期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Postoperative Analgesia Following Caesarean Section: Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia Versus Conventional Continuous Infusion 被引量:2
1
作者 Samina Ismail Gauhar Afshan +1 位作者 Abdul Monem Aliya Ahmed 《Open Journal of Anesthesiology》 2012年第4期120-126,共7页
Background: Management of postoperative pain after caesarean section (C/S) requires a balance between pain relief and undesirable side effects of drugs and technique. In order to improve postoperative pain management ... Background: Management of postoperative pain after caesarean section (C/S) requires a balance between pain relief and undesirable side effects of drugs and technique. In order to improve postoperative pain management after caesarean section, we compared intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with our current hospital practice, which is continuous opioid infusion. Method: We enrolled one hundred and twenty patients in our prospective randomized trial after an uneventful elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. All patients received 0.5 mg/kg bolus of pethidine on first complaint of pain or at 120 minutes after institution of spinal anaesthesia. Depending upon the randomization, Group P received IV-PCA with 0.15 mg/kg bolus pethidine with 10-minute lockout and Group C received continuous pethidine infusion at a rate of 0.15 mg/kg/hr. Statistical analysis: For qualitative variables means and standard deviations were computed and analyzed by T-test, Mann Whitney U test and repeated measures ANOVA. Frequency and percentages were computed for qualitative data and analyzed by Chi-Square and Fischer exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was treated as significant. Results: The numeric rating score for pain, need for rescue analgesia and incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower (p-value < 0.001) in IV-PCA group as compared to continuous infusion group at 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively, 98% of the patients were satisfied with pain management in Group P as compared to 70% (p < 0.001) in Group C. Conclusion: Our results showed improved pain control, less need for rescue analgesia for breakthrough pain, lower incidence of nausea and vomiting and greater patient satisfaction with IV-PCA. In the absence of preservative free narcotics for intrathecal use, postoperative pain management can be significantly improved by using IV-PCA instead of continuous opioid infusion in patients undergoing caesarean section. 展开更多
关键词 Postoperative Pain iv-pca Continuous OPIOID INFUSION OPIOIDS CAESAREAN Section
下载PDF
比较基于舒芬太尼和芬太尼的静脉患者自控镇痛对腹腔镜肾切除术后恶心和呕吐的影响
2
作者 王军 任岩岩 《中国医学工程》 2022年第6期51-54,共4页
目的探讨比较基于舒芬太尼和芬太尼的静脉患者自控镇痛(IV-PCA)对腹腔镜肾切除术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。方法选取2019至2020年于洛阳市中医院接受治疗的80名腹腔镜肾切除术后患者,依据随机抽签法分为观察组(舒芬太尼治疗)和对照组(芬... 目的探讨比较基于舒芬太尼和芬太尼的静脉患者自控镇痛(IV-PCA)对腹腔镜肾切除术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。方法选取2019至2020年于洛阳市中医院接受治疗的80名腹腔镜肾切除术后患者,依据随机抽签法分为观察组(舒芬太尼治疗)和对照组(芬太尼治疗),比较两组PONV发生率、Rhodes评分、止吐药物及止痛药的使用、不良事件及Ramsay镇静评分。结果两组PONV发生率、需要止吐药物患者总人数及Rhodes评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后疼痛评分、静脉自控镇痛的使用剂量、夹住静脉自控镇痛的患者人数以及患者满意度评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后排气时间、不良事件发生率和Ramsay镇静评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论基于舒芬太尼和基于芬太尼的IV-PCA显示出相似的PONV发生率,并且在腹腔镜肾切除术后镇痛效果相当。基于这些结果,建议舒芬太尼和芬太尼对腹腔镜肾切除术后IV-PCA的疗效相当。 展开更多
关键词 舒芬太尼 芬太尼 静脉患者自控镇痛 腹腔镜肾切除术 术后恶心和呕吐
下载PDF
开腹胃肠道术后局部麻醉镇痛与静脉自控镇痛的临床效果比较 被引量:11
3
作者 吕赤 张忻平 +3 位作者 李瑾 张成 蒋会勇 张雪峰 《中华全科医学》 2014年第4期531-533,共3页
目的比较开腹胃肠道术后患者局部麻醉镇痛与静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2012年2月—2012年12月间沈阳军区总医院普通外科116例行开腹胃肠道手术患者资料,术后60例采用局部麻醉镇痛,另外56例应用PCIA镇痛,比较2组镇痛... 目的比较开腹胃肠道术后患者局部麻醉镇痛与静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2012年2月—2012年12月间沈阳军区总医院普通外科116例行开腹胃肠道手术患者资料,术后60例采用局部麻醉镇痛,另外56例应用PCIA镇痛,比较2组镇痛效果。结果 2组患者年龄、性别、身高、体重、手术类型、术后1 d与2 d视觉模拟评分(VAS)、是否追加镇痛药、恶心、呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、眩晕、术后排气时间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),但PCIA组出现嗜睡者(6例,10.7%)多于局部麻醉镇痛组(0例,0.0%),而局部麻醉镇痛组出现局部渗液者(7例,11.7%)多于PCIA组(0例,0.0%),上述差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论术后局部麻醉镇痛同静脉自控镇痛均具有良好的临床效果,可作为术后疼痛管理选择之一。 展开更多
关键词 局部麻醉镇痛 静脉自控镇痛 术后镇痛
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部