Post-operative morbidity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for gallbladder cancer: A national surgical quality improvement program analysis

BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract.Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy(NACT)has improved overall survival by enabling R0 resection.Currently,there is no consensus of guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy in gallbladder cancer.As investigations continue to analyze the regimen and benefit of NACT for ongoing care of gallbladder cancer patients,we examined American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(NSQIP)database to determine if there was higher morbidity among the neo-adjuvant group within the 30-day post-operative period.We hypothesized patients who underwent NACT were more likely to have higher post-operative morbidity.AIM To investigate the 30-day post-operative morbidity outcomes between patients who received NACT and underwent surgery and patients who only had surgery.METHODS A retrospective analysis of the targeted hepatectomy NSQIP data between 2015 and 2019 was performed to determine if NACT in gallbladder cancer increased the risk for post-operative morbidity(bile leak,infection rate,rate of converting to open surgery,etc.)compared to the group who only had surgery.To calculate the odds ratio for the primary and secondary outcomes,a crude logistic regression was performed.RESULTS Of the 452 patients,52 patients received NACT prior to surgery.There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of morbidity between the two groups,including bile leak[odds ratio(OR),0.69;95%confidence interval(95%CI):0.16-2.10;P=0.55],superficial wound infection(OR,0.58;95%CI:0.03-3.02;P=0.61),and organ space wound infection(OR,0.63;95%CI:0.18-1.63;P=0.61).CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in the risk of 30-day post-operative morbidity between the NACT and surgery group and the surgery only group.

Benefits of Viewing Nature: A Review of Landscape Health Research

Nowadays,several studies demonstrate that viewing nature has positive effects on human health and well-being.This essay discusses about the essential methods of viewing natural environment and their impacts on human well-being by clarifying four important theoretical models:reducing stress,lowering heart rate,improving outcome of surgery,and increasing attention.In addition,some important research results in this field are taken as examples to introduce research methods.By collecting and organizing existing studies and theories about the relationship between viewing nature and human well-being,the methods of viewing nature can be divided into two parts:viewing nature through specific media(e.g.,through a window,a book,a painting or a videotape)and being with the presence of nature.This study aims to clarify the research significance of viewing nature and find deficiency in this field to maximize the role of landscapes in human health and well-being.

Radiation therapy prior to a pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma is associated with longer operative times and higher blood loss

BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States.In patients with“borderline resectable”disease,current National Comprehensive Cancer Center guidelines recommend the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation prior to a pancreaticoduodenectomy.Although neoadjuvant radiotherapy may improve negative margin resection rate,it is theorized that its administration increases operative times and complexity.AIM To investigate the association between neoadjuvant radiotherapy and 30-d morbidity and mortality outcomes among patients receiving a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.METHODS Patients listed in the 2015-2019 National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data set,who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma,were divided into two groups based off neoadjuvant radiotherapy status.Multivariable regression was used to determine if there is a significant correlation between neoadjuvant radiotherapy,perioperative blood transfusion status,total operative time,and other perioperative outcomes.RESULTS Of the 11458 patients included in the study,1470(12.8%)underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy.Patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy were significantly more likely to require a perioperative blood transfusion[adjusted odds ratio(aOR)=1.58,95%confidence interval(CI):1.37-1.82;P<0.001]and have longer surgeries(insulin receptor-related receptor=1.14,95%CI:1.11-1.16;P<0.001),while simultaneously having lower rates of organ space infections(aOR=0.80,95%CI:0.66-0.97;P=0.02)and pancreatic fistula formation(aOR=0.50,95%CI:0.40-0.63;P<0.001)compared to those who underwent surgery alone.CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant radiotherapy,while not associated with increased mortality,will impact the complexity of surgical resection in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.