AIM:To investigate immunosuppressive agents used to treat inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)in East China. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted, involving 227 patients with IBD admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospit...AIM:To investigate immunosuppressive agents used to treat inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)in East China. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted, involving 227 patients with IBD admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,College of Medicine,Zhejiang University from June 2000 to December 2007.Data regarding demographic,clinical characteristics and immunosuppressants usage were analyzed. RESULTS:A total of 227 eligible patients were evaluated in this study,including 104 patients with Crohn’s disease and 123 with ulcerative colitis.Among the patients,61 had indications for immunosuppressive agents use.However,only 21 (34.4%)received immunosuppressive agents.Among the 21 patients,6(37.5%)received a subtherapeutic dose of azathioprine with no attempt to increase the dosage.Of the 20 patients that received immunosuppressive agent treatment longer than 6 mo,15 patients went into remission,four patients were not affected and one relapsed.Among these 20 patients,four patients suffered from myelotoxicity and one suffered from hepatotoxicity.CONCLUSION:Immunosuppressive agents are used less frequently to treat IBD patients from East China compared with Western countries.Monitoring immunosuppressive agent use is recommended to optimize dispensation of drugs for IBD in China.展开更多
Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisti...Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.展开更多
Background and aim:There are still no clinically satisfactory therapy for PBC.This study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of IAs for the therapy of PBC.Methods:Relevant studies were identified and selec...Background and aim:There are still no clinically satisfactory therapy for PBC.This study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of IAs for the therapy of PBC.Methods:Relevant studies were identified and selected by searching PubMed,Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases.The primary outcome was defined as the need for mortality or liver transplantation.Adverse effects and liver biochemical variables were a secondary outcome.Results:Nine randomized controlled trials,involving six different treatment regimens with a total of 996 patients,were included in the analysis.On meta-analysis,IAs was not associated with a reduction in risk of mortality or liver transplantation(risk ratio[RR]:0.92,95% confidence interval[CI]:0.69-1.22,P=0.57,P=0%),and have resulted in more adverse effects(RR:1.44,95%CI:1.08-1.92,P=0.01,P=19%).Subgroup analysis showed that IAs monotherapy caused adverse effects such as diarrthea,abdominal pain,and renal insufficiency(RR:1.36,95% CI:1.01-1.82,P=0.04,P=48%).IAs therapy did not prominently improve markers of liver function except for alkaline phosphatases(weighted mean difference[WMD]:-0.38,95% CI:-0.62 to-0.14,P=0.002).Conclusions:IAs cannot reduce the risk of mortality or liver transplantation,whether in IAs monotherapy or combination therapy,and even be associated with more adverse effects.展开更多
For kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression commonly consists of combination treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid. Many medical centers use a sequential immun...For kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression commonly consists of combination treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid. Many medical centers use a sequential immunosuppression regimen where an induction agent, either an anti-thymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is given at the time of transplantation to prevent early acute rejection which is then followed by a triple immunosuppressive maintenance regimen. Very low rejection rates have been achieved at many transplant centers using combinations of these agents in a variety of protocols. Yet, a large number of recipients suffer chronic allograft injury and adverse events associated with drug therapy. Regimens designed to limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid use are actively being pursued. An ideal immunosuppressive regimen limits toxicity and prolongs the functional life of the graft. This article contains a critical analysis of clinical data on currently available immuno-suppressive strategies and an overview of therapeutic moieties in development.展开更多
Recurrence of hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection following liver transplantation(LT)is almost universal and can accelerate graft cirrhosis in up to 30%of patients.The development of effective strategies to treat or preve...Recurrence of hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection following liver transplantation(LT)is almost universal and can accelerate graft cirrhosis in up to 30%of patients.The development of effective strategies to treat or prevent HCV recurrence after LT remains a major challenge,considering the shortage of donor organs and the accelerated progression of HCV in LT recipients.Standard antiviral therapy with pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin is the current treatment of choice for HCV LT recipients,even though the combination is not as effective as it is in immunocompetent patients.A sustained virological response in the setting of LT improves patient and graft survival,but this is only achieved in 30%-45%of patients and the treatment is poorly tolerated.To improve the efficacy of pre-and post-transplant antiviral therapy,a new class of potent direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs)has been developed.The aim of this review is to summarize the use of DAAs in LT HCV patients.PubMed,Cochrane Library,MEDLINE,EMBASE,Web of Science and clinical trial databases were searched for this purpose.To date,only three clinical studies on the topic have been published and most of the available data are in abstract form.Although a moderately successful early virological response has been reported,DAA treatment regimens were associated with severe toxicity mitigating their potential usefulness.Moreover,the ongoing nature of data,the lack of randomized studies,the small number of enrolled patients and the heterogeneity of these studies make the results largely anecdotal and questionable.In conclusion,large welldesigned clinical studies on DAAs in HCV LT patients are required before these drugs can be recommended after transplantation.展开更多
BACKGROUND: The most common complication after allogenic islet transplantation is rejection. This study was to evaluate the effect of anti-rejection of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen on allogenic islet ...BACKGROUND: The most common complication after allogenic islet transplantation is rejection. This study was to evaluate the effect of anti-rejection of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen on allogenic islet transplantation. METHODS: Tacrolimus(FK506)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and FK506+MMF+prednisone (Pred) were administered respectively for 2 weeks to inhibit rejection after allogenic islet transplantation in rats, which were compared with the control group. The concentrations of blood glucose, insulin and C-peptide were determined dynamically in recipients and the sites of transplantation were observed morphologically. RESULTS: As compared with the control group without immunosuppressive agents, FK506+MMF and FK506+MMF+Pred could prolong the survival time of grafts significantly. There were many morphologically intact islets in the liver of recipients 2 months after transplantation. Group FK506+MMF kept normal levels of blood glucose, insulin and C-peptide beyond 60 days after transplantation. In contrast, group FK506+MMF+Pred secreted less C-peptide(P<0.05) and maintained a higher level of blood glucose concentration (P<0.01) after the operation. There was no significant difference in insulin concentrations between the two groups. The level of blood glucose beyond the first 2 weeks after drug withdrawal in group FK506+MMF+Pred decreased obviously (P<0.05), and the secretion of insulin and C-peptide increased. These results were compared with those the first 2 weeks after transplantation and the first 2 weeks after drug withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Both regimens of FK506+MMF and FK506+MMF+Pred could provide effective immunosup-pression. Moreover the combined glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive strategy of low-dose FK506 and MMF could protect islet grafts in islet transplantation without diabetogenic side-effects.展开更多
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a rare extrapulmonary manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)but its full correlation with COVID-19 infection remains unknown.AIM To identify acute pancreatitis’occurrence...BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a rare extrapulmonary manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)but its full correlation with COVID-19 infection remains unknown.AIM To identify acute pancreatitis’occurrence,clinical presentation and outcomes in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with acute COVID-19.METHODS A retrospective observational single-centre cohort study from a transplant centre in Croatia for all adult renal transplant recipients with a functioning kidney allograft between March 2020 and August 2022 to record cases of acute pancreatitis during acute COVID-19.Data were obtained from hospital electronic medical records.Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)infection was proven by a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on the nasopharyngeal swab.RESULTS Four hundred and eight out of 1432(28.49%)patients who received a renal allograft developed COVID-19 disease.The analyzed cohort included 321 patients(57%males).One hundred and fifty patients(46.7%)received at least one dose of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine before the infection.One hundred twenty-five(39.1%)patients required hospitalization,141(44.1%)developed pneumonia and four patients(1.3%)required mechanical ventilation.Treatment included immunosuppression modification in 233 patients(77.1%)and remdesivir in 53 patients(16.6%),besides the other supportive measures.In the study cohort,only one transplant recipient(0.3%)developed acute pancreatitis during acute COVID-19,presenting with abdominal pain and significantly elevated pancreatic enzymes.She survived without complications with a stable kidney allograft function.CONCLUSION Although rare,acute pancreatitis may complicate the course of acute COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.The mechanism of injury to the pancreas and its correlation with the severity of the COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients warrants further research.展开更多
基金Supported by Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundationof China,R2080029 Caoqian Research Group
文摘AIM:To investigate immunosuppressive agents used to treat inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)in East China. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted, involving 227 patients with IBD admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,College of Medicine,Zhejiang University from June 2000 to December 2007.Data regarding demographic,clinical characteristics and immunosuppressants usage were analyzed. RESULTS:A total of 227 eligible patients were evaluated in this study,including 104 patients with Crohn’s disease and 123 with ulcerative colitis.Among the patients,61 had indications for immunosuppressive agents use.However,only 21 (34.4%)received immunosuppressive agents.Among the 21 patients,6(37.5%)received a subtherapeutic dose of azathioprine with no attempt to increase the dosage.Of the 20 patients that received immunosuppressive agent treatment longer than 6 mo,15 patients went into remission,four patients were not affected and one relapsed.Among these 20 patients,four patients suffered from myelotoxicity and one suffered from hepatotoxicity.CONCLUSION:Immunosuppressive agents are used less frequently to treat IBD patients from East China compared with Western countries.Monitoring immunosuppressive agent use is recommended to optimize dispensation of drugs for IBD in China.
文摘Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.
文摘Background and aim:There are still no clinically satisfactory therapy for PBC.This study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of IAs for the therapy of PBC.Methods:Relevant studies were identified and selected by searching PubMed,Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases.The primary outcome was defined as the need for mortality or liver transplantation.Adverse effects and liver biochemical variables were a secondary outcome.Results:Nine randomized controlled trials,involving six different treatment regimens with a total of 996 patients,were included in the analysis.On meta-analysis,IAs was not associated with a reduction in risk of mortality or liver transplantation(risk ratio[RR]:0.92,95% confidence interval[CI]:0.69-1.22,P=0.57,P=0%),and have resulted in more adverse effects(RR:1.44,95%CI:1.08-1.92,P=0.01,P=19%).Subgroup analysis showed that IAs monotherapy caused adverse effects such as diarrthea,abdominal pain,and renal insufficiency(RR:1.36,95% CI:1.01-1.82,P=0.04,P=48%).IAs therapy did not prominently improve markers of liver function except for alkaline phosphatases(weighted mean difference[WMD]:-0.38,95% CI:-0.62 to-0.14,P=0.002).Conclusions:IAs cannot reduce the risk of mortality or liver transplantation,whether in IAs monotherapy or combination therapy,and even be associated with more adverse effects.
文摘For kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression commonly consists of combination treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid. Many medical centers use a sequential immunosuppression regimen where an induction agent, either an anti-thymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is given at the time of transplantation to prevent early acute rejection which is then followed by a triple immunosuppressive maintenance regimen. Very low rejection rates have been achieved at many transplant centers using combinations of these agents in a variety of protocols. Yet, a large number of recipients suffer chronic allograft injury and adverse events associated with drug therapy. Regimens designed to limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid use are actively being pursued. An ideal immunosuppressive regimen limits toxicity and prolongs the functional life of the graft. This article contains a critical analysis of clinical data on currently available immuno-suppressive strategies and an overview of therapeutic moieties in development.
文摘Recurrence of hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection following liver transplantation(LT)is almost universal and can accelerate graft cirrhosis in up to 30%of patients.The development of effective strategies to treat or prevent HCV recurrence after LT remains a major challenge,considering the shortage of donor organs and the accelerated progression of HCV in LT recipients.Standard antiviral therapy with pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin is the current treatment of choice for HCV LT recipients,even though the combination is not as effective as it is in immunocompetent patients.A sustained virological response in the setting of LT improves patient and graft survival,but this is only achieved in 30%-45%of patients and the treatment is poorly tolerated.To improve the efficacy of pre-and post-transplant antiviral therapy,a new class of potent direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs)has been developed.The aim of this review is to summarize the use of DAAs in LT HCV patients.PubMed,Cochrane Library,MEDLINE,EMBASE,Web of Science and clinical trial databases were searched for this purpose.To date,only three clinical studies on the topic have been published and most of the available data are in abstract form.Although a moderately successful early virological response has been reported,DAA treatment regimens were associated with severe toxicity mitigating their potential usefulness.Moreover,the ongoing nature of data,the lack of randomized studies,the small number of enrolled patients and the heterogeneity of these studies make the results largely anecdotal and questionable.In conclusion,large welldesigned clinical studies on DAAs in HCV LT patients are required before these drugs can be recommended after transplantation.
文摘BACKGROUND: The most common complication after allogenic islet transplantation is rejection. This study was to evaluate the effect of anti-rejection of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen on allogenic islet transplantation. METHODS: Tacrolimus(FK506)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and FK506+MMF+prednisone (Pred) were administered respectively for 2 weeks to inhibit rejection after allogenic islet transplantation in rats, which were compared with the control group. The concentrations of blood glucose, insulin and C-peptide were determined dynamically in recipients and the sites of transplantation were observed morphologically. RESULTS: As compared with the control group without immunosuppressive agents, FK506+MMF and FK506+MMF+Pred could prolong the survival time of grafts significantly. There were many morphologically intact islets in the liver of recipients 2 months after transplantation. Group FK506+MMF kept normal levels of blood glucose, insulin and C-peptide beyond 60 days after transplantation. In contrast, group FK506+MMF+Pred secreted less C-peptide(P<0.05) and maintained a higher level of blood glucose concentration (P<0.01) after the operation. There was no significant difference in insulin concentrations between the two groups. The level of blood glucose beyond the first 2 weeks after drug withdrawal in group FK506+MMF+Pred decreased obviously (P<0.05), and the secretion of insulin and C-peptide increased. These results were compared with those the first 2 weeks after transplantation and the first 2 weeks after drug withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Both regimens of FK506+MMF and FK506+MMF+Pred could provide effective immunosup-pression. Moreover the combined glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive strategy of low-dose FK506 and MMF could protect islet grafts in islet transplantation without diabetogenic side-effects.
文摘BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a rare extrapulmonary manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)but its full correlation with COVID-19 infection remains unknown.AIM To identify acute pancreatitis’occurrence,clinical presentation and outcomes in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with acute COVID-19.METHODS A retrospective observational single-centre cohort study from a transplant centre in Croatia for all adult renal transplant recipients with a functioning kidney allograft between March 2020 and August 2022 to record cases of acute pancreatitis during acute COVID-19.Data were obtained from hospital electronic medical records.Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)infection was proven by a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on the nasopharyngeal swab.RESULTS Four hundred and eight out of 1432(28.49%)patients who received a renal allograft developed COVID-19 disease.The analyzed cohort included 321 patients(57%males).One hundred and fifty patients(46.7%)received at least one dose of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine before the infection.One hundred twenty-five(39.1%)patients required hospitalization,141(44.1%)developed pneumonia and four patients(1.3%)required mechanical ventilation.Treatment included immunosuppression modification in 233 patients(77.1%)and remdesivir in 53 patients(16.6%),besides the other supportive measures.In the study cohort,only one transplant recipient(0.3%)developed acute pancreatitis during acute COVID-19,presenting with abdominal pain and significantly elevated pancreatic enzymes.She survived without complications with a stable kidney allograft function.CONCLUSION Although rare,acute pancreatitis may complicate the course of acute COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.The mechanism of injury to the pancreas and its correlation with the severity of the COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients warrants further research.