AIM: To compare the effectiveness of needle-free incision suture closure with butterfly tape and traditional secondary suturing techniques in treating incision infection. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three patients...AIM: To compare the effectiveness of needle-free incision suture closure with butterfly tape and traditional secondary suturing techniques in treating incision infection. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three patients with incision infection following hepatobiliary surgery at a tertiary hospital were randomly divided into three groups: 90 patients were closed by needle-free incision suture closure, which gradually closed the incision wound when drainage from incision infection was visibly decreased and healthy granulation tissues had grown; 79 patients were closed by butterfly bandage; another 54 patients were closed by traditional secondary suturing technique. Healing time of incision infection was calculated from the beginning of dressing change to the healing of the incision. RESULTS: Healing time in the needle-free incision suture closure group (24.2 +/- 7.2 d) was significantly shorter than that in the butterfly bandage group (33.3 +/- 11.2 d) and the traditional secondary suturing group (36.2 +/- 15.3 d) (P < 0.05). Healing time in the butterfly bandage group appeared to be slightly shorter than that in the secondary suture group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Needle-free incision suture closure could gradually close the infection wound at the same time of drainage and dressing change, thereby shortening the healing time. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.展开更多
目的探讨肺癌患者胸腔镜肺切除术后闭式引流切口愈合不良的影响因素,为临床干预提供依据。方法选取2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日经病理诊断为肺癌并行胸腔镜肺切除术的704例患者为研究对象。根据是否发生闭式引流切口愈合不良将患者分...目的探讨肺癌患者胸腔镜肺切除术后闭式引流切口愈合不良的影响因素,为临床干预提供依据。方法选取2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日经病理诊断为肺癌并行胸腔镜肺切除术的704例患者为研究对象。根据是否发生闭式引流切口愈合不良将患者分为愈合不良组(128例)和愈合组(576例)。对可能影响患者术后闭式引流切口愈合不良因素,如性别、年龄、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、其他既往史(手术侧乳腺癌根治性切除术史、免疫系统疾病)、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟史、手术时间、切除范围、闭式引流位置、引流管切口缝合针数、留置引流管时间、引流管口拆线时间、术前白蛋白水平进行单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析。结果单因素分析结果显示,年龄、BMI、糖尿病与发生闭式引流切口愈合不良有关(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=1.615,95%CI:1.081~2.413,P=0.019)、BMI(OR=2.086,95%CI:1.382~3.148,P<0.001)、糖尿病(OR=2.103,95%CI:1.216~3.638,P=0.008)是闭式引流切口愈合不良独立危险因素。结论年龄、BMI、糖尿病是肺癌患者行胸腔镜术后闭式引流切口愈合不良的独立危险因素,医护人员应重点关注,围手术期做好准备工作,术后关注伤口变化,给予针对性措施,以减少闭式引流切口愈合不良的发生。展开更多
基金Supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China,No.30801111 and No.30972923Science and Technology Sup-port Project of Sichuan Province No.14ZC1337,No.14ZC1335 and No.2014SZ0002-10
文摘AIM: To compare the effectiveness of needle-free incision suture closure with butterfly tape and traditional secondary suturing techniques in treating incision infection. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three patients with incision infection following hepatobiliary surgery at a tertiary hospital were randomly divided into three groups: 90 patients were closed by needle-free incision suture closure, which gradually closed the incision wound when drainage from incision infection was visibly decreased and healthy granulation tissues had grown; 79 patients were closed by butterfly bandage; another 54 patients were closed by traditional secondary suturing technique. Healing time of incision infection was calculated from the beginning of dressing change to the healing of the incision. RESULTS: Healing time in the needle-free incision suture closure group (24.2 +/- 7.2 d) was significantly shorter than that in the butterfly bandage group (33.3 +/- 11.2 d) and the traditional secondary suturing group (36.2 +/- 15.3 d) (P < 0.05). Healing time in the butterfly bandage group appeared to be slightly shorter than that in the secondary suture group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Needle-free incision suture closure could gradually close the infection wound at the same time of drainage and dressing change, thereby shortening the healing time. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
文摘目的探讨肺癌患者胸腔镜肺切除术后闭式引流切口愈合不良的影响因素,为临床干预提供依据。方法选取2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日经病理诊断为肺癌并行胸腔镜肺切除术的704例患者为研究对象。根据是否发生闭式引流切口愈合不良将患者分为愈合不良组(128例)和愈合组(576例)。对可能影响患者术后闭式引流切口愈合不良因素,如性别、年龄、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、其他既往史(手术侧乳腺癌根治性切除术史、免疫系统疾病)、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟史、手术时间、切除范围、闭式引流位置、引流管切口缝合针数、留置引流管时间、引流管口拆线时间、术前白蛋白水平进行单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析。结果单因素分析结果显示,年龄、BMI、糖尿病与发生闭式引流切口愈合不良有关(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=1.615,95%CI:1.081~2.413,P=0.019)、BMI(OR=2.086,95%CI:1.382~3.148,P<0.001)、糖尿病(OR=2.103,95%CI:1.216~3.638,P=0.008)是闭式引流切口愈合不良独立危险因素。结论年龄、BMI、糖尿病是肺癌患者行胸腔镜术后闭式引流切口愈合不良的独立危险因素,医护人员应重点关注,围手术期做好准备工作,术后关注伤口变化,给予针对性措施,以减少闭式引流切口愈合不良的发生。
