A Study on the Discourse Guidance of Major International Political Issues in the International Students in China——Taken Zhejiang Province for Example

The purpose of this research mainly investigates the level of discourse guidance among international students in Zhejiang province.And the related level of aspects of politically conscious,political attitude,feedback,and discourse guidance are also investigated.408 Chinese university international students in Zhejiang province have involved in this study,and there is a medium level of politically conscious,high level of attitude,medium level of feedback,and low level of discourse guidance.Some discussions and suggestions are proposed.

Establish an International Communication Platform for Human Rights and Promote China's Discourse Power on Human Rights——A Review on Ten Years of Beijing Forum on Human Rights

The beijing forum on Human Rights is a global human rights forum founded by the china Society for Human Rights Studies in 2008? it has been successfully held for nine times? in the past 10 years, the forum has kept up with the trend of the times and carefully set up issues; seeking common ground while reserving differences,seeking the greatest consensus on human rights; being open and inclusive, and building a model of international human rights exchange and cooperation? The forum has become a high-level academic platform for human rights exchanges and cooperation on the basis of equality,harmony, tolerance, openness and mutual respect, and has played an important role in promoting the healthy development of the international human rights cause? With the socialism with chinese characteristics entering a new era, the beijing forum on Human Rights needs to position new roles in the new era, seek more clear development momentum and direction, and promote the vitality, cohesiveness and international influence of the forum in a deep and all-round way and contribute to the development of world human rights cause and global human rights governance?

China's Innovation Research on International Communication of Human Rights Discourse on Ethnic Issues

The Western system of human rights discourse plays a leading role in the world.Western media have used the human rights discourse to attack China,especially on ethnic issues in China.The theory of transcultural political economy of communication is very inspiring to the innovation research on international communication of China's human rights discourse on ethnic issues.China's requires an innovation in the international communication of human rights discourse on ethnic issues so as to reconstruct the historical view of human rights discourse.In particular,the discourse resources of human rights protection in China should be explored from the social revolution in the 20 th century.Meanwhile,it is necessary to reconstruct the world discourse of human rights,that is,to construct the"human rights discourse of the Chinese nation,"and focus on human rights dialogue and cooperation with other civilizations and religious systems in the world.In particular,it is necessary to break through the"connection"or"integration"with the Western discourse,transcend the West-centered human rights discourse through competition and collision,reconstruct China's human rights discourse system,and improve the capability of international communication.

Raising International Discourse Rights in Translation and Interpreting Pedagogy

This research project aims at consolidating and revitalizing translation and interpreting pedagogy with dual emphasis on the cultural soft power and international discourse rights of China via emphasizing international competitiveness.In order to realize the significant needs of the current market requirements and the new era of China,this project proposes the“ICC”interpreting training model.It refers to the combination of intercultural communication competency with international competitiveness as the teaching and learning outcomes by means of integrating the following five components in the course content and the whole curriculum design:(1)interpreting competency-bilingual competence and interpreting skill-based training;e.g.,short-term memory and note-taking;(2)national value-strengthening translation and the crucial roles and responsibilities of interpreter trainers and trainees in disseminating national culture;(3)expertise of subject matters-equipping students with expertise for work field and meeting the market requirements;e.g.,specific professional knowledge and jargons demanded by the tasks;(4)professional ethics and image-extra-linguistic knowledge emphasizing a translator’s and an interpreter’s professional code of conduct and ethics in a way that can establish the“iconic”image of a professional interpreter;e.g.,confidentiality,posture,and appearance;(5)practical assessment-evaluation of students’performance in practical translation and interpreting opportunities and/or internship in organizations of various natures according to international standards.This research proposes a new training model to incorporate intercultural communication competency with international competitiveness.The significant role of interpreting pedagogy in contributing to a sound national name is investigated.The new“ICC”model that this research is proposing answers such a call for the significant role of raising cultural soft power and international discourse rights in China.

Research on the Path of Constructing Foreign Discourse System——How to spread China’s Voice Well

In an important speech delivered at the 2018 National Propaganda and Ideological Work Conference,General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out:“Tell Chinese stories well,spread China’s voices,and increase the national cultural soft power and influence of Chinese culture.”National soft power is mainly manifested in the attractiveness of a country,and the improvement of national soft power is conducive to enhancing the international voice.All along,China’s hard power and China’s soft power development are very unbalanced.China’s hard power has not yet been reflected in China’s cultural soft power and cultural influence,so that it cannot display China’s national image well.Although China has the confidence and self-confidence to tell a good Chinese story,under the environment of international public opinion that“the west is strong and China is weak”,it dares not take the initiative to speak up and has been in a dilemma of“being scolded”.One of the most important reasons is that China’s international communication capabilities are not enough.In the current era of highly developed information technology,whoever has advanced communication methods and strong communication capabilities,whoever has the cultural ideas and values can spread out,and who can master the right to speak internationally,it can be said that if there is no effective communication channel,it will fall into the dilemma of“justification is nowhere to be said,and there is no way to spread it.”

A Summary of the Seminar on “Construction of China's Human Rights Discourse System in the New Era”

A seminar on Construction of China’s human Rights discourse System in the new era was held in Central South University(CSU) on April 12, 2018. The event was sponsored by the China Society for human Rights Studies and the Publicity department of the hunan Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, and hosted by the CSU Research Center for human Rights and the CSU School of law. nearly 70 experts and scholars in law, international relations, and communication from institutes of higher learning, research institutions, and practical work departments from around the country shared their opinions on three topics: Cultivation of a Chinese human Rights discourse System in the new era, Communication of the Chinese human Rights discourse in the new era, and Chinese human Rights discourse and International human Rights Governance in the new era. They conducted an in-depth discussion on enhancing human rights self-confidence, grasping the characteristics of the new era and the general development trend, consolidating consensus between domestic and overseas human rights discourses, and effectively carrying out international human rights exchanges. Fully reflecting the in-depth thinking and insights of attending experts and scholars on the matter, the seminar effectively promoted the development of research on Construction of China’s human rights discourse system in the new era.

中国式现代化进程中国际话语权提升的影响因素和实现路径

国际话语权是国际关系较量和博弈的重要指向,在中国式现代化进程中提升国际话语权有利于破除中国式现代化议题在国际舆论场域的话语困境,彰显中国式现代化发展模式的世界意义。国际话语权是内在因素和外部因素共同作用、交织叠加的结果,从内生机理来看,遵循话语供给—话语传播—话语认同—话语运用的递进逻辑;从外部机理来看,以综合国力、国家治理能力、文化自信为保障。在中国式现代化进程中探索国际话语权提升路径,坚持理论指导与文化传承,丰富话语供给内容;多方协作与多点互动,增强话语传播能力;立足中国现代化建设实践,夯实话语认同;关注人类现代化全球性难题,树立话语运用示范,形成与中国大国身份和地位相匹配的国际话语权。

信息学视域下提升中国生态文明国际话语权的路径探索

中西方在生态文明建设方面的理念思路不同导致全球实现一致性策略和纲领成为竞合博弈难题。拥有话语权是争取国际认同、行使国家生态治理权力的重要手段。面对世界重大变化的机遇期,通过分析中国生态文明国际话语权的困境,以信息学视角,探讨提升中国生态文明国际话语权路径。即提高原始能量输入,增强国际话语权力量;精准控制传播过程提升传播效果,引导形成环境友好场域;扩大国际影响力,提高话语权有效输出,以达成行使国家生态治理权力的目的。

中国语言学国际话语权现状及建构方略——跨学科话语权反思与重构

国际话语权建设是近年来关注热度很高的话题,有关语言学的研究在观察视角、研究方法、研究深度方面还有值得商榷的问题。文章基于知识社会学和传播学考察学术共同体和话语权,认为学术话语权指一种知识体系在学术共同体中的影响力,其四大要素包括信任感、吸引力、依赖感、服务性。从这4个维度考察中国语言学国际学术话语权现状,发现:(1)中国传统语言学的国际认可度高于现代语言学,应用语言学的国际显示度高于语言基础研究;(2)在认识和研究世界语言的宽度、研究质量,在服务社会和学术共同体能力方面,中国语言学的表现不够理想。为此提出融合知识生产和知识传播两方面的话语权建设方略,认为知识生产应注重宽度、厚度和特色,知识传播应注意结构、多语言和多路径。文章对学科话语权的学理性分析、提出的分析维度和观察指标,亦可启发其他领域的相关研究。

译传合一:中国话语对外翻译传播研究的理路

国际传播与对外翻译同根相系,密不可分。然而,中国话语的国际传播研究与对外翻译研究长期在传播学和翻译学两个学科框架内各自行进,相互区隔,前者蕴含的民族—国家本位思维与后者蕴含的人类—全球本位思维之间更是存有内生性矛盾。这种情势严重削弱了相关学术成果的实践效能。将中国话语的国际传播与对外翻译视为两种各自独立的行为,并分别展开研究,是造成这一情势的根本原因。将国际传播与对外翻译视为一个整体,并以国际传播为立足点,展开译传合一的中国话语对外翻译传播研究,将有益于拓展国际传播研究的理论视野,提升中国话语国际传播研究的实践效能,最终为提升中国话语的国际影响力做出更大贡献。

中国贫困治理对外话语体系建构研究

改革开放以来,中国让数亿农民摆脱了绝对贫困,过上了小康生活,其经验与智慧受到海外受众的广泛关注。消除贫困、改善民生是全球各国社会治理的主要目标,有共通之处,易于引起共鸣和认同,这为讲好中国扶贫故事、传播中国优秀传统文化和价值观提供了契机。但如何讲好中国扶贫故事,如何使这些故事与世界各国政治和学术话语融合,成为共通共情话语,是我们亟需探讨的重要现实问题。文章突破传统意义上的“形式/意义”两个层面,从符号媒介、结构形式、语义内容、实践语境和意识形态五层次建构中国贫困治理五大对外话语体系。该话语体系的建构可促进中国贫困治理理念和实践经验上升为知识体系,助力于中国国际减贫合作和破解全球减贫难题,推进人类命运共同体建设,并进一步提升中国贫困治理话语权、国际传播能力和国际形象。

中国特色新型智库的国际传播能力建设探析——以浙江师范大学非洲研究院为例

[目的/意义]世界百年未有之大变局加速演进,迫切需要发挥中国特色新型智库在公共外交和文化互鉴中的重要作用,助力讲好中国故事,积极引导国际舆论,提升我国的国际形象,增强我国的国际影响力、感召力和塑造力。[方法/过程]中国特色新型智库是我国国家软实力的重要载体,在传播中国好声音、展现中国好形象等方面责无旁贷。本文以浙江师范大学非洲研究院作为研究对象,通过梳理该院对非话语创新与战略传播的探索实践,分析总结其加强和改进国际传播能力建设的路径与策略。[结果/结论]本文从建构话语体系、传播平台、人才队伍、传播路径等四方面,就新时期中国特色新型智库如何加强我国国际传播效能、改进国际舆论引导、提升国际话语权提出建议。

习近平文化思想视域下中华优秀传统文化国际传播的四重维度

习近平文化思想为中华优秀传统文化国际传播指明了方向。中华优秀传统文化国际传播,在价值之维上,有助于推动理论发展、扩大文化影响、加强文化认同、促进文化发展;在内容之维上,其传播内容包括天人合一的宇宙观、协和万邦的天下观、和而不同的社会观、人心和善的道德观等;在条件之维上,其传播条件包括国家实力增强、国际地位上升、数媒技术成熟、文化发展需要;在实践之维上,其传播路径包括强化传播主体、明晰传播对象、创新传播话语、优化传播媒介、用好传播平台。四重维度是系统的整体,价值之维明晰了国际传播意义,内容之维规定了国际传播要义,条件之维确定了国际传播基础,实践之维是价值之维、内容之维及条件之维在现实中的展开。

“讲述美国故事”的霸权外交叙事模式:解构与批评

20世纪40年代,美国为塑造其全球大国的话语霸权,启动了“向世界讲述美国故事”的外交战略传播工程。“向世界讲述美国故事”有其特殊的历史动因、发展脉络和叙事模式及策略。研究发现,美国通过整合对外传播资源和先进信息技术,建构了一套服务其国家利益的霸权外交叙事模式,逐渐成长为一个与其综合国力相匹配的国际话语权超级大国。美国为了打造全政府、全社会、全媒体的外交叙事体系,在推动跨部门联动、法制化构建和双轨并行的同时,辅之以故事情节塑造、人物形象凸显、多重视角呈现和数据信息操纵等多元叙事策略。为了打破美国的叙事霸权,维护中国的叙事主权,中国应加快推进“讲好中国故事”的大国外交叙事体系建设,敢于揭露和反制美国对华污名化叙事,不断提升中国的国际话语权。

中国英语在提升国际话语权中的作用与路径

国际话语权的提升离不开语言这一载体,认同中国英语是中国文化的一部分,借力中国英语是提升中国国际话语权的有效路径之一。为实现有效沟通,建议利用主流媒体统一规范有争议的中国英语表达;鼓励中国公民利用微信、抖音等现代媒体进行民间中国英语交流,表达中国理念和声音;培养译者创新意识,做到“言之有礼”。

“一带一路”倡议下中国国际合作话语权的提升

当前世界正处于百年未有之大变局,世界多极化、经济全球化历史潮流势不可当。话语权博弈是大国竞争的重要组成部分,然而,中国等发展中国家在国际合作话语权领域却面临一定的困境。从依附论的角度看,国际合作话语权领域仍呈现鲜明的“中心外围”的依附结构,“外围”的发展中国家在范式、理论、价值、传播等维度均存在对美西方等“中心”国家的“话语依附”。2013年以来,“一带一路”倡议实现了中国国际合作话语权从理念到行动、从愿景到现实的转化,在提供实践场域、供给理论养分、搭建交流桥梁、壮大传播平台等方面为磨砺和增强中国国际合作话语权提供了有利条件,与此同时,变革国际合作话语体系的不平等格局、提升中国话语权的事业仍任重道远。随着共建“一带一路”进入第二个十年,中国应将国际合作话语权建设作为未来工作的着力点,通过完善理论建设、凸显价值追求、开展话语对接、优化话语传播等路径,着力提升中国国际合作话语权的影响力,助力广大发展中国家摆脱对美西方国家的话语依附,共同为实现新型国际合作积极发声、贡献智慧。

高等教育国际话语权的世界格局与中国行动方略

中国高等教育国际话语权既表征着国际社会对中国高等教育质量与水平的认可程度,也反映着中国式高等教育现代化的国际影响力。构建与提升中国高等教育国际话语权,既是争取中国国际话语权的战略之源,也是为世界高等教育多样化发展贡献中国方案的必然之举,还是加快建设世界重要人才中心和创新高地的基础支撑。然而,当前中国尚未掌握作为世界高等教育第一大国与自身综合国力和国际地位相匹配的高等教育国际话语权。相对于传统高等教育发达国家而言,中国高等教育国际话语权依然处于弱势地位。中国高等教育国际话语权的构建与提升是一个复杂而艰难的过程,需要坚持实事求是的基本原则,坚持夯实国内根基、布局发展中国家和着眼发达国家“三位一体”协同推进,加快构建中国特色高等教育话语体系,保持坚定的战略定力。

中国式教育现代化的内涵要义、本质要求与推进路径

中国式教育现代化是办好人民满意教育、走中国特色社会主义道路、中华优秀传统文化创新发展、教育科技人才三位一体、构建人类命运共同体的教育现代化。正确把握中国式教育现代化的本质要求,要坚持以中国共产党的领导为根本保证、以立德树人为根本任务、以人民为中心为鲜明底色、以高质量发展为战略要求。进一步推进中国式教育现代化,要坚持“为党育人、为国育才”的价值使命,加快实现人才自主培养与科技自立自强,建设协调融通的高质量教育体系,以高水平对外开放打造教育交流合作新局面,为世界教育现代化提供新思路与新样板。