BACKGROUND Early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction(EPISBO)is easy to be complicated after colorectal cancer surgery.Both intestinal obstruction catheter and meglumine can treat EPISBO.AIM To investiga...BACKGROUND Early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction(EPISBO)is easy to be complicated after colorectal cancer surgery.Both intestinal obstruction catheter and meglumine can treat EPISBO.AIM To investigate the efficacy of an intestinal obstruction tube combined with meg-lumine diazo in treating EPISBO of colorectal cancer.METHODS Data from 60 patients with colorectal cancer and intestinal obstruction admitted to the Proctology Department of our hospital from April 2018 to May 2022 were collected and analyzed and divided into three cohorts according to different treatment regimens.Cohort A(n=20)received a transnasal intestinal obstruction catheter with panumglumine,and cohort B(n=20)received a transnasal intestinal obstruction catheter with liquid paraffin.Cohort C(n=20)received oral treatment with meglumine.The clinical efficacy,first exhaust/defecation time,length of hospital stay,gastrointestinal decompression time,relief time of abdo-minal pain,and relief time of abdominal distension were compared among the three cohorts.The levels of C-reactive protein(CRP),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6),monocyte chemotactic protein-1(MCP-1),serum albumin,and transferrin were compared among the three cohorts before and after treatment.The occurrence of adverse reactions in the three cohorts was compared.RESULTS Compared with cohort C,the successful treatment rate of cohort A was signi-ficantly higher.There were statistically significant variations in the time of first exhaust/defecation,length of hospital stays,gastrointestinal decompression time,relief time of abdominal pain,and relief time of abdominal distention among the three cohorts.Compared with cohort C,cohort A’s first exhaust/defecation time,hospitalization time,gastrointestinal decompression time,abdominal pain relief time,and abdominal distension relief time was reduced(P<0.05).After treatment,serum CRP,TNF-α,IL-6,and MCP-1 expression levels increased,and serum albumin and serum transferrin levels increased in the three cohorts.The serum albumin level in cohort A was higher than in cohort C.Compared with cohort B and cohort C,the serum transferrin level in cohort A increased(P<0.05).Compared with cohort C,the total incidence of adverse reactions in cohorts A and B was significantly higher(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between cohort A and cohort B.CONCLUSION Using an ileus tube combined with meglumine diatrizoate can effectively treat postoperative inflammatory ileus obstructions after surgery colorectal cancer and improve prognosis,inflammatory response,and nutritional status.展开更多
BACKGROUND Acute iatrogenic colorectal perforation(AICP)is a serious adverse event,and immediate AICP usually requires early endoscopic closure.Immediate surgical repair is required if the perforation is large,the end...BACKGROUND Acute iatrogenic colorectal perforation(AICP)is a serious adverse event,and immediate AICP usually requires early endoscopic closure.Immediate surgical repair is required if the perforation is large,the endoscopic closure fails,or the patient's clinical condition deteriorates.In cases of delayed AICP(>4 h),surgical repair or enterostomy is usually performed,but delayed rectal perforation is rare.CASE SUMMARY A 53-year-old male patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)at a local hospital for the treatment of a laterally spreading tumor of the rectum,and the wound was closed by an endoscopist using a purse-string suture.Unfortunately,the patient then presented with delayed rectal perforation(6 h after ESD).The surgeons at the local hospital attempted to treat the perforation and wound surface using transrectal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM);however,the perforation worsened and became enlarged,multiple injuries to the mucosa around the perforation and partial tearing of the rectal mucosa occurred,and the internal anal sphincter was damaged.As a result,the perforation became more complicated.Due to the increased bleeding,surgical treatment with suturing could not be performed using TEM.Therefore,the patient was sent to our medical center for follow-up treatment.After a multidisciplinary discussion,we believed that the patient should undergo an enterostomy.However,the patient strongly refused this treatment plan.Because the position of the rectal perforation was relatively low and the intestine had been adequately prepared,we attempted to treat the complicated delayed rectal perforation using a self-expanding covered mental stent(SECMS)in combination with a transanal ileus drainage tube(TIDT).CONCLUSION For patients with complicated delayed perforation in the lower rectum and adequate intestinal preparation,a SECMS combined with a TIDT can be used and may result in very good outcomes.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction(EPISBO)is easy to be complicated after colorectal cancer surgery.Both intestinal obstruction catheter and meglumine can treat EPISBO.AIM To investigate the efficacy of an intestinal obstruction tube combined with meg-lumine diazo in treating EPISBO of colorectal cancer.METHODS Data from 60 patients with colorectal cancer and intestinal obstruction admitted to the Proctology Department of our hospital from April 2018 to May 2022 were collected and analyzed and divided into three cohorts according to different treatment regimens.Cohort A(n=20)received a transnasal intestinal obstruction catheter with panumglumine,and cohort B(n=20)received a transnasal intestinal obstruction catheter with liquid paraffin.Cohort C(n=20)received oral treatment with meglumine.The clinical efficacy,first exhaust/defecation time,length of hospital stay,gastrointestinal decompression time,relief time of abdo-minal pain,and relief time of abdominal distension were compared among the three cohorts.The levels of C-reactive protein(CRP),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6),monocyte chemotactic protein-1(MCP-1),serum albumin,and transferrin were compared among the three cohorts before and after treatment.The occurrence of adverse reactions in the three cohorts was compared.RESULTS Compared with cohort C,the successful treatment rate of cohort A was signi-ficantly higher.There were statistically significant variations in the time of first exhaust/defecation,length of hospital stays,gastrointestinal decompression time,relief time of abdominal pain,and relief time of abdominal distention among the three cohorts.Compared with cohort C,cohort A’s first exhaust/defecation time,hospitalization time,gastrointestinal decompression time,abdominal pain relief time,and abdominal distension relief time was reduced(P<0.05).After treatment,serum CRP,TNF-α,IL-6,and MCP-1 expression levels increased,and serum albumin and serum transferrin levels increased in the three cohorts.The serum albumin level in cohort A was higher than in cohort C.Compared with cohort B and cohort C,the serum transferrin level in cohort A increased(P<0.05).Compared with cohort C,the total incidence of adverse reactions in cohorts A and B was significantly higher(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between cohort A and cohort B.CONCLUSION Using an ileus tube combined with meglumine diatrizoate can effectively treat postoperative inflammatory ileus obstructions after surgery colorectal cancer and improve prognosis,inflammatory response,and nutritional status.
基金Supported by the Hangzhou Major Science and Technology Projects,No.202004A14the Hangzhou Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan,No.OO20190610 and No.A20200174+1 种基金the Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan,No.WKJ-ZJ-2136 and No.2019RC068the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,No.LGF21H310004.
文摘BACKGROUND Acute iatrogenic colorectal perforation(AICP)is a serious adverse event,and immediate AICP usually requires early endoscopic closure.Immediate surgical repair is required if the perforation is large,the endoscopic closure fails,or the patient's clinical condition deteriorates.In cases of delayed AICP(>4 h),surgical repair or enterostomy is usually performed,but delayed rectal perforation is rare.CASE SUMMARY A 53-year-old male patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)at a local hospital for the treatment of a laterally spreading tumor of the rectum,and the wound was closed by an endoscopist using a purse-string suture.Unfortunately,the patient then presented with delayed rectal perforation(6 h after ESD).The surgeons at the local hospital attempted to treat the perforation and wound surface using transrectal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM);however,the perforation worsened and became enlarged,multiple injuries to the mucosa around the perforation and partial tearing of the rectal mucosa occurred,and the internal anal sphincter was damaged.As a result,the perforation became more complicated.Due to the increased bleeding,surgical treatment with suturing could not be performed using TEM.Therefore,the patient was sent to our medical center for follow-up treatment.After a multidisciplinary discussion,we believed that the patient should undergo an enterostomy.However,the patient strongly refused this treatment plan.Because the position of the rectal perforation was relatively low and the intestine had been adequately prepared,we attempted to treat the complicated delayed rectal perforation using a self-expanding covered mental stent(SECMS)in combination with a transanal ileus drainage tube(TIDT).CONCLUSION For patients with complicated delayed perforation in the lower rectum and adequate intestinal preparation,a SECMS combined with a TIDT can be used and may result in very good outcomes.