Background:The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems(ICD-11)was released on June 18,2018,by the World Health Organization and will come into effect on January 1,2022...Background:The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems(ICD-11)was released on June 18,2018,by the World Health Organization and will come into effect on January 1,2022.Apart from the chapters on the classification of diseases in the conventional medicine(CM),a new chapter,traditional medicine(TM)conditions–Module 1,was added.Low back pain(LBP)is one of the common reasons for the physician visits.The classification codes for LBP in the ICD-11 are vital to documenting accurate clinical diagnoses.Methods:The qualitative case study method was adopted.The secondary use data for 100 patients were randomly selected using the ICD-11 online interface to find the classification codes for both the CM section and the TM Conditions–Module 1(TM1)section for LBP diagnosis.Results:Of the 27 codes obtained from the CM section,six codes were not relevant to LBP,whereas the other 21 codes represented diagnoses of LBP and its related diseases or syndromes.In the TM1 section,six codes for different patterns and disorders represented the diagnoses for LBP from the TM perspective.Conclusion:This study indicates that specific diagnoses of LBP can be represented by the combination of CM classification codes and TM1 classification codes in the ICD-11;the CM codes represent specific and accurate clinical diagnoses for LBP,whereas the TM1 codes add more accuracy to the diagnoses of different patterns from the TM perspective.展开更多
In 2018,the 11^(th) Edition of the International Classification of Diseases(ICD-11)defined a diagnostic code list for standard traditional medicine(TM)conditions.The codes improve patient safety by providing more comp...In 2018,the 11^(th) Edition of the International Classification of Diseases(ICD-11)defined a diagnostic code list for standard traditional medicine(TM)conditions.The codes improve patient safety by providing more comprehensive and accurate medical records for hospitals in the Western Pacific Region.In these facilities,TM is often a standard of care for those populations.In several mainstream media sources,writers are circumventing evidence-based peer-reviewed medical literature by unduly influencing public opinion and,in this case,against the new ICD-11 codes.The dangers imposed by the transgression of popular writing onto the discipline of peer-reviewed works are present since best practices in medical record-keeping will fail without the inclusion of TM in the ICD-11 codes.Such failures directly affect the health of the patients and policymakers in regions where TM and conventional medicine are combined.This article investigates the boundaries between substantial evidence and popular opinion.In this era where media is used to manipulate evidence,the reader’s use of sound judgment and critical thought are thwarted.This article also challenges three controversial themes in pop literature,including the threat to endangered species,increased patient risk,and contaminants in the TM.These themes are made without evidence and are,in fact,of flawed logic.There is no reason to assume that improved medical record-keeping and knowledge of patient cases increase risks.展开更多
比较国际疾病分类第十一次修订本(International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision,ICD-11)的传统医学模块(Traditional Medicine Module 1,TM1)与国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局发布的《中医病证分类与代码》《中医临...比较国际疾病分类第十一次修订本(International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision,ICD-11)的传统医学模块(Traditional Medicine Module 1,TM1)与国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局发布的《中医病证分类与代码》《中医临床诊疗术语第1部分:疾病》《中医临床诊疗术语第2部分:证候》《中医临床诊疗术语第3部分:治法》4项国标的修订版(简称“新版中医国标”)的分类体系与编码方式,并对新版中医国标与ICD-11 TM1在肺系疾病的中医疾病与证候分类编码中的应用进行探讨。分析结果显示,ICD-11 TM1和新版中医国标都能满足本研究中医疾病名称分类;ICD-11 TM1能基本满足肺系证候名称分类,但在对部分临床证候的诊断时,编码员需与临床医生沟通,了解内涵,从而尽可能利用现有的证候分类准确编码,或按ICD-11修订标准扩充TM1,或将其分类于残余类目;新版中医国标代码能够满足肺系临床证候分类需求。为了更准确地对临床病历进行中医病证分类编码,编码员应加强中医理论知识学习及与临床医生沟通,收集更科学的中医临床数据,以有利于我国中医卫生服务的发展及中医学的世界交流。展开更多
文摘Background:The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems(ICD-11)was released on June 18,2018,by the World Health Organization and will come into effect on January 1,2022.Apart from the chapters on the classification of diseases in the conventional medicine(CM),a new chapter,traditional medicine(TM)conditions–Module 1,was added.Low back pain(LBP)is one of the common reasons for the physician visits.The classification codes for LBP in the ICD-11 are vital to documenting accurate clinical diagnoses.Methods:The qualitative case study method was adopted.The secondary use data for 100 patients were randomly selected using the ICD-11 online interface to find the classification codes for both the CM section and the TM Conditions–Module 1(TM1)section for LBP diagnosis.Results:Of the 27 codes obtained from the CM section,six codes were not relevant to LBP,whereas the other 21 codes represented diagnoses of LBP and its related diseases or syndromes.In the TM1 section,six codes for different patterns and disorders represented the diagnoses for LBP from the TM perspective.Conclusion:This study indicates that specific diagnoses of LBP can be represented by the combination of CM classification codes and TM1 classification codes in the ICD-11;the CM codes represent specific and accurate clinical diagnoses for LBP,whereas the TM1 codes add more accuracy to the diagnoses of different patterns from the TM perspective.
基金financed by grants from the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (No. YB2019023)Independent Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. ZZ12-002)
文摘In 2018,the 11^(th) Edition of the International Classification of Diseases(ICD-11)defined a diagnostic code list for standard traditional medicine(TM)conditions.The codes improve patient safety by providing more comprehensive and accurate medical records for hospitals in the Western Pacific Region.In these facilities,TM is often a standard of care for those populations.In several mainstream media sources,writers are circumventing evidence-based peer-reviewed medical literature by unduly influencing public opinion and,in this case,against the new ICD-11 codes.The dangers imposed by the transgression of popular writing onto the discipline of peer-reviewed works are present since best practices in medical record-keeping will fail without the inclusion of TM in the ICD-11 codes.Such failures directly affect the health of the patients and policymakers in regions where TM and conventional medicine are combined.This article investigates the boundaries between substantial evidence and popular opinion.In this era where media is used to manipulate evidence,the reader’s use of sound judgment and critical thought are thwarted.This article also challenges three controversial themes in pop literature,including the threat to endangered species,increased patient risk,and contaminants in the TM.These themes are made without evidence and are,in fact,of flawed logic.There is no reason to assume that improved medical record-keeping and knowledge of patient cases increase risks.
