BACKGROUND Despite high risk of bacterial contamination,yet there are no studies that have evaluated the optimal hang time of blenderized and reconstituted powdered formulas at standard room temperature and high tempe...BACKGROUND Despite high risk of bacterial contamination,yet there are no studies that have evaluated the optimal hang time of blenderized and reconstituted powdered formulas at standard room temperature and high temperature.AIM To investigate the optimal hang time of both types of formulas at standard room temperature and high temperature.METHODS Ten specimens of blenderized formula and 10 specimens of reconstituted powdered formula were prepared using aseptic techniques.Five specimens of each formula were administered at 25℃and 32℃.Simulated administration was done in an incubator.The samples were collected at 0,2,4,6 h and aerobic culture was performed.Food and drug administration criteria were used to determine the unacceptable levels of bacterial contamination.RESULTS Unacceptable contamination for blenderized formula began at 4 h at 25℃and at 2 h at 32℃.As for the reconstituted powdered formula,there was no bacterial growth in all specimens up to 6 h at both temperatures.CONCLUSION The optimal hang time to avoid significant bacterial contamination of the blenderized formula should be limited to 2 h at standard room temperature and be administered by bolus method at high temperature,while a reconstituted powdered formula may hang up to 6 h at both temperatures.展开更多
AIM To correlate the length of endoscope hang time and number of bacteria cultured prior to use.METHODS Prospectively, we cultured specimens from 19 gastroscopes, 24 colonoscopes and 5 side viewing duodenoscopes durin...AIM To correlate the length of endoscope hang time and number of bacteria cultured prior to use.METHODS Prospectively, we cultured specimens from 19 gastroscopes, 24 colonoscopes and 5 side viewing duodenoscopes during the period of 2011 to 2015. A total of 164 results had complete data denoting date of cleansing, number of days stored and culture results. All scopes underwent initial cleaning in the endoscopy suite utilizing tap water, and then manually cleaned and flushed. High level disinfection was achieved with a Medivator~? DSD(Medivator Inc., United States) automated endoscope reprocessor following manufacturer instructions, with Glutacide~?(Pharmax Limited, Canada), a 2% glutaraldehyde solution. After disinfection, all scopes were stored in dust free, unfiltered commercial cabinets for up to 7 d. Prior to use, all scopes were sampled and plated on sheep blood agar for 48 h; the colony count was obtained from each plate. The length of endoscope hang time and bacterial load was analyzed utilizing unpaired t-tests. The overall percentage of positive and negative cultures for each type of endoscope was also calculated. RESULTS All culture results were within the acceptable range(less than 200 cfu/mL). One colonoscope cultured 80 cfu/mL after hanging for 1 d, which was the highest count. ERCP scopes cultured at most 10 cfu, this occurred after 2 and 7 d, and gastroscopes cultured 50 cfu/mL at most, at 1 d. Most cultures were negative for growth, irrespective of the length of hang time. Furthermore, all scopes, with the exception of one colonoscope which had two positive cultures(each of 10 cfu/mL), had at most one positive culture. There was no significant difference in the number of bacteria cultured after 1 d compared to 7 d when all scopes were combined(day 2: P = 0.515; day 3: P = identical; day 4: P = 0.071; day 5: P = 0.470; day 6: P = 0.584; day 7: P = 0.575). There was also no significant difference in the number of bacteria cultured after 1 day compared to 7 d for gastroscopes(day 2: P = 0.895; day 3: P = identical; day 4: P = identical; day 5: P = 0.893; day 6: P = identical; day 7: P = 0.756), colonoscopes(day 2: P = 0.489; day 4: P = 0.493; day 5: P = 0.324; day 6: P = 0.526; day 7: P = identical), or ERCP scopes(day 2: P = identical; day 7: P = 0.685). CONCLUSION There is no correlation between hang time and bacterial load. Endoscopes do not need to be reprocessed if reused within a period of 7 d.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Despite high risk of bacterial contamination,yet there are no studies that have evaluated the optimal hang time of blenderized and reconstituted powdered formulas at standard room temperature and high temperature.AIM To investigate the optimal hang time of both types of formulas at standard room temperature and high temperature.METHODS Ten specimens of blenderized formula and 10 specimens of reconstituted powdered formula were prepared using aseptic techniques.Five specimens of each formula were administered at 25℃and 32℃.Simulated administration was done in an incubator.The samples were collected at 0,2,4,6 h and aerobic culture was performed.Food and drug administration criteria were used to determine the unacceptable levels of bacterial contamination.RESULTS Unacceptable contamination for blenderized formula began at 4 h at 25℃and at 2 h at 32℃.As for the reconstituted powdered formula,there was no bacterial growth in all specimens up to 6 h at both temperatures.CONCLUSION The optimal hang time to avoid significant bacterial contamination of the blenderized formula should be limited to 2 h at standard room temperature and be administered by bolus method at high temperature,while a reconstituted powdered formula may hang up to 6 h at both temperatures.
文摘AIM To correlate the length of endoscope hang time and number of bacteria cultured prior to use.METHODS Prospectively, we cultured specimens from 19 gastroscopes, 24 colonoscopes and 5 side viewing duodenoscopes during the period of 2011 to 2015. A total of 164 results had complete data denoting date of cleansing, number of days stored and culture results. All scopes underwent initial cleaning in the endoscopy suite utilizing tap water, and then manually cleaned and flushed. High level disinfection was achieved with a Medivator~? DSD(Medivator Inc., United States) automated endoscope reprocessor following manufacturer instructions, with Glutacide~?(Pharmax Limited, Canada), a 2% glutaraldehyde solution. After disinfection, all scopes were stored in dust free, unfiltered commercial cabinets for up to 7 d. Prior to use, all scopes were sampled and plated on sheep blood agar for 48 h; the colony count was obtained from each plate. The length of endoscope hang time and bacterial load was analyzed utilizing unpaired t-tests. The overall percentage of positive and negative cultures for each type of endoscope was also calculated. RESULTS All culture results were within the acceptable range(less than 200 cfu/mL). One colonoscope cultured 80 cfu/mL after hanging for 1 d, which was the highest count. ERCP scopes cultured at most 10 cfu, this occurred after 2 and 7 d, and gastroscopes cultured 50 cfu/mL at most, at 1 d. Most cultures were negative for growth, irrespective of the length of hang time. Furthermore, all scopes, with the exception of one colonoscope which had two positive cultures(each of 10 cfu/mL), had at most one positive culture. There was no significant difference in the number of bacteria cultured after 1 d compared to 7 d when all scopes were combined(day 2: P = 0.515; day 3: P = identical; day 4: P = 0.071; day 5: P = 0.470; day 6: P = 0.584; day 7: P = 0.575). There was also no significant difference in the number of bacteria cultured after 1 day compared to 7 d for gastroscopes(day 2: P = 0.895; day 3: P = identical; day 4: P = identical; day 5: P = 0.893; day 6: P = identical; day 7: P = 0.756), colonoscopes(day 2: P = 0.489; day 4: P = 0.493; day 5: P = 0.324; day 6: P = 0.526; day 7: P = identical), or ERCP scopes(day 2: P = identical; day 7: P = 0.685). CONCLUSION There is no correlation between hang time and bacterial load. Endoscopes do not need to be reprocessed if reused within a period of 7 d.
