BACKGROUNDHepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is animportant type of liver failure in Asia. There is a direct relationship between HBVACLFand gastrointestinal barrier function. Howev...BACKGROUNDHepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is animportant type of liver failure in Asia. There is a direct relationship between HBVACLFand gastrointestinal barrier function. However, the nutritional status ofHBV-ACLF patients has been poorly studied.AIMTo investigate the nutritional risk and nutritional status of HBV-ACLF patientsand evaluated the impact of nutritional support on the gastrointestinal barrier and28-d mortality.METHODSNutritional risk screening assessment and gastrointestinal barrier biomarkers ofpatients with HBV-ACLF (n = 234) and patients in the compensatory period ofliver cirrhosis (the control group) (n = 234) were compared during the periodbetween 2016 and 2018. Changes were analyzed after nutritional support in HBVACLFpatients. Valuable biomarkers have been explored to predict 28-d death.The 28-d survival between HBV-ACLF patients with nutritional support (n = 234)or no nutritional support (2014-2016) (n = 207) was compared.RESULTSThe nutritional risk of the HBV-ACLF patients was significantly higher than thatof the control group. The nutritional intake of the patients with HBV-ACLF waslower than that of the control group. The decrease in skeletal muscle and fatcontent and the deficiency of fat intake were more obvious (P < 0.001). Thecoccus-bacillus ratio, secretory immunoglobulin A, and serum D-lactate weresignificantly increased in HBV-ACLF patients. The survival group had a lowernutritional risk, lower D-lactate, and cytokine levels (endotoxin, tumor necrosisfactor alpha, interleukin-10, and interleukin-1). Interleukin-10 may be a potentialpredictor of death in HBV-ACLF patients. The 28-d survival of the nutritionalsupport group was better than that of the non-nutritional support group (P =0.016).CONCLUSIONPatients with HBV-ACLF have insufficient nutritional intake and high nutritionalrisk, and their intestinal barrier function is impaired. Individualized and dynamicnutritional support is associated with a better prognosis of 28-d mortality in HBVACLFpatients.展开更多
基金Supported by the Tianjin Science and Technology Project,No.15ZXLCSY00040and National Major Science and Technology Projects in the 13th Five-Year Plan,No.2018ZX10732-202-004-005.
文摘BACKGROUNDHepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is animportant type of liver failure in Asia. There is a direct relationship between HBVACLFand gastrointestinal barrier function. However, the nutritional status ofHBV-ACLF patients has been poorly studied.AIMTo investigate the nutritional risk and nutritional status of HBV-ACLF patientsand evaluated the impact of nutritional support on the gastrointestinal barrier and28-d mortality.METHODSNutritional risk screening assessment and gastrointestinal barrier biomarkers ofpatients with HBV-ACLF (n = 234) and patients in the compensatory period ofliver cirrhosis (the control group) (n = 234) were compared during the periodbetween 2016 and 2018. Changes were analyzed after nutritional support in HBVACLFpatients. Valuable biomarkers have been explored to predict 28-d death.The 28-d survival between HBV-ACLF patients with nutritional support (n = 234)or no nutritional support (2014-2016) (n = 207) was compared.RESULTSThe nutritional risk of the HBV-ACLF patients was significantly higher than thatof the control group. The nutritional intake of the patients with HBV-ACLF waslower than that of the control group. The decrease in skeletal muscle and fatcontent and the deficiency of fat intake were more obvious (P < 0.001). Thecoccus-bacillus ratio, secretory immunoglobulin A, and serum D-lactate weresignificantly increased in HBV-ACLF patients. The survival group had a lowernutritional risk, lower D-lactate, and cytokine levels (endotoxin, tumor necrosisfactor alpha, interleukin-10, and interleukin-1). Interleukin-10 may be a potentialpredictor of death in HBV-ACLF patients. The 28-d survival of the nutritionalsupport group was better than that of the non-nutritional support group (P =0.016).CONCLUSIONPatients with HBV-ACLF have insufficient nutritional intake and high nutritionalrisk, and their intestinal barrier function is impaired. Individualized and dynamicnutritional support is associated with a better prognosis of 28-d mortality in HBVACLFpatients.
