Septic shock is a common critical condition, for which effective early fluid resuscitation is the therapeutic focus. According to the 2008 international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, res...Septic shock is a common critical condition, for which effective early fluid resuscitation is the therapeutic focus. According to the 2008 international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, resuscitation should achieve a central venous pressure （CVP） of 8-12 mmHg within the first 6 h. However, it is still uncertain about the sensitivity and specificity of CVP in reflecting the cardiac preload. Ultrasonography is a simple, rapid, non-invasive, and repeatable method for the measurement of sensitivity and specificity of CVP and has thus gradually attracted the increasing attention of physicians. It was reported that ultrasonography can show the inferior vena cava diameter, respiratory variability index, and blood volume in patients with sepsis or heart failure.展开更多
目的:分析超声检测下腔静脉(IVC)和锁骨下静脉(SCV)内径变异在预测全麻诱导后低血压(PIH)中的价值。方法:回顾性选取2021年5月—2023年5月在咸宁市第一人民医院行全麻手术的204例患者作为研究对象,根据是否发生PIH将其分为研究组(发生PI...目的:分析超声检测下腔静脉(IVC)和锁骨下静脉(SCV)内径变异在预测全麻诱导后低血压(PIH)中的价值。方法:回顾性选取2021年5月—2023年5月在咸宁市第一人民医院行全麻手术的204例患者作为研究对象,根据是否发生PIH将其分为研究组(发生PIH,86例)和对照组(未发生PIH,118例)。对两组患者的基础资料、麻醉诱导前血压、麻醉诱导药物用量进行对比。比较IVC内径的最大值(IVCmax)和最小值(IVCmin)、SCV内径的最大值(SCVmax)和最小值(SCVmin),并计算IVC塌陷指数(IVCCI)和SCV塌陷指数(SCVCI)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IVC、SCV内径及变异对全麻PIH的预测价值。结果:两组基础资料、麻醉诱导前血压指标和麻醉诱导药物用量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组IVCmax、IVCmin、SCVmax、SCVmin水平均低于对照组,IVCCI、SCVCI水平均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析结果显示,麻醉诱导前IVCmax、IVCmin、SCVmax、SCVmin、IVCCI、SCVCI水平预测PIH的ROC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.674、0.675、0.618、0.707、0.895、0.905,其中,SCVCI的AUC和cut-off值下的敏感度均为最高,分别为0.905、65.12%。结论:全麻PIH患者可表现为IVC和SCV内径缩小及IVCCI、SCVCI等内径变异指标的增高,采用血管超声技术检测上述变异指标可辅助预测PIH风险。展开更多
文摘Septic shock is a common critical condition, for which effective early fluid resuscitation is the therapeutic focus. According to the 2008 international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, resuscitation should achieve a central venous pressure （CVP） of 8-12 mmHg within the first 6 h. However, it is still uncertain about the sensitivity and specificity of CVP in reflecting the cardiac preload. Ultrasonography is a simple, rapid, non-invasive, and repeatable method for the measurement of sensitivity and specificity of CVP and has thus gradually attracted the increasing attention of physicians. It was reported that ultrasonography can show the inferior vena cava diameter, respiratory variability index, and blood volume in patients with sepsis or heart failure.
文摘目的:分析超声检测下腔静脉(IVC)和锁骨下静脉(SCV)内径变异在预测全麻诱导后低血压(PIH)中的价值。方法:回顾性选取2021年5月—2023年5月在咸宁市第一人民医院行全麻手术的204例患者作为研究对象,根据是否发生PIH将其分为研究组(发生PIH,86例)和对照组(未发生PIH,118例)。对两组患者的基础资料、麻醉诱导前血压、麻醉诱导药物用量进行对比。比较IVC内径的最大值(IVCmax)和最小值(IVCmin)、SCV内径的最大值(SCVmax)和最小值(SCVmin),并计算IVC塌陷指数(IVCCI)和SCV塌陷指数(SCVCI)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IVC、SCV内径及变异对全麻PIH的预测价值。结果:两组基础资料、麻醉诱导前血压指标和麻醉诱导药物用量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组IVCmax、IVCmin、SCVmax、SCVmin水平均低于对照组,IVCCI、SCVCI水平均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析结果显示,麻醉诱导前IVCmax、IVCmin、SCVmax、SCVmin、IVCCI、SCVCI水平预测PIH的ROC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.674、0.675、0.618、0.707、0.895、0.905,其中,SCVCI的AUC和cut-off值下的敏感度均为最高,分别为0.905、65.12%。结论:全麻PIH患者可表现为IVC和SCV内径缩小及IVCCI、SCVCI等内径变异指标的增高,采用血管超声技术检测上述变异指标可辅助预测PIH风险。
