Objective:To investigate the correlation between MSCT grading and the prognosis of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods:A total of 86 patients with basal ganglia hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage...Objective:To investigate the correlation between MSCT grading and the prognosis of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods:A total of 86 patients with basal ganglia hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to March 2018 were selected.The clinical data and imaging data were collected from 86 patients.The MSCT images were observed and summarized by two radiologists.Based on the morphology of cisterna ambiens and brain stem,the correlation of MSCT grading to Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)and Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)grading was analyzed by use of Spearman correlation analysis.Results:Among 86 patients,the number of MSCT gradeⅠ,Ⅱ,ⅢandⅣwere 29 cases,38 cases,9 cases and 10 cases respectively.There was no significant correlation between MSCT grading and age,sex as well as types of combined underlying diseases in the patients with basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(p>0.05).Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between MSCT grading and GCS score of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.The higher MSCT grade was,the higher GCS score was(r=0.719,p<0.001).There was a positive correlation between MSCT grading and GOS grading of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.The higher MSCT grade was,the higher GOS grade was,leading to a poor prognosis(r=0.734,p<0.001).86 cases of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage showed round or quasi-circular high-density shadows in MSCT images,the CT value ranged from 50 Hu to 80 Hu.Low-density bands surrounded the hematoma in the acute stage,and space-occupying effect could be seen in some patients,which resulted in the compression of ventricular sulcus and cistern and the displacement of midline structure.Subacute basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage patients showed a relative decrease in the density of hematoma,with the extent of edema gradually reduced,the focus showed a high-density shadow in the center;chronic basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage focus showed a cystic low-density shadow.Conclusion:MSCT grading of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is positively correlated to GCS and GOS grading.MSCT grading can contribute to the prognostic evaluation to the patients.展开更多
目的分析不同入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月丰城市人民医院收治的88例基底节区高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组44例。两组均行小骨窗开颅显微手术,...目的分析不同入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月丰城市人民医院收治的88例基底节区高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组44例。两组均行小骨窗开颅显微手术,对照组采用经颞叶皮质入路手术治疗,观察组采用经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路手术治疗,比较两组手术情况、血肿清除率、再出血率、术后并发症、术后1个月格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma score,GOS)分级情况及术后1、3、6个月的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分及世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表(World Health Organization on quality of life brief scale,WHOQOL-BREF)评分。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量、引流管放置时间、行大骨瓣减压例数、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义;观察组开始手术至颅内压下降时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后24 h血肿清除率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组再出血率比较差异无统计学意义。观察组术后1个月预后良好率为81.82%,高于对照组的61.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3、6个月,观察组NIHSS评分均低于对照组,WHOQOL-BREF评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为6.82%,低于对照组的25.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果显著,有助于提升血肿清除率,减少术后并发症发生率,促进术后神经功能的恢复,提高患者预后生存质量。展开更多
目的比较神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路与显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床效果。方法选取52例进行手术治疗的高血压性基底节区脑出血患者进行回顾性分析,根据手术方式不同分为内镜组(28例,采用神经内镜下经眶上锁...目的比较神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路与显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床效果。方法选取52例进行手术治疗的高血压性基底节区脑出血患者进行回顾性分析,根据手术方式不同分为内镜组(28例,采用神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路治疗)和显微镜组(24例,采用显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路治疗)。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、血肿清除率、住院时间、术后7 d格拉斯哥昏迷评分法(GCS)评分、神经功能缺损程度、术后并发症发生情况、颅内再出血情况及预后情况。结果内镜组手术时间(82.35±15.26)min、住院时间(11.58±2.09)d短于显微镜组的(162.47±20.43)min、(14.67±2.11)d,术中出血量(109.58±20.45)ml少于显微镜组的(161.67±38.78)ml,血肿清除率(88.24±8.68)%、术后7 d GCS评分(12.88±1.56)分高于显微镜组的(83.07±7.81)%、(11.16±1.24)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);内镜组术后1周NIHSS评分(7.86±1.56)分低于显微镜组的(11.12±1.83)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组颅内感染、脑脊液漏、继发性脑梗发生率及颅内再出血发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组格拉斯哥预后评分法(GOS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路可以有效治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血,能明显减少术中出血量,提高血肿清除率、术后GCS评分,缩短手术时间和住院时间,且安全性和预后与显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路手术无明显差异。展开更多
基金funded by Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(2013MS1102).
文摘Objective:To investigate the correlation between MSCT grading and the prognosis of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods:A total of 86 patients with basal ganglia hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to March 2018 were selected.The clinical data and imaging data were collected from 86 patients.The MSCT images were observed and summarized by two radiologists.Based on the morphology of cisterna ambiens and brain stem,the correlation of MSCT grading to Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)and Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)grading was analyzed by use of Spearman correlation analysis.Results:Among 86 patients,the number of MSCT gradeⅠ,Ⅱ,ⅢandⅣwere 29 cases,38 cases,9 cases and 10 cases respectively.There was no significant correlation between MSCT grading and age,sex as well as types of combined underlying diseases in the patients with basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(p>0.05).Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between MSCT grading and GCS score of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.The higher MSCT grade was,the higher GCS score was(r=0.719,p<0.001).There was a positive correlation between MSCT grading and GOS grading of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.The higher MSCT grade was,the higher GOS grade was,leading to a poor prognosis(r=0.734,p<0.001).86 cases of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage showed round or quasi-circular high-density shadows in MSCT images,the CT value ranged from 50 Hu to 80 Hu.Low-density bands surrounded the hematoma in the acute stage,and space-occupying effect could be seen in some patients,which resulted in the compression of ventricular sulcus and cistern and the displacement of midline structure.Subacute basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage patients showed a relative decrease in the density of hematoma,with the extent of edema gradually reduced,the focus showed a high-density shadow in the center;chronic basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage focus showed a cystic low-density shadow.Conclusion:MSCT grading of basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is positively correlated to GCS and GOS grading.MSCT grading can contribute to the prognostic evaluation to the patients.
文摘目的分析不同入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月丰城市人民医院收治的88例基底节区高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组44例。两组均行小骨窗开颅显微手术,对照组采用经颞叶皮质入路手术治疗,观察组采用经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路手术治疗,比较两组手术情况、血肿清除率、再出血率、术后并发症、术后1个月格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma score,GOS)分级情况及术后1、3、6个月的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分及世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表(World Health Organization on quality of life brief scale,WHOQOL-BREF)评分。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量、引流管放置时间、行大骨瓣减压例数、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义;观察组开始手术至颅内压下降时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后24 h血肿清除率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组再出血率比较差异无统计学意义。观察组术后1个月预后良好率为81.82%,高于对照组的61.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3、6个月,观察组NIHSS评分均低于对照组,WHOQOL-BREF评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为6.82%,低于对照组的25.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果显著,有助于提升血肿清除率,减少术后并发症发生率,促进术后神经功能的恢复,提高患者预后生存质量。
文摘目的比较神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路与显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床效果。方法选取52例进行手术治疗的高血压性基底节区脑出血患者进行回顾性分析,根据手术方式不同分为内镜组(28例,采用神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路治疗)和显微镜组(24例,采用显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路治疗)。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、血肿清除率、住院时间、术后7 d格拉斯哥昏迷评分法(GCS)评分、神经功能缺损程度、术后并发症发生情况、颅内再出血情况及预后情况。结果内镜组手术时间(82.35±15.26)min、住院时间(11.58±2.09)d短于显微镜组的(162.47±20.43)min、(14.67±2.11)d,术中出血量(109.58±20.45)ml少于显微镜组的(161.67±38.78)ml,血肿清除率(88.24±8.68)%、术后7 d GCS评分(12.88±1.56)分高于显微镜组的(83.07±7.81)%、(11.16±1.24)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);内镜组术后1周NIHSS评分(7.86±1.56)分低于显微镜组的(11.12±1.83)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组颅内感染、脑脊液漏、继发性脑梗发生率及颅内再出血发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组格拉斯哥预后评分法(GOS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论神经内镜下经眶上锁孔入路可以有效治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血,能明显减少术中出血量,提高血肿清除率、术后GCS评分,缩短手术时间和住院时间,且安全性和预后与显微镜下经侧裂岛叶入路手术无明显差异。
