Relationship between preoperative psychological stress and shortterm prognosis in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture

BACKGROUND Older adults are at high risk of femoral neck fractures(FNFs).Elderly patients face and adapt to significant psychological burdens,resulting in different degrees of psychological stress response.Total hip replacement is the preferred treatment for FNF in elderly patients;however,some patients have poor postoperative prognoses,and the underlying mechanism is unknown.We speculated that the postoperative prognosis of elderly patients with FNF may be related to preoperative psychological stress.AIM To explore the relationship between preoperative psychological stress and the short-term prognosis of elderly patients with FNF.METHODS In this retrospective analysis,the baseline data,preoperative 90-item Symptom Checklist score,and Harris score within 6 months of surgery of 120 elderly patients with FNF who underwent total hip arthroplasty were collected.We analyzed the indicators of poor short-term postoperative prognosis and the ability of the indicators to predict poor prognosis and compared the correlation between the indicators and the Harris score.RESULTS Anxiety,depression,garden classification of FNF,cause of fracture,FNF reduction quality,and length of hospital stay were independent influencing factors for poor short-term postoperative prognoses in elderly patients with FNF(P<0.05).The areas under the curve for anxiety,depression,and length of hospital stay were 0.742,0.854,and 0.749,respectively.The sensitivities of anxiety,depression,garden classification of FNF,and prediction of the cause of fracture were 0.857,0.786,0.821,and 0.821,respectively.The specificities of depression,FNF quality reduction,and length of hospital stay were the highest at 0.880,0.783,and 0.761,respectively.Anxiety,depression,and somatization scores correlated moderately with Harris scores(r=-0.523,-0.625,and-0.554;all P<0.001).CONCLUSION Preoperative anxiety,depression,and somatization are correlated with poor short-term prognosis in elderly patients with FNF and warrant consideration.

Bipolar hip arthroplasty using conjoined tendon preserving posterior lateral approach in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND Hip fractures account for 23.8%of all fractures in patients over the age of 75 years.More than half of these patients are older than 80 years.Bipolar hemiarthroplasty(BHA)was established as an effective management option for these patients.Various approaches can be used for the BHA procedure.However,there is a high risk of postoperative dislocation.The conjoined tendon-preserving posterior(CPP)lateral approach was introduced to reduce postoperative dislocation rates.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the CPP lateral approach for BHA in elderly patients.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed medical data from 80 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures who underwent BHA.The patients were followed up for at least 1 year.Among the 80 patients,57(71.3%)were female.The time to operation averaged 2.3 d(range:1-5 d).The mean age was 80.5 years(range:67-90 years),and the mean body mass index was 24.9 kg/m^(2)(range:17-36 kg/m^(2)).According to the Garden classification,42.5%of patients were typeⅢand 57.5%of patients were typeⅣ.Uncemented bipolar hip prostheses were used for all patients.Torn conjoined tendons,dislocations,and adverse complications during and after surgery were recorded.RESULTS The mean postoperative follow-up time was 15.3 months(range:12-18 months).The average surgery time was 52 min(range:40-70 min)with an average blood loss of 120 mL(range:80-320 mL).The transfusion rate was 10%(8 of 80 patients).The gemellus inferior was torn in 4 patients(5%),while it was difficult to identify in 2 patients(2.5%)during surgery.The posterior capsule was punctured by the fractured femoral neck in 3 patients,but the conjoined tendon and the piriformis tendon remained intact.No patients had stem varus greater than 3 degrees or femoral fracture.There were no patients with stem subsidence more than 5 mm at the last follow-up.No postoperative dislocations were observed throughout the follow-up period.No significance was found between preoperative and postoperative mean Health Service System scores(87.30±2.98 vs 86.10±6.10,t=1.89,P=0.063).CONCLUSION The CPP lateral approach can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative dislocation without increasing perioperative complications.For surgeons familiar with the posterior lateral approach,there is no need for additional surgical instruments,and it does not increase surgical difficulty.

Comparison of DAA and PLA Approaches for Total Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Objectives: Femoral neck fractures are becoming more common within nowadays. This research is to explore the clinical effect of primary total hip replacement (THA) via direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PLA) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 100 cases of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who underwent total hip arthroplasty admitted to Tianyou Hospital affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology from January 2019 to January 2022. 50 patients treated with DAA approach were included in the observation group, and 50 patients treated with PLA approach were included in the control group. The operation indexes, postoperative acetabular abduction angle and anteversion angle, hip joint function, Harris score and complications were compared between the two groups. Result: The length of incision in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospital stay were shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05);There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the ratio of acetabular abduction angle and its safe zone, and the length difference of both lower limbs (P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the ratio of acetabular anteversion angle and its safe zone, eccentricity, and its recovery rate (P > 0.05);Harris score of hip joint: 6 months after operation, the anterior approach group was significantly higher than the posterolateral approach group (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups 12 months after operation (P > 0.05);The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P Conclusion: DAA and PLA approaches for total hip replacement can restore the hip joint structure of patients with femoral neck fractures and achieve good results, but DAA approach has greater advantages in early postoperative recovery, improvement of hip joint function, small surgical injury, high application value, so it is recommended.

Control study of short-term curative effect of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using metal-on-metal large-diameter femoral head for the elderly patients with femoral neck fractures

Objective To discuss the postoperative curative effects of two surgical techniques of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) using metal-on-metal largediameter and conventional diameter femoral head for the elderly patients

Therapeutic Effect of Artificial Femoral Head Replacement and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation on Elderly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement and Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 60 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA and artificial femoral head replacement from 2015.06 to 2018.06, of which 34 were in the PFNA group (Group A) and 26 in the artificial femoral head replacement group (Group B). Statistical analysis of relevant surgical indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative time to landing, postoperative infection rate, hospital stay, number of secondary operations, postoperative VAS score, and postoperative Hip function score comparison. Results: All 60 patients were followed up for 1 - 24 months. Compared with the artificial femoral head replacement group, the operation time of PFNA group was shorter, the blood loss during operation was less, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: The hip joint function and pain scores of the artificial femoral head replacement group in the early and follow-up periods are better than those of the PFNA group. The artificial femoral head replacement is more suitable for the treatment of elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Comparison of femoral neck fracture healing and affected limb pain after anterolateral-approach minimally invasive total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty

Objective:To study the differences in femoral neck fracture healing and affected limb pain after anterolateral-approach minimally invasive total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty. Methods:A total of 92 patients with femoral neck fracture who received hip replacement in our hospital between May 2013 and December 2015 were selected and randomly divided into total hip and half hip group, total hip group received anterolateral-approach minimally invasive total hip replacement, half hip group received anterolateral-approach minimally invasive hemiarthroplasty, and 1 month after operation, serum was collected to detect the levels of bone metabolism markers, osteocyte cytokines, SP and CGRP.Results:1 month after operation, serum PINP, PICP, BMP, TGF-β, FGF, IGF-I and IGF-II levels of total hip group were significantly higher than those of half hip group while TRAP5b and CatK levels were significantly lower than those of half hip group;the day after operation, serum pain media SP and CGRP levels were not significantly different between the two groups of patients;36 h after operation, serum SP and CGRP levels of total hip group were significantly lower than those of half hip group.Conclusion:The bone metabolism after anterolateral-approach minimally invasive total hip replacement is better than that after hemiarthroplasty, and the degree of pain is less than that after hemiarthroplasty.

Effect of different hip replacement methods under minimally invasive anterolateral approach on bone metabolism and joint pain in patients with femoral neck fracture

Objective: To explore the effect of different hip replacement methods under minimally invasive anterolateral approach on bone metabolism and joint pain in patients with femoral neck fracture. Methods: A total of 110 patients with femoral neck fracture who were treated in Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between July 2015 and January 2017 were collected and divided into control group and observation group by random number table, each with 55 cases. Control group accepted half hip replacement under minimally invasive anterolateral approach, and observation group accepted total hip replacement under minimally invasive anterolateral approach. The differences in contents of bone metabolism and joint pain-related indexes were compared between the two groups before and after surgery. Results: Before surgery, serum contents of bone formation indexes, bone resorption indexes, inflammatory indexes and pain mediators were not statistically significant between the two groups. 1 month after surgery, serum bone formation indexes PINP, BAP and BGP contents of observation group were higher than those of control group;serum bone resorption indexes β-CTX and TRACP-5b contents were lower than those of control group;serum inflammatory indexes IL-1 and TNF-α contents were lower than those of control group;serum pain mediators 5-HT and PGE2 contents were lower than those of control group. Conclusion: Total hip replacement under minimally invasive anterolateral approach is more effective to promote the formation of bone formation/bone resorption balance and reduce the joint pain.

Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture:What is the current evidence?

This editorial reviews and summarises the current evidence(meta-analyses and Cochrane reviews) relating to the use of hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fractures. Regarding the optimal surgical approach,two recent meta-analyses have found that posterior approaches are associated with: higher rates of dislocation compared to lateral and anterior approaches; and higher rates of re-operation compared to lateral approaches. Posterior approaches should therefore be avoided when performing hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures. Assessing the optimal prosthesis head component,three recent meta-analyses and one Cochrane review have found that while unipolar hemiarthroplasty can be associated with increased rates of acetabular erosion at short-term follow-up(up to 1 year),there is no significant difference between the unipolar hemi-arthroplasty and bipolar hemi-arthroplasty for surgical outcome,complication profile,functional outcome and acetabular erosion rates at longer-term follow-up(2 to 4 years). With bipolar hemi-arthroplasty being the more expensive prosthesis,unipolar hemi-arthroplasty is the recommended option. With regards to the optimal femoral stem insertion technique,three recent metaanalyses and one Cochrane Review have found that,while cemented hip hemi-arthroplasties are associated with a longer operative time compared to uncemented Hip Hemi-arthroplasties,cemented prostheses have lower rates of implant-related complications(particularly peri-prosthetic femoral fracture) and improved postoperative outcome regarding residual thigh pain and mobility. With no significant difference found between the two techniques for medical complications and mortality,cemented hip hemi-arthroplasty would appear to be the superior technique. On the topic of wound closure,one recent meta-analysis has found that,while staples can result in a quicker closure time,there is no significant difference in post-operative infections rates or wound healing outcomes when comparing staples to sutures. Therefore,either suture or staple wound closure techniques appear equally appropriate for hip hemiarthroplasty procedures.

Total hip arthroplasty following the failure of intertrochanteric nailing:First implant or salvage surgery?

BACKGROUND Proximal femur fractures,including both intracapsular(femoral neck fractures)and extracapsular fractures(intertrochanteric femoral fractures,IFFs),affect around 1.5 million people per year worldwide.Mechanical failures of intertrochanteric nailing in IFFs could be managed with revision total hip arthroplasty(THA).AIM To describe the surgical complexity and the procedure-related complication rates in patients with trochanteric nailing failure and treated with THA.METHODS Patients referred to our level I trauma center between April 2012 and July 2018 with failed cephalomedullary nailing following trochanteric fractures were retrospectively recruited.All patients underwent a salvage surgical procedure,i.e.,cephalomedullary nail removal and conversion to THA.The same surgical and anesthesiology team performed the surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia.All patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-ups for at least 24 mo.Complications and re-operations were recorded.RESULTS Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria(male:29;female:45;mean age:73.8-years-old;range:65-89)and were included in the current study.The average operative time was 117 min(76-192 min).The average blood loss was 585 mL(430-1720 mL).Among the 74 patients,43(58.1%)required transfusion of three or more blood units.Two patients died within the 4th d after surgery because of pulmonary embolism,and 1 patient died 9 mo after surgery due to ischemic myocardial infarction.The complication rate in the 71 patients who completed the minimum 24-mo follow-up was 22.5%.In 3 cases out of 71(4.2%)periprosthetic acetabular fracture was observed during the followup.One of these periacetabular fractures occurred intraoperatively.An intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture was observed in 5 patients out of 71(7.0%).Four of these patients needed a re-operation to fix the fracture with plates and cerclages;in one of these patients,femoral stem revision was also necessary.In 4 patients out of 71(5.6%),an early THA dislocation was observed,whereas in 1 case(1.4%)a late THA dislocation was observed.Three patients out of 71(4.2%)developed a periprosthetic joint infection during the study follow-up.CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that salvage options for IFF fixation failure are complex procedures with a relevant intraoperative and postoperative complication rate.

Effect of early surgery in high surgical risk geriatric patients with femoral neck fracture and taking antiplatelet agents

AIM: To investigate the effect of early surgical intervention on the high surgical risk elderly patients who sustained femoral neck fracture(FNF) and taking concomitant antiplatelet agents. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2012, a prospective study was conducted on 49 geriatric patients, who took antiplatelet agents, sustained FNF and underwent surgery within 72 h [early surgery(ES) group], and these were compared with a retrospective consecutive case series of patients with similar characteristics(45 cases) who had delayed surgery(DS group) after 72 h during an earlier 3-year period. Postoperative outcomeswere followed for one year and compared. RESULTS: There were non-significant differences in perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, intensive care unit requirement and postoperative mortality(P > 0.05 all). There were 2 patients(4%) in the DS group who died after surgery(P = 0.23). However, the ES group showed a significantly better postoperative outcome in terms of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and functional outcome(P < 0.05 all).CONCLUSION: Early hip surgery in geriatric hip fracture patients with ongoing antiplatelet treatment was not associated with a significant increase of perioperative blood loss and postoperative mortality. Moreover, ES resulted in a better postoperative surgical outcome. In early hip surgery protocol, the antiplatelet agents are discontinued and the patient is operated on within 72 h after admission, which is safe and effective for the medically fit patients.

Comparative study of anterolateral approach versus posterior approach for total hip replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

Objective： To compare the clinical outcome of anterolateral minimally invasive approach versus conventional posterior approach for total hip replacement against femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Methods： The retrospective study was carried out on 42 patients who suffered from displaced femoral neck fractures （19 cases of Garden type Ⅲ, 23 cases of Garden type Ⅳ） treated by total hip replacement via anterolateral minimally invasive approach or conventional posterior approach by the same experienced surgeon. The average age of the patients was 78.1 years （range： 65-89 years）. They were divided into anterolateral mini-invasive group （22 cases） and posterior group （20 cases）. The mean time of follow-up was 13 months （range： 6-36 months）. The anterolateral approach described by Hardinge goes through between anterior 1/3 and posterior 2/3 of the gluteus medius muscle, reaching the femoral neck from anterior capsule. The traditional posterior approach described by Moore （Southern incision） goes through the insertions of short external rotation muscles, reaching the femoral neck from posterior capsule. The related variables under observation were length of incision, operation time, postoperative limp, length of hospital stay and bed stay and dislolcation rate. Results： The length of the skin incision varied between 7 cm and 12 cm with the anterolateral minimally invasive technique, compared to 15-22 cm in the conventional procedure. It took less time （average 15 minutes） to complete the anterolateral minimally invasive approach （72 15 min）, compared with the conventional approach （87 min ±10 min）. The average Harris hip score was 91.23±10.20 in anterolateral approach, 90.03±11.05 in the posterior approach. The average length of hospital stay for patients with the anterolateral approach was （6.4±2.2） days （range： 4-9 days）, while that in posterior approach was （9.2 ±3.1） days （range： 6-13 days）. The average length of bed stay was （3.4±1.1） days （range： 2-5 days） in anterolateral group and （6.2±2.8） days （range： 3-10 days） in posterior group. No patients in anterolateral group experienced dislocation. One （5%） hip in posterior approach had dislocation. Conclusions： Anterolateral mini-invasive approach can decrease trauma, operation time, length of hospital stay and bed stay and rehabilitation time. The stability and minimal muscular damage permit the acceleration of postoperative rehabilitation, which can subsequently reduce the perioperative risk in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly undergoing total hip replacement.

改良Hardinge入路髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折疗效及安全性分析

目的:探讨改良Hardinge入路髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效及安全性。方法:随机将2019年4月至2023年1月本院收治的75例股骨颈骨折患者分为对照组(37例)和观察组(38例)。对照组给予传统后外侧入路治疗,观察组给予改良Hardinge入路治疗。分析比较两组疗效、髋关节功能以及术后并发症。结果:对照组治疗总有效率显著低于观察组(P<0.05)。对照组术后1 m、3 m髋关节功能Harris评分均显著低于观察组(P<0.05)。术后3 m内,对照组术后并发症发生率明显高于观察组(P<0.05)。结论:股骨颈骨折采用改良Hardinge入路髋关节置换术治疗的疗效显著,有利于患者髋关节功能恢复,且安全性高。

Primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement: A case report and surgical techniques

For the treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture combined with femoral head necrosis in middle-age patients,it has been controversial whether to perform fracture reduction and fixation first then total hip replacement,or direct total hip replacement.We present a rare case of 53-year-old male patient suffered from bilateral intertrochanteric fracture caused by a road traffic injury.The patient had a history of femoral head necrosis for eight years,and the Harris score was 30.We performed total hip replacement with prolonged biologic shank prostheses for primary repair.One year after the surgery,nearly full range of motion was achieved without instability(active flexion angle of 110°,extension angle of 20°,adduction angle of 40°,abduction angle of 40°,internal rotation angle of 25°,and external rotation angle of 40°).The Harris score was 85.For the middle-aged patient with unstable intertrochanteric fractures and osteonecrosis of the femoral head,we can choose primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement.

Prosthetic replacement in treatment of subcapital femoral neck fractures in the elderly

Objective: To compare the results of femoral head replacement (FHR) and total hip replacement (THR) in treatment of subcapital femoral neck fractures (SFNF). Methods: Between May 1987 and July 1998, 56 elderly patients (65-90 years; average 73.5 years) with SFNF were treated with prosthetic replacement. Six cases were treated with unipolar FHR, 18 cases with Bateman bipolar FHR, and 32 cases with Bateman bipolar THR. All domestic prostheses were installed with cement. Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in operating time and blood transfusion. Forty-nine patients were followed-up for an average of 5 years and 10 months. No wound infection or death was related to surgery. Complications in Group FHR were significantly higher than that in Group THR. Conclusions: Since FHR is difficult to fit the bony acetabulum, it is only indicated for senile cases with poor conditions. However, the bipolar THR installed with cement is indicated for most elderly patients. Since the femoral head and acetabulum can fit each other completely, it is more stable for taking weight-bearing earlier with less complications.

Effect of dynamic hip screw on the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly

[Abstract] Objective： To discuss the indications, surgical procedures, and curative effect of dynamic hip screw （DHS） in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly. Methods： A retrospective study was conducted to analyse the clinical data of 42 elderly patients who had been treated for femoral neck fracture with DHS in our department between June 2009 and November 2011. There were 21 males and 21 females with a mean age of 68.5 years （range 60-75 years）. According to the Garden Classification, there were 19 cases of type II, 21 cases of type III and 2 cases of type IV fractures. By the Singh In- dex Classification, there were 3 cases of level 2, 19 cases of level 3 and 20 cases of level 4 fractures. The Harris cri- terion, complications and function recovery after operation were analysed. Results： The average hospitalization time in 42 patients was 11.2 days （range 7-21 days）. All patients were followed up for 12-26 months （mean 18 months）. No lung infection, deep venous thrombosis or other complications occurred. Partial backing-out of the screws was found in 2 cases. The internal fixation device was with- drawn after fracture healing. Internal fixation cutting was found in 1 case, and he had a good recovery after total hip arthroplasty. The time for fracture healing ranged from 3-6 months （average 4.5 months）. According to Harris criteri- on, 15 cases were rated as excellent, 24 good, 2 fair and 1 poor. The Harris scale was significantly improved from 30.52＋2.71 preoperatively to 86.61＋2.53 at 6 months post- operatively （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： DHS, being minimal invasive, al- lowing early activity and weight-bearing, is advisable for treatment of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. In addition, it can avoid complications seen in artificial joint replacement. It is especially suitable for patients with mild osteoporosis.

Analysis of prosthetic replacement in treatment of femoral neck fracture on the hemiplegia side in the elderly

Objective: To study the effect of prosthetic replacement in treatment of femoral neck fractures on the hemiplegia side in the elderly. Methods: From May 1990 to May 2000, 189 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures were treated with prosthetic replacement in my hospital. Twenty-nine hemiplegia patients, who suffered from stroke previously, had Garden type III and type IV femoral neck fractures on the hemiplegia side. Thirty non-hemiplegia patients were chosen randomly. The two groups were followed-up for 27-98 months (average: 59 months). The age, hospitalization days, operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, complications during perioperative period and long-term complications were compared between the two groups and the results of femoral head replacement and total hip replacement in the hemiplegia group were also compared. Results: All the patients of the two groups survived the perioperative period. No significant difference was found in the age, hospitalization days, operation time, blood loss and blood transfusion and long-term complications between the two groups (P> 0.05). However there was significant difference in complications during perioperative period between the two groups (P< 0.05). Five patients died in the hemiplegia group with the mortality of 17.2% and two died in the non-hemiplegia group with the mortality of 6.7% 11 months to 5 years after operation. There was significant difference in long-term complications between the femoral head replacement and the total hip replacement in the hemiplegia group (P< 0.05). The result of the total hip replacement was better than that of the femoral head replacement. Conclusions: Prosthetic replacement is a reliable method in treatment of Garden type III and type IV femoral neck fractures on the hemiplegia side in the elderly, and patients are safe during perioperative period. More complications during perioperative period occur in the hemiplegia group, and long-term complications are insignificantly different between the two groups. The mortality rate is higher in the hemiplegia group than in the non-hemiplegia group within 5 years after operation. Since the result of the total hip replacement is better than that of the femoral head replacement, total hip replacement should be chosen firstly to treat Garden type III and type IV femoral neck fractures on the hemiplegia side in the elderly if the muscular strength of the hip is beyond IV degree.

Closed reduction and internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture

Objective： To compare the clinical effects between closed reduction and internal fixation （CRIF） and total hip arthroplasty （THA） for displaced femoral neck fracture. Methods： In this prospective randomized study, 285 patients aged above 65 years with hip fractures （Garden III or IV） were included from January 2001 to December 2005. The cases were randomly allocated to either the CRIF group or THA group. Patients with pathological fractures （bone tumors or metabolic bone disease）, preoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, hemiplegia, long-term bed rest and complications affecting hip functions were excluded. Results： During the had significantly higher 5-year follow-up, CRIF group rates of complication in hipjoint, general complication and reoperation than THA group （38.3% vs. 12.7%, P〈0.01; 45.3% vs. 21.7%, P〈0.01; 33.6% vs. 10.2%, P〈0.05 respectively）. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Postoperative function of the hip joint in THA group recovered favorably with higher Harris scores. Conclusion： For displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients, THA can achieve a lower rate of complication and reoperation, as well as better postoperative recovery of hip joint function compared with CRIF.

Does total hip arthroplasty provide better outcomes than hemiarthroplasty for the femoral neck fracture? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose By comparing the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture to investigate the one-year mortality,dislocation,infection,reoperation rate,and thromboembolic event.Methods The PubMed,EMBASE databases,and Cochrane library were systematically searched from the inception dates to April 1,2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials in English language using the keywords:“total hip arthroplasty”,“hemiarthroplasty”and“femoral neck fracture”to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Two reviewers independently selected articles,extracted data,assessed the quality evidence and risk bias of included trials using the Cochrane Collaboration’stools,and discussed any disagreements.The third reviewer was consulted for any doubts or uncertainty.We derived risk ratios and 95%confidence intervals.Mortality was defined as the primary outcome.Secondary outcomes were other complications,dislocation,infection,reoperation rate,and thromboembolic event.Results This meta-analysis included 10 studies with 1419 patients,which indicated that there were no significant differences between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in reoperation,infection rate,and thromboembolic event.However,there was a lower mortality and dislocation rate association with total hip arthroplasty at the one-year follow-up.Conclusion Based on our results,we found that total hip arthroplasty was better than hemiarthroplasty for a hip fracture at one-year follow-up.

SuperPATH入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术对骨质疏松导致的股骨颈骨折患者肌酸磷酸激酶、Harris评分及改良Barthel指数的影响

目的调研和分析SuperPATH入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术对骨质疏松导致的股骨颈骨折患者肌酸磷酸激酶、Harris评分及改良Barthel指数的影响。方法回顾性选取2019年3月至2022年3月唐山市第二医院收治的64例骨质疏松导致的股骨颈骨折患者纳入至本次研究,按照治疗方法的不同将其分为对照组(n=32)与观察组(n=32)。对照组给予外侧小切口入路全髋关节置换术,观察组则行SuperPATH入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术。观察两组患者术前、术后1 d、5 d、15 d、3个月、6个月疼痛疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分,比较术前、术后1、5、15 d两组患者血清肌酸磷酸激酶水平变化情况,统计术前、术后1 d、5 d、15 d、3个月、6个月的髋关节功能恢复情况以及术前、术后1 d、5 d、3个月、6个月的日常生活活动能力情况。结果术后3、6个月,两组评分较术前降低,观察组患者术后5 d、15 d、3个月、6个月的VAS评分分别为(4.23±0.53)、(3.53±0.43)、(1.83±0.21)、(0.24±0.12)分,均低于对照组[(4.93±0.98)、(4.21±0.94)、(2.45±0.52)、(0.78±0.36)]分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、5、15 d,两组血清肌酸磷酸激酶水平较术前升高,且观察组患者的血清肌酸磷酸激酶水平分别为(478.39±234.12)、(216.28±131.27)、(138.23±63.12)U/L,显著低于对照组[(893.47±428.13)、(436.29±261.57)、(198.67±98.47)U/L],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1 d、5 d、15 d、3个月、6个月,两组Harris评分均较术前升高,且观察组患者的Harris评分分别为(52.36±5.23)、(61.24±6.15)、(72.46±5.26)、(86.28±6.31)、(91.21±3.15)分,均明显高于对照组[(41.78±6.29)、(56.39±6.78)、(63.49±6.34)、(70.47±6.21)、(81.47±5.23)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1 d、5 d、1个月、6个月,两组改良Barthel指数均较术前升高,且观察组患者的改良Barthel指数分别为(49.23±7.26)、(68.29±7.23)、(76.28±7.31)、(89.46±7.34)分,均高于对照组[(40.58±6.19)、(60.12±6.45)、(70.36±6.73)、(81.37±6.81)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在骨质疏松导致的股骨颈骨折患者接受治疗的过程中,采用SuperPATH入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术的临床治疗效果较好,可显著降低血清肌酸磷酸激酶水平,提升Harris评分、改良Barthel指数,可有效改善患者的髋关节功能,值得在临床治疗中推广。

早期康复护理对股骨颈骨折术后患者Barthel指数及Harris髋关节评分的影响

目的探讨早期康复护理对股骨颈骨折术后患者Barthel指数及Harris评分的影响。方法选取2018年10月至2020年10月在我院接受手术治疗的80例股骨颈骨折患者作为研究对象,根据随机编号将其分为对照组和研究组,各40例。对照组采用常规护理,研究组采用早期康复护理。比较两组的并发症发生情况、Barthel指数、Harris髋关节评分及生活质量。结果研究组的并发症总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。护理1、2、4周后,两组的Barthel指数及Harris髋关节评分均升高,且研究组高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能及物质生活评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论早期康复护理应用于股骨颈骨折术后患者中能有效减少并发症,促进髋关节功能及活动能力的恢复,提高Barthel指数及Harris髋关节评分,改善生活质量。