AIM:To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of inebilizumab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders(NMOSD).METHODS:A total of 33 patients with NMOSD treated with inebilizumab(Group INB,n=15)or rituximab(...AIM:To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of inebilizumab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders(NMOSD).METHODS:A total of 33 patients with NMOSD treated with inebilizumab(Group INB,n=15)or rituximab(Group RTX,n=18)in addition to high-dose glucocorticoids were included.Both groups underwent hormone shock therapy during the acute phase.Subsequently,Group INB received inebilizumab injections during the remission phase,while Group RTX received rituximab injections.A comparison of aquaporins 4(AQP4)titer values,peripheral blood B lymphocyte counts,and visual function recovery was conducted before and 8wk after treatment.Additionally,adverse reactions and patient tolerability were analyzed after using inebilizumab treatment regimes.RESULTS:Following inebilizumab treatment,there was a significantly improvement in the visual acuity of NMOSD patients(P<0.05),accompanied by a notable decrease in AQP4 titer values and B lymphocyte ratio(P<0.05).Moreover,inebilizumab treatment showed a partial effect in preventing optic nerve atrophy(P<0.05).However,there were no significant differences in other therapeutic effects compared to rituximab,which has previously demonstrated substantial therapeutic efficacy(P>0.05).Furthermore,inebilizumab exhibited higher safety levels than that of rituximab injections.CONCLUSION:The combination of inebilizumab and high-dose glucocorticoids proves to be effective.In comparison to rituximab injections,inebilizumab displays better tolerance and safety.Moreover,it demonstrates a partial effect in preventing optic nerve atrophy.Thus,it stands as an effective method to reduce the disability rates and improve the daily living ability of patients with NMOSD.展开更多
Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma(EMZL)encompasses 70%of cases of marginal zone lymphoma.Frontline bendamustine and rituximab(BR)were derived from trials involving other indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.Only one tria...Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma(EMZL)encompasses 70%of cases of marginal zone lymphoma.Frontline bendamustine and rituximab(BR)were derived from trials involving other indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.Only one trial has evaluated frontline BR prospectively in EMZL.This retrospective study reports outcomes among EMZL patients receiving frontline BR.Twenty-five patients were included with a median age of 69 years(40–81).Five(20.0%)patients had stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ disease,and 20(80.0%)had stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ disease.The median number of cycles was 6.0(3.0–6.0).Maintenance rituximab was administered to 10(41.7%)individuals.Overall response rate(ORR)was 100.0%(60.0%complete response,40.0%partial response).Medians of overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached.The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 85.2%and overall survival was 100.0%.Four(16.6%)patients had infections related to treatment;3(12.0%)transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma;5(20.8%)had a relapse or progression of EMZL;and 3(12.0%)died unrelated to BR.BR is an efficacious and well-tolerated front-line regimen for EMZL with response data consistent with existing literature.展开更多
Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20, which is a specific B-cell surface antigen. It was the first monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis,...Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20, which is a specific B-cell surface antigen. It was the first monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, and other cutaneous lymphoid malignancies. There are many off-label uses of rituximab, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, multiple sclerosis, graft-versus-host disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and chronic immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Among the rare side effects associated with rituximab treatment is vasculitis, more specifically, leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Here, we describe a 21-year-old Saudi female with leukocytoclastic vasculitis occurring three months after treatment with rituximab.展开更多
BACKGROUND Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is a severe,life-threatening disease.However,the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined,although early biological intervention may improve dis...BACKGROUND Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is a severe,life-threatening disease.However,the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined,although early biological intervention may improve disease outcomes.AIM To assess the differences in the outcomes of different types of rituximab administration(early and late).METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the information of 36 children with SLE with administration(LRA)was analyzed.We compared initial disease characteristics at onset,at baseline(start of rituximab),and at the end of the study(EOS)at 12 months,as well as outcomes and treatment characteristics.RESULTS The main differences at baseline were a higher daily median dose of corticosteroids,increased MAS frequency,and a higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index(SLEDAI)in the ERA group.No differences in the main SLE outcomes between groups at the EOS were observed.The part of lupus nephritis patients who achieved remission changed from 44%to 31%in ERA and 32%to 11%in the LRA group.Patients with ERA had a shorter time to achieve low daily corticosteroid dose(≤0.2 mg/kg)at 1.2(0.9;1.4)years compared to 2.8(2.3;4.0)years(P=0.000001)and higher probability to achieve this low dose[hazard ratio(HR)=57.8(95%confidence interval(CI):7.2-463.2),P=0.00001 and remission(SLEDAI=0);HR=37.6(95%CI:4.45-333.3),P=0.00001].No differences in adverse events,including severe adverse events,were observed.CONCLUSION ERA demonstrated a better steroid-sparing effect and a possibility of earlier remission or low disease activity,except for lupus nephritis.Further investigations are required.展开更多
BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis(FSGS)often recurs after transplantation,leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss.Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of ...BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis(FSGS)often recurs after transplantation,leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss.Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of re-recurrence in subsequent grafts.Rituximab and plasma exchange have been used pre-emptively to prevent post-transplant recurrence.However,the efficacy of such preventative measures remains unclear.AIM To investigate the outcomes of preventative rituximab and plasma exchange for recurrent FSGS in transplant recipients after prior graft loss.METHODS We conducted a systematic review of 11 studies with 32 patients who had experienced prior graft loss due to post-transplant FSGS recurrence and were treated with either pre-emptive plasma exchange alone,rituximab alone,or a combination of both.RESULTS Overall,47%of the 32 patients experienced recurrence despite prophylactic treatment.Re-recurrence was seen in 25%(1/4)with pre-emptive rituximab alone,and 45%recurrence(9/20)with plasma exchange alone.Re-recurrence was noted in 63%with the use of combined plasma exchange and rituximab.CONCLUSION There is a paucity of available evidence in the literature to draw clear conclusions on the benefits of pre-emptive measures to prevent FSGS re-recurrence.The small sample sizes and variations in protocols call for larger and controlled studies to serve this patient population at high risk of recurrence and graft loss.展开更多
BACKGROUND Systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease.Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood.There are a lot of negative effects of ...BACKGROUND Systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease.Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood.There are a lot of negative effects of standard-of-care treatment(SOCT),including steroid toxicity.Rituximab(RTX)is the biological B-lymphocyte-depleting agent suggested as a basic therapy in pediatric SLE.AIM To compare the benefits of RTX above SOCT.METHODS The data from case histories of 79 children from the Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University from 2012 to 2022 years,were analyzed.The diagnosis of SLE was established with SLICC criteria.We compared the outcomes of treatment of SLE in children treated with and without RTX.Laboratory data,doses of glucocorticosteroids,disease activity measured with SELENA-SLEDAI,RESULTS Patients,treated with RTX initially had a higher degree of disease activity with prevalence of central nervous system and kidney involvement,compared to patients with SOCT.One year later the disease characteristics became similar between groups with a more marked reduction of disease activity(SELENA-SLEDAI activity index)in the children who received RTX[-19 points(17;23)since baseline]compared to children with SOCT[-10(5;15.5)points since baseline,P=0.001],the number of patients with active lupus nephritis,and daily proteinuria.During RTX therapy,infectious diseases had three patients;one patient developed a bi-cytopenia.CONCLUSION RTX can be considered as the option in the treatment of severe forms of SLE,due to its ability to arrest disease activity compared to SOCT.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with varying levels of serum phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies.Methods:A total of 137 patients with idiopathi...Objective:To investigate the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with varying levels of serum phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies.Methods:A total of 137 patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy admitted to Beijing Sixth Hospital were selected.Based on their blood PLA2R antibody levels before rituximab treatment,patients were categorized into the PLA2R antibody positive group(n=94)and the PLA2R antibody negative group(n=43).They were followed up for at least 1 year,during which the efficacy,measured through 24-hour urine protein quantification and serum albumin levels,were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results:After 3 months of treatment,there was no significant difference in the quantitative levels of 24-hour urine protein between the two groups(P>0.05).However,after 6 and 12 months of treatment,there was a significant difference in the levels of 24-hour urine protein between the two groups(P<0.05).Additionally,after 3 months of treatment,there was a notable difference in the serum albumin levels between the two groups(P<0.05).However,after 6 and 12 months of treatment,there was no significant difference in serum albumin levels between the two groups(P>0.05).Analysis of complications in the two groups revealed that in the positive group,9 individuals experienced thrombosis,5 had infections,and 11 developed acute kidney injury(AKI).In contrast,in the negative group,5 individuals had thrombosis,2 had infections,and 3 developed AKI.There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Serum anti-PLA2R antibody levels provide valuable insights into the clinical observation of rituximab treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.They aid in understanding the disease’s pathogenesis,evaluating treatment efficacy,and predicting disease prognosis.展开更多
文摘AIM:To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of inebilizumab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders(NMOSD).METHODS:A total of 33 patients with NMOSD treated with inebilizumab(Group INB,n=15)or rituximab(Group RTX,n=18)in addition to high-dose glucocorticoids were included.Both groups underwent hormone shock therapy during the acute phase.Subsequently,Group INB received inebilizumab injections during the remission phase,while Group RTX received rituximab injections.A comparison of aquaporins 4(AQP4)titer values,peripheral blood B lymphocyte counts,and visual function recovery was conducted before and 8wk after treatment.Additionally,adverse reactions and patient tolerability were analyzed after using inebilizumab treatment regimes.RESULTS:Following inebilizumab treatment,there was a significantly improvement in the visual acuity of NMOSD patients(P<0.05),accompanied by a notable decrease in AQP4 titer values and B lymphocyte ratio(P<0.05).Moreover,inebilizumab treatment showed a partial effect in preventing optic nerve atrophy(P<0.05).However,there were no significant differences in other therapeutic effects compared to rituximab,which has previously demonstrated substantial therapeutic efficacy(P>0.05).Furthermore,inebilizumab exhibited higher safety levels than that of rituximab injections.CONCLUSION:The combination of inebilizumab and high-dose glucocorticoids proves to be effective.In comparison to rituximab injections,inebilizumab displays better tolerance and safety.Moreover,it demonstrates a partial effect in preventing optic nerve atrophy.Thus,it stands as an effective method to reduce the disability rates and improve the daily living ability of patients with NMOSD.
文摘Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma(EMZL)encompasses 70%of cases of marginal zone lymphoma.Frontline bendamustine and rituximab(BR)were derived from trials involving other indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.Only one trial has evaluated frontline BR prospectively in EMZL.This retrospective study reports outcomes among EMZL patients receiving frontline BR.Twenty-five patients were included with a median age of 69 years(40–81).Five(20.0%)patients had stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ disease,and 20(80.0%)had stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ disease.The median number of cycles was 6.0(3.0–6.0).Maintenance rituximab was administered to 10(41.7%)individuals.Overall response rate(ORR)was 100.0%(60.0%complete response,40.0%partial response).Medians of overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached.The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 85.2%and overall survival was 100.0%.Four(16.6%)patients had infections related to treatment;3(12.0%)transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma;5(20.8%)had a relapse or progression of EMZL;and 3(12.0%)died unrelated to BR.BR is an efficacious and well-tolerated front-line regimen for EMZL with response data consistent with existing literature.
文摘Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20, which is a specific B-cell surface antigen. It was the first monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, and other cutaneous lymphoid malignancies. There are many off-label uses of rituximab, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, multiple sclerosis, graft-versus-host disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and chronic immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Among the rare side effects associated with rituximab treatment is vasculitis, more specifically, leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Here, we describe a 21-year-old Saudi female with leukocytoclastic vasculitis occurring three months after treatment with rituximab.
基金Supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation,No.075-15-2022-301the Russian Science Foundation Grant,No.22-45-08004.
文摘BACKGROUND Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is a severe,life-threatening disease.However,the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined,although early biological intervention may improve disease outcomes.AIM To assess the differences in the outcomes of different types of rituximab administration(early and late).METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the information of 36 children with SLE with administration(LRA)was analyzed.We compared initial disease characteristics at onset,at baseline(start of rituximab),and at the end of the study(EOS)at 12 months,as well as outcomes and treatment characteristics.RESULTS The main differences at baseline were a higher daily median dose of corticosteroids,increased MAS frequency,and a higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index(SLEDAI)in the ERA group.No differences in the main SLE outcomes between groups at the EOS were observed.The part of lupus nephritis patients who achieved remission changed from 44%to 31%in ERA and 32%to 11%in the LRA group.Patients with ERA had a shorter time to achieve low daily corticosteroid dose(≤0.2 mg/kg)at 1.2(0.9;1.4)years compared to 2.8(2.3;4.0)years(P=0.000001)and higher probability to achieve this low dose[hazard ratio(HR)=57.8(95%confidence interval(CI):7.2-463.2),P=0.00001 and remission(SLEDAI=0);HR=37.6(95%CI:4.45-333.3),P=0.00001].No differences in adverse events,including severe adverse events,were observed.CONCLUSION ERA demonstrated a better steroid-sparing effect and a possibility of earlier remission or low disease activity,except for lupus nephritis.Further investigations are required.
文摘BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis(FSGS)often recurs after transplantation,leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss.Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of re-recurrence in subsequent grafts.Rituximab and plasma exchange have been used pre-emptively to prevent post-transplant recurrence.However,the efficacy of such preventative measures remains unclear.AIM To investigate the outcomes of preventative rituximab and plasma exchange for recurrent FSGS in transplant recipients after prior graft loss.METHODS We conducted a systematic review of 11 studies with 32 patients who had experienced prior graft loss due to post-transplant FSGS recurrence and were treated with either pre-emptive plasma exchange alone,rituximab alone,or a combination of both.RESULTS Overall,47%of the 32 patients experienced recurrence despite prophylactic treatment.Re-recurrence was seen in 25%(1/4)with pre-emptive rituximab alone,and 45%recurrence(9/20)with plasma exchange alone.Re-recurrence was noted in 63%with the use of combined plasma exchange and rituximab.CONCLUSION There is a paucity of available evidence in the literature to draw clear conclusions on the benefits of pre-emptive measures to prevent FSGS re-recurrence.The small sample sizes and variations in protocols call for larger and controlled studies to serve this patient population at high risk of recurrence and graft loss.
基金Supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation,No.075-15-2022-301the Russian Science Foundation,No.22-45-08004.
文摘BACKGROUND Systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease.Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood.There are a lot of negative effects of standard-of-care treatment(SOCT),including steroid toxicity.Rituximab(RTX)is the biological B-lymphocyte-depleting agent suggested as a basic therapy in pediatric SLE.AIM To compare the benefits of RTX above SOCT.METHODS The data from case histories of 79 children from the Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University from 2012 to 2022 years,were analyzed.The diagnosis of SLE was established with SLICC criteria.We compared the outcomes of treatment of SLE in children treated with and without RTX.Laboratory data,doses of glucocorticosteroids,disease activity measured with SELENA-SLEDAI,RESULTS Patients,treated with RTX initially had a higher degree of disease activity with prevalence of central nervous system and kidney involvement,compared to patients with SOCT.One year later the disease characteristics became similar between groups with a more marked reduction of disease activity(SELENA-SLEDAI activity index)in the children who received RTX[-19 points(17;23)since baseline]compared to children with SOCT[-10(5;15.5)points since baseline,P=0.001],the number of patients with active lupus nephritis,and daily proteinuria.During RTX therapy,infectious diseases had three patients;one patient developed a bi-cytopenia.CONCLUSION RTX can be considered as the option in the treatment of severe forms of SLE,due to its ability to arrest disease activity compared to SOCT.
文摘Objective:To investigate the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with varying levels of serum phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies.Methods:A total of 137 patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy admitted to Beijing Sixth Hospital were selected.Based on their blood PLA2R antibody levels before rituximab treatment,patients were categorized into the PLA2R antibody positive group(n=94)and the PLA2R antibody negative group(n=43).They were followed up for at least 1 year,during which the efficacy,measured through 24-hour urine protein quantification and serum albumin levels,were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results:After 3 months of treatment,there was no significant difference in the quantitative levels of 24-hour urine protein between the two groups(P>0.05).However,after 6 and 12 months of treatment,there was a significant difference in the levels of 24-hour urine protein between the two groups(P<0.05).Additionally,after 3 months of treatment,there was a notable difference in the serum albumin levels between the two groups(P<0.05).However,after 6 and 12 months of treatment,there was no significant difference in serum albumin levels between the two groups(P>0.05).Analysis of complications in the two groups revealed that in the positive group,9 individuals experienced thrombosis,5 had infections,and 11 developed acute kidney injury(AKI).In contrast,in the negative group,5 individuals had thrombosis,2 had infections,and 3 developed AKI.There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Serum anti-PLA2R antibody levels provide valuable insights into the clinical observation of rituximab treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.They aid in understanding the disease’s pathogenesis,evaluating treatment efficacy,and predicting disease prognosis.
