria,with the mean age of(44.9±20.2)years.Most patients were male(80.7%),had traffic related injuries(83.1%)and mild TBIs(64.3%).Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores.Among all the scoring systems,the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’outcomes(kappa=0.657,p<0.001).The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity(90.1%)in predicting death of TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity(89.8%)in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.Conclusion:The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.
