论三种翻译模式的主要异同(英文)

The Jerome model, the Horace model and the Schleiermacher model are among the most popular translation models, which have exerted their different influences at different historical periods. This paper analyzes their main differences and similarities that find expression in their different criteria of "faithfulness" or "equivalence"and discusses their different roles in translation practice. The paper concludes that no single translation model is really better than another because the criteria of translation are dynamic rather than static.

论“杰罗姆模式”和“贺拉斯模式”的主要异同--以大学英语翻译教学为例(英文)

The Jerome model and the Horace model are very popular translation models and have exerted different influences on translation theories and practice.This paper analyzes their main differences and similarities in terms of their different criteria of'faithfulness'and'equivalence'.Through a case study,it concludes that a proper application of the two models to College - English Translation Teaching will help improve the teaching quality and the students’ translation ability.

A Comparative Study of the Jerome Model and the Horace Model

For many years,the two important translation styles,the Jerome model and the Horace model,are widely studied.Consisting of four parts,this paper will focus on making a comparison between the two translation models.

A Comparison Study of the Jerome Model and the Horace Model

Jerome' s Vulgate set the norms for translation aiming at linguistic equivalence between the SLT and the TLT,from which came the Jerome Model,though his views towards translating did not follow the prescribed order,as different text-specific factors were involved in his theory building.To the contrary,Horace demonstrated a much more differentiated approach in his awareness of negotiation or sometimes collision between as many roles as can play in translation,such as translator/interpreter,clients,patronage,languages.Hence the Horace model focuses on text-pragmatic equivalence as the context under which translating is to take place is taken into account.

Preliminary Study of Jerome Model and Horace Model—Taking the English Version of Tian Jingsha Qiusi as an Example

In this paper, two old translation models Jerome model and Horace model will be compared. Two English versions ofTianjingsha Qiusi by Ma Zhiyuan are examined to see how far two translation models can go in rendering original beauty of Chineseshort lyric.

Preliminary Study of Jerome Model and Horace Model

Translation always plays the crucial role in the cross-culture communication and the development of human being's history of civilization. The author of this papertries to make an analysis and contrast of the two translation models: the Jerome model and the Horace model, pointing out that it is because of different circumstances that different translation models are used in the translation.

A Preliminary Study of Jerome Model and Horace Model:Application of Chinese word “yisi”

The research tries to deplore the two translation models which are Jerome Model and Horace model with the translation of Chinese word yisi,and then concludes that the two kinds of models should be used in different situation after taking other elements just like context,culture,and the innate discrepancy of way of expression in Chinese and English into concern.

Preliminary Study of Jerome Model and Horace Model

This paper first gives a brief introduction to both Jerome Model and Horace Model, and then makes comparison between them. Last it draws a conclusion that no one from them is better than the other.

The Comparison between Jerome Model and Horace Model

Jerome Model and Horace Model are the two influential translation models in the translation field. This article tries to find the similarities and differences between these two models.

Major Differences between the Jerome Model and the Horace Model

There are three famous translation models in the field of translation: the Jerome model,the Horace model and the Schleiermacher model. The production and development of the three models have significant influence on the translation. To find the major differences between the two western classical translation theoretical models,we discuss the Jerome model and the Horace model deeply in this paper.

Romantic Pedagogy in the Age of Revolutions： The Strange Career of Emile in America

The puzzle is palpable. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was the most brilliant of all developmental psychologists and his Emile the most profound book ever written on education. In the age of revolutions, Rousseau was one of the two most widely read philosophes in America and Emile the most popular of all his writings. More even than all that, Rousseau＇s ideas about education were far more in tune with the rhetoric of revolutionary America than those of his only real rival in pedagogy, John Locke. Yet Rousseau＇s influence on education in the new nation was negligible. How are we to explain that？ This paper suggests an answer to that question.

The Application of the Jerome Model and the Horace Model in Translation Practice

The Jerome model and the Horace model have a great influence on translation theories and practice from ancient times. This paper starts from a comparative study of the two models, and mainly discusses similarities, differences and weakness of them. And then, through the case study, it analyzes the application of the two models to English-Chinese translation. In the end,it draws a conclusion that generally accepted translation criterion does not exist, different types of texts require different translation criterion.

The Preliminary Study of Jerome Model and Horace Model

This paper introduces and compares two western translating theories represented by Horace and Jerome. According to the discussions, the author found both models have their own importance in the field of translation; furthermore, they may be used in the same text to produce a good translation that satisfies both parties.