Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Acts as a Key Mediator in the Impacts of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Spine Surgery

Objective Although goal-directed fluid therapy(GDFT)has been proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications,the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of intraoperative hemodynamic lability in the association between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications.We further tested the role of this mediation effect using mean arterial pressure,a hemodynamic indicator.Methods This secondary analysis used the dataset of a completed nonrandomized controlled study to investigate the effect of GDFT on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing posterior spine arthrodesis.We used a simple mediation model to test whether there was a mediation effect of average real variability between the association of GDFT and postoperative complications.We conducted mediation analysis using the mediation package in R(version 3.1.2),based on 5,000 bootstrapped samples,adjusting for covariates.Results Among the 300 patients in the study,40%(120/300)developed postoperative complications within 30 days.GDFT was associated with fewer 30-day postoperative complications after adjustment for confounders(odds ratio:0.460,95%CI:0.278,0.761;P=0.003).The total effect of GDFT on postoperative complications was-0.18(95%CI:-0.28,-0.07;P<0.01).The average causal mediation effect was-0.08(95%CI:-0.15,-0.04;P<0.01).The average direct effect was-0.09(95%CI:-0.20,0.03;P=0.17).The proportion mediated was 49.9%(95%CI:18.3%,140.0%).Conclusions The intraoperative blood pressure lability mediates the relationship between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications.Future research is needed to clarify whether actively reducing intraoperative blood pressure lability can prevent postoperative complications.

Goal-directed therapy in intraoperative fluid and hemodynamic management

Intraoperative fluid management is pivotal to the outcome and success of surgery, especially in high-risk proce- dures. Empirical formula and invasive static monitoring have been traditionally used to guide intraoperative fluid management and assess volume status. With the awareness of the potential complications of invasive procedures and the poor reliability of these methods as indicators of volume status, we present a case scenario of a patient who underwent major abdominal surgery as an example to discuss how the use of minimally invasive dynamic monitoring may guide intraoperative fluid therapy.

Scoliosis in Children: Impact of Goal-Directed Therapies on Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes

Background: Scoliosis is among interventions with high postoperative complication rates due to the characteristics of the surgery, where blood loss, transfusion and fluid requirements can be increased. A monocentric retrospective observational study was undertaken earlier to determine predictors of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in surgical patients. In this initial cohort, there were patients who underwent scoliosis surgery, and a secondary analysis to describe outcomes in these patients was realized and presented here. Objective: To describe intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients under 18 years old in scoliosis surgery included in the initial study and to propose improvement and implementation measures. Methods: A secondary analysis of patients undergoing scoliosis surgery from 1 January 2014 to 17 May 2017 was undertaken in our institution—Necker Enfants Malades university hospital. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: There were 116 patients with a mean age of 147.5 ± 40.2 months. Twenty-eight patients (24.1%) presented intraoperative and/or postoperative complications. The most common intraoperative complication was hemorrhagic shock in 3 patients (2.6%). The most common postoperative organ failure was neurologic in seven patients (6%), respiratory in 3 patients (2.6%), cardio-circulatory in 2 patients (1.7%) and renal failure in 1 patient (0.9%). The most common postoperative infection was surgical wound sepsis in 8 patients (6.9%), urinary sepsis in 3 patients (2.6%), and abdominal sepsis and septicemia in 2 patients (1.7%). 12 patients (10.3%) had reoperations. Fifty-six patients (48.3%) had intraoperative transfusion. There was no in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: The portion of patients with intraoperative and or postoperative complications was 24.1%, integrating goal-directed therapies in this surgical setting could improve postoperative outcomes.

Intraoperative Goal-Directed Therapies in Femoral and Pelvic Osteotomies in Children and In-Hospital Postoperative Outcomes

Background: Femoral and pelvic osteotomies are potential hemorrhagic interventions where transfusion requirements can be necessary. Objective: We undertook a secondary analysis of patients who underwent femoral and pelvic osteotomy in the initial cohort. The objective of this secondary analysis was to describe intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and to describe intraoperative management in these patients in terms of blood product management and fluid and hemodynamic therapy with the aim of implementing optimization management protocols for postoperative outcome improvement. Methods: A secondary analysis of patients who underwent femoral and pelvic osteotomy surgery was included in the initial retrospective study. Results: There were eighteen patients with a mean age of 104 ± 47.1 months. Four (22.2%) patients had intraoperative and/or postoperative complications. One patient (5.6%) had an intraoperative hemorrhagic shock, two patients (11.1%) had postoperative neurologic failure, and one patient (5.6%) had postoperative wound sepsis. The transfusion rate was 50% in nine patients. Conclusion: Femoral and pelvic osteotomies are interventions where blood, transfusion and fluid requirements can be increased;thus, this implies the necessity of a global patient blood management protocol with point-of-care tests and fluid- and hemodynamic-guided protocols with validated tools in children for intraoperative and postoperative outcome optimization.

Goal-directed fluid therapy in gastrointestinal cancer surgery:A prospective randomized study

Objective:To investigate the effects of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy(GDFT)on intraoperative fluid balance,postoperative morbidity,and mortality.Methods:This is a prospective randomized study,and 90 patients who underwent elective open gastrointestinal cancer surgery between April 2017 and May 2018 were included.Patients were randomized into 2 groups that received liberal fluid therapy(the LFT group,n=45)and goal-directed fluid therapy(the GDFT group,n=45).Patients’Colorectal Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity(CR-POSSUM)physiological score,Charlson Comorbidity Index(CCI),perioperative vasopressor and inotrope use,postoperative AKIN classification,postoperative intensive care unit(ICU)hospitalization,hospital stay,and 30-day mortality were recorded.Results:The volume of crystalloid used perioperatively and the total volume of fluid were significantly lower in the GDFT group compared to the LFT group(P<0.05).CR-POSSUM physiological score and CCI were significantly higher in the GDFT group(P<0.05).Although perioperative vasopressor and inotrope use was significantly higher in the GDFT group(P<0.05),postoperative acute kidney injury development was not affected.Postoperative mortality was determined to be similar in both groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Although GDFT was demonstrated to be a good alternative method to LFT in open gastrointestinal cancer surgery,and it can prevent perioperative fluid overload,and the postoperative results are comparable in the two groups.

Simplified Intraoperative Goal-Directed Therapy Using the FloTrac/Vigileo System: An Analysis of Its Usefulness and Safety

Purpose: We investigated whether the simplified intraoperative Goal-Directed Therapy (GDT) could improve the factors affecting medical costs, and contribute in standardizing intraoperative fluid management. Methods: The enrolled patients underwent esophagectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, or aortic stent grafting in 2012, and between March 2013 and October 2014. We conducted a comparison study on the effects of GDT, between the before-GDT historical control group (n = 100) and GDT group (n = 100). The hemodynamic indices used for control group patients were conventional: Blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output. For GDT group, additionally, we used stroke volume variation (SVV) and stroke volume index (SVI). The primary outcomes were the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay (LOS). Regression analysis was used to identify factors affecting LOS. The secondary outcomes were the albumin use, the fluid amount administered, and the variation in the fluid administration rate. Results: The control and GDT groups comprised 96 and 99 patients, respectively. The patient characteristics were similar. The length of ICU stay was significantly shorter (2.1 ± 2.1 days vs. 2.8 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.0009) and LOS was shorter but without statistical significance (24.5 ± 17.7 days vs. 27.7 ± 20.1 days, P = 0.21) in the GDT group than in the control group. The fluid amount administered and the presence/ absence of albumin use were factors affecting LOS. The variation of the fluid administration rate was significantly lower in the GDT group. Conclusion: The simplified GDT may contribute to the improvement of medical economics and standardize the fluid management.

Use of Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Emergency Department before and after the Sepsis Trilogy

The management of sepsis evolved recently with the publication of three large trials (referred to as the sepsis trilogy) investigating the efficacy of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Our goal was to determine if the publication of these trials has influenced the use of EGDT when caring for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department (ED). In February 2014, we surveyed a sample of board-certified emergency medicine physicians regarding their use of EGDT in the ED. A follow-up survey was sent after the publication of the sepsis trilogy. Data was analyzed using 95% confidence intervals to determine if there was a change in the use of EGDT following the publication of the above trials. Subgroup analyses were also performed with regard to academic affiliation and emergency department volume. Surveys were sent to 308 and 350 physicians in the pre-and post-publication periods, respectively. Overall, ED use of EGDT did not change with publication of the sepsis trilogy, 48.7% (CI 39.3% - 58.2%) before and 50.5% (CI 40.6% - 60.3%) after. Subgroup analysis revealed that academic-affiliated EDs significantly decreased EGDT use following the sepsis trilogy while nonacademic departments significantly increased EGDT use. Use of EGDT was significantly greater in community departments versus academic departments following the publication of the sepsis trilogy. There was no change overall in the use of EGDT protocols when caring for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, but subgroup analyses revealed that academic departments decreased their use of EGDT while community departments increased use of EGDT. This may be due to varying rates of uptake of the medical literature between academic and community healthcare systems.

Effect of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Lung Function, Cognitive Function and Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Radical Esophageal Cancer Surgery under One-Lung Ventilation

Objective: To explore the effects of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on lung function, cognitive function and inflammatory response in patients undergoing radical esophageal cancer surgery under one-lung ventilation. Methods: Sixty-seven patients undergoing radical esophageal cancer surgery were divided into GDFT group (GDFT therapy) and control group (conventional liquid therapy). The changes in patients’ pulmonary function, cognitive function and inflammatory response were evaluated. Results: Both alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference [P(A-a)O2] and respiratory index (RI) increased at one-lung ventilation for 30 minutes (T2) and decreased at one-lung ventilation for 60 minutes (T3), and after surgery (T4) in the two groups, and the GDFT group was lower than the control group (P < 0.05);theoxygenation index (OI) of the two groups decreased at T2, T3, and T4 compared with that at T1 (before one-lung ventilation), and the GDFT group was higher than the control group (P < 0.05). At T4 and T5, the tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), central nervous system specific protein (S100β), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in the GDFT group were lower compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while interleukin-10 (IL-10) was higher compared to the control group (P < 0.05);the incidence of perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) in the GDFT group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: GDFT can help prevent lung injury during radical esophageal cancer surgery under one-lung ventilation, reduce the body’s inflammatory response, and reduce the incidence of perioperative cognitive disorder to a certain extent.

The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND Intraoperative fluid management is an important aspect of anesthesia mana-gement in gastrointestinal surgery.Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy(GDFT)is a method for optimizing a patient's physiological state by monitoring and regulating fluid input in real-time.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative GDFT in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.METHODS This study utilized a retrospective comparative study design and included 60 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a hospital.The experimental group(GDFT group)and the control group,each comprising 30 patients,received intraoperative GDFT and traditional fluid management strategies,respectively.The effect of GDFT was evaluated by comparing postoperative recovery,com-plication rates,hospitalization time,and other indicators between the two patient groups.RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss in the experimental and control groups was 296.64±46.71 mL and 470.05±73.26 mL(P<0.001),and urine volume was 415.13±96.72 mL and 239.15±94.69 mL(P<0.001),respectively.The postoperative recovery time was 5.44±1.1 days for the experimental group compared to 7.59±1.45 days(P<0.001)for the control group.Hospitalization time for the experimental group was 10.87±2.36 days vs 13.65±3 days for the control group(P<0.001).The visual analogue scale scores of the experimental and control groups at 24 h and 48 h INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal surgery is one of the most common procedures in the field of general surgery[1],involving the stomach,intestines,liver,pancreas,spleen,and other internal abdominal organs[2,3].With advancements in surgical technology and anesthesia methods,the safety and success rates of surgery have significantly improved[4,5].However,intraop-erative fluid management remains a critical challenge[6].Traditional fluid management strategies often rely on experience and basic physiological parameters,which may lead to excessive or insufficient fluid input,thereby affecting postoperative recovery and complication rates.Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy(GDFT)is an emerging fluid management strategy that dynamically adjusts fluid input volume by monitoring the patient's hemodynamic parameters in real-time to optimize the patient's physiological state[7,8].GDFT has shown superiority in many surgical fields;however,its application in gastrointestinal surgery requires further research and verification[9,10].The application of intraoperative GDFT in clinical settings has gradually increased in recent years[11,12].Studies have demonstrated that GDFT can optimize tissue perfusion and oxygenation by precisely controlling fluid input and reducing the occurrence of postoperative complications[13,14].For example,in cardiac and major vascular surgeries,GDFT significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury and cardiovascular events[15,16].Similarly,in abdominal surgery,GDFT effectively reduced postoperative infections and expedited recovery[17].However,studies on the utilization of GDFT in gastrointestinal surgery are relatively limited and they are confounded by contradictory findings[18].Traditional fluid management strategies typically rely on estimating fluid input volume based on the patient's weight,preoperative status,and basic physiological parameters[19].However,this method lacks real-time dynamic adjustment,which may result in either insufficient or excessive fluid input,consequently affecting postoperative recovery.Insufficient fluid input can lead to hypovolemia and inadequate tissue perfusion,whereas excessive fluid input can cause tissue edema and postoperative complications,such as pulmonary edema and heart failure.GDFT involves dynamically adjusting fluid input volume by monitoring the patient's hemodynamic parameters in real-time,such as cardiac output,pulse pressure variability,and central venous pressure.Commonly used monitoring equipment include esophageal Doppler and pulse wave profile analyzers[20].These devices provide real-time hemo-dynamic data to assist anesthesiologists in tailoring fluid therapy to a patient's specific condition.Firstly,the patient's volume responsiveness is assessed by preloading fluid;secondly,fluid input volume is dynamically adjusted based on real-time monitoring data;finally,vasoactive and inotropic drugs are administered in combination to further optimize the patient’s hemodynamic status.Through personalized fluid management,GDFT can more accurately maintain intraop-erative hemodynamic stability and reduce complications[21].Gastrointestinal surgery involves procedures on multiple organs,often requiring prolonged operative times and extensive tissue trauma,which presents challenges for intraop-erative fluid management.Surgical procedures can lead to significant bleeding and fluid loss,requiring prompt and effective fluid replenishment.In addition,the slow recovery of gastrointestinal function after surgery and susceptibility to complications such as intestinal obstruction and delayed gastric emptying elevate the necessity for postoperative fluid management.

Hepatic Perfusion Alterations in Septic Shock Patients： Impact of Early Goal-directed Therapy

Background： Early goal-directed therapy （EGDT） has become an important therapeutic management in early salvage stage of septic shock. However, splenic organs possibly remained hypoperfused and hypoxic despite fluid resuscitation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of EGDT on hepatic perfusion in septic shock patients. Methods： A prospective observational study was carried out in early septic shock patients who were admitted to Intensive Care Unit within 24 h after onset and who met all four elements of the EGDT criteria after treatment with the standard EGDT procedure within 6 h between December 1, 2012 and November 30, 2013. The hemodynamic data were recorded, and oxygen metabolism and hepatic functions were monitored. An indocyanine green clearance test was applied to detect the hepatic perfusion. The patients＇ characteristics were compared before treatment （TO）, immediately after EGDT （T 1 ）, and 24 h after EGDT （T2）. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.org, NCT02060773. Results： Twenty-one patients were included in the study; however, the hepatic perfusion data were not included in the analysis for two patients： therefore, 19 patients were eligible for the study. Hemodynamics data, as monitored by pulse-indicator continuous cardiac output, were obtained from 16 patients. There were no significant differences in indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate （ICG-PDR） and 15-min retention rate （Rl 5） at TO （ 11.9 ±5.0%/min and 20.0 ±13.2%）, T1 （ 11.4 ± 5.1%/min and 23.6 ± 14.9%）, and T2 （ 11.0 ±4.5%/rain and 23.7 ± 15.3%） （all P 〉 0.05）. Both of the alterations of ICG-PDR and R l 5 showed no differences at TO, T1, and T2 in the patients of different subgroups that achieved different resuscitation goal numbers when elected （P 〉 0.05）.

每搏量变异度指导的目标导向液体治疗对脑膜瘤切除术患者术后恶心呕吐的影响

目的探讨FloTrac/Vigileo提供的每搏量变异度(SVV)指导的目标导向液体治疗(GDT)与传统静态参数指导的液体治疗对脑膜瘤切除术患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。方法择期行脑膜瘤切除术患者50例,随机分为两组:C组和G组,每组25例。两组麻醉诱导前按照3ml/kg输注6%羟乙基淀粉(130/0.4),术中通过输注6%羟乙基淀粉(130/0.4)或静脉注射血管活性药物(麻黄素或去氧肾上腺素)分别达到以下要求,C组:中心静脉压(CVP)≥8mmHg或平均动脉压(MAP)>80%基础值;G组:SVV≤12%且MAP>70%基础值。观察两组患者术中及术后24h液体出入情况。观察患者术后1～3d恶心呕吐程度,记录止吐药物使用情况。结果两组患者一般资料、手术及麻醉时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与C组比较,G组术中胶体液量[(710±61)mlvs.(464±45)ml]和总液量[(1427±76)mlvs.(1171±54)ml]均增加(P<0.05),G组患者术毕SVV值[(10.6±0.4)%vs.(13.4±1.0)%]降低(P<0.05)。与C组比较,G组患者术后第2、3天恶心评分均降低(P<0.05),术后第1天呕吐评分降低(P<0.05)。与C组比较,G组术后追加止吐药物的患者例数较少(10例vs.3例,P<0.05)。结论 FloTrac/Vigileo提供SVV指导的术中GDT,可以减轻脑膜瘤切除术患者PONV的程度,减少止吐药物的使用。

目标导向液体管理用于老年患者开胸手术的临床研究

目的 观察以心指数（cardiac index,CI）/每搏指数（stroke volume index,SVI）/每搏量变异度（stroke volume variation,SVV）为目标导向的液体管理策略对行开胸肺叶切除术的老年患者术后转归的影响.方法 30例行择期肺叶切除术的患者,年龄≥65岁,美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）分级Ⅰ～Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法随机分为以CI/SVI/SVV为导向的S组（n=15）和常规液体管理组（routine group,R组）（n=15）,监测围术期两组指标,包括心率（heart rate,HR）、平均动脉压（mean arterial pressure,MAP）、动脉血氧饱和度（arterial oxygen saturation,SpO2）、呼气末二氧化碳分压（end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure,PETCO2）、气道压力（airway pressure,Pmax）、脑电双频指数（bispectral index,BIS）等,评价以CI/SVI/SVV为导向的围术期液体管理策略在改善患者术后转归方面是否优于常规液体管理策略.结果 S组患者术中不同观察时间点HR、MAP、SpO2、PETCO2、Pmax、BIS与R组比较,差异无统计学意义.S组患者术后脱离呼吸机时间4±2h、术中输液量1310±310ml、术后液体输入的正平衡量516±212ml明显小于R组患者9±3h,1920土646ml,859±335ml（P ＜0.05）,术后ICU驻留时间、氧合指数等指标S组较R组呈现良好的转归趋势.两组患者的术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义.结论 以CI/SVI/SVV为目标导向的老年开胸手术围术期液体管理策略较常规液体管理策略更严格限制液体的摄入量,缩短患者呼吸机支持时间,不增加心肺并发症的发生率,有助于改善老年患者的术后转归.

目标导向治疗中每搏变异度对液体复苏患者的影响

目的评价目标导向治疗（Goal—directed therapy，GDT）中每搏变异度（Stroke volume variation，svv）对液体复苏患者的影响。方法选择围手术期高风险的外科手术患者68例，随机分为两组，以SVV为指导的Vigileo治疗组（T组，n=32例）及对照组（c组，n=36例），术中液体复苏目标为维持SVV〈10％，统计术中补液量、发生低血压事件、术后乳酸水平及30d病死率、ICU住院天数及发生术后并发症情况。结果T组患者术中补胶体液量高于C组（1425±326mL vs 1136±408mL，P=0．002）；术中发生低血压事件两组比较无统计学差异；术后乳酸水平T组低于C组（1．78±0．83mmol／LVS2．25±1．12mmol／L，P=0．021）。T组中ICU住院天数（P=0．002）、患者发生术后并发症情况（P=0．012）均少于C组，两组比较有统计学差异。患者30d病死率两组比较无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。结论每搏变异度指导的目标导向治疗，能够使高风险外科手术患者术中血流动力学更加平稳，有效地指导液体复苏，降低术后患者的乳酸水平，能够改善组织灌注，减少术后并发症及感染的发生。

Effects of fluid therapy combined with a preoperative glucose load regimen on postoperative recovery in patients with rectal cancer

BACKGROUND Patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical resection often have poor post-operative recovery due to preoperative fasting and water deprivation and the removal of diseased tissue,and have a high risk of complications.Therefore,it is of great significance to apply appropriate rehydration regimens to patients un-dergoing radical resection of rectal cancer during the perioperative period to improve the postoperative outcomes of patients.AIM To analyze the effects of goal-directed fluid therapy(GDFT)with a preoperative glucose load regimen on postoperative recovery and complications in patients undergoing radical resection for rectal cancer.METHODS Patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical resection(n=184)between January 2021 and December 2023 at our hospital were randomly divided into either a control group or an observation group(n=92 in each group).Both groups received a preoperative glucose load regimen,and routine fluid replacement and GDFT were additionally implements in the control and observation groups,res-pectively.The operative conditions,blood levels of lactic acid and inflammatory markers,postoperative recovery,cognitive status,hemodynamic indicators,brain oxygen metabolism,and complication rates were compared between the groups.RESULTS The colloidal fluid dosage,total infusion,and urine volume,as well as time to first exhaust,time to food intake,and postoperative length of hospital stay,were lower in the observation group(P<0.05).No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operation time,bleeding volume,crystalloid liquid consumption,time to tracheal extubation,complication rate,heart rate,or mean arterial pressure(P>0.05).Compared with the control group,in the ob-servation group the lactic acid level was lower immediately after the surgery(P<0.05);the Mini-Mental State Examination score was higher on postoperative day 3(P<0.05);the pulse pressure variability(PPV)was lower at 30 min after pneumoperitoneum(P<0.05),though the differences in the PPV of the two groups was not significant at the remaining time points(P>0.05);tumor necrosis factor-αand interleukin-6 levels were lower on postoperative day 3(P<0.05);and the left and right regional cerebral oxygen saturation was higher immediately after the surgery and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum(P<0.05).CONCLUSION GDFT combined with the preoperative glucose load regimen is a safe and effective treatment strategy for im-proving postoperative recovery and risk of complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical re-section.

Influence of antibiotic-regimens on intensive-care unit-mortality and liver-cirrhosis as risk factor

AIM: To assess the rate of infection, appropriateness of antimicrobial-therapy and mortality on intensive care unit(ICU). Special focus was drawn on patients with liver cirrhosis.METHODS: The study was approved by the local ethical committee. All patients admitted to the Internal Medicine-ICU between April 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009 were included. Data were extracted retrospectively from all patients using patient charts and electronic documentations on infection, microbiological laboratory reports, diagnosis and therapy. Due to the large hepatology department and liver transplantation center, special interest was on the subgroup of patients with liver cirrhosis. The primary statistical-endpoint was the evaluation of the influence of appropriate versusinappropriate antimicrobial-therapy on in-hospitalmortality.RESULTS: Charts of 1979 patients were available. The overall infection-rate was 53%. Multiresistantbacteria were present in 23% of patients with infection and were associated with increased mortality(p < 0.000001). patients with infection had significantly increased in-hospital-mortality(34% vs 17%, p < 0.000001). Only 9% of patients with infection received inappropriate initial antimicrobial-therapy, no influence on mortality was observed. Independent risk-factors for in-hospital-mortality were the presence of septicshock, prior chemotherapy for malignoma and infection with pseudomonas spp. Infection and mortality-rate among 175 patients with liver-cirrhosis was significantly higher than in patients without liver-cirrhosis. Infection increased mortality 2.24-fold in patients with cirrhosis. patients with liver cirrhosis were at an increased risk to receive inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy.CONCLUSION: The results of the present study report the successful implementation of early-goal-directed therapy. Liver cirrhosis patients are at increased risk of infection, mortality and to receive inappropriate therapy. Increasing burden are multiresistant-bacteria.

Perioperative fluid management in major hepatic resection: an integrative review

BACKGROUND: Fluid intervention and vasoactive pharmacological support during hepatic resection depend on the preference of the attending clinician, institutional resources, and practice culture. Evidence-based recommendations to guide perioperative fluid management are currently limited. Therefore, we provide a contemporary clinical integrative overview of the fundamental principles underpinning fluid intervention and hemodynamic optimization for adult patients undergoing major hepatic resection. DATA SOURCES: A literature review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials using the terms 'surgery', 'anesthesia', 'starch', 'hydroxyethyl starch derivatives', 'albumin', 'gelatin', 'liver resection', 'hepatic resection', 'fluids', 'fluid therapy', 'crystalloid', 'colloid', 'saline', 'plasma-Lyte', 'plasmalyte', 'hartmann's', 'acetate', and 'lactate'. Search results for MEDLINE and EMBASE were additionally limited to studies on human populations that included adult age groups and publications in English. RESULTS: A total of 113 articles were included after appropriate inclusion criteria screening. Perioperative fluid management as it relates to various anesthetic and surgical techniques is discussed.CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should have a fundamental understanding of the surgical phases of the resection, hemodynamic goals, and anesthesia challenges in attempts to individualize therapy to the patient's underlying pathophysiological condition. Therefore, an ideal approach for perioperative fluid therapy is always individualized. Planning and designing large-scale clinical trials are imperative to define the optimal type and amount of fluid for patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Further clinical trials evaluating different intraoperative goal-directed strategies are also eagerly awaited.

Postoperative Outcome in Children Aged between 6 and 10 Years in Major Abdominal Surgery, Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Anticipating postoperative evolution in surgical patients is an important issue in our daily practice. We demonstrated in a previous study that there were multiple predictors of postoperative outcome, including American Society of Anesthesiologists status (ASA), transfusion, emergency, surgery and age. A secondary analysis describing intraoperative and postoperative outcomes was undertaken in children aged between 6 and 10 years old included in the initial study. Objective: To describe intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in children aged between 6 and 10 years old included in the initial cohort in abdominal surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics. Methods: The secondary analysis of postoperative outcomes in children aged between 6 and 10 years old was retrospectively included in the initial study of 594 patients. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: There were 88 patients with a mean age of 98.7 ± 13.8 months. The most common surgical interventions were scoliosis in 23 patients (26.1%), limb tumor resection in 8 patients (9.1%), femoral osteotomy in 6 patients (6.8%), intracerebral tumor resection in 6 patients (6.8%), intestinal resection in 5 patients (5.6%), Chiari’s malformation in 4 patients (4.5%), pelvic osteotomy in 4 patients (4.5%) and renal transplantation in 4 patients (4.5%). Most patients (45%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 (ASA 3), and 13 (14.8%) were ASA grade 4. Twenty-two (25%) patients had intraoperative and/or postoperative complications (organ dysfunction or sepsis). Two patients (2.3%) had intraoperative hemorrhage, 1 patient (1.1%) had intraoperative difficult intubation, and 1 patient experienced intraoperative anaphylaxis. Nine patients (10.2%) had postoperative neurologic failure, and 2 (2.3%) had postoperative cardio-circulatory failure. Three patients (3.4%) had postoperative septicemia, 2 patients (2.3%) had postoperative pulmonary and urinary sepsis, and 1 patient (1.1%) had postoperative abdominal sepsis. 3 patients (3.4%) had re-operations. 42 (47.7%) patients had intra-operative transfusion. There was 1 in-hospital death (1.1%). The median total length of hospital stay was 9 days [5 - 16]. Conclusion: Twenty-five percent of the patients had intraoperative and/or postoperative complications, and most of them were ASA grade 3 3. Integrating goal-directed therapies to optimize intraoperative management in these patients could be necessary to improve postoperative outcomes in surgical pediatric patients.

四逆汤对脓毒性休克患者目标导向性治疗和血清炎性因子的影响

目的:观察四逆汤对脓毒性休克目标导向性治疗的影响,同时分析对部分血清炎性因子的影响。方法:选取2013年3月至2016年2月重庆市开州区人民医院收治的适合进行目标导向性治疗的浓毒性休克患者90例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组45例。观察组患者接受目标导向性治疗和四逆汤;对照组仅接受目标导向性治疗。比较2组患者中医证候,达标所需时间、参数以及部分血清炎性反应指标等。结果:观察组中医证候效果优于对照组(P<0.05);2组治疗后达目标所需要时间分别为(4.13±2.10)d、(8.45±1.89)d,观察组达标时各参数均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);2组治疗后炎性因子有所下降,与对照组比较,观察组治疗后炎性因子水平更低(P<0.05)。结论:四逆汤能有效地脓毒性休克目标导向性治疗其作用机制可能与降低TNF-α、IL-8等血清炎性因子表达有关。

Postoperative Outcomes in Exploratory Laparotomy and Intestinal Resection in Children: A Secondary Descriptive Observational Analysis

Background: We previously reported independent predictors of intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. These were age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (ASA), emergency situations, surgery and transfusion. ASA was the independent predictor of mortality. We conducted a secondary analysis of this previous retrospective study in patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy and intestinal resection. Objectives: The objective was to describe intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy and intestinal resection in the initial study and to present a research protocol for intraoperative and postoperative optimization. Methods: Secondary analysis of the initial study was used. The Ethics Committee approved the study. Results: There were 54 patients with a median age of 15.5 [0 - 172] months. Thirty-seven (68.5%) patients underwent intestinal resection, nine (16.7%) underwent exploratory laparotomy, and eight (16.8%) underwent laparotomy for volvulus. Fourteen (25.9%) patients had intraoperative and/or postoperative complications. Two (3.7%) patients had an intraoperative hemorrhagic shock. Two (3.7%) patients had a postoperative cardio-circulatory failure. Three (5.6%) had postoperative respiratory failure. One (1.8%) patient had postoperative multiple organ failure and neurologic failure. Three (5.6%) patients had postoperative abdominal sepsis. One (1.8%) patient had postoperative multiple organ sepsis and neuromeningeal sepsis. Four (7.4%) patients had postoperative pulmonary sepsis. Two (3.7%) had postoperative septicemia. Six (11.1%) patients had reoperations. Seventeen (31.5%) patients had an intraoperative transfusion. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.7% in two patients. Conclusion: The number of patients with postoperative complications in this cohort was not negligible. We, therefore, elaborated a research protocol where intraoperative patient management will be guided with transthoracic echocardiography for fluid and hemodynamic therapy optimization. The objective of this study protocol is to clarify the impact of intraoperative goal-directed fluid and hemodynamic therapy with transthoracic echocardiography on postoperative outcomes in terms of complications in pediatric surgical patients.

Effect of inferior vena cava respiratory variability-guided fluid therapy after laparoscopic hepatectomy:a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background:After major liver resection,the volume status of patients is still undetermined.However,few concerns have been raised about postoperative fluid management.We aimed to compare gut function recovery and short-term prognosis of the patients after laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)with or without inferior vena cava(IVC)respiratory variability-directed fluid therapy in the anesthesia intensive care unit(AICU).Methods:This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled 70 patients undergoing LLR.The IVC respiratory variability was used to optimize fluid management of the intervention group in AICU,while the standard practice of fluid management was used for the control group.The primary outcome was the time to flatus after surgery.The secondary outcomes included other indicators of gut function recovery after surgery,postoperative length of hospital stay(LOS),liver and kidney function,the severity of oxidative stress,and the incidence of severe complications associated with hepatectomy.Results:Compared with patients receiving standard fluid management,patients in the intervention group had a shorter time to anal exhaust after surgery(1.5±0.6 days vs.2.0±0.8 days)and lower C-reactive protein activity(21.4[95%confidence interval(CI):11.9-36.7]mg/L vs.44.8[95%CI:26.9-63.1]mg/L)24 h after surgery.There were no significant differences in the time to defecation,serum concentrations of D-lactic acid,malondialdehyde,renal function,and frequency of severe postoperative complications as well as the LOS between the groups.Conclusion:Postoperative IVC respiratory variability-directed fluid therapy in AICU was facilitated in bowel movement but elicited a negligible beneficial effect on the short-term prognosis of patients undergoing LLR.Trial Registration:ChiCTR-INR-17013093.