Background:To compare two swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)biometers,IOLMaster 700 and ANTERION.Methods:This is a retrospective study.Biometric measurements of cataract patients performed between March...Background:To compare two swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)biometers,IOLMaster 700 and ANTERION.Methods:This is a retrospective study.Biometric measurements of cataract patients performed between March and July 2021 in the Department of Ophthalmology,United Christian Hospital,Hong Kong,were reviewed.Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were measured with both SS-OCT devices on the same day.The following biometry parameters were compared:keratometry(K),total keratometry(TK),axial length(AL),central corneal thickness(CCT),anterior chamber depth(ACD),lens thickness(LT),white-to-white(WTW)and the predicted intraocular lens(IOL)power to achieve emmetropia.To assess the agreement between the devices,Bland-Altman analysis with 95%limits of agreement(LoA)were used.Results:In total,92 eyes of 47 subjects were measured with both devices.There were statistically significant differences between the two biometers for most measurements(P<0.05)except for flat K,AL and IOL power when using the right eyes for analysis.For the left eyes,there were statistically significant differences in the measurements from the two biometers in all parameters except for flat and steep K.The ANTERION did not obtain ACD,AL and LT in 2(2.17%),1(1.09%)and 5 cases(5.43%)respectively.Conclusions:The two biometers showed a clinically acceptable agreement in most parameters.Comparisons showed significant differences in most parameters but not clinically relevant except for the TK and WTW,and these two parameters should not be used interchangeably between the devices.展开更多
目的对比IOLMaster 700、OPD-ScanⅢ与MODi 2角膜地形图仪3种仪器在测量白内障患者水平角膜直径(white to white,WTW)、平坦轴角膜曲率(keratometry of flataxial,Kf)和陡峭轴角膜曲率(keratometry of steepaxial,Ks)的差异性和一致性...目的对比IOLMaster 700、OPD-ScanⅢ与MODi 2角膜地形图仪3种仪器在测量白内障患者水平角膜直径(white to white,WTW)、平坦轴角膜曲率(keratometry of flataxial,Kf)和陡峭轴角膜曲率(keratometry of steepaxial,Ks)的差异性和一致性。方法选取2019年11月至12月于西安市第四医院眼科白内障人工晶状体中心就诊并拟行白内障超声乳化抽吸联合人工晶状体植入术的患者54例(92只眼),其中男17例(28只眼),女37例(64只眼),平均年龄(52.83±15.00)岁。采用3种仪器分别测量患者的WTW、Kf、Ks。采用方差分析及LSD-t检验比较仪器间的差异性,Pearson相关性分析分析仪器相关性及Bland-Altman法评价仪器的一致性。结果 3种仪器测量WTW、Kf、Ks值时,只有IOLMaster 700与OPD-ScanⅢ的WTW值、OPD-ScanⅢ与MODi 2角膜地形图仪的WTW值差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),余测量值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。相关性分析中,3种仪器测量值均呈现出显著正相关性,相关系数r在0.75~0.98之间。Bland Altman法评价仪器的一致性时,IOLMaster 700与OPD-ScanⅢ、IOLMaster 700与MODi 2角膜地形图仪、OPD-ScanⅢ与MODi 2角膜地形图仪测量WTW、Kf、Ks值95%一致性界限外比例分别为(5.43%、6.52%、4.34%)、(4.34%、4.34%和7.61%)、(5.43%、5.43%和7.61%)。结论 3种仪器测量Kf、Ks值差异无统计学意义,IOLMaster 700与MODi 2角膜地形图仪测量WTW值差异无统计学意义,但3种仪器测量Kf、Ks、WTW差异均有临床意义,不能互换使用。展开更多
目的利用IOLMaster700对比分析飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术后3种多焦点人工晶状体术后有效位置和轴向移动量的变化趋势。方法选取2018年3月至12月就诊于潍坊眼科医院的年龄相关性白内障患者79例(92只眼)进行研究。所有患者均接受同一术者飞...目的利用IOLMaster700对比分析飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术后3种多焦点人工晶状体术后有效位置和轴向移动量的变化趋势。方法选取2018年3月至12月就诊于潍坊眼科医院的年龄相关性白内障患者79例(92只眼)进行研究。所有患者均接受同一术者飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术,依据植入多焦点人工晶状体的类型将患者分为Lisa组、Restor组及Oculentis组3组,并分别植入AT Lisa tri839MP、AcrySof Restor及Oculentis LS-313型人工晶状体。使用IOLmaster700测量患者术后1周、1个月及3个月人工晶状体的有效位置(ELP),计算每个时间段ELP的移动量。ELP的移动量以各时间段ELP变化的均方根表示。术前三组性别的描述采用例数和百分比,组间比较采用卡方检验。术前三组患者的年龄、前房深度、晶状体厚度及人工晶状体度数符合正态分布,以x±s描述,组间比较采用单因方差分析。三组不同时间点ELP的比较,采用两因素重复测量方差分析。当差异具有统计学意义时,进一步采用SNK法两两比较。结果三组患者性别的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.96,P>0.05);三组患者年龄、前房深度、晶状体厚度及人工晶状体屈光度的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.38,0.16,2.40,0.35,0.89;P>0.05)。Lisa组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月的ELP均值分别为(4.84±0.14)mm、(4.95±0.17)mm及(4.97±0.17)mm。三者比较的差异具有统计学意义(F=2.29,P<0.05);术后1个月与术后3个月的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.38,P>0.05)。Restor组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月的ELP均值分别为(4.94±0.25)mm、(4.95±0.28)mm及(4.92±0.27)mm。术后1周和术后3个月与术后1个月ELP均值的比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.13,0.37;P>0.05)。Oculentis组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月的ELP均值分别为(4.72±0.25)mm、(4.80±0.23)mm及(4.80±0.22)mm。术后1周与术后1个月ELP均值的比较,差异有统计学意义(F=2.35,P<0.05);术后1个月与术后3个月的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.08,P>0.05)。三组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月ELP均值组间的比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=1.56,1.78,1.45;P>0.05)。Lisa组、Restor组及Oculentis组ELP变化的均方根分别为(0.08±0.07)mm、(0.04±0.04)mm及(0.06±0.06)mm,三组比较的差异无统计学意义(F=2.16,P>0.05)。结论3种不同设计的人工晶状体在囊袋内达到稳定状态所需的时间不同。其中,AcrySof Restor在术后1周稳定,AT Lisa tri 839MP和Oculentis LS-313在术后1个月稳定。ELP变化的均方根能够体现人工晶状体轴向的微小移动量,扫频源断层相干光成像技术是评估人工晶状体植入术后有效位置和位移量变化的有效方法。展开更多
文摘Background:To compare two swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)biometers,IOLMaster 700 and ANTERION.Methods:This is a retrospective study.Biometric measurements of cataract patients performed between March and July 2021 in the Department of Ophthalmology,United Christian Hospital,Hong Kong,were reviewed.Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were measured with both SS-OCT devices on the same day.The following biometry parameters were compared:keratometry(K),total keratometry(TK),axial length(AL),central corneal thickness(CCT),anterior chamber depth(ACD),lens thickness(LT),white-to-white(WTW)and the predicted intraocular lens(IOL)power to achieve emmetropia.To assess the agreement between the devices,Bland-Altman analysis with 95%limits of agreement(LoA)were used.Results:In total,92 eyes of 47 subjects were measured with both devices.There were statistically significant differences between the two biometers for most measurements(P<0.05)except for flat K,AL and IOL power when using the right eyes for analysis.For the left eyes,there were statistically significant differences in the measurements from the two biometers in all parameters except for flat and steep K.The ANTERION did not obtain ACD,AL and LT in 2(2.17%),1(1.09%)and 5 cases(5.43%)respectively.Conclusions:The two biometers showed a clinically acceptable agreement in most parameters.Comparisons showed significant differences in most parameters but not clinically relevant except for the TK and WTW,and these two parameters should not be used interchangeably between the devices.
文摘目的利用IOLMaster700对比分析飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术后3种多焦点人工晶状体术后有效位置和轴向移动量的变化趋势。方法选取2018年3月至12月就诊于潍坊眼科医院的年龄相关性白内障患者79例(92只眼)进行研究。所有患者均接受同一术者飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术,依据植入多焦点人工晶状体的类型将患者分为Lisa组、Restor组及Oculentis组3组,并分别植入AT Lisa tri839MP、AcrySof Restor及Oculentis LS-313型人工晶状体。使用IOLmaster700测量患者术后1周、1个月及3个月人工晶状体的有效位置(ELP),计算每个时间段ELP的移动量。ELP的移动量以各时间段ELP变化的均方根表示。术前三组性别的描述采用例数和百分比,组间比较采用卡方检验。术前三组患者的年龄、前房深度、晶状体厚度及人工晶状体度数符合正态分布,以x±s描述,组间比较采用单因方差分析。三组不同时间点ELP的比较,采用两因素重复测量方差分析。当差异具有统计学意义时,进一步采用SNK法两两比较。结果三组患者性别的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.96,P>0.05);三组患者年龄、前房深度、晶状体厚度及人工晶状体屈光度的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.38,0.16,2.40,0.35,0.89;P>0.05)。Lisa组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月的ELP均值分别为(4.84±0.14)mm、(4.95±0.17)mm及(4.97±0.17)mm。三者比较的差异具有统计学意义(F=2.29,P<0.05);术后1个月与术后3个月的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.38,P>0.05)。Restor组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月的ELP均值分别为(4.94±0.25)mm、(4.95±0.28)mm及(4.92±0.27)mm。术后1周和术后3个月与术后1个月ELP均值的比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.13,0.37;P>0.05)。Oculentis组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月的ELP均值分别为(4.72±0.25)mm、(4.80±0.23)mm及(4.80±0.22)mm。术后1周与术后1个月ELP均值的比较,差异有统计学意义(F=2.35,P<0.05);术后1个月与术后3个月的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.08,P>0.05)。三组患者术后1周、1个月及3个月ELP均值组间的比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=1.56,1.78,1.45;P>0.05)。Lisa组、Restor组及Oculentis组ELP变化的均方根分别为(0.08±0.07)mm、(0.04±0.04)mm及(0.06±0.06)mm,三组比较的差异无统计学意义(F=2.16,P>0.05)。结论3种不同设计的人工晶状体在囊袋内达到稳定状态所需的时间不同。其中,AcrySof Restor在术后1周稳定,AT Lisa tri 839MP和Oculentis LS-313在术后1个月稳定。ELP变化的均方根能够体现人工晶状体轴向的微小移动量,扫频源断层相干光成像技术是评估人工晶状体植入术后有效位置和位移量变化的有效方法。
