期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
基于改进粗糙表面Greenwood-William接触模型的离散元方法 被引量:2
1
作者 赵婷婷 冯云田 +1 位作者 王敏 王勇 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第9期3440-3452,3460,共14页
颗粒材料的表面粗糙度在很大程度上影响颗粒集合体的力学特性,传统离散元方法中对颗粒具有光滑表面的假设,使得其无法准确描述真实颗粒材料的接触行为,因此有必要发展可以定量考虑颗粒表面粗糙度的随机离散元方法。在介绍经典粗糙表面... 颗粒材料的表面粗糙度在很大程度上影响颗粒集合体的力学特性,传统离散元方法中对颗粒具有光滑表面的假设,使得其无法准确描述真实颗粒材料的接触行为,因此有必要发展可以定量考虑颗粒表面粗糙度的随机离散元方法。在介绍经典粗糙表面接触模型Greenwood-Williamson(简称G-W)模型的基础上,分析了G-W模型应用于离散元模拟的缺陷,提出了分别考虑颗粒重叠光滑部分和粗糙部分的改进模型,并推导出了相应的无量纲形式,对比了经典G-W模型与改进模型计算得到的粗糙颗粒接触时压力分布、变形分布、总接触力等结果。结果表明,改进的接触模型能够更直观地反映颗粒表面粗糙度对颗粒接触的影响。基于改进的接触模型,采用两步曲线拟合手段,得到了可以直接应用于离散元模拟的随机法向接触定律。将该定律通过开发用户自定义接触模型引入到颗粒离散元程序PFC^(3D)中。通过数值试验观察了表面粗糙度在不同加载路径下对颗粒集合体力学特性的影响。 展开更多
关键词 表面粗糙度 greenwood-williamson模型 接触定律 随机离散元
下载PDF
An experimental method for quantitative analysis of real contact area based on the total reflection optical principle 被引量:3
2
作者 罗治军 宋保江 +1 位作者 韩靖宇 阎绍泽 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2019年第5期158-165,共8页
The simulation of real contact area between materials is foundationally important for the contact mechanics of mechanical structures. The Greenwood and Williamson(GW) model and the Majumdar(MB) model are the basic mod... The simulation of real contact area between materials is foundationally important for the contact mechanics of mechanical structures. The Greenwood and Williamson(GW) model and the Majumdar(MB) model are the basic models in this field, which are widely accepted and proven to be valid in many experiments and engineering. Although the contact models have evolved considerably in recent years, the verifications of the models are most based on the indirect methods such as electrical conductivity and contact stiffness, because of the lack of effective methods to directly measure the variation of contact surface. In this paper, the total reflection(TR) method is introduced into the verification of contact models.An experiment system based on TR method is constructed to measure the real contact area of two PMMA specimens. The comparison analysis between the results of experiment and models suggests that the experiment result has the same trend with simulation, the MB model has better agreement with the experimental result because this method can take into account the variation of radius and the merging of asperities, while the GW model has a huge deviation because of the dependence on resolution and the lack of considering the variation of radius and asperity's merging process. Taking the interaction of asperities into account could give a better result that is closer to the experiment. Our results and analysis prove that the experimental methods in this paper could be used as a more direct and valid method to quantitatively measure the real contact area and to verify the contact models. 展开更多
关键词 real contact area greenwood and williamson (gw) model Majumdar (MB) model Persson’s model total REFLECTION (TR) method
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部