Objective:To report our experience with the hybrid external fixator in emergency.Methods:We assessed 80 cases of pilon fracture treated with the external fixator during the period of January 2009 and December 2016:55 ...Objective:To report our experience with the hybrid external fixator in emergency.Methods:We assessed 80 cases of pilon fracture treated with the external fixator during the period of January 2009 and December 2016:55 men (69%) and 30 women (33%) with a mean age of 40 years (range between 16 and 70 ). About 45 occurred as isolated trauma, 35 instead were politrauma. Each patient underwent standard radiographic examination and a CT examination. There were 28 open fractures (35%), (Gustilo type 1, 2 and 3) while closed fractures showed soft tissue involvement of various grade (2-3 Tscherne classification). In all cases, the external fixation, sometimes associated with other reduction and synthesis techniques, was used. The timing of surgery was dictated by the condition of the soft tissues. For clinical evaluation, the Mazur score with mean follow-ups at 12 months was utilized.Results:The final range of ankle motion was 15 dorsal and 10 plantar flexion. In about 80 cases there was an average Mazur score of83. The mean score was 90;in open fractures 85 to 72. Radiographic healing of fractures in 60 patients occurred in 120 days (mean 105 days), at the time when the external fixator was removed.Conclusion:Pilon fractures are complex and often present complications;the definitive treatment, in emergency or delayed, with hybrid external fixator permits a stable synthesis with minimal soft tissue damage. Weight bearing maybe allowed early and functional recovery is generally good.展开更多
BACKGROUND High-energy tibial pilon fractures are complex and severe fractures that are associated with a high risk of infection following open reduction and internal fixation.Infection can negatively impact patient o...BACKGROUND High-energy tibial pilon fractures are complex and severe fractures that are associated with a high risk of infection following open reduction and internal fixation.Infection can negatively impact patient outcomes.AIM To compare risk factors for postoperative infection after open reduction and internal fixation for a pilon fracture.METHODS Among the 137 patients included,67 developed a surgical site infection.Demographic,clinical,and surgical factors were compared between the two groups.A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratio(OR)and corresponding 95% CI for significant risk factors for postoperative infection.RESULTS The distribution of pathogenic bacteria among the 67 patients who developed a surgical site infection was as follows:Gram-positive,58.2%(n=39);Gramnegative,38.8%(n=26);and fungal,2.9%(n=2).The following factors were associated with postoperative infection(P<0.05):a Ruedi–Allgower pilon fracture type Ⅲ(OR=2.034;95%CI:1.109–3.738);a type Ⅲ surgical incision(OR=1.840;95%CI:1.177–2.877);wound contamination(OR=2.280;95%CI:1.378–3.772);and diabetes as a comorbidity(OR=3.196;95%CI:1.209–8.450).CONCLUSION Infection prevention for patients with a Ruedi–Allgower fracture type Ⅲ,surgical incision type Ⅲ,wound contamination,and diabetes lowers the postoperative infection risk after surgical management of tibial pilon fractures.展开更多
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the damage control, in emergency to treat the open tibial pilon fractures with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy). Methods: From J...Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the damage control, in emergency to treat the open tibial pilon fractures with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy). Methods: From January 2017 to August 2017, at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Vito Fazzi Hospital Lecce, we treated 23 open tibial pilon fractures with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy). The evaluation criteria of the case series were: the time needed to assemble the external fixator;the time taked to treat the ankle associated lesions;the time of skin healing;the ankle alignment;the subjective/objective Ovadia and Beals score;and complications. The Endpoint assessment was set at the days of the definitive surgery. Results: The results in terms of alignment, biomechanical stability of the frame, healing of soft tissue, complications were as good as the objective and subjective results according Ovadia and Beals score. Conclusion:Pilon fractures are complex and often present complications;the damage control treatment, in emergency, with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy) permits a stable osteotaxis with minimal soft tissue damage and permit the repair of muscles, blood vessels and nerves with a stable bone and the soft tissue healing with vaccum therapy.展开更多
文摘Objective:To report our experience with the hybrid external fixator in emergency.Methods:We assessed 80 cases of pilon fracture treated with the external fixator during the period of January 2009 and December 2016:55 men (69%) and 30 women (33%) with a mean age of 40 years (range between 16 and 70 ). About 45 occurred as isolated trauma, 35 instead were politrauma. Each patient underwent standard radiographic examination and a CT examination. There were 28 open fractures (35%), (Gustilo type 1, 2 and 3) while closed fractures showed soft tissue involvement of various grade (2-3 Tscherne classification). In all cases, the external fixation, sometimes associated with other reduction and synthesis techniques, was used. The timing of surgery was dictated by the condition of the soft tissues. For clinical evaluation, the Mazur score with mean follow-ups at 12 months was utilized.Results:The final range of ankle motion was 15 dorsal and 10 plantar flexion. In about 80 cases there was an average Mazur score of83. The mean score was 90;in open fractures 85 to 72. Radiographic healing of fractures in 60 patients occurred in 120 days (mean 105 days), at the time when the external fixator was removed.Conclusion:Pilon fractures are complex and often present complications;the definitive treatment, in emergency or delayed, with hybrid external fixator permits a stable synthesis with minimal soft tissue damage. Weight bearing maybe allowed early and functional recovery is generally good.
文摘BACKGROUND High-energy tibial pilon fractures are complex and severe fractures that are associated with a high risk of infection following open reduction and internal fixation.Infection can negatively impact patient outcomes.AIM To compare risk factors for postoperative infection after open reduction and internal fixation for a pilon fracture.METHODS Among the 137 patients included,67 developed a surgical site infection.Demographic,clinical,and surgical factors were compared between the two groups.A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratio(OR)and corresponding 95% CI for significant risk factors for postoperative infection.RESULTS The distribution of pathogenic bacteria among the 67 patients who developed a surgical site infection was as follows:Gram-positive,58.2%(n=39);Gramnegative,38.8%(n=26);and fungal,2.9%(n=2).The following factors were associated with postoperative infection(P<0.05):a Ruedi–Allgower pilon fracture type Ⅲ(OR=2.034;95%CI:1.109–3.738);a type Ⅲ surgical incision(OR=1.840;95%CI:1.177–2.877);wound contamination(OR=2.280;95%CI:1.378–3.772);and diabetes as a comorbidity(OR=3.196;95%CI:1.209–8.450).CONCLUSION Infection prevention for patients with a Ruedi–Allgower fracture type Ⅲ,surgical incision type Ⅲ,wound contamination,and diabetes lowers the postoperative infection risk after surgical management of tibial pilon fractures.
文摘Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the damage control, in emergency to treat the open tibial pilon fractures with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy). Methods: From January 2017 to August 2017, at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Vito Fazzi Hospital Lecce, we treated 23 open tibial pilon fractures with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy). The evaluation criteria of the case series were: the time needed to assemble the external fixator;the time taked to treat the ankle associated lesions;the time of skin healing;the ankle alignment;the subjective/objective Ovadia and Beals score;and complications. The Endpoint assessment was set at the days of the definitive surgery. Results: The results in terms of alignment, biomechanical stability of the frame, healing of soft tissue, complications were as good as the objective and subjective results according Ovadia and Beals score. Conclusion:Pilon fractures are complex and often present complications;the damage control treatment, in emergency, with Dolphix? External Fixator Frame(CITIEFFE?, Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy) permits a stable osteotaxis with minimal soft tissue damage and permit the repair of muscles, blood vessels and nerves with a stable bone and the soft tissue healing with vaccum therapy.
